Minimal activation of the p53 DNA damage response by a modular cytosine base editor enables effective multiplexed gene knockout in induced pluripotent stem cells

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Precise genome editing of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) holds great promise for engineering advanced cell therapies. CRISPR-Cas systems have been widely adopted in genome engineering applications, however their dependence on genotoxic DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) presents challenges in hypersensitive iPSCs. Base editors are capable of both modifying and ablating gene function without generating DSBs making them an attractive solution for iPSC engineering. Here we report efficient and durable multiplexed target knockout with minimal impact on cell viability and expansion with a cytosine base editor composed of nCas9-UGI and Rat APOBEC1 assembled using the Pin-point™ platform (nCas9-UGI:rAPO). Minimal p53-mediated DNA damage signalling occurred independently of the number of simultaneous edits installed, and this could be further reduced by modulating the assembly of the base editor complex. Whereas non-homologous end-joining-mediated DNA damage repair led to p53-mediated selection against imprecise editing outcomes and an associated reduction in the on-target efficiency of multiplexed SpCas9 nuclease editing, p53 activity was dispensable for maintaining genome integrity during the base editing process. The Pin-point platform therefore enables the assembly of base editors optimised for high editing efficiency with substantially reduced risk of selecting for defective DNA damage responses inherent to DSB-dependent editing systems.
Full text 2,153 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Precise genome editing of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) holds great promise for engineering advanced cell therapies. CRISPR-Cas systems have been widely adopted in genome engineering applications, however their dependence on genotoxic DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) presents challenges in hypersensitive iPSCs. Base editors are capable of both modifying and ablating gene function without generating DSBs making them an attractive solution for iPSC engineering. Here we report efficient and durable multiplexed target knockout with minimal impact on cell viability and expansion with a cytosine base editor composed of nCas9-UGI and Rat APOBEC1 assembled using the Pin-point™ platform (nCas9-UGI:rAPO). Minimal p53-mediated DNA damage signalling occurred independently of the number of simultaneous edits installed, and this could be further reduced by modulating the assembly of the base editor complex. Whereas non-homologous end-joining-mediated DNA damage repair led to p53-mediated selection against imprecise editing outcomes and an associated reduction in the on-target efficiency of multiplexed SpCas9 nuclease editing, p53 activity was dispensable for maintaining genome integrity during the base editing process. The Pin-point platform therefore enables the assembly of base editors optimised for high editing efficiency with substantially reduced risk of selecting for defective DNA damage responses inherent to DSB-dependent editing systems. Competing Interest Statement All work was funded by Revvity Discovery Limited. The Pin-point base editing platform technology is available for clinical or diagnostic study and commercialization under a commercial license from Revvity. Revvity Discovery Limited has an exclusive license from Rutgers University to certain base editing patents. Rutgers University and Revvity Discovery Limited have filed patent applications on this work. All authors except for Hanneke Okkenhaug were employees of Revvity Discovery Limited during the completion of the work described. Hanneke Okkenhaug was employed at Babraham Institute, a provider of imaging services to Revvity Discovery Limited.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-01T06:38:12.426807+00:00