Results
In order to establish stable cisplatin-resistant human ovarian cancer cell lines, we used two widely used OVCAR8 and SKOV3 cell lines and selected them for cell proliferation based on a dose-escalating selection scheme. Briefly, exponentially growing OVCAR8 and SKOV3 cells were initially treated with 0.05 μM cisplatin, a relatively low sub-lethal concentration. Most cells were killed by cisplatin. The remaining surviving cells were replated, expanded, and then subjected to another round of selection of 0.05 μM cisplatin, resulting in more surviving cells. Such selection cycles were repeated with escalating concentrations of cisplatin until the reach of stable resistance to 10 μM cisplatin, which was designated as OVCAR8CR and SKOV3CR. The dose-escalating selection scheme took up to three months.
As shown by the crystal violet staining analysis, both OVCAR8CR and SKOV3CR survived 10 μM cisplatin, while the parental cell lines OVCAR8 and SKOV3 were all killed at 6 μM cisplatin ( Fig. 1 A, panels a & b ). Quantitative analysis revealed that OVCAR8CR and SKOV3CR lines had significantly higher percentages of surviving cells than that of their parental counterparts ( Fig. 1 A, panels c & d ). Figure 1 Cell viability and proliferation capability of the cisplatin-resistant (CR) human ovarian cancer cell lines. (A) Cell viability assay. Subconfluent OVCAR8CR ( a ) and SKOV3CR ( b ) and parental lines OVCAR8 ( a ) and SKOV3 ( b ) were treated with varying concentrations of cisplatin for 72 h, followed by crystal violet staining. The stained cells were dissolved with 30% acetic acid and measured for absorbance at 570–590 nm. Each conditioned assay was carried out in triplicate. Relative optical density (OD) was calculated by dividing the average OD values of the cisplatin treatment groups by that of the respective control group treated with 0 μM cisplatin ( i.e. , DMF only) ( c, d ). ∗∗ P < 0.01, compared with that of the CR lines. (B) WST-1 proliferation assay. Subconfluent OVCAR8CR ( a ) and SKOV3CR ( b ) cells were seeded in 96-well cell culture plates, treated with the indicated concentrations of cisplatin for 72 h, and incubated with the WST-1 regent for an additional 2 h, followed by absorbance reading. IC50 values were determined by using Graph Pad Prism 8.4.0. All conditioned assays were done in triplicate. Fig. 1
Cell viability and proliferation capability of the cisplatin-resistant (CR) human ovarian cancer cell lines. (A) Cell viability assay. Subconfluent OVCAR8CR ( a ) and SKOV3CR ( b ) and parental lines OVCAR8 ( a ) and SKOV3 ( b ) were treated with varying concentrations of cisplatin for 72 h, followed by crystal violet staining. The stained cells were dissolved with 30% acetic acid and measured for absorbance at 570–590 nm. Each conditioned assay was carried out in triplicate. Relative optical density (OD) was calculated by dividing the average OD values of the cisplatin treatment groups by that of the respective control group treated with 0 μM cisplatin ( i.e. , DMF only) ( c, d ). ∗∗ P < 0.01, compared with that of the CR lines. (B) WST-1 proliferation assay. Subconfluent OVCAR8CR ( a ) and SKOV3CR ( b ) cells were seeded in 96-well cell culture plates, treated with the indicated concentrations of cisplatin for 72 h, and incubated with the WST-1 regent for an additional 2 h, followed by absorbance reading. IC50 values were determined by using Graph Pad Prism 8.4.0. All conditioned assays were done in triplicate.
We further examined the effect of cisplatin on cell proliferation of OVCAR8CR and SKOV3CR lines, in comparison with their respective parental lines OVCAR8 and SKOV3. We found that cisplatin inhibited cell proliferation of OVCAR8 cells in a dose-dependent fashion with IC 50 at 2.01 μM, while the IC 50 value for OVCAR8CR cells was 10.25 μM ( Fig. 1 B, panel a ). Similarly, cisplatin effectively inhibited cell proliferation of SKOV3 in a dose-dependent fashion with IC 50 at 2.45 μM, while the IC 50 for SKOV3CR was at 10.08 μM ( Fig. 1 B, panel b ).
We next characterized the cisplatin-resistance features of these two lines. By comparing with their respective parental lines OVCAR8 and SKOV3, we showed that both OVCAR8CR and SKOV3CR cells were resistant to cisplatin-induced apoptosis ( Fig. 2 A, panels a vs. b and c vs. d ). Quantitative analysis revealed that the % apoptotic cells was significantly lower in OVCAR8CR ( Fig. 2 A, panel e ) and SKOV3CR ( Fig. 2 A, panel f ) cells than that in the respective parental lines ( P < 0.01). Thus, these results indicate that OVCAR8CR and SKOV3CR cells can survive and proliferate in the presence of cisplatin concentrations that are toxic to their parental lines. Even though the exact mechanism underlying cisplatin resistance remains to be fully understood, numerous studies have identified differential expression of many genes that were associated with cisplatin resistance. 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 We analyzed a panel of seven genes that are associated with cisplatin resistance, and we found that, except ERCC1 , the expression of ABCB1 , ATP7A , ATP7B , CTR2 , FN1 , and CDH2 was significantly up-regulated in the OVCAR8CR cells, compared with that in the parental OVCAR8 cells, and even all seven genes were up-regulated in OVCAR8 cells upon cisplatin treatment ( Fig. 2 B, panel a ). Accordingly, we found the expression of these seven genes was significantly up-regulated in the SKOV3CR cells, compared with that of the SKOV3 cells, and all seven genes were up-regulated in SKOV3 cells upon cisplatin treatment ( Fig. 2 B, panel b ). Collectively, these results demonstrate that the OVCAR8CR and SKOV3CR cell lines exhibit some of the essential biological characteristics of cisplatin resistance in human cancer. Figure 2 Cell apoptosis and expression of cisplatin resistance-associated genes in human CR ovarian cancer cell lines. (A) Cell apoptosis assay. Subconfluent OVCAR8 ( a ), OVCAR8CR ( b ), SKOV3 ( c ), and SKOV3CR ( d ) were treated with 0 or 10 μM cisplatin for 72 h. Cells were harvested, fixed, and stained with Hoechst33258. Representative apoptotic cells are indicated by yellow arrows. Apoptotic cells were counted and averaged in 10 random high-power fields (HPFs) for the calculation of % apoptotic cells for OVCAR8 and OVCAR8CR ( e ) and SKOV3 and SKOV3CR ( f ). ∗∗ P < 0.01, compared with that of the respective parental lines treated with the same concentration of cisplatin. (B) Expression of the cisplatin resistance-associated genes. Subconfluent OVCAR8CR & OVCAR8 ( a ) and SKOV3CR & SKOV3 ( b ) cells were treated with 0 or 2 μM cisplatin for 48 h. Total RNA was isolated and subjected to TqPCR analysis of the indicated genes. GAPDH was used as a reference gene. ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, compared with that of the parental lines treated with 0 μM cisplatin ( i.e. , DMF control). Fig. 2
Cell apoptosis and expression of cisplatin resistance-associated genes in human CR ovarian cancer cell lines. (A) Cell apoptosis assay. Subconfluent OVCAR8 ( a ), OVCAR8CR ( b ), SKOV3 ( c ), and SKOV3CR ( d ) were treated with 0 or 10 μM cisplatin for 72 h. Cells were harvested, fixed, and stained with Hoechst33258. Representative apoptotic cells are indicated by yellow arrows. Apoptotic cells were counted and averaged in 10 random high-power fields (HPFs) for the calculation of % apoptotic cells for OVCAR8 and OVCAR8CR ( e ) and SKOV3 and SKOV3CR ( f ). ∗∗ P < 0.01, compared with that of the respective parental lines treated with the same concentration of cisplatin. (B) Expression of the cisplatin resistance-associated genes. Subconfluent OVCAR8CR & OVCAR8 ( a ) and SKOV3CR & SKOV3 ( b ) cells were treated with 0 or 2 μM cisplatin for 48 h. Total RNA was isolated and subjected to TqPCR analysis of the indicated genes. GAPDH was used as a reference gene. ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, compared with that of the parental lines treated with 0 μM cisplatin ( i.e. , DMF control).
In order to search for potential therapeutic agents that can overcome cisplatin resistance, we assessed the anti-proliferative activity of niclosamide (NA) in these two cisplatin-resistant lines. When both OVCAR8CR and parental OVCAR8 cells were treated with different concentrations of NA, we found that the numbers of viable cells drastically decreased at as low as 1.0 μM of NA, and completely eliminated at 2.0 μM of NA ( Fig. 3 A, panel a ). The quantitative analysis further confirmed that NA significantly decreased the cell viability of both OVCAR8CR and OVCAR8 cells at as low as 1.0 μM ( Fig. 3 A, panel b ). Similar results were obtained in SKOV3CR and SKOV3 cells as we found that NA markedly decreased the cell viability of both SKOV3CR and SKOV3 cells at as low as 1.0 μM although more cells survived in the SKOV3CR cells ( Fig. 3 B, panel a ). Quantitative analysis showed that NA significantly inhibited cell proliferation of SKOV3CR and SKOV3 cells in a dose-dependent fashion, and no viable cells were observed at 2.0 μM of NA treatment ( Fig. 3 B, panel b ). It is noteworthy that, while we only established cisplatin-resistant lines from low-grade epithelial ovarian cancer lines OVCAR8CR and OVCAR8, two commonly used high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) cell lines OVPA8 and OVCAR3 were shown highly sensitive to NA treatment ( Fig. S1A ) and were nearly completely killed at 2.0 μM NA ( Fig. S1B ), which is similar to the lethal concentrations for OVCAR8CR and SKOV3CR lines, suggesting that NA may exert its potent anti-cancer activity independent of genetic and/or epigenetic alterations acquired in ovarian cancer development and/or chemoresistance. Figure 3 Inhibitory effects of niclosamide (NA) on the cell viability and proliferation of human CR ovarian cancer lines. (A) Cell viability assay. Subconfluent OVCAR8 & OVCAR8CR ( a ) and SKOV3 & SKOV3CR ( b ) were treated with varying concentrations of NA for 72 h. The treated cells were fixed and subjected to crystal violet staining. The stained cells were dissolved with 30% acetic acid and measured for absorbance at 570–590 nm. Each conditioned assay was carried out in triplicate. Relative optical density (OD) was calculated by dividing the average OD values of the NA treatment groups by that of the respective control group treated with 0 μM NA ( i.e. , DMSO only) ( c , d ). ∗∗ P < 0.01, compared with that of the respective cells treated with 0 μM NA ( i.e. , DMSO control). (B) WST-1 cell proliferation assay. Subconfluent OVCAR8CR ( a ) and SKOV3CR ( b ) cells were seeded in 96-well cell culture plates and treated with varying concentrations of NA for 48 h and 72 h, followed by the addition of WST-1 reagent for additional 2-h incubation prior to the absorbance reading. All conditioned assays were done in triplicate. Fig. 3
Inhibitory effects of niclosamide (NA) on the cell viability and proliferation of human CR ovarian cancer lines. (A) Cell viability assay. Subconfluent OVCAR8 & OVCAR8CR ( a ) and SKOV3 & SKOV3CR ( b ) were treated with varying concentrations of NA for 72 h. The treated cells were fixed and subjected to crystal violet staining. The stained cells were dissolved with 30% acetic acid and measured for absorbance at 570–590 nm. Each conditioned assay was carried out in triplicate. Relative optical density (OD) was calculated by dividing the average OD values of the NA treatment groups by that of the respective control group treated with 0 μM NA ( i.e. , DMSO only) ( c , d ). ∗∗ P < 0.01, compared with that of the respective cells treated with 0 μM NA ( i.e. , DMSO control). (B) WST-1 cell proliferation assay. Subconfluent OVCAR8CR ( a ) and SKOV3CR ( b ) cells were seeded in 96-well cell culture plates and treated with varying concentrations of NA for 48 h and 72 h, followed by the addition of WST-1 reagent for additional 2-h incubation prior to the absorbance reading. All conditioned assays were done in triplicate.
We further examined the effect of NA on the cell proliferative activity of OVCAR8CR and SKOV3CR. Using the WST-1 assay, we demonstrated that NA inhibited OVCAR8CR cell proliferation in a dose-dependent fashion. Specifically, at the 1.0 μM of NA, the viable cells decreased to 70.7% and 56.7% of the control group at 48 and 72 h, respectively. The viable OVCAR8CR cells at 2.0 μM of NA further decreased to 37.8% and 20.5% of the control group at 48 and 72 h, respectively ( Fig. 3 B, panel a ). Similarly, when SKOV3CR cells were treated with 1.0 μM of NA, the viable cells decreased to 50.0% and 25.0% of the control group at 48 and 72 h, respectively; and at 2.0 μM of NA, the viable cells further decreased to 29.1% and 11.6% of the control group at 48 h and 72 h, respectively ( Fig. 3 B, panel b ). Collectively, these results suggest that NA may be able to inhibit cell viability and proliferative activity of the CR human ovarian cancer cells.
We further investigated if NA inhibited wound healing/cell migration in cisplatin-resistance human ovarian cancer cells. NA was shown to inhibit wound healing/cell migration in OVCAR8CR cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner ( Fig. 4 A, panel a ). Specifically, the OVCAR8CR cells failed to close the gap at 40 h when treated with 1.0 μM of NA, while the DMSO control group was completely healed at the same time. Similar results were obtained in SKOV3CR cells as wound healing/cell migration was effectively inhibited by 1.0 μM NA ( Fig. 4 A, panel b ). Quantitative analysis revealed that cell wound closure was significantly inhibited in OVCAR8CR ( Fig. 4 A, panel c ) and SKOV3CR ( Fig. 4 A, panel d ) cells by 0.5 μM NA at 40 h and 1.0 μM NA at both 24 h and 40 h. These results demonstrated that NA inhibits cisplatin-resistance human ovarian cancer cell proliferation and migration at low micromole concentrations. Figure 4 NA inhibits wound healing/cell migration and induces apoptosis in the cisplatin resistance human ovarian cancer cells. (A) Wound healing/cell migration assay. Subconfluent OVCAR8CR ( a ) and SKOV3CR ( b ) cells were wounded with micro-pipette tips and treated with 0, 0.5, and 1.0 μM NA. The wound gaps were recorded at 0, 24, and 40 h post-treatment. Representative results are shown. The wound gaps were quantitatively measured, and % gap opening was calculated for OVCAR8CR ( c ) and SKOV3CR ( d ) by using the gap distance at 0 h as 100% for each treatment group. ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, compared with that of the cells treated with 0 μM NA at respective time points. (B) Apoptosis assay. Subconfluent OVCAR8CR ( a ) and SKOV3CR ( b ) cells were treated with varying concentrations of NA for 72 h. The cells were harvested, fixed, and stained with Hoechst 33258. Representative apoptotic cells are indicated by arrows. Apoptotic cells were also counted and averaged in 10 random high-power fields (HPFs) for the calculation of % apoptotic cells for OVCAR8CR ( c ) and SKOV3CR ( d ). ∗∗ P < 0.01, compared with that of the cells treated with 0 μM NA. Fig. 4
NA inhibits wound healing/cell migration and induces apoptosis in the cisplatin resistance human ovarian cancer cells. (A) Wound healing/cell migration assay. Subconfluent OVCAR8CR ( a ) and SKOV3CR ( b ) cells were wounded with micro-pipette tips and treated with 0, 0.5, and 1.0 μM NA. The wound gaps were recorded at 0, 24, and 40 h post-treatment. Representative results are shown. The wound gaps were quantitatively measured, and % gap opening was calculated for OVCAR8CR ( c ) and SKOV3CR ( d ) by using the gap distance at 0 h as 100% for each treatment group. ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, compared with that of the cells treated with 0 μM NA at respective time points. (B) Apoptosis assay. Subconfluent OVCAR8CR ( a ) and SKOV3CR ( b ) cells were treated with varying concentrations of NA for 72 h. The cells were harvested, fixed, and stained with Hoechst 33258. Representative apoptotic cells are indicated by arrows. Apoptotic cells were also counted and averaged in 10 random high-power fields (HPFs) for the calculation of % apoptotic cells for OVCAR8CR ( c ) and SKOV3CR ( d ). ∗∗ P < 0.01, compared with that of the cells treated with 0 μM NA.
We also tested the effect of NA on cell apoptosis in cisplatin-resistance ovarian cancer cells. We found that, when OVCAR8CR and SKOV3CR cells were treated with 1.0 μM and 2.0 μM NA for 72 h, apoptotic cells were more readily observed in both cell lines, compared with that of the DMSO control group in a dose-dependent fashion ( Fig. 4 B, panels a & b ), suggesting that NA may effectively induce cell apoptosis in cisplatin-resistance human ovarian cancer cells.
Collectively, these results strongly suggest that human cisplatin-resistance ovarian cancer cells are sensitive to NA treatment. NA can reduce cell viability, inhibit cell proliferation and wound healing/cell migration, and induce cell apoptosis.
Mechanistically, it has been reported that NA may exert anti-cancer activity by inhibiting multiple cellular signal pathways. 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 Here, we sought to determine whether NA would overcome cisplatin-based chemoresistance in human ovarian cancer cells through similar mechanisms. By using a panel of Gaussia luciferase (GLuc) reporters for 12 cancer-related signal pathways, 40 , 54 we tested the effect of NA on the 12 cancer-related signal pathways in the cisplatin-resistant human ovarian cancer cells. When the GLuc reporters were transfected into SKOV3CR cells and then treated with various concentrations of NA for 48 h, we found that 11 of the 12 cancer-related pathway reporters were significantly inhibited by NA in a dose-dependent fashion ( Fig. 5 A). Interestingly, the CREB-GLuc reporter was activated at 4 μM of NA after 48 h. Nonetheless, the results suggest that NA may suppress cisplatin chemoresistance in ovarian cancer cells by inhibiting multiple cancer-related signal pathways. Figure 5 The inhibitory effects of NA on multiple cancer-associated signaling pathways in human CR ovarian cancer cell lines. (A) Effect of NA on the 12 cancer-associated pathways in SKOV3CR cells. SKOV3CR cells were transfected with the Gaussia luciferase reporter plasmids for the 12 cancer-associated pathways and treated with varying concentrations of NA for 48 h. The culture medium was collected for Gaussia luciferase assay using the Gaussia Luciferase Assay Kit (GeneCopoeia, Rockville, MD). Each conditioned assay was done in triplicate. ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, compared with that of the cells treated with 0 μM NA. (B) The inhibitory effect of NA on four cancer-associated pathways in a dose- or time-dependent manner. The four most affected pathway reporter plasmids AP1 ( a ), ELK/SRF ( b ), HIF1 ( c ), and TCF/LEF ( d ) were transfected into SKOV3CR cells as described in (A). The transfected cells were treated with varying concentrations of NA for 24 h or 48 h. The culture media were taken for Gaussia Luciferase activity assays. Each conditioned assay was done in triplicate. ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, compared with that of the cells treated with 0 μM NA. Fig. 5
The inhibitory effects of NA on multiple cancer-associated signaling pathways in human CR ovarian cancer cell lines. (A) Effect of NA on the 12 cancer-associated pathways in SKOV3CR cells. SKOV3CR cells were transfected with the Gaussia luciferase reporter plasmids for the 12 cancer-associated pathways and treated with varying concentrations of NA for 48 h. The culture medium was collected for Gaussia luciferase assay using the Gaussia Luciferase Assay Kit (GeneCopoeia, Rockville, MD). Each conditioned assay was done in triplicate. ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, compared with that of the cells treated with 0 μM NA. (B) The inhibitory effect of NA on four cancer-associated pathways in a dose- or time-dependent manner. The four most affected pathway reporter plasmids AP1 ( a ), ELK/SRF ( b ), HIF1 ( c ), and TCF/LEF ( d ) were transfected into SKOV3CR cells as described in (A). The transfected cells were treated with varying concentrations of NA for 24 h or 48 h. The culture media were taken for Gaussia Luciferase activity assays. Each conditioned assay was done in triplicate. ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, compared with that of the cells treated with 0 μM NA.
We further analyzed the inhibitory effect of NA on the four most affected pathways, AP1, ELK/SRF, HIF1, and TCF/LEF in SKOV3CR cells. We found that AP1 reporter activities were significantly inhibited by NA at 24 h and 48 h in a dose-dependent or time-dependent fashion ( Fig. 5 B, panel a ). Similar results were obtained for the ELK/SRF pathway ( Fig. 5 B, panel b ), the HIF1 pathway ( Fig. 5 B, panel c ), and the TCF/LEF pathway ( Fig. 5 B, panel d ). Furthermore, we demonstrated that the AP1, ELK/SRF, HIF1, and TCF/LEF pathways were also effectively inhibited by NA in OVCAR8CR cells in both time- and dose-dependent fashions ( Fig. S2 , panels a – d ). Collectively, these results strongly suggest that NA may primarily target cell proliferation and cell survival pathways in overcoming cisplatin resistance in human ovarian cancer cells.
Lastly, we analyzed the effect of NA on in vivo tumor growth of cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells. To establish the xenograft tumor model, we stably tagged the OVCAR8CR cells with firefly luciferase and injected the cells into the flanks of athymic nude mice. At three days post-injection, the mice were divided into two doses of NA-treated groups (10 mg/kg body weight and 20 mg/kg body weight) and the vehicle control group. Tumor growth was monitored by using Xenogen bioluminescence imaging for up to 24 days post-treatment, which showed remarkable decreases in imaging signals in the treatment groups ( Fig. 6 A, panel a ). Further quantitative analysis revealed that NA effectively inhibited tumor growth at 17 and 24 days after NA treatment, compared with that of the vehicle control group ( Fig. 6 A, panel b ). At the endpoint, the tumor masses were retrieved, and the vehicle control group had larger average tumor masses individually ( Fig. 6 B, panel a ) and the largest bulk volume of retrieved tumors ( Fig. 6 B, panel b ). Figure 6 Suppression of tumor growth by NA in the xenograft tumor model of human CR ovarian cancer cells. (A) Firefly luciferase-tagged SKOV3CR cells were injected into the flanks subcutaneously of athymic nude mice ( n = 6 per group). At 3 days post-implantation, the mice were randomized into three groups and separately treated with 0, 10, and 20 mg/kg NA for 3 weeks. The mice were imaged at 3, 10, 17, and 24 days after treatment, and sacrificed on day 24. Representative images on day 24 are shown ( a ). The average signal for each group at different time points was calculated by using Xenogen’s Living Image analysis software ( b ). ∗∗ P < 0.01, compared with that of the 0 mg/kg NA group. (B) Gross images of retrieved tumor masses. Representative retrieved tumor masses were individually photographed ( a ) or pooled in Eppendorf tubes ( b ). (C) Histologic and IHC analyses. The retrieved tumor masses were subjected to H&E staining ( a ) and anti-PCNA immunochemical staining ( b ). Minus primary antibody and control IgG were used as negative controls. Representative images are shown. Fig. 6
Suppression of tumor growth by NA in the xenograft tumor model of human CR ovarian cancer cells. (A) Firefly luciferase-tagged SKOV3CR cells were injected into the flanks subcutaneously of athymic nude mice ( n = 6 per group). At 3 days post-implantation, the mice were randomized into three groups and separately treated with 0, 10, and 20 mg/kg NA for 3 weeks. The mice were imaged at 3, 10, 17, and 24 days after treatment, and sacrificed on day 24. Representative images on day 24 are shown ( a ). The average signal for each group at different time points was calculated by using Xenogen’s Living Image analysis software ( b ). ∗∗ P < 0.01, compared with that of the 0 mg/kg NA group. (B) Gross images of retrieved tumor masses. Representative retrieved tumor masses were individually photographed ( a ) or pooled in Eppendorf tubes ( b ). (C) Histologic and IHC analyses. The retrieved tumor masses were subjected to H&E staining ( a ) and anti-PCNA immunochemical staining ( b ). Minus primary antibody and control IgG were used as negative controls. Representative images are shown.
H&E histologic analysis of the retrieved tumor masses revealed that xenograft tumors treated with NA exhibited significant necrosis and decreased cellularity, compared with that of the control group ( Fig. 6 C, panel a ). Immunohistochemical staining analysis of the cell proliferative marker PCNA indicated that the cell proliferation was effectively inhibited in the xenograft tumors treated with NA, especially in the high NA dose group (20 mg/kg body weight) ( Fig. 6 C, panel b ). NA-induced apoptosis was also confirmed by immunohistochemical staining analysis with cleaved Caspase-3 antibody ( Fig. S3 ). Collectively, these in vivo findings showed that NA effectively suppressed the xenograft tumor growth of cisplatin-resistance human ovarian cancer cells, suggesting that NA may be used as an efficacious therapeutic agent to overcome cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer.
While surgical removal of primary tumors followed by platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard treatment for patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer, 3 many patients experience cancer recurrence due to chemotherapeutic resistance to platinum. Thus, it is imperative to uncover the underlying mechanism of chemoresistance and to identify novel therapeutic agents to overcome such chemoresistance. It is conceivable that the availability of stable chemoresistant ovarian cancer lines will facilitate our efforts to understand and overcome ovarian cancer chemoresistance in order to improve the long-term survival of ovarian cancer patients. Interestingly, several human ovarian cancer lines that are stably and robustly resistant to cisplatin are available in the cancer research community, 82 , 83 although the first cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer line A2780 CP or A2780/CP70 was reported in 1988 82 , 83 , 84 and a couple of resistant lines were created from less well-characterized cell lines or treated patients. 85 , 86 , 87 However, most of those lines tolerate relatively low concentrations of cisplatin, and lack of parental vs . resistant lines for comparative mechanism-based studies.
Here, we established the stable cisplatin-resistant lines OVCAR8 and SKOV3 through a cisplatin dose-escalating selection process. We further demonstrated that both lines conferred robust and stable resistance to at least 5 μM cisplatin in vitro . More importantly, the OVCAR8CR and SKOV3CR lines were shown to share similar biological characteristics to other chemoresistance, especially platinum-resistance cancer lines, and up-regulated the expression of representative chemoresistance-related genes. Therefore, the OVCAR8CR and SKOV3CR lines should be valuable research tools to study cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer.
Drug repurposing of existing or abandoned drugs represents a cost-effective and time-saving approach to the identification of potentially efficacious therapeutic agents since toxicity and pharmacokinetic profiles are already established for those drugs. 9 , 10 Anthelmintic drugs are a group of agents to treat intestinal infections caused by parasitic worms (helminths). Niclosamide (NA) is an anthelmintic drug belonging to salicylanilides. 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 For the past several years, NA has been shown to exert anti-cancer activity in several malignant tumors including ovarian cancer. 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 In this study, our results are the first to demonstrate that NA can overcome cisplatin resistance in human ovarian cancer cells.
Mechanistically, we tested the effect of NA on the12 cancer-related signaling pathways in the cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells and found that 11 of 12 cancer-related pathways, especially AP1, ELK/SRF, HIF1, and TCF/LEF pathways, were effectively inhibited by NA in a dose-dependent fashion. Our results strongly suggest that NA may exert its anti-chemoresistant activity in cisplatin-resistance human ovarian cancer lines, at least in part, by inhibiting multiple cancer-associated proliferation-related pathways. Consistent with our findings, another study reported that NA effectively inhibited cell proliferation and survival, and angiogenesis of retinoblastoma via targeting Wnt/β-catenin pathway. 88 NA was also shown to inhibit cancer cell stemness, extracellular matrix remodeling, and metastasis by dysregulating the nuclear β-catenin/c-Myc axis in human oral squamous cell carcinoma. 89 In addition, it was reported that NA acted as a potent radiosensitizer via inhibiting STAT3 and Bcl-2 and increasing ROS generation in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells and xenograft tumors. 90 Thus, while it has been reported that NA can inhibit multiple cellular targets, 13 , 14 , 91 it is interesting to investigate whether NA exerts its anti-cancer activity and overcomes chemoresistance through the same or similar mechanisms.
Materials
Human epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines OVCAR8 and SKOV3, as well as the high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) cell lines OVPA8 and OVCAR3, were generously provided by Dr. Ernest Lengyel of The University of Chicago. All cells were maintained in complete Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gemini Bio-Products, West Sacramento, CA, USA), 100 units of penicillin and 100 μg of streptomycin at 37 °C in 5% CO 2 as described. 33 , 34 , 35 Niclosamide (NA) was purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), and cisplatin was purchased from Selleckchem (Houston, TX, USA). Unless otherwise indicated, other chemicals were purchased from either Thermo-Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) or Sigma–Aldrich.
Exponentially growing OVCAR8 and SKOV3 cells were initially treated with 0.05 μM cisplatin (dissolved in dimethylformamide or DMF; the cisplatin stock solution was aliquoted and kept at −80 °C) for 72 h. The viable cells were replated and grew, followed by dose-escalating selections of cisplatin concentrations gradually to 10 μM, yielding the stable cisplatin-resistant (CR) lines, designated as OVCAR8CR and SKOV3CR. 36 These CR cell lines were further characterized in this study.
Crystal violet staining assay was conducted as described. 37 , 38 , 39 Briefly, subconfluent OVCAR8CR, SKOV3CR, and/or their parental lines were treated with various concentrations of cisplatin or niclosamide for 72 h. The cells were washed with PBS and stained with crystal violet/formalin mix at room temperature for 20 min. The stained cells were washed with tap water gently, air dried, and scanned for macrographic images. For quantitative analysis, the stained cells were dissolved with 30% acetic acid and measured for absorbance at 570–590 nm. Each conditioned assay was carried out in triplicate. Relative optical density (OD) was calculated by dividing the average OD values of the drug treatment groups by that of the respective control group treated with 0 μM drug ( i.e. , vehicle control).
Cell proliferation was assessed with premixed WST-1 reagent (Takara Bio USA Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) as described. 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 Briefly, cells were seeded into 96-well culture plates and treated with varying concentrations of cisplatin or niclosamide for 72 h. The freshly prepared WST-1 Working Mix was added into each well and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h before subjecting plate reading at 450 nm using a microplate reader. IC50 values were calculated by using Graph Pad Prism 8.4.0. Each conditioned assay was done in triplicate.
Wound healing/cell migration assay was performed as described. 44 , 45 , 46 Experimentally, cells were seeded in 6-well plates and grew to 90% confluence. The monolayer cells were then scratched with sterile micro-pipette tips, and treated with different concentrations of NA. The wound closure status at the same locations was recorded under a bright field microscope at the indicated time points. Each assay was done in triplicate.
Hoechst 33258 staining assay was conducted as described. 36 , 41 , 47 , 48 Briefly, exponentially growing cells were treated with varying concentrations of niclosamide or cisplatin for 72 h. The treated cells were harvested, fixed, and stained with the Hoechst 33258. Apoptotic cells were analyzed under a fluorescence microscope. Each conditioned assay was done in triplicate.
Subconfluent parental human epithelial ovarian cancer lines OVCAR8 and SKOV3 and cisplatin-resistance human epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines OVCAR8CR and SKOV3CR were treated with various conditions for 48 h. Total RNA was isolated from treated cells by using the NucleoZOL reagent (Takara Bio USA Inc) and subjected to reverse transcription (RT) reactions with hexamer, M-MuLV reverse transcriptase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA), and dNTPs (GenScript USA Inc. Piscataway, NJ, USA). RT products were used as qPCR templates. The qPCR primers for the genes of interest were designed by using the Primer3 Plus program ( Table S1 ). TqPCR reactions were carried out by using SYBR Green-based Forget-Me-Not™ qPCR Master Mix (Biotium Inc., Hayward, CA, USA) on a CFX-Connect unit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) as described. 42 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53
GAPDH was used as a reference gene. Relative expression was calculated by using the 2 −ΔΔCt method. All qPCR reactions were done in triplicate.
The transfection of the 12 cancer-associated pathway reporters and the Gaussia luciferase assay were performed as previously described. 40 , 54 , 55 These cancer-associated pathways included NFAT, HIF-1, TCF/LEF, E2F/DP1, ELK1/SRF, AP1, NFκB, SMAD, STAT1/2, RBP-JK, CREB, MYC/MAX pathway reporters. Briefly, exponentially growing SKOV3CR cells were seeded in 60-mm cell culture dishes and transfected with 5 μg reporter plasmid DNA per dish of each reporter plasmid by using the PEI transfection reagent (Polysciences, Warrington, PA) as described. 56 , 57 , 58 At 18 h post-transfection, the transfected cells were replated into 24-well cell culture plates and treated with niclosamide at various concentrations or DMSO. At 24 h and/or 48 h after treatment, culture media were taken for Gaussia luciferase assays using the Gaussia Luciferase Assay Kit (GeneCopoeia, Rockville, MD) as previously described. 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 Each conditioned assay was done in triplicate.
The use and care of animals for the reported work were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of The University of Chicago. The xenograft tumor model of human cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells was established as previously described. 63 , 64 Specifically, exponentially growing firefly luciferase-tagged SKOV3CR cells were collected, resuspended in sterile PBS at the concentration of 5 × 10 7 cells/mL, and injected subcutaneously into the flanks of athymic nude mice (Harlan Laboratories; 5–6 weeks old, female; 5 × 10 6 cells per injection; 6 injection sites and 3 injections on each side per mouse).
For the NA treatment, at 7 days post-implantation, the mice were randomized and divided into three groups ( n = 6 per group), low dose niclosamide group (intraperitoneal injection of 10 mg/kg body weight, once every two days), high dose niclosamide group (intraperitoneal injection of 20 mg/kg body weight, once every two days), and DMSO control group ( i.e. , 0 mg/kg body weight). Tumor growth was monitored by using the Xenogen IVIS 200 whole-body bioluminescence imaging system weekly. The average signals were calculated using Xenogen's Living Image analysis software as previously described. 65 , 66 , 67 , 68
H&E histologic evaluation was performed as previously described. 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 Experimentally, the retrieved tumor masses were fixed with 10% PBS-buffered formalin and paraffin-embedded. Serial sections were deparaffinized and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Staining results were photographed under a bright field microscope.
IHC analysis was conducted as previously described. 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 Briefly, the tissue sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and subjected to IHC staining with a PCNA antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA). Minus primary antibody and control IgG were used as negative controls.
All quantitative experiments were done in triplicate and/or in three independent batches. Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was determined by one-way analysis of variance and the student’s t -test. A P -value <0.05 was defined as statistically significant.
Introduction
Ovarian cancer is the third most common malignant tumor of the female reproductive system and the second most common cause of gynecologic cancer death in women around the world. 1 , 2 , 3 Due to the lack of early screening and diagnosis techniques, most ovarian cancer patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, leading to poor outcomes for this disease. Therefore, the five-year survival rates remain below 50%. 1 , 3 Approximately 90% of ovarian cancers are epithelial, and the four most common histological types of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are serous, endometrioid, clear cell, and mucinous, some of which can be further classified into more subtypes based on their specific biology and treatment responses. 1 , 2 , 3 It has been estimated that a female individual's lifetime risk to develop ovarian cancer is 1 in 75, and their chance to die of this disease is 1 in 100. 4 While the cellular origin and pathogenesis of ovarian cancer remain to be fully understood, several risk factors and numerous genetic susceptibilities have been reported. 2 , 3 , 4 Some of the reported risk factors include hormonal and reproductive factors such as incessant ovulation and gonadotropin exposure, early age at menarche and late age at menopause, parity and infertility, lack of lactation, benign gynecologic conditions such as polycystic ovarian syndrome and endometriosis, and hormone replacement therapy. However, one of the most significant risk factors for ovarian cancer is a positive family history of breast or ovarian cancer. 4 High penetrant mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes greatly increase lifetime risk and account for the majority of hereditary cases and 10%–15% of all cases. 4 , 5 Other familial syndromes such as hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC), and mutations in DNA repair genes, are significant risk factors. 4 The known syndromes account for 36% of ovarian cancer familial relative risk, while genome-wide association studies have identified 22 susceptibility alleles for invasive ovarian cancer with weak to moderate effects. 4 , 6
The standard ovarian cancer treatment includes debulking surgery and/or platinum-taxane chemotherapy. 3 , 7 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used to decompress the tumor burden for poor surgical candidates with a low likelihood of optimal cytoreduction, whereas patients with a favorable surgical profile receive either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or undergo cytoreduction surgery. 3 , 7 , 8 For the past several years, a series of novel small molecule inhibitors and humanized monoclonal antibodies, such as anti-angiogenic inhibitors pazopanib and bevacizumab, and poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors olaparib, veliparib, and niraparib, have been used for maintenance therapy, some of which have significantly improved progression-free survival. 3 , 7 , 8 While ovarian cancer is one of the most chemo-responsive tumors, patients will relapse with chemoresistant tumors after an initial response and about 80% of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer experience cancer recurrence. 7 , 8 Thus, there is an unmet clinical need to identify new and effective therapeutic agents to overcome platinum resistance in ovarian cancer.
Repurposing drugs represent a cost-effective and time-saving strategy to identify new therapeutic applications for the approved drugs or investigational drugs that are outside the scope of the originally approved indications. 9 , 10 Drug repurposing is particularly popular in the cancer drug discovery community, and several repurposed drugs have entered various phases of clinical trials. 11 , 12 , 13 Niclosamide (NA) represents one of the most promising repurposing drug candidates for cancer. 14 Niclosamide is a drug approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat tapeworm infection since the 1960s. 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 It has been reported that NA exerts strong anti-cancer activities in several types of human cancers. 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 We previously demonstrated that blockade of IGF signaling sensitized human ovarian cancer cells to niclosamide-induced anti-proliferative and anti-cancer activities. 32 Nonetheless, it is unclear whether NA exerts strong cytotoxicity in cisplatin-resistant (CR) ovarian cancer.
In this study, we sought to investigate whether NA could be repurposed as an effective therapeutic agent to overcome cisplatin resistance in human ovarian cancer cells. Here, we first established two robust CR human ovarian cancer lines OVCAR8CR and SKOV3CR and demonstrated both CR lines exhibited the essential biological characteristics of cisplatin resistance in human cancer. NA was shown to effectively inhibit cell proliferation, suppress cell migration, and induce cell apoptosis in the CR ovarian cancer cells at a very low micromole range. We further demonstrated NA effectively inhibited xenograft tumor growth of the SKOV3CR cells. Mechanistically, NA was shown to inhibit multiple cancer-related pathways, especially AP1, ELK/SRF, HIF1, and TCF/LEF, in the CR ovarian cancer cells. Collectively, our findings suggest that NA may be repurposed as a novel efficacious agent to overcome cisplatin resistance in chemoresistant human ovarian cancer.