Interplay Between Supermassive Black holes, Galaxies, and Dark Matter Halos Revealed by Discrepancies with Cosmological Simulations

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Supermassive black holes (SMBHs) may be crucial to stifle star formation [1–5], but understanding their effects is limited by a lack of reliable measurements for host galaxies of actively accreting SMBHs. Here we present comprehensive measurements for about 40,000 nearby active SMBHs, including star formation rates, stellar masses, and multi-scale environments, along with precise halo mass estimates for galaxies in the SDSS and GAMA surveys. We use these new benchmarks to reveal that SMBH feedback physics in three prominent cosmological simulations is overly aggressive, consistently producing too many low-mass quiescent galaxies in high-mass halos. In contrast, observed galaxies with active SMBHs are predominantly located in relatively low-mass halos and in gas-rich, star-forming galaxies, broadly consistent with simulation results. However, major discrepancies remain in the the large-scale distribution of stellar mass in galaxies and there environments as well as the number density functions for stellar mass, star formation rates, black hole mass, and accretion luminosity. Our results suggest that past, cumulative SMBH activity alters halo-scale environments over long timescales, while the impact of current SMBH activity on star formation in the host galaxy or other halo members is minimal.
Full text 10,975 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Interplay Between Supermassive Black holes, Galaxies, and Dark Matter Halos Revealed by Discrepancies with Cosmological Simulations | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Interplay Between Supermassive Black holes, Galaxies, and Dark Matter Halos Revealed by Discrepancies with Cosmological Simulations Hassen Yesuf, Connor Bottrell This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5793232/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 25 Feb, 2026 Read the published version in Nature Astronomy → Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Supermassive black holes (SMBHs) may be crucial to stifle star formation [1–5], but understanding their effects is limited by a lack of reliable measurements for host galaxies of actively accreting SMBHs. Here we present comprehensive measurements for about 40,000 nearby active SMBHs, including star formation rates, stellar masses, and multi-scale environments, along with precise halo mass estimates for galaxies in the SDSS and GAMA surveys. We use these new benchmarks to reveal that SMBH feedback physics in three prominent cosmological simulations is overly aggressive, consistently producing too many low-mass quiescent galaxies in high-mass halos. In contrast, observed galaxies with active SMBHs are predominantly located in relatively low-mass halos and in gas-rich, star-forming galaxies, broadly consistent with simulation results. However, major discrepancies remain in the the large-scale distribution of stellar mass in galaxies and there environments as well as the number density functions for stellar mass, star formation rates, black hole mass, and accretion luminosity. Our results suggest that past, cumulative SMBH activity alters halo-scale environments over long timescales, while the impact of current SMBH activity on star formation in the host galaxy or other halo members is minimal. Physical sciences/Astronomy and planetary science/Astronomy and astrophysics Physical sciences/Physics/Astronomy and astrophysics Full Text Additional Declarations There is NO Competing Interest. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 25 Feb, 2026 Read the published version in Nature Astronomy → Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5793232","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":414183598,"identity":"50150a20-7aca-41cb-b811-432888f68221","order_by":0,"name":"Hassen Yesuf","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shanghai Astronomical Observatory","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hassen","middleName":"","lastName":"Yesuf","suffix":""},{"id":414183599,"identity":"5d4e0087-81f6-4eb9-b73e-6045ff717590","order_by":1,"name":"Connor Bottrell","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research, University of Western Australia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Connor","middleName":"","lastName":"Bottrell","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-01-09 04:55:15","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5793232/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5793232/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-026-02792-y","type":"published","date":"2026-02-25T05:00:00+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":103481835,"identity":"d33d62a5-8bbc-4a8b-b218-a75d6269c55c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-26 08:12:38","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":4787693,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Article File","description":"","filename":"YesufBottrellinitialsubmission.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5793232/v1_covered_2800e02c-21e0-448b-bc37-7a8a4a91c28e.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"There is \u003cb\u003eNO\u003c/b\u003e Competing Interest.","formattedTitle":"Interplay Between Supermassive Black holes,\r\nGalaxies, and Dark Matter Halos Revealed by\r\nDiscrepancies with Cosmological Simulations","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"nature-portfolio","isNatureJournal":true,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Nature Portfolio","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":false,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5793232/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5793232/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eSupermassive black holes (SMBHs) may be crucial to stifle star formation [1–5], but understanding their effects is limited by a lack of reliable measurements for host galaxies of actively accreting SMBHs. Here we present comprehensive measurements for about 40,000 nearby active SMBHs, including star formation rates, stellar masses, and multi-scale environments, along with precise halo mass estimates for galaxies in the SDSS and GAMA surveys. We use these new benchmarks to reveal that SMBH feedback physics in three prominent cosmological simulations is overly aggressive, consistently producing too many low-mass quiescent galaxies in high-mass halos. In contrast, observed galaxies with active SMBHs are predominantly located in relatively low-mass halos and in gas-rich, star-forming galaxies, broadly consistent with simulation results. However, major discrepancies remain in the the large-scale distribution of stellar mass in galaxies and there environments as well as the number density functions for stellar mass, star formation rates, black hole mass, and accretion luminosity. Our results suggest that past, cumulative SMBH activity alters halo-scale environments over long timescales, while the impact of current SMBH activity on star formation in the host galaxy or other halo members is minimal.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Interplay Between Supermassive Black holes,\nGalaxies, and Dark Matter Halos Revealed by\nDiscrepancies with Cosmological Simulations","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-04-16 08:15:26","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5793232/v1","editorialEvents":[],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"nature-astronomy","isNatureJournal":true,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"natastron","sideBox":"Learn more about [Nature Astronomy](http://www.nature.com/natastron/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Nature Astronomy","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Nature Research","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"b24f9bdc-ebab-4fe7-bf9a-acab6a23cb94","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 16th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":44165261,"name":"Physical sciences/Astronomy and planetary science/Astronomy and astrophysics"},{"id":44165262,"name":"Physical sciences/Physics/Astronomy and astrophysics"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-02-26T08:12:27+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-5793232","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-026-02792-y","journal":{"identity":"nature-astronomy","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Nature Astronomy"},"publishedOn":"2026-02-25 05:00:00","publishedOnDateReadable":"February 25th, 2026"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-04-16 08:15:26","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s41550-026-02792-y","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-026-02792-y","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5793232","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5793232","identity":"rs-5793232","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0