ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT The geographical and familial origins of Christopher Columbus have remained a subject of intense historiographical debate for over five centuries. Despite numerous hypotheses, empirical genetic evidence capable of resolving his ancestral history or place of birth has been absent from the literature until now. This study presents the third stage of the first forensic genetic analysis performed on skeletal remains belonging to several direct descendants of Columbus, spanning the 16 th to 18 th centuries. By applying Massively Parallel Sequencing (MPS) to analyse autosomal, X- and Y- chromosome DNA markers, and integrating the results with multidisciplinary evidence from historical, genealogical, archaeological, and anthropological research implicated in this project, the identification of several individuals founded in the Crypt of Santa María de Gracia located in Gelves (Sevilla, Spain) has been achieved. The analysis of their biological relatedness enabled the reconstruction of kinship networks among the individuals interred in the crypt, which, when interpreted in the context of documented genealogical lineages, provides indirect but consistent evidence pointing toward the debated origin of the discoverer.
Full text 55,915 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · 10 sections · click to expand

Keywords

Christophorus Columbus, ancient DNA, forensic genetic genealogy, MPS, AIMS, autosomal DNA, family pedigree.

Abstract

The geographical and familial origins of Christopher Columbus have remained a subject of intense historiographical debate for over five centuries. Despite numerous hypotheses, empirical genetic evidence capable of resolving his ancestral history or place of birth has been absent from the literature until now. This study presents the third stage of the first forensic genetic analysis performed on skeletal remains belonging to several direct descendants of Columbus, spanning the 16 th to 18 th centuries. By applying Massively Parallel Sequencing (MPS) to analyse autosomal, X - and Y- chromosome DNA markers, and integrating the results with multidisciplinary evidence from historical, genealogical, archaeological, and anthropological research implicated in this project, the identification of several individuals founded in the Crypt of Santa María de Gracia located in Gelves (Sevilla, Spain) has been achieved. The analysis of their biological relatedness enabled the reconstruction of kinship networks among the individuals interred in the crypt, which, when interpreted in the context of documented genealogical lineages, provides indirect but consistent evidence pointing toward the debated origin of the discoverer. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 2 / 22

Introduction

For more than 500 years, the precise origin of Christopher Columbus has been one of history’s most enduring enigmas. The intentional obfuscation of his early life by Columbus himself 1,2 has led to a myriad of conflicting theories proposing various European sites as his place of birth. To date, a lack of scientific certainty has persisted due to the absence of conclusive genetic data. Most studies investigating the origins of Admiral Christopher Columbus are based on circumstantial evidence and indirect findings, which are often influenced by no scientific motivations. However, his origins have rarely been examined from a rigorous scientific perspective. The objective of this study was to analyse the origins of Christopher Columbus from an expert standpoint, employing a multidisciplinary approach and a range of scientific techniques. To scientifically address the ancestral identity of Christopher Columbus, this study targeted the primary burial site of his direct lineage: the Santa María de Gracia church in Gelves (Seville; 37.33848, -6.02730) (See 3d model of the church) 3. The site serves as the pantheon for the Counts of Gelves, housing the largest concentration of Columbus’ direct descendants, at least seven, including his granddaughter. The selection of this crypt as the source for genomic and anthropological samples is justified b y several critical factors. The church serves as a monumental testament to the Columbus lineage. The transept dome features a prominent relief of the House of Columbus arms, inscribed with the foundational motto: “A Castilla y a León nuevo mundo dio Colón” (To Castile and León, Columbus gave a New World ). This iconography is further reinforced by the presence of both the Columbus coat of arms and those of the Royal House of Portugal on the four pendentives. Beyond its symbolic importance, the crypt offers unique analytical advantages due to its unprofaned state and the distinctive cultural markers of its funerary architecture. Situated beneath the high altar, the burial chamber follows a Lusitanian tradition —virtually non - existent in the Spanish context of the period —where coffins are placed in large, vaulted niches (both in hight and width) upon pedestals to prevent contact with the floor, allowing them to be seen through the grilles or doors that lead into t he niche. This architectural arrangement underscores the Portuguese identity inherent to this branch of the lineage, .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 3 / 22 aligning with the historical and genealogical records of the family 4,5, 6. The exceptional preservation of the remains, coupled with precise genealogical traceability, provides a verified biological framework for the high -resolution genomic and isotopic analyses conducted in this research. Over the past years, an extensive multidisciplinary investigation has been carried out, encompassing genealogical, historical, archaeological, anthropological, and forensic genetic research. Advances in technology in each of these fields have made it possible to obtain diverse datasets, which have helped progress the study and establish a comprehensive line of research with a broad scope. The skeletal remains of all individuals were commingled and distributed across four unidentified boxes (Box 1–4). Following the anthropological study, the minimum number of individuals (MNI) was established at 12, with biological sex estimation indicating six males and six females 7,8. Individuals were further classified based on age estimation, stature, bone pathologies, and information derived from historical records. Long bones, dental and molar specimens were subsequently retrieved from the individuals included in this study, prioritizing those with optimal preservation. After exhaustive historical research, the combination of anthropological studies, paleo- chemical analysis as radiocarbon or isotopic determination, the 3D scanning of the samples and posterior laser based mineral composition determination ending up with the genetic studies performed using M assive Parallel Sequencing (MPS), have been used to perform a comprehensive study of the individuals founded in the aforementioned crypt. Preliminary results identifying some of the individuals founded in the crypt have been already published 7,8. This research seeks to resolve Columbus origin uncertainty through a comprehensive study of his documented direct descendants. By extracting and analysing autosomal DNA from these historical remains, we addressed two primary objectives: biogeographical ancestry estimation through a ncestry informative markers (AIMs) and kinship analysis. The results presented herein are part of a broader, highly complex investigation into Columbus's ancestry, providing a detailed genetic footprint of his lineage through his descendants' autosomal genetic profiles. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 4 / 22 This entire investigation has been conducted in accordance with all legal criteria and requirements regarding the preservation of the chain of custody and the legal validity of documentary and expert evidence 9.

Material and methods

Historiography and documentation. A large amount of historical and genealogical data has been collected demonstrating that the skeletal remains analysed belong to the counts of Gelves lineage, direct descendants of Christopher Columbus. 10-24 Sample’s Origin and Archaeological Context. An in situ anthropological study was performed on March 21st and 22nd 2022 at the crypt of the Church of Santa María de Gracia in Gelves, Seville. In the presence of a notary public, three wooden urns containing the remains of the Count of Gelves' family were opened and documented via photography, 3D scanning, and osteometric measurements. To ensure transparency, impartial witnesses from the press were present duri ng the exhumation 25. The immediate collection of samples for DNA analysis made it possible to perform forensic genetics studies, with legal validity of an expert report. Physical Anthropology and Pathology 26-42. The minimum number of individuals (MNI) was determined using the White method. Biological sex was estimated following Bruzek (2002) and Buikstra & Ubelaker (1994). Age at death was assessed through multiple criteria: pubic symphysis morphology (Brooks & Su chey, 1990), auricular surface changes (Buckberry & Chamberlain, 2002), and sacral development (Passalacqua, 2009), supplemented by cranial suture closure (Meindl & Lovejoy, 1985) and dental wear (Brothwell, 1989). Stature and Body Mass Index (BMI) were es timated using standard osteometric formulae. Paleopathological analysis followed the clinical protocols of Ortner (2003) and Waldron (2008). Radiocarbon, Chemical and Isotopic Analysis 43-58. Prior to destructive sampling, 3D scans were generated using the Artec Space Spider and Artec Studio software to preserve the morphological integrity of the remains. Radiocarbon dating (C14) and stable isotope analysis (δ13C y δ15N) were conducted by Beta Analytic to determine chronologies and dietary patterns. Isobar Science performed strontium isotope analysis (87Sr / 86Sr) on dental enamel to assess geographical origin. Elemental composition was characterized .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 5 / 22 via Laser -Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) using a SciAps Z -903 portable device, providing a "chemical fingerprint" of the remains. DNA extraction and quantification 59. After cleaning and disinfection, bone samples were grinded using a Tissuelyser II (QIAGEN). Bone powder was incubated O/N in a lysis/decalcification buffer following previously described methods 59. Subsequent DNA extraction was carried out using the large volume protocol in an EZ2 Connect instrument (QIAGEN). DNA concentration process was carried out using Amicon®Ultra -0.5 columns (Millipore). The obtained DNA was quantified by real -time PCR using Quantifiler™Trio DNA Q uantification kit in a QuantStudio5 thermocycler (ThermoFischer). Library preparation and targeted sequencing 60. Library preparation from genomic DNA was carried out following the ForenSeq® Kintellingence HT kit (QIAGEN) manufacturer’s protocol. DNAse/RNAse free water was used as negative amplification control and 1ng of the genomic DNA control sample NA24385 (HG002-Coriell Institute for Medical Research, Camden NJ) was included as positive control. Both were processed together with the test samples. To assess the size, quantity, and integrity, of the obtained libraries, these were quantified using both a fluorometric (Qubit™) and an electrophoretic

Method

(TapeStation™). Subsequently, libraries were pooled together. The denaturalized pool was loaded on a MiSeq® FGx Reagent Cartridge. MPS run was set up in a MiSeq®FGx instrument. Targeted sequencing took place on a Standard MiSeq ®FGx Flow Cell (QIAGEN). Data analysis. Sequenced libraries were visualised and analysed using the ForenSeq® Kintelligence Analysis Module in the ForenSeq® Universal Analysis Software (UAS) v2.7(QIAGEN). Allele calling was performed as described in the ForenSeq® Kintelligence Kit Reference Guide and the Universal Analysis Software – Kintelligence HT Module Reference Guide 61,62. All analysis within the UAS were performed with the default analytical and interpretation thresholds at 1.5 % in the ForenSeq® Kintelligence HT analysis method. This represents a minimum read count of 10 reads 63,64. Kinship calculations were carried out with the UAS associated local database, applying the manufacturer's default settings. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 6 / 22 Pedigree Modelling and Biogeographical Ancestry Inference . Simultaneously, biogeographical ancestry (BGA) was inferred through a triangulated bioinformatic approach to ensure cross-validated results. Genomic datasets were analysed using Snipper v3.5 65, and Genogeographer version 0.3.1 66,67,68,69,70. Genealogical datasets were processed and modelled using the QuickPed analytical framework 71. Kinship coefficients across the expanded pedigree were systematically quantified using Henderson’s recursive algorithm, implemented through the kinship2 R package and the pedtools suite within the QuickPed framework 72,7 3,74. To evaluate the structural influence of the proposed genealogical configurations, a "Virtual Knock -out" analysis was performed. This involved a comparative assessment of kinship matrices under two mutually exclusive scenarios. Finally, ancestral nodes were scrutinized using Wright’s pa th coefficients to identify kinship intersections among descendants of a shared common ancestor 75.

Results

Historiography and documentation. An analysis of historical documentation provided evidence that the familial pantheon is, in fact, the family tomb of the Counts of Gelves , which is indeed the place in the world where the largest number of direct descendants of Columbus are buried. Furthermore, it allowed to identify the historical figures buried there and provided their dates of birth and death, along with other key information needed to identify the individuals interred there. Archaeological and anthropological studies Anthropological assessment determined the MNI at 12. The estimated ages at death and biological sex determined are shown in Table 1. The recovered data showed high concordance with the expected age and sex distribution, based on the historical records. Skeletal traits and pathologies were detected and registered in some of the individuals. The presence of metopism, a skeletal trait characterized by the persistence of the metopic suture in the skull, in three of the recovered individuals was remarkable. LIBS detected traces of Al, Ti, Fe, Zn, Ba, and Pb, creating an elemental profile of each analysed skeletal sample, was used as a chemical fingerprint and allowed to ensure bone provenance and guaranteed the subsequent skeletal remains individualisation (data not .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 7 / 22 shown). This characterization, together with the notary act, the photographs and 3D scan, provides absolute assurance of the chain of custody of the samples. Table 1: Individuals characterization through anthropological study. ID Estimated age Anthroplogical sex Skeletal traits and pathologies Ind-I 25-30 F Yes Ind-II 25-30 F No Ind-III 25-30 F Yes Ind-IV 35-45 F No Ind-V 45-55 F No Ind-VI 45-55 F Yes Ind-VII 25-30 M No Ind-VIII 35-45 M No Ind-IX > 45 M Yes Ind-X > 45 M Yes Ind-XI > 45 M No Ind-XII > 45 M Yes Table 1: Individuals characterization through anthropological study. Estimated age at death; F: female; M: male. Samples from two individuals were subjected to studies of dietary and isotopic characterization. Stable isotope values obtained for the following individuals w ere as follows: a) Ind-I: IRMS δ13C: -17.7 ‰, IRMS δ15N: 12.6 ‰; b) Ind-II: IRMS δ13C: - 16.67 ± 0.30 ‰, IRMS δ15N: 13.05 ± 0.40 ‰. These values suggest a diet predominantly composed of marine proteins, which is consistent with the riverine and coastal environments of Gelves and Cádiz, where these individuals were residing. Genetic studies To date, seven of the twelve individuals exhumated in this study have been genetically studied following amplicon library preparation protocols, with a large-scale SNP panel encompassing autosomal and Y- and X-chromosome markers. Up front, the genetically determined biological sex matched that previously determined on an anthropological basis. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 8 / 22 The targeted SNP panel encompasses 56 Ancestry Informative Markers (AIMS) that have been analysed in order to establish the most probable biogeographical ancestry from the studied individuals. As expected, a mong the seven candidates , after applying several bioinformatic tools, all resulted compatible with European biogeographical ancestry (Figure 1). Figure 1. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of genomic ancestry in the studied individuals. The scatterplot illustrates the projection of the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) derived from th 56 autosomal SNPs. PC1 (32.6%) and PC_2 (21.7%) collectively account for 54.3% of the total genetic variation, capturing the primary axes of Eur opean population structure. The Gelves subjects (indicated by black diamonds]) exhibit a highly cohesive and compact clustering within the reference population. The tight spatial distribution of the samples in the PC_1/PC_2 plane underscores a robust genetic affinity and minimal individual outliers, providing strong empirical support for their biogeographical origin. Additional projections, including the third princi pal component PC3 = 7.94% (data not shown), demonstrate consistent clustering Based on the documentary research, the only young adult male expected to be found in the crypt was Jorge Alberto de Portugal, the III Count of Gelves , who died at the age of 23. Ind. VII was the only male found whose age at death was compatible with his, thus it was classified as the most likely candidate for him. The specific data related to the comprehensive study done in this individual, including genetic profiling through autosomal, Y- and X-chromosome STR markers and SNPs , that allowed to confirm his identity have been already published 8 Subsequently, a genomic study based on Forenseq™ Kintelligence technology was carried out, which made it possible to establish kinship relationships between four of the individuals found in the crypt 7. These were individuals III, VIII, IX and X (Table 1). The documentary study carried out on the individuals present in the crypt together with the anthropological data and combined with the kinship results obtained in the aforementioned work, enabled the identification of these individuals and, consequently, .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 9 / 22 their attribution to the corresponding historical figures (Table 2) . Furthermore, the integration of all disciplines show ed that individuals III, IX and X , who share a grandmother-son-grandson relationship, all exhibited metopism, an inherited condition , supporting even more the genetic based results. Finally, another kinship came to light after further genetic studies. This relationship was established between Individual VII, previously identified as J orge Alberto de Portugal, and Individual II, a woman who was determined as 25–30 years old at the time of her death. According to historical documents and anthropological findings, there were two female candidates who matched to this age: Individual II and Individual I. In order to rule out which sample could correspond to each woman, samples from individuals I and II were sent for C14 analysis, what made it possible to date both women and thus distinguish them in time. For Ind.I, the date of death was determined with the highest probability falling within the years 1539 to 1635. On the other hand, in the case of Ind.II, the most likely estimated range for her date of death was determined between 1628 and 1680 , showing that individual Ind.I dates from approximately one century earlier than Ind.II. Once more, putting together the data from all disciplines involved in this work, the identification of individual II was possible, according to the anthropological estimated age of dead, the radiocarbon datation, the chemical footprint and the historical records, showing that Individual II corresponds to María de Castro Girón de Portugal, VI consort countess of Gelves. Figure 2: Forensic identification protocol for María de Castro Girón de Portugal Figure 2: Forensic identification protocol for María de Castro Girón de Portugal .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 10 / 22 A summary of the studies and findings relating to the individuals in the crypt is shown in Table 2. Table 2: Identification of the historical characters Ind. ID AA HA AS BS SkT C14 IBS I DNA Individual Identification Lifespan Ind-I 25-30 32 F F Y [1539- 1635] Y Y Y ND ND Ind-II 25-30 30 F F N [1628-1680] Y Y Y María de Castro Girón de Portugal, VI consort countess of Gelves * 1640-1670 Ind-III 25-30 26 F F Y N Y N Y Isabel de la Cueva, VI consort countess of Gelves * 1631-1657 Ind-IV 35-45 F N N Y N N ND ND Ind-V 45-55 F N N Y N N ND ND Ind-VI 45-55 F Y N Y N N ND ND Ind-VII 25-30 23 M M N Y Y Y Y Jorge Alberto de Portugal III count Gelves 1566-1589 Ind-VIII 35-45 38 M M N N Y N Y Álvaro Jacinto Colón de Portugal, V consort count of Gelves 1598-1636 Ind-IX > 45 55 M M Y N Y N Y Pedro Manuel Florentín Colón de Portugal y Ayala, VIII count of Gelves 1676-1736 Ind-X > 45 56 M M Y N Y N Y Pedro Manuel Colón de Portugal y de la Cueva, VII count of Gelves 1651-1710 Ind-XI > 45 M N N Y N N ND ND Ind-XII > 45 M Y N Y N N ND ND Table 2: Identification of the historical characters: * Isabel de la Cueva was the first wife of the VI Count of Gelves (Pedro Nuño Colón de Portugal, a direct descendant of Columbus), and María de Castro Girón de Portugal was his second wife, whom he married after his first wife’s death. AA: anthropological estimated age; HA: Age at dead as determined by historical records; AS: Anthroplogical estimated biological sex; BS: Biological sex determined by genetic testing; SkT: Skeletal traits; C14: Radiocarbon based dating; LIBS: Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy; I: Isotopic analysis; DNA: Genetic study. Overall: Y stays for yes, meaning done; N stays for no, study not performed and ND for not determined yet. Kinship analysis. The UAS v 2.7 allows to do kinship calculations based on the SNPs tested with the Kintelligence HT panel. The results obtained for Ind.VII and Ind.II are shown in Table 3 Table 3: Kintelligence HT results. Table 3: Kintelligence HT results. Total reads: number of reads per sample; Total SNPs: number of SNPs typed; X/Y - SNPs: SNPs located in X/Y Chromosome; aSNPs: ancestry SNPs; phSNPS: phenotype SNPs; iSNPs: identity SNPS and kSNPs: kinship SNPs. Typed markers are expressed as total number (Nr) and percentage of markers present in the panel (%) typed. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 11 / 22 The main results obtained out of the UAS local database algorithm related to the detected kinship between the two individuals identified as Jorge Alberto de Portugal, 3 rd count of Gelves (Ind.VII) and María de Castro Girón de Portugal, VI countess consort of Gelves (Ind. II) are shown in the following table: Table 4: Kinship study results. The initially unexpected biological kinship between María de Castro and Jorge Alberto de Portugal necessitated a rigorous multi-generational analysis. While her interment in th The initially unexpected biological kinship between María de Castro and Jorge Alberto de Portugal necessitated a rigorous multi -generational analysis. While her interment in the crypt was historically attributed to her status as the consort of the VI Count of Gelves rather than direct consanguinity, the genetic evidence prompted an exhaustive investigation into her full ancestry. This research stated on her high-status paternal lineage as the daughter of the IX Count of Lemos (noble house of Galicia, Spain) but encompassed a full reconstruction of both maternal and paternal branches to ensure a comprehensive screening of the pedigree. Systematic mapping of the shared ancestral landscape identified a profound convergence within two prominent noble houses: Zúñiga (Navarra) and Sotomayor (Galicia). These lineages, both originating from Northern Iberia, were found to exert a consistent influence on the shared genomic inheritance between the subjects. Pedigree reconstruction identified Pedro Álvarez de Sotomayor—a noble descendant of both houses —as a high- centrality node. His recurrent presence across multiple ancestral pathways within the expanded tree provides the requisite connectivity to explain the identified kinship, effectively functioning as a very likely biological nexus for the transmission of the ancestral genetic signal. Consequently, based on the familial pedigrees, two competing hypotheses were formulated for in silico statistical evaluation: (a) the observed kinship is derived from Table 4: Kinship study results. SNP overlap: number of SNPs in common between two samples; Shared DNA: Total amount of shared DNA between two samples. cM: Centimorgans; Longest shared segment: The longest stretch of shared DNA between two samples. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 12 / 22 Pedro Álvarez de Sotomayor as the second -great-grandfather of Jorge Alberto de Portugal; versus (b) the null hypothesis, in which the second -great-grandfather of Jorge Alberto de Portugal is an individual possessing no biological affinity with Pedro Álvarez de Sotomayor, and thus has no influence on the biological relationship detected in the genetic study (Figure 3). The resulting variance between these matrices delineated the estimated net genetic contribution of Pedro Álvarez de Sotomayor to the kinship detected between María de Castro and Jorge Alberto de Portugal, in strict accordance with Mendelian inheritance patterns. The identification of multiple nodes with equivalent contribution values served to validate a sustained "genealogical tunnel" — a constant connecting lineage demonstrating that the relatedness between distant cousins is fundamentally contingent upon this specific chain of individuals. Figure 3. Pedigrees representing the two postulated hypotheses. Figure 3. Pedigrees representing the two postulated hypotheses. Individuals are represented by numbers. Squares represent male individuals; circles represent female individuals. Marriages shown in red indicate consanguinity. Red doted arrows show relationships from the same individuals with other family branches. CC: Christophorus Columbus; PAS: Pedro Álvarez de Sotomayor .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 13 / 22 Both hypotheses were analysed using the R package pedtools (by Vigeland). This analysis characterized the genetic relationship between individuals Jorge Alberto de Portugal and María de Castro within a deep 16-generation pedigree, encompassing the Zuñiga and Sotomayor ancestors . Despite a significant temporal distance, a detectable kinship remains (Φ = 0.00243). These findings identified Pedro Álvarez de Sotomayor as a pivotal genetic bridge; the exclusion of this node , representing hypothesis b, resulted in a total loss of kinship (r = 0), defining Pedro Álvarez de Sotomayor as an obligatory ancestor for the observed IBD (Identical By Descent) sharing.

Discussion

The integration of high -resolution genomic data with forensic anthropology and multi - generational pedigree modelling presented in this work, has provided a transformative perspective on the ancestral origins of Christopher Columbus. By analysing the genetic legacy bequeathed to his direct descendants, this study successfully projects the lineage backward to identify his biological roots. The empirical identification of a 50.605 cM contiguous IBD segment between María de Castro Girón de Portugal (Ind. II) and Jorge Alberto de Portugal (Ind. VII)—the III Count of Gelves and great -great-grandson of Columbus —, prompted a novel line of inquiry . This shared genetic signal, identified within an archaeological context where direct relationship was not historically documented, served as the primary catalyst for the multi- layered genomic and genealogical investigation presented here. By integrating h igh- resolution autosomal data with forensic pedigree modelling, this study establishes a definitive framework for re -evaluating the ancestral origins of Christopher Columbus . Therefore, a comprehensive pedigree based on primary sources ranging from the 11th to the 18th century was performed. This multi -secular investigation aimed to map the specific points of convergence between the lineages and to identify the origin of the unexpected biological nexus. The crucial discovery of this research is the role of Pedro Álvarez de Sotomayor within the consolidated pedigree. Systematic modelling corroborated the empiri cal results obtained by identifying a significant kinship surplus between María de Castro and Jorge Alberto de Portugal, that exceeded documented genealogical predictions. Based on the genealogical research, the present study demonstrates that , to our knowledge, Pedro .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 14 / 22 Álvarez de Sotomayor is the unique ancestor capable of reconciling this genomic covariance. Moreover, computational exclusion via the "Virtual Knock -out" technique confirms Pedro Álva rez de Sotomayor as the critical node in this biological bridge. Upon his removal from the expanded tree, the kinship between María de Castro and the second - great-grandson of Columbus is eliminated. Across 16 generations of scrutinized connections, no other individual was identified who could provide the specific genetic inheritance required to explain the identified kinship. These findings definitively point to the ancestral origin of the Columbus lineage within the noble houses of Northern Spain, specifically the Zúñiga (Navarre) and Sotomayor (Galicia) families.

Conclusion

By synthesizing MPS -derived autosomal profiles with rigorous historiographical and anthropological data, this study establishes a coherent framework linking the Columbus lineage to the elder Galician and Navarrese nobility. The results confirm that the remains deposited in the church of Santa María de Gracia´s crypt (familial pantheon of the counts of Gelves) are indeed those of the counts of Gelves, as historical accounts had suggested. Furthermore, they are direct descendants of Christopher Columbus and s hare a common genetic architecture with the Sotomayor and Zúñiga houses. Collectively, these findings provide for the first time robust genetic support for the hypothesis of a Galician provenance for Christopher Columbus, laying a definitive foundation within the scientific discourse for the re-evaluation of his historical identity. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 15 / 22 ACKNOWLEGEMENTS: The authors express their gratitude to the Archdiocese of Seville, specifically Bishop Teodoro León Muñoz, for the authorization that made this research possible. We thank Alba Hernández for her accurate laboratory work, and Ana María Ortiz Paredes of "El Mundo" for her professional chronicling of the archaeological process. AUTHORSHIP CONTRIBUTION. Sample collection and "in situ" archaeological work: Yravedra Saez de los Terreros, J, Bonilla A, Tirapu M, Albert M, Jímenez P, Herránz D. Legal assistance, organization and independent sponsorship of the scientific project: García, M.C. Anthropologic study: Tirapu M. DNA extraction, genetic studies and quality control during analyses: Navarro- Vera, I. AUTHOR DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. The authors declare no conflict of interest. FUNDING STATEMENT: Private support without any grant.

References

1. Colón Hernando; “Historia del Almirante Don Cristóbal Colón”. Capítulo I. Página 12. 2. Colón Hernando; “Historia del Almirante Don Cristóbal Colón”. Capítulo I. Página 12. Available from: https://bibliotecadigital.jcyl.es/es/catalogo_imagenes/grupo.do?path=10659554 [Last accessed: December/ 4th/ 2025]. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 16 / 22 3. https://www1.sedecatastro.gob.es/Cartografia/FXCC/Visor3D.aspx?del=41&mu n=44&refcat=3467404QB6336N0001YJ&final= 4. Pereira; Manuela; Aspetos da morte na nobreza do século XVII. A escavação da Cripta dos mascarenhas no Convento da saudação em montemor-o-novo. Almansor | Revista de Cultura n.º 1 | 3.ª série 2015 pp. 109. 5. Pereira; Manuela; Aspetos da morte na nobreza do século XVII. A escavação da Cripta dos mascarenhas no Convento da saudação em montemor-o-novo. Almansor | Revista de Cultura n.º 1 | 3.ª série 2015 pp. 109. Available from: https://montemorbase.com/wp- content/uploads/2017/05/Manuela-Pereira-Aspetos-da-morte-na-nobreza-do- s%c3%a9culo-XVII-A-escava%c3%a7%c3%a3o-.pdf . [Last accessed: December/ 4th/ 2025]. 6. Cemitério dos Prazeres: Licínio é o guardião de um milhão de almas e das suas histórias. Álvaro Filho. 16.04.2022. A mensagem de Lisboa. https://amensagem.pt/2022/04/16/cemiterio-prazeres-historia-tour/ 7. I Navarro-Vera, J Yravedra Sainz de los Terreros, A Bonilla, M Tirapu, M Albert, PP Jímenez, D Herranz, C García; “Guess Who?”: Forensic genetics and archaeology converge to identify Cristopher Columbus descendants. doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.12.16.694569 8. Navarro-Vera, I. et al. (2024). The first comprehensive forensic genetic study of a member of Christopher Columbus' family. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.12.618003 9. STS 179/2006 de 14 de febrero de 2006, STS: 777/2013, STS 513/2018, de 30 de octubre, STS 6/2010, de 27 de enero; STS 776/2011, de 20 de julio , STS 347/2012, de 25 de abril . STS 30 de noviembre de 2010, art 348 LEC, STS 28 enero de 1995, STS 20 de mayo de 1996, STS 7 enero de 1991(/109), STS 17 de junio de 1996 (/5071), STS 4 de diciembre de 1989 (/8793), STS 4631/2016 de 10 de octubre de 2016. 10. Archivo Histórico Nacional. OM- CABALLEROS -SANTIAGO, Exp 2023. 11. Archivo General de Simancas. CME, 451, 30; ES.47161.AGS, 12. Archivo General de Simancas. CME, 451, 30 3) 13. Archivo Protocolos de Sevilla. Oficio 1, año 1551, libro 2, cuadernillo 24 y 25, fols 690 y siguientes. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 17 / 22 14. Archivo Alba. Gelves, C.155-9 15. Archivo Histórico Nacional: A.H.N. Consejos Suprimidos, legajo 21479, pieza 6; 16. Archivo Histórico Nacional: A.H.N. Consejos Suprimidos, 21477, pieza 11, fols 11 a 19v 17. Archivo Parroquial de Santa María de Gracia (Gelves) libro 1º de Defunciones 18. Archivo Histórico Nacional. OM-CABALLEROS_SANTIAGO, Exp. 2022. 19. Ladero Quesada M. Á. (1984). De Per Afán a Catalina de Ribera. Siglo y medio en la historia de un linaje sevillano (1371 - 1514). En la España Medieval, 4, 447. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ELEM/article/view/ELEM8484120447A 20. Argote de Molina, Gonzalo, 1548-1596; Diaz, Fernando; Nobleza del Andaluzia; 1588. Pp 578-580. Argote de Molina, Gonzalo, 1548-1596; Diaz, Fernando; Nobleza del Andaluzia; 1588. Pp 578 -580. Available from: Nobleza del Andaluzia: Argote de Molina, Gonzalo, 1548-1596 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive . [Last accessed: December/ 4th/ 2025]. 21. Anunciada Colón de Carvajal y Gorosábel, Guadalupe Chocano Higueras; Cristobal Colón : incógnitas de su muerte 1506-1902 : primeros almirantes de las Indias; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, 1992; pp 105, 110-115. 22. Fernández de Bethéncourt, Francisco. Historia Genealógica y heráldica de la monarquía española. Casa Real y grandes de España. Tomo 4. 1902. 23. Lopez de Haro, Alonso; Nobiliario genealógico de los reyes y títulos de España. Madrid, 1622. 24. www.geni.com 25. Ana María Ortiz Paredes. Exhumando a la nieta de Colón… El Mundo. 26.06.2022. Available from: https://www.elmundo.es/espana/2022/06/26/62b5935ffdddff2b6c8b45a3.html . [Last accessed: December/ 4th/ 2025]. 26. White, T.E. (1953) “A method of calculating the dietary percentage of various food animals utilized by aboriginal peoples”, Am. Antiq., 18 (4), 396–398. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 18 / 22 27. Bruzek, J. (2002) “A Method for Visual Determination of Sex, Using the Human Hip Bone”, American Journal of Physical Athropology, 117:157 -168. Hip Bone”, https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10012 28. Buikstra, J.D. y Ubelaker, D.H. (1994) Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Arkansas Archaeology Survey. Fayetteville. https://archive.org/details/isbn_1563490757 29. Brooks, S. y Suchey, J.M. (1990) “Skeletal age determination based on the Os Pubis: a comparison of the Acsádie -Nemeskéri and Suchey -Brooks methods”, Human Evolution, 5, pp.227-238. 30. Buckberry, J.L. y Chamberlain, A. T. (2002) “Age estimation from the auricular surface of the ilium: a revised method”, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 119(3):231-239. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10130 31. Passalacqua, M.S. (2009) “Forensic Age-at-death estimation from the human sacrum”, J.Forensic. Sci., 54(2):255-262 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00977.x 32. Meindl, R.S. y Lovejoy, O. (1985) “Ectocranial Suture Closure: A Revised Method for the Determination of Skeletal Age at Death Based on the Lateral -Anterior Sutures”, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 68(1):57-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330680106 33. Brothwell, D.R. (1989) “The relationship of tooth wear to aging”. En: M.Y. Iscan (Ed.) Age makers in human skeleton. CC. Thomas Publisher, Springfield, Illinois. pp.303 - 316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103707 34. Mendonça, M.C. (2000) “Estimation of Height from the Length of Long Bones in a Portuguese Adult Population”, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 112, pp. 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(200005)112:13.0.CO;2- %23 35. Pearson K. (1899) “Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution: on the reconstruction of stature of prehistoric races”, Philos Trans R Soc Lond [Biol], 192:169 –244. 36. González, V. y Priego, A. (2013) Estimación del IMC en poblaciones arqueológicas. Aportaciones de las colecciones documentadas contemporáneas. Trabajo Fin de Máster. UAM. Madrid. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 19 / 22 37. Pérez, L., Niinimäki, S., Junno, J.A., Niskanen, M., Niinimäki, J. y Núñez, M. (2012) “The relationship between the observed body mass and the dimensions of femoral head – A hip MRI case study”, Rev. Esp. Antrop. Fís. 2012; 33: 1-6. Available from: https://www.seaf.es/images/seaf/papers/vol33/revista%20seaf%2033.pdf [Last accessed: December/ 4th/ 2025]. 38. Ortner, D.J. (2003) Identification of Pathological Conditions in Human Skeletal Remains. Academic Press. Amsterdam. doi: 10.1016/B978 -0-12-528628- 2.X5037-6.Available from:https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780125286282/identification-of- pathological-conditions-in-human-skeletal-remains . [Last accessed: December/ 4th/ 2025]. 39. Waldron, T. (2008) Paleopathlogy. Cambridge University Press. UK. Available from: doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108583961 . [Last accessed: December/ 4th/ 2025]. 40. Buikstra, J.E. (2019) Ortner’s Identification of Pathological Conditions in Human Skeletal Remains. 3º edición: Academy Press. doi: 10.1016/C2011-0-06880-1 41. García-Medrano, P., Ashton, N., Moncel, M. -H. & Ollé, A. (2020) The WEAP

Method

a New Age in the Analysis of the Acheulean Handaxes, Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology 3: 756-793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41982-020-00054-5 42. Hanegraef, H. & Spoor, F. (2025) Morphological variation of the Australopithecus afarensis maxilla, Journal of Human Evolution 201: 103651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2025.103651 43. Jesus, M., Teixeira, J., Guimarães, A.S., Rangel, B. & Alves, J.L. (2025) From 3D survey data of cultural heritage artefacts to 3D -printed prototypes based on cement and lime-based mortars, Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 37: e00412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2025.e00412 44. Pieraccini, M., Guidi, G. & Atzeni, C. (2001) 3D digitizing of material culture, Journal of Cultural Heritage 2: 63 -70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1296- 2074(01)01108-6 45. Riga, A., Mori, T., Di Vincenzo, F., Pasquinelli, F., Carpi, R., Moggi -Cecchi, J. (2022). 3D Methods for the Anthropological Cultural Heritage. In: Furferi, R., Governi, L., V olpe, Y ., Seymour, K., Pelagotti, A., Gherardini, F. (eds) The Future of Heritage Science and Technologies: ICT and Digital Heritage. Florence Heri- .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 20 / 22 Tech 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science , vol 1645. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20302-2_2 46. Zhang, C., Chen, J., Li, P., Han, S. & Xu, J. (2024) Integrated high-precision real scene 3D modeling of karst cave landscape based on laser scanning and photogrammetry, Scientific Reports 14: 20485. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71113-y 47. Bronk Ramsey, C. (2009). Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon, 51(1), 337-360. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge- core/content/view/F622173B70F9C1597F2738DEFC597114/S00338222000338 65a.pdf/bayesian_analysis_of_radiocarbon_dates.pdf. [Last accessed: December/ 4th/ 2025]. 48. Hua, et al., 2022, Radiocarbon 64(4): 723-745. Reimer, et al., 2020, Radiocarbon 62(4): 725-757. 49. Hoppe, K.A.; P.L. and Furutani, T.T., 2003: Assessing the Preservation of Biogenic Strontium in Fossil Bones and Tooth Enamel. Int. J. Osteoarchaeol. Vol. 13, pp. 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.663 50. McArthur. J. M.; Howarth, R. J. and Bailey, T. R., 2001: Stronium Isotope Stratigraphy: LOWESS Version 3: Best Fit to the Marine Sr -Isotope Curve for 0 -509 Ma and Accompanying Look -up Table for Deriving Numerical Age Source. The Journal of Geology, vol. 109, no. 2, pp.155-170. https://doi.org/10.1086/319243 51. Pourmand, A.; Prospero, J. M. and Sharifi, A., 2014: Geochemical fingerprinting of trans-Atlantic African dust based on radiogenic Sr -Nd-Hf isotopes and rare earth element anomalies. GEOLOGY, vol.42, pp.675 -678. https://doi.org/10.1130/G35624.1 52. Pourmand, A. and Dauphas, N., 2010. Distribution coefficients of 60 elements on TODGA resin: Application to Ca, Lu, Hf, U and Th isotope geochemistry. Talanta 81, 741-753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2010.01.008 53. White, T.E. (1953) “A method of calculating the dietary percentage of various food animals utilized by aboriginal peoples”, Am. Antiq., 18 (4), 396–398. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 21 / 22 54. Moncayo, S., 2016. Desarrollo y Aplicación de Métodos Quimiométricos para el Estudio de Muestras Mediante Espectroscopia de Ablación Láser (LIBS). Tesis Doctoral. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. 55. Dwivedi, V.; Marín -Roldán, A. & Veis, P., 2019. Figure 1. Simple neural network architecture. Discrimination of Bone Samples Using Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) Coupled with Artificial Neural Network (ANN). 56. Lie, T.J.; Kurniawan, K.H.; Kurniawan, D.P.; Pardede, M.; Suliyanti, M.M.; Khumaeni, A.; N atiq, S.A.; A bdulmadjid, S.N.; L ee, Y.I.; K agawa, K.; I dris, N. & T ija, M.O., 2006. Elemental analysis of bead samples using a laser induced plasma at low pressure. Spectrochimica Acta Part B, 61, págs. 104-112. 28. 57. Marín Roldán, A.; Dwivedi, V.; Yravedra, J. & Veis, P., 2020. Laser Induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) for the analyses of faunal bones: Assembling of individuals and elemental quantification. Optik (Stuttgart), 218, págs. 164992. 58. Siozos, P.; Hausmann, N.; Holst, M. & Anglos, D., 2021. Application of laserinduced breakdown spectroscopy and neural networks on archaeological human bones for the discrimination of distinct individuals. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 35, 102769. 59. Loreille, O. M. et al. High efficiency DNA extraction from bone by total demineralization. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2, 191 –195 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.02.006 60. Jäger, A.C. et al. (2017). Developmental validation of the MiSeq FGx Forensic System for targeted next-generation sequencing. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 28: 52- 70. 61. Zedda, N. et al. Evaluation of the ForenSeq® Kintelligence Kit for forensic genetic genealogy applications. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 58, 102747 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102747 62. Available from: https://www.qiagen.com/en-US/resources/download/KitHandbook/forenseq- kintelligence-reference-guide-vd2020053-c 63. Antunes, J. et al. Developmental validation of the ForenSeq® Kintelligence kit, MiSeq FGx® sequencing system and ForenSeq Universal Analysis Software. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint ARCHAEOGENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE COLUMBUS LINEAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COUNTS OF GELVES. 22 / 22 Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 71, 103055 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103055 64. Available from: https://www.qiagen.com/en-US/resources/download/AnalysisSoftware/forenseq- univ-analysis-sw-guide-vd2018007-a 65. Inferring ancestral origin using a single multiplex assay of ancestry -informative marker SNPs. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007, 1(3-4):273-280. C. Phillips, A. Salas, J. J. Sánchez, M. Fondevila, A. Gómez -Tato, J. Álvarez -Dios, M. Calaza, M. Casares de Cal, D . Ballard, M.V . Lareu, Á. Carracedo and The SNPforID Consortium. Available from: https://mathgene.usc.es/snipper4/index.php 66. Available from: http://apps.math.aau.dk/aims/# 67. T Tvedebrink, PS Eriksen, HS Mogensen, N Morling (2017). GenoGeographer - A tool for genogeographic inference. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 6, e463-e465. 68. T Tvedebrink, PS Eriksen, HS Mogensen, N Morling (2018). Weight of the evidence of genetic investigations of ancestry informative markers. Theoretical Population Biology 120, 1-10. 69. T Tvedebrink, PS Eriksen (2019). Inference of admixed ancestry with Ancestry Informative Markers. Forensic Science International: Genetics 42, 147-153. 70. HS Mogensen, T Tvedebrink, C Borsting, V Pereira, N Morling (2020). Ancestry prediction efficiency of the software GenoGeographer using a z-score method and the ancestry informative markers in the Precision ID Ancestry Panel. Forensic Science International: Genetics 44, 102154. 71. Vigeland, M.D. (2022). QuickPed: an online tool for drawing pedigrees and analysing relatedness. BMC Bioinformatics, 2l 72. Therneau, T. M. (2012). Pedigree software in R. Mayo Clinic Technical Report. 73. Sinnwell, J. P., Therneau, T. M., & Schaid, D. J. (2014). The kinship2 R package for pedigree data. Human Heredity. 74. Meuwissen, T. H., & Luo, Z. (1992). Computing inbreeding coefficients in large populations. Genetics Selection Evolution, 24(4), 305. 75. Wright, S. (1922). Coefficients of inbreeding. American Naturalist, 56, 330-338. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licensemade available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 4, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.01.715912doi: bioRxiv preprint

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0