Characteristics of Suspected Endometriosis without Histologic Confirmation

In: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · 2020 · vol. 27(7) , pp. S109–S110 · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2020.08.166 · W3097004153
article OA: green CC0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash+body, 2026-08-23 ⓘ

This retrospective cohort study evaluated 68 patients with suspected endometriosis lacking histologic confirmation, revealing that most exhibited non-specific histopathologic findings or no abnormalities despite high clinical suspicion.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-23 · read from full text ⓘ

This retrospective cohort study analyzed 487 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for clinically suspected endometriosis to determine the prevalence and characteristics of cases lacking histologic confirmation. The researchers found that 14% of these patients did not have confirmed endometriosis, with many presenting non-specific histopathologic findings such as chronic inflammation or fibrosis, while others showed no abnormalities at all. Despite the absence of a definitive histologic diagnosis, these patients continued to experience significant symptoms, highlighting the diagnostic challenges clinicians face when visual lesions do not match pathological results. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically examining the clinical and surgical features of suspected cases that lack histologic confirmation.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 2,327 characters · extracted from oa-html · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Study Objective We aim to describe the clinical and laparoscopic features of suspected endometriosis lacking histologic confirmation. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Quaternary community medical center. Patients or Participants All consecutive pathology reports from patients who underwent surgery for clinically suspected endometriosis by three surgeons from the Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery between 01/01/2016 and 12/31/2019 were reviewed and categorized in two groups: endometriosis histologically confirmed, and endometriosis not histologically confirmed. A retrospective analysis of the patients without confirmed endometriosis was performed by evaluating clinical, surgical, and histologic characteristics. Interventions Laparoscopic surgery. Measurements and Main Results Of 487 patients, endometriosis was histologically confirmed in 419 (86.0%) and not confirmed in 68 (14.0%). Study group age range was 16 to 48 (median 30.5). Patients clinically presented with a variety of symptoms suspicious for endometriosis. 23 (33.8%) of the 68 patients without confirmed endometriosis had other gynecologic abnormalities, including leiomyomata, endometrial polyps or adenomyosis. 39 cases (57.3%) without confirmed endometriosis had non-specific histopathologic findings such chronic inflammation, fibrosis, adhesions, reactive changes, and hemosiderin deposits, while the remaining 29 (42.6%) had no histologic abnormalities. On laparoscopic evaluation, lesions appeared heterogeneous and suspicion of endometriosis was high in 10 (15%), low in 36 (53%), and absent in 22 (32%) patients. Laparoscopically, there were 14 cases without any abnormality visualized in the group with no histologic abnormalities (48%) compared to only 5 cases in the group with histologic findings (13%).

Conclusion

Despite the absence of histologically confirmed endometriosis, patients with clinically suspected disease still experience significant symptoms and management decisions remain challenging for both patientsand clinicians. Over half of the patients without confirmed endometriosis had non-specific histopathologic findings. Further research should analyze how these findings correlate to the clinical symptoms of patients with suspected endometriosis and role in management in such patients.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK