Clinical efficacy analysis of arthroscopically assisted Orthcord suture fixation in the treatment of tibial intercondylar eminence fractures: a retrospective case-control study

Clinical efficacy analysis of arthroscopically assisted Orthcord suture fixation in the treatment of tibial intercondylar eminence fractures: a retrospective case-control study | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Clinical efficacy analysis of arthroscopically assisted Orthcord suture fixation in the treatment of tibial intercondylar eminence fractures: a retrospective case-control study Rongfang Zhang, Yuqi Wang, Chunyu Wang, Yuanxin Qiao, HongBo Liu This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5256408/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background: To explore the efficacy of arthroscopically assisted fixation of type II and type III tibial intercondylar eminence fractures with Orthcord sutures. Method: A retrospective analysis was performed on 80 patients with intercondylar eminence fractures admitted to our hospital from April 2020 to March 2024. According to different surgical methods, the patients were divided into special suture fixation group (n = 30), cannulated screw fixation group (n = 24), and wire fixation group (n = 26). The suture group used arthroscopic orthcord sutures to fix tibial intercondylar eminence fractures, and the cannulated screw group used cannulated compression screws for fixation. Patients in the wire group underwent arthroscopic wire fixation. The basic information of all patients was collected and followed up for 1 year. The Lysholm score of the knee joint was performed at 3 months and 1 year after surgery. The patients' general data, surgical conditions, operation time, blood loss, hospitalization costs, postoperative recovery (Lysholm score of knee joint at 3 months and 1 year after surgery) and other data were analyzed by variance analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Result: There was no statistical difference in the general data of all patients. One-year follow-up showed that all patients had achieved bone healing without infection, displacement, or bone malformation. The hospitalization time in the wire group was (11 ± 1.02) days, the screw group was (11.58 ± 1.61) days, and the Orhtcord suture group was shortened to (10.03 ± 1.07) days. The differences among the three groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). At the same time, the cost of Orhtcord suture surgery (1310.7 ± 0.29) $ was significantly lower than that of the other two groups (P＜0.05). The operation time of the suture group (68.13±1.11min) was significantly shorter than that of the wire group (76.76±11.57min) and the screw group (90.62±1.99min) (P＜0.05). In the follow-up, the score of Orhtcord suture 3 months after operation (94.07±2.72 points) was better than that of the wire group (90.23±5.23 points) and the screw group (90.37±5.41 points); the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the Lysholm score of the three groups of patients 6 months after operation (96.26±1.89, 96.33±2.44, 97.3±1.70) (P＞0.05). Conclusion: The use of Orhtcord sutures in the arthroscopically assisted treatment of intercondylar ridge fractures can shorten the length of hospital stay and surgery, while greatly reducing hospitalization costs. It can achieve better short-term (3 months) recovery effects while avoiding secondary surgery, and ultimately show no weaker fixation effect than conventional screws and wires when fully weight-bearing is restored. intercondylar eminence fracture anterior cruciate ligament lower insertion avulsion fracture Orhtcord suture arthroscopic assisted surgery Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 1 Introduction Tibial intercondylar spine fracture is called anterior cruciate ligament inferior insertion avulsion fracture 1 . In recent years, with the increase of various sports injuries and traffic accidents, intercondylar ridge fracture has gradually become a common intra-articular fracture of the knee, and the incidence rate is getting higher and higher 2 . In tram accidents, knee valgus or rotational stress and hyperextension of the knee are likely to cause intercondylar ridge avulsion fractures, which account for 2–5% of all knee injuries. The injury mechanism is mostly caused by motor vehicle accidents, sports injuries, hyperextension, rotation of the knee during falls, or direct violence. During the injury process, the traction of the anterior cruciate ligament will cause avulsion and displacement of the fracture. Intercondylar ridge fracture were first described by Poncet as early as 1875. and the classic X-ray classification system was proposed by Meyers and McKeever 3 , which was updated and improved by Zaricznyj in 1977 and is still used today. 4 . Treatment of different types of intercondylar ridge fractures: For type I fractures, conservative treatment with plaster immobilization and regular follow-up is generally recommended because the fracture is relatively stable and the tension of the anterior cruciate ligament is acceptable. Type II and III fractures are prone to secondary meniscus and cartilage damage and accelerated joint wear and degeneration due to fracture displacement, loss of tension of the anterior cruciate ligament, and instability of the knee joint. Surgical treatment is generally required. The surgical methods mainly include traditional open reduction and internal fixation and arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation. Open reduction and internal fixation is a relatively old surgical method. With the continuous development of arthroscopic technology and the concept of small incisions, early and rapid recovery and return to sports, arthroscopic minimally invasive surgery has gradually become the mainstream. Arthroscopic surgical methods include wire fixation, screw fixation 5 and suture fixation 6 . Among them, Orthcord sutures have better flexibility than wires and screws, and there is no need to remove the implants again after surgery. The non-metallic material does not affect security checks and imaging examinations such as MRI in normal life. This article selected 80 patients with intercondylar eminence fractures admitted to our hospital from October 2020 to March 2024, aiming to explore the effectiveness and economic value of Orthcord suture fixation. 2 Data and methods 2.1 General data A total of 80 patients with intercondylar eminence fractures who were hospitalized in our hospital from October 2020 to March 2024 were selected. All patients underwent knee joint X-ray, CT and MRI examinations. Inclusion criteria: ① Patients aged>18 years and epiphysis closed; ② Clear diagnosis of Meyers-Mckeever II and III type fractures of the tibial intercondylar eminence; ③ Lachman test and anterior drawer test were positive; ④ The patient agreed to surgical treatment or actively cooperated and signed an informed consent form. Exclusion criteria: ① Patients with fractures around the knee joint (femur, patella, etc.) and vascular and nerve injuries ② Patients who were lost to follow-up for less than 3 months ③ Patients with posterior cruciate ligament rupture or medial collateral ligament rupture; All surgeries for this study were performed by the same team, and the study was approved by the ethics committee of this institution. 2.2 Pre-treatment evaluation Among all patients, 57 were injured in traffic accidents, 10 were injured in slips or falls, 8 were injured in sports such as basketball, football, and badminton, and 5 were injured in falls. The 80 patients were divided into three groups according to the treatment they received: high-strength suture Orthcord group (n = 30): 17 males, 13 females, 11 Meyers-Mckeever type II, 19 type III, wire group (n = 26): 14 males, 12 females, 12 Meyers-Mckeever type II, 15 type III; screw group (n = 24): 13 males, 11 females, 8 Meyers-Mckeever type II, 16 type III. The general data of the three groups of patients are shown in Table 1 . The tibial intercondylar eminence is the attachment point of the anterior cruciate ligament to the tibia. There is more blood accumulation in the knee joint after fracture, and the knee joint is swollen 7. Acute injuries usually cannot use scoring scales to assess activity levels. The knee joint is usually in a slightly flexed position, Therefore this study used X-rays (anteroposterior and lateral X-rays of the knee joint, Fig. 1a & 1b) to determine the displacement of the fracture and 3D CT to provide a more accurate fracture type (Fig. 2a 2b 2c), Magnetic resonance imaging is used to assess the tension of the patient's cruciate ligament. At the same time, imaging examinations are used to exclude patients with other injuries (such as the medial collateral ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, etc.).. Table 1 Comparison of general data of patients in the three groups Grouping age weight Sex Side (left/right) type(II/III) M F Wire (26) 38.5 ± 9.75 67.6 ± 8.46 14 12 13/13 12/14 Screw (24) 38.3 ± 10.8 65.9 ± 11.8 14 10 10/14 12/12 Suture(30) 38.6 ± 11.2 65.1 ± 10.39 17 13 14/16 12/18 F/X 2 0.003 0.404 0.105 0.352 0.559 P 0.997 0.66 0.949 0.839 0.756 2.3 Surgical method: 2.3.1 Orthcord suture group: establish a conventional approach to the knee joint (anterolateral and anteromedial), use the arthroscopic power system to clean the blood accumulation in the suprapatellar bursa, synovium and infrapatellar fat pad that blocks the field of vision, and after the field of vision is clear, clean the blood scab and soft tissue under the intercondylar eminence fracture to expose the fracture fragment and bone bed. Use curved forceps and probe hooks to reduce the fracture fragment, and use 1–2 1.0 Kirschner wires percutaneously to reduce and fix the fracture fragment. Make a small incision below the tibial tuberosity, and use the ACL reconstruction locator to insert two 2.0 Kirschner wires to create a bone tunnel on the anterior medial and anterolateral sides of the bone bed (Figs. 3a and 3b). The external openings of the bone tunnels are all located on the medial side of the tibial tubercle, and the distance between the bone tunnels is more than 1 cm. Through the arthroscopic approach, use right-angle forceps to introduce a double-strand Orthcord high-strength suture, bypass the anterior cruciate ligament in an "8-shaped" fixation, and introduce double-strand steel wires to lead out the Orthcord high-strength suture. After the fracture fragment is properly adjusted to a good position, the suture is tightened and tied at the external opening to fix it. After it is firmly fixed, observe with an arthroscope for any impact and move the knee joint throughout the range of motion. 2.3.2 Steel wire fixation group : fracture reduction and temporary fixation are the same as above. Double-strand steel wires are introduced through the tibial bone tunnel and then pulled out from the arthroscopic approach. The outer wire is used as a guide to pull out the inner double-strand steel wire. After the fracture fragment position is properly adjusted to a satisfactory level and the wire tension is adjusted, it can be tightened. The wire tension should be moderate to prevent the wire from breaking due to excessive pressure and excessive cutting of the fracture fragment. 2.3.3 Hollow screw group : fracture reduction is the same as above. Two small incisions are made on the inner and outer sides of the patella, and the hollow screw guide pin is inserted and fixed through the parapatellar incision. The guide pin positions are more than 4 mm apart, and there is enough space to insert the hollow screw. After confirming that the fracture fragment is in a good position, screw in the hollow pressure screw and use a gasket if necessary. 2.4 Postoperative rehabilitation All three groups of patients were fixed in the straight position with braces immediately after surgery. After 5 days of cotton leg pressure bandage, the cotton leg was removed and knee flexion functional exercise was performed once. Knee flexion functional exercise was performed again in the second week after surgery. After 3 weeks, knee flexion exercises were performed every other day, and the knee flexion angle was increased by 10° every week. The affected limb was not weight-bearing with crutches within 6 weeks. After 6 weeks, the patient gradually walked with weight under the protection of the brace, and the brace was completely removed after 3 months. 2.5 Postoperative follow-up observation and clinical evaluation The patients were reexamined at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after surgery, and X-ray or CT three-dimensional reconstruction was performed to evaluate the fracture healing, MRI examination was performed to evaluate the tension of the anterior cruciate ligament, and the changes in the angle of the patient's knee joint were recorded in time. Six months after surgery, the Lysholm score was used to objectively evaluate the patient's recovery, and the Lachman test was performed to determine the stability of the anterior cruciate ligament. 2.6 Statistical methods The data collected in the study were analyzed using spss 26.0 software, and the graphs were drawn using GraphPad Prism 8 software. The measurement data such as age, weight, time and score, as well as the patient's hospitalization time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative knee function score (Lysholm score of the knee joint 3 months and 1 year after surgery) were expressed as ‾x ± s and analyzed by variance. The measurement data such as gender and recurrence rate were tested by chi-square test. and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. 3 Results There was no statistical difference in the general data of all patients. All patients were followed -up for 1 year after surgery. and bone union was achieved without infection, displacement, or bone malunion. The Lachman test and drawer test were negative after surgery. The hospitalization time of the wire group was (11 ± 1.02) days, the screw group was (11.58 ± 1.61) days, and the Orhtcord suture was shortened to (10.03 ± 1.07) days. The difference between the three groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). At the same time, the cost of the Orhtcord suture surgery (1310.7 ± 0.29) $ was significantly lower than that of the other two groups (P < 0.05). In terms of operation time, the suture group (68.13 ± 1.11min) was significantly shorter than the wire group (76.76 ± 11.57min) and the screw group (90.62 ± 1.99min) (P < 0.05). In the follow-up, the score of Orhtcord suture at 3 months after surgery (94.07 ± 2.72 points) was better than that of the wire group (90.23 ± 5.23 points) and the screw group (90.37 ± 5.41 points); the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). See Table 2 4 Discussion Tibial ridge fractures are anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) avulsion fractures. Previous studies have found that this type of injury is most common in children (between 8 and 14 years old), but it has also been observed in adults. Tibial ridge fractures account for 2–5% of all pediatric knee injuries and 3% of all adult ACL injuries, with an incidence of approximately 3 per 100,000 children per year. 8 Although tibial ridge fractures are relatively rare in adults in previous studies, with the popularity of electric vehicles and frequent traffic accidents in recent years, the number of adult ridge fractures has been increasing year by year. In previous studies, Noyes FR 9 studied the biomechanics of anterior cruciate ligament failure caused by anterior cruciate ligament insertion injury in primates and found that the tibial intercondylar ridge is a bony protuberance between the medial and lateral condylar articular surfaces of the tibia. The anterior and posterior positions of the protuberance are the attachment points of the meniscus and the anterior cruciate ligament. It is anatomically divided into four different areas - the medial and lateral intercondylar spines and the anterior and posterior recesses, and serves as the attachment points of the cruciate ligament and the meniscus. Type I intercondylar ridge fractures can be treated conservatively due to their relatively stable position, but for type II and type III fractures, due to the instability of the fracture, if not promptly treated surgically, the anterior cruciate ligament will fail 10 , which will in turn affect the stability of the knee joint, cause meniscus tearing, and eventually cause articular cartilage wear and development of osteoarthritis. Therefore, the goal of treatment is to restore stability and eliminate mechanical obstruction through anatomical reduction and stable internal fixation, which will help to resume exercise early, improve the quality of life, and thus avoid further joint damage. Traditional surgery for intercondylar ridge fractures is open fracture reduction and internal fixation. In the 1980s, people began to use arthroscopic minimally invasive techniques to treat intercondylar ridge fractures. With the continuous development and maturity of arthroscopic technology, it has become the mainstream method for treating intercondylar ridge fractures 11 . Current surgical methods for treating intercondylar ridge fractures include Kirschner wires, metal screws, wire anchors, and various biomaterials, such as Orthcord sutures and Ethicon sutures. Each of these various treatment options has its own advantages and disadvantages. There is no unified gold standard for which treatment option is better. Although there are many controversies about the preferred method for treating type II and type III fractures, the main difference is the choice of fixation 12 . For example, Kirschner wire fixation, although economical and convenient, studies have shown 13 that Kirschner wires cannot firmly fix comminuted and small fracture fragments. In the long term, due to the risk of infection, loosening, and dislocation of the tail end of the Kirschner wire, it cannot be used as the preferred method. Regarding metal screws, Coyle et al. 14 believed that metal screws are suitable for larger fracture fragments, and that the nut poses a risk of cutting the ACL. Poor screw positioning can easily cause intercondylar fossa impact and aggravate cartilage damage. Liao et al. 15 reported that there was no difference between absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in repairing tibial intercondylar eminence fractures. The study by Sekiya et al. 16 showed that titanium plates with loops are also a easy, effective, and strong internal fixation method. In addition, related studies have also shown that suture fixation has greater advantages than screws and wires. Wust et al. 17 reported that Orthcord fiber sutures have better biomechanical properties than traditional arthroscopic repair of absorbable latex polydioxanone 18 . Tsukada et al. 19 compared the biomechanical effects of different methods such as hollow nails and high-strength sutures in the treatment of tibial intercondylar eminence fractures and proposed that the fixation strength of suture fixation is not weaker than that of hollow nails. In addition, compared with screws, sutures cause less damage to the anterior cruciate ligament and are more reliable. They have achieved very good results in clinical studies.. Eggers et al. 20 found that suture fixation provides greater strength than screw fixation in a porcine model. In the current study, all patients had good follow-up results compared with preoperative results in terms of both radiological and clinical examination. This supports the effectiveness of the Orthcord suture technique in repairing adult tibial intercondylar eminence fractures. This suggests that the Orthcord suture method is a very effective method for treating adult tibial intercondylar eminence fractures. This view is also supported by a systematic retrospective analysis by Eggers et al. 21, who compared different internal fixation methods such as wires, screws, non-absorbable sutures, and anchors. Although different methods can achieve good treatment results, the Orthcord suture has less irritation to the joint and does not require secondary removal of the internal fixator, and studies have shown that the Orthocord suture combines flexibility and fixation strength, and the knot safety is better than that of the Aixibang 22 . At the same time, in our study, there were 2 cases of internal fixation fracture in the steel wire group, which is an unavoidable situation when using steel wire fixation. The cutting force generated by the steel wire on various parts of the knee joint can directly affect or limit the patient's early postoperative activities, and even cause traumatic arthritis 23 . The knee joint is a multi-activity weight-bearing joint, and the fracture will inevitably produce stress on the steel wire during the growth process, causing metal fatigue to a certain extent, and eventually leading to the fracture of the internal fixation. However, there was no such complication for patients using Orthcord sutures. In addition, in terms of treatment costs, both steel wires and screws need to be removed a second time, especially the removal of screws requires the help of arthroscopy, which will eventually lead to costs far higher than the Orthcord suture group. And Orthocord sutures are non-absorbable polyethylene and PDS synthetic sterile sutures with good biocompatibility. They not only have the characteristics of high strength and high wear resistance, but also have less cutting force on soft tissues, thus ensuring the stability of the bone fragment during postoperative knee flexion and extension exercises 24–25 . In addition, in terms of surgical technique, the key requirement for the reduction of intercondylar spine fractures is not to destroy the posterior fibers of the fracture fragment. When fixing, it is only necessary to press down the front end of the tilted part to achieve the requirements of anatomical reduction. During the reduction process, it is often found that the anterior horn of the meniscus or the transverse ligament of the knee is stuck in the gap between the broken ends of the intercondylar spine fracture. At this time, the transverse ligament of the knee or the meniscus should be properly handled. In most cases, the transverse ligament of the knee needs to be planed so that the bone bed can be fully exposed to fully expose the surgical field for easy reduction. Intercondylar spine fractures are rarely combined with anterior cruciate ligament rupture or tibial plateau fracture. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries are mostly partial ruptures. For those with anterior cruciate ligament ruptures, primary or secondary ligament reconstruction should be performed according to the ligament rupture. For those with tibial plateau fractures, the tibial plateau fracture should be reduced at the same time, and then the intercondylar spine fracture should be reduced and fixed internally. Compared with other surgeries, sutures do not need to be shaped, which greatly shortens the operation time and can better restore the tension of the anterior cruciate ligament 26–29 . Currently, many surgical methods have been developed for the treatment of tibial intercondylar eminence fractures 30–33 , all of which can restore the anatomical structure of the intercondylar ridge fracture and restore the tension of the anterior cruciate ligament. However, there are still many problems to be solved, such as knee extension dysfunction and postoperative anterior cruciate ligament laxity. This surgery has many advantages, including: arthroscopic surgery has lower morbidity and faster recovery compared to open surgery. Compared with screw and wire fixation, this technique uses suture fixation, eliminating the possibility of secondary surgery to remove traditional internal fixators. This technique fixes the lower end of the anterior cruciate with better stability and minimizes ligament creep. It also eliminates physical damage, implant irritation, and impact caused by poor fixation position caused by internal fixators. However, this study also has some limitations. First, as a retrospective analysis, the current study only provides limited clinical diagnosis and treatment evidence and lacks mechanical analysis. Second, the sample size is relatively small, and the study will continue and extend the follow-up time. Third, this study did not include type IV comminuted fractures and small avulsed bone fragments, which still need further supplementary research. 5 Conclusion Using Orhtcord sutures to treat intercondylar ridge fractures under arthroscopy can shorten the hospital stay and operation time, and greatly reduce the cost of hospitalization. It can achieve better short-term (3 months) recovery effect on the basis of avoiding secondary surgery, and the fixation effect is not weaker than that of conventional screws and wires when fully weight-bearing recovery is finally achieved. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Nanyang Orthopedic Hospital; KJGG123). The patients/participants provided written informed consent to participate in this study. Consent for publication Not applicable Availability of data and materials All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Funding This study was supported by the Henan Provincial Health Commission Project Plan (No. KJGG123) and the 2023 Weifang Science and Technology Development Plan (Medical) Project (No. 2023YX115); 2024 Weifang Health Commission Scientific Research Project Plan (No. WFWSJK-2024-133) Author contributions RF-Z and HB-L designed this study. Data were acquired byYQ-W,YX-Q and CY-W. RF-Zand YQ-W analyzed the data. All authors participated in the interpretation of the data. All reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Acknowledgements Not applicable Correspondence to: HongBo Liu, Department of Sports Medicine, Weifang Yidu Central Hospital, WeiFang 262500, ShanDong, P.R. China E-mail address: [email protected] References Tuca M., Bernal N., Luderowski E., Green D.W. Tibial spine avulsion fractures: Treatment update. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2019;31:103–111. Meyers M.H., McKeever K.F. Fracture of the intercondylar eminence of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959;41-A:209–220. discussion 220-222. Meyers MH, McKeever FM. Fracture of the intercondylar eminence of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1959;41:209-222. Zaricznyj B. Avulsion fracture of the tibial eminence: Treatment by open reduction and pinning. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977;59:1111-1114. Tibial Spine Avulsion Fracture Fixation Using a Re-tensionable All-Suture Construct Stokes DJ, Sanchez RA, Williams BT, Strassman AK, Shinsako KK, DiFelice GS, Frank RM.Arthrosc Tech. 2024 Apr 4;13(7):102983. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.102983. eCollection 2024 Jul. DeFroda S.F., Hodax J.D., Shah K.N., Cruz A.I. Tibial eminence fracture repair with double Hewson suture passer technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2017;6:e1275–e1279. Evangelopoulos D S,Kohls S，SchwienbacheＲS，et al．Collagen application reduces complication rates of mid-substance ACL tears treated with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization，2017，25( 8) : 2414-2419 Strauss E.J., Kaplan D.J., Weinberg M.E., Egol J., Jazrawi L.M. Arthroscopic management of tibial spine avulsion fractures: Principles and techniques. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26:360–367. Noyes FR, DeLucas JL, Torvik PJ. Biomechanics of anterior cruciate ligament failure: an analysis of strainW.K. Accousti, R.B. Willis / Orthop Clin N Am 34 (2003) 365–375 373rate sensitivity and mechanisms of failure in primates. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974;56(2):236 – 53. Malige A, Baghdadi S, Hast MW, Schmidt EC, Shea KG, Ganley TJ. Biomechanical properties of common graft choices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review.2022 May;95:105636. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech. Tuca M., Bernal N., Luderowski E., Green D.W. Tibial spine avulsion fractures: Treatment update. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2019;31:103–111. Li J, Yu Y, Liu C, Su X, Liao W, Li Z. Arthroscopic fixation of tibial eminence fractures: A biomechanical comparative study of screw, suture, and suture anchor. Arthroscopy 2018;34:1608-1616. Yonghong，fan .Arthroscopic treatment of tibial intercondylar spine in children using proximal Kirschner wire tension band fixation via epiphysis Analysis of therapeutic effect，2019，34：177-178. Coyle C，Jagernauth S，Ramachandran M. Tibial eminence fractures in the paediatric population： a systematic review. J Child Orthop， 2014，8（2）：149-159. Li J, Yu Y, Liu C, Su X, Liao W, Li Z. Arthroscopic fixation of tibial eminence fractures: A biomechanical comparative study of screw, suture, and suture anchor. Arthroscopy 2018;34:1608-1616 Liao W., Li Z., Zhang H., Li J., Wang K., Yang Y. Arthroscopic fixation of tibial eminence fractures: A clinical comparative study of nonabsorbable sutures versus absorbable suture anchors. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:1639–1650. Tuca M., Bernal N., Luderowski E., Green D.W. Tibial spine avulsion fractures: Treatment update. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2019;31:103–111. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000719. Yuan L., Shi R., Chen Z., Ding W., Tan H. The most economical arthroscopic suture fixation for tibial intercondylar eminence avulsion fracture without any implant. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2022;17:327. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03219-w. Tsukada H, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Hiraga Y, Toh S. A biomechanical comparison of repair techniques for anterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fracture under cyclic loading. Arthroscopy 2005;21:1197-1201 Eggers AK, Becker C, Weimann A, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of different fixation methods for tibial eminence fractures. Am J Sports Med 2007;35:404-410. Eggers AK, Becker C, Weimann A, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of different fixation methods for tibial eminence fracture. Am J.Sports Med, 2007, 35(3): 404⁃410. Ilahi OA, Younas SA, Ho DM, et al. Security of knots tied with ethibond, fiberwire, orthocord, or ultrabraid. ,2008, 36(12): 2407⁃2414. Strauss E.J., Kaplan D.J., Weinberg M.E., Egol J., Jazrawi L.M. Arthroscopic Management of Tibial Spine Avulsion Fractures: Principles and Techniques. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2018;26:360–367. Rudran B, Little C, Wiik A, Logishetty K.Tibial Plateau Fracture: Anatomy, Diagnosis and Management 2020 Oct 2;81(10):1-9.doi: 10.12968 shinch，LeeDJ，Ｃhoilh，etal．Ｃlinicaandradio－logicalout comes of arthroscpically assisted can nulated screw fixation for tibial eminence fracture in children and adlolescents．BMC Musculoske let Disrod，2018.19（1）:41 Tibial Spine Avulsion Fracture Fixation Using a Re-tensionable All-Suture Construct.Arthrosc Tech. 2024 Jul; 13(7): 102983. Kobayashi S., Harato K., Udagawa K., Masumoto K., Jinnouchi M., Toyoda T., Niki Y. Arthroscopic Treatment of Tibial Eminence Avulsion Fracture with Suture Tensioning Technique. Arthrosc. Tech. 2018;7:e251–e256. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.08.078. Green D., Tuca M., Luderowski E., Gausden E., Goodbody C., Konin G. A new, MRI-based classification system for tibial spine fractures changes clinical treatment recommendations when compared to Myers and Mckeever. Knee Surgery Sport. Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2019;27:86–92. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5039-7. Sekiya H., Takatoku K., Kimura A., Kanaya Y., Fukushima T., Takeshita K. Arthroscopic Fixation with EndoButton for Tibial Eminence Fractures Visualised through a Proximal Superomedial Portal: A Surgical Technique. J. Orthop. Surg. 2016;24:417–420. doi: 10.1177/1602400329. Chu Y., Hu T., Chen M., Jiang C., Wu Z., Shi J. Preliminary clinical outcomes of the double-row anchor suture-bridge technique for the fixation of tibial intercondylar eminence fractures in adults: A 12-months minimal follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2021;22:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-03948-9. Dung T.T., Du H.G., Long N.H., Son L.M., Thanh D.X., Son D.N., Tuyen N.T., Van Minh D., Phương N.H., Nam V.T., et al. Arthroscopic fixation of ACL avulsion fracture in the saint pault hospital: A review of treatment outcomes: Cohort study. Ann. Med. Surg. 2019;48:91–94. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.07.008. Arthroscopic treatment of tibial intercondylar eminence fractures in skeletally immature patients with bioabsorbable nails. Pediatr Med Chir. 2022 Oct 28;44(s1). doi: 10.4081/pmc.2022.299. Figure A female patient was hospitalized for tram injury. Her knee joint was obviously swollen. X-ray examination of the knee joint showed a fracture of the lower insertion point of the anterior cruciate ligament and a raised fracture fragment (the red arrows in the figure show the intercondylar ridge fracture 1a & 1b) In addition to X-rays, intra-articular fractures usually require CT three-dimensional reconstruction to further clarify the fracture situation. Three-dimensional reconstruction can show displacement of the lower insertion point of the fracture. As shown in Figure 3a, an arthroscopic approach is established to clear the blood in the joint to expose the fracture fragment and thoroughly clean the bone bed. 3b, an anteromedial and anterolateral bone tunnels are established under the guidance of the locator. As shown in Figure 3a, an arthroscopic approach is established to clear the blood in the joint to expose the fracture fragment and thoroughly clean the bone bed. 3b, an anteromedial and anterolateral bone tunnels are established under the guidance of the locator. cleaning the blood clots around the fracture, the ligament-connected fracture fragment was seen to be lifted up (4a & 4b), which was consistent with the preoperative MRI examination results. (The red arrow in Figure 4c shows that the anterior cruciate ligament is loose, the fracture fragment is lifted up, and the ligament loses tension) During the operation, Kirschner wires were used to temporarily fix the fracture fragments (4d) to maintain a stable position, and an anterior cruciate ligament locator was used to create a tibial bone tunnel (4e). After the bone tunnel was made, Orthcord sutures were introduced and cross-fixed. The tension of the anterior cruciate ligament was restored (4f). The wound was minimally invasive and beautiful. The first dressing change after the operation was minimally invasive and did not require suture removal. It was beautiful and did not require suture removal (4g). Postoperative knee joint MRI (5a & 5b) was performed. MRI showed that the tension of the anterior cruciate ligament was significantly restored compared with that before the operation (indicated by the red arrow: Figure 5a shows that the anterior cruciate ligament lost tension, and Figure 5b shows that the ligament tension was restored after fixation) Postoperative review of the knee joint CT three-dimensional reconstruction showed that the fracture was well reduced (5c) was the preoperative CT, and postoperative (5d) showed that the fracture was well reduced. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5256408","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":366249603,"identity":"88f5f173-cbfd-4646-938b-a0c16ccb2d44","order_by":0,"name":"Rongfang Zhang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Nanyang Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital (Nanyang Orthopedic Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Rongfang","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhang","suffix":""},{"id":366249604,"identity":"e88243be-4357-45d5-822c-3b4341919ad2","order_by":1,"name":"Yuqi Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Yidu Central Hospital of Weifang","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yuqi","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""},{"id":366249605,"identity":"8f11c7de-78cc-460f-b365-76db19c6bf70","order_by":2,"name":"Chunyu Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Yidu Central Hospital of Weifang","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Chunyu","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""},{"id":366249606,"identity":"01b0d758-9367-40e6-8b23-40b8a4a5e0c6","order_by":3,"name":"Yuanxin Qiao","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Nanyang Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital (Nanyang Orthopedic Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yuanxin","middleName":"","lastName":"Qiao","suffix":""},{"id":366249607,"identity":"f29d7f21-76fd-4557-b89b-4adf20f29de7","order_by":4,"name":"HongBo Liu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Yidu Central Hospital of Weifang","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"HongBo","middleName":"","lastName":"Liu","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-10-13 17:23:07","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5256408/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5256408/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":67280820,"identity":"9c478814-36dc-40bd-b28b-f094d9636bbe","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-23 09:00:21","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":466377,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eLegend not included with this version\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"fig1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5256408/v1/c70858ce6e2fa18168f2f6a1.png"},{"id":67280833,"identity":"fa72e531-84ff-4bbc-9eb0-a520306ab570","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-23 09:00:21","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":631493,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eLegend not included with this version\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"fig2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5256408/v1/c3c2f57f191db22bede2e529.png"},{"id":67281923,"identity":"8c62044d-40e7-42e0-91e5-239065ad95c5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-23 09:08:21","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":895735,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eLegend not included with this version\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"fig3ab.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5256408/v1/2d2ac889a59304c81f0b5d00.png"},{"id":67280858,"identity":"39e1c74e-c122-45ab-abbf-90844eb3f2e7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-23 09:00:21","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1494919,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eLegend not included with this version\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"fig4abc.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5256408/v1/0eff5e919ff1996bdd8f87a9.png"},{"id":67280821,"identity":"b41a8aa7-4594-44e1-9cde-ce9d104399b9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-23 09:00:21","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1166032,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eLegend not included with this version\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"fig5ab.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5256408/v1/5929151bf6546d72cc7fbc04.png"},{"id":73423211,"identity":"e5cdcc67-9693-4355-b1bd-ca7926474b4a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-01-09 19:31:33","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":5372183,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5256408/v1/9810a950-44bd-4923-8a26-a75d6a7d887c.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Clinical efficacy analysis of arthroscopically assisted Orthcord suture fixation in the treatment of tibial intercondylar eminence fractures: a retrospective case-control study","fulltext":[{"header":"1 Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eTibial intercondylar spine fracture is called anterior cruciate ligament inferior insertion avulsion fracture\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. In recent years, with the increase of various sports injuries and traffic accidents, intercondylar ridge fracture has gradually become a common intra-articular fracture of the knee, and the incidence rate is getting higher and higher\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. In tram accidents, knee valgus or rotational stress and hyperextension of the knee are likely to cause intercondylar ridge avulsion fractures, which account for 2\u0026ndash;5% of all knee injuries. The injury mechanism is mostly caused by motor vehicle accidents, sports injuries, hyperextension, rotation of the knee during falls, or direct violence. During the injury process, the traction of the anterior cruciate ligament will cause avulsion and displacement of the fracture. Intercondylar ridge fracture were first described by Poncet as early as 1875. and the classic X-ray classification system was proposed by Meyers and McKeever\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, which was updated and improved by Zaricznyj in 1977 and is still used today.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTreatment of different types of intercondylar ridge fractures: For type I fractures, conservative treatment with plaster immobilization and regular follow-up is generally recommended because the fracture is relatively stable and the tension of the anterior cruciate ligament is acceptable. Type II and III fractures are prone to secondary meniscus and cartilage damage and accelerated joint wear and degeneration due to fracture displacement, loss of tension of the anterior cruciate ligament, and instability of the knee joint. Surgical treatment is generally required. The surgical methods mainly include traditional open reduction and internal fixation and arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation. Open reduction and internal fixation is a relatively old surgical method. With the continuous development of arthroscopic technology and the concept of small incisions, early and rapid recovery and return to sports, arthroscopic minimally invasive surgery has gradually become the mainstream. Arthroscopic surgical methods include wire fixation, screw fixation\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and suture fixation\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Among them, Orthcord sutures have better flexibility than wires and screws, and there is no need to remove the implants again after surgery. The non-metallic material does not affect security checks and imaging examinations such as MRI in normal life. This article selected 80 patients with intercondylar eminence fractures admitted to our hospital from October 2020 to March 2024, aiming to explore the effectiveness and economic value of Orthcord suture fixation.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2 Data and methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e2.1 General data\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eA total of 80 patients with intercondylar eminence fractures who were hospitalized in our hospital from October 2020 to March 2024 were selected. All patients underwent knee joint X-ray, CT and MRI examinations. Inclusion criteria: ① Patients aged\u0026gt;18 years and epiphysis closed; ② Clear diagnosis of Meyers-Mckeever II and III type fractures of the tibial intercondylar eminence; ③ Lachman test and anterior drawer test were positive; ④ The patient agreed to surgical treatment or actively cooperated and signed an informed consent form. Exclusion criteria: ① Patients with fractures around the knee joint (femur, patella, etc.) and vascular and nerve injuries ② Patients who were lost to follow-up for less than 3 months ③ Patients with posterior cruciate ligament rupture or medial collateral ligament rupture;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAll surgeries for this study were performed by the same team, and the study was approved by the ethics committee of this institution.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e2.2 Pre-treatment evaluation\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAmong all patients, 57 were injured in traffic accidents, 10 were injured in slips or falls, 8 were injured in sports such as basketball, football, and badminton, and 5 were injured in falls. The 80 patients were divided into three groups according to the treatment they received: high-strength suture Orthcord group (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;30): 17 males, 13 females, 11 Meyers-Mckeever type II, 19 type III, wire group (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;26): 14 males, 12 females, 12 Meyers-Mckeever type II, 15 type III; screw group (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;24): 13 males, 11 females, 8 Meyers-Mckeever type II, 16 type III. The general data of the three groups of patients are shown in Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e. The tibial intercondylar eminence is the attachment point of the anterior cruciate ligament to the tibia. There is more blood accumulation in the knee joint after fracture, and the knee joint is swollen 7. Acute injuries usually cannot use scoring scales to assess activity levels. The knee joint is usually in a slightly flexed position, Therefore this study used X-rays (anteroposterior and lateral X-rays of the knee joint, Fig. 1a \u0026amp; 1b) to determine the displacement of the fracture and 3D CT to provide a more accurate fracture type (Fig. 2a 2b 2c), Magnetic resonance imaging is used to assess the tension of the patient\u0026apos;s cruciate ligament. At the same time, imaging examinations are used to exclude patients with other injuries (such as the medial collateral ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, etc.)..\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003ctable id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eComparison of general data of patients in the three groups\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGrouping\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eage\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eweight\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSex\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSide (left/right)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003etype(II/III)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eF\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWire (26)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e38.5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;9.75\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e67.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;8.46\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13/13\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12/14\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eScrew (24)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e38.3\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;10.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e65.9\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;11.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10/14\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12/12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSuture(30)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e38.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;11.2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e65.1\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;10.39\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e17\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14/16\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12/18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eF/X\u003c/strong\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.003\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.404\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.105\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.352\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.559\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eP\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.997\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.66\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.949\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.839\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.756\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cimg src=\"https://myfiles.space/user_files/122228_c8a1650c59388082/122228_custom_files/img1729072161.png\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e2.3 Surgical method:\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.3.1\u003c/strong\u003e Orthcord suture group: establish a conventional approach to the knee joint (anterolateral and anteromedial), use the arthroscopic power system to clean the blood accumulation in the suprapatellar bursa, synovium and infrapatellar fat pad that blocks the field of vision, and after the field of vision is clear, clean the blood scab and soft tissue under the intercondylar eminence fracture to expose the fracture fragment and bone bed. Use curved forceps and probe hooks to reduce the fracture fragment, and use 1\u0026ndash;2 1.0 Kirschner wires percutaneously to reduce and fix the fracture fragment. Make a small incision below the tibial tuberosity, and use the ACL reconstruction locator to insert two 2.0 Kirschner wires to create a bone tunnel on the anterior medial and anterolateral sides of the bone bed (Figs. 3a and 3b). The external openings of the bone tunnels are all located on the medial side of the tibial tubercle, and the distance between the bone tunnels is more than 1 cm. Through the arthroscopic approach, use right-angle forceps to introduce a double-strand Orthcord high-strength suture, bypass the anterior cruciate ligament in an \u0026quot;8-shaped\u0026quot; fixation, and introduce double-strand steel wires to lead out the Orthcord high-strength suture. After the fracture fragment is properly adjusted to a good position, the suture is tightened and tied at the external opening to fix it. After it is firmly fixed, observe with an arthroscope for any impact and move the knee joint throughout the range of motion.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.3.2 Steel wire fixation group\u003c/strong\u003e: fracture reduction and temporary fixation are the same as above. Double-strand steel wires are introduced through the tibial bone tunnel and then pulled out from the arthroscopic approach. The outer wire is used as a guide to pull out the inner double-strand steel wire. After the fracture fragment position is properly adjusted to a satisfactory level and the wire tension is adjusted, it can be tightened. The wire tension should be moderate to prevent the wire from breaking due to excessive pressure and excessive cutting of the fracture fragment.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.3.3 Hollow screw group\u003c/strong\u003e: fracture reduction is the same as above. Two small incisions are made on the inner and outer sides of the patella, and the hollow screw guide pin is inserted and fixed through the parapatellar incision. The guide pin positions are more than 4 mm apart, and there is enough space to insert the hollow screw. After confirming that the fracture fragment is in a good position, screw in the hollow pressure screw and use a gasket if necessary.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/span\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e2.4 Postoperative rehabilitation\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAll three groups of patients were fixed in the straight position with braces immediately after surgery. After 5 days of cotton leg pressure bandage, the cotton leg was removed and knee flexion functional exercise was performed once. Knee flexion functional exercise was performed again in the second week after surgery. After 3 weeks, knee flexion exercises were performed every other day, and the knee flexion angle was increased by 10\u0026deg; every week. The affected limb was not weight-bearing with crutches within 6 weeks. After 6 weeks, the patient gradually walked with weight under the protection of the brace, and the brace was completely removed after 3 months.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e2.5 Postoperative follow-up observation and clinical evaluation\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe patients were reexamined at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after surgery, and X-ray or CT three-dimensional reconstruction was performed to evaluate the fracture healing, MRI examination was performed to evaluate the tension of the anterior cruciate ligament, and the changes in the angle of the patient\u0026apos;s knee joint were recorded in time. Six months after surgery, the Lysholm score was used to objectively evaluate the patient\u0026apos;s recovery, and the Lachman test was performed to determine the stability of the anterior cruciate ligament.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e2.6 Statistical methods\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe data collected in the study were analyzed using spss 26.0 software, and the graphs were drawn using GraphPad Prism 8 software. The measurement data such as age, weight, time and score, as well as the patient\u0026apos;s hospitalization time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative knee function score (Lysholm score of the knee joint 3 months and 1 year after surgery) were expressed as \u003cstrong\u003e\u0026oline;x\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;s\u003c/strong\u003e and analyzed by variance. The measurement data such as gender and recurrence rate were tested by chi-square test. and P\u0026lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"3 Results","content":"\u003cp\u003e There was no statistical difference in the general data of all patients. All patients were followed -up for 1 year after surgery. and bone union was achieved without infection, displacement, or bone malunion. The Lachman test and drawer test were negative after surgery. The hospitalization time of the wire group was (11\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.02) days, the screw group was (11.58\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.61) days, and the Orhtcord suture was shortened to (10.03\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.07) days. The difference between the three groups was statistically significant (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). At the same time, the cost of the Orhtcord suture surgery (1310.7\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.29) \u003cspan\u003e$\u003c/span\u003e was significantly lower than that of the other two groups (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). In terms of operation time, the suture group (68.13\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.11min) was significantly shorter than the wire group (76.76\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;11.57min) and the screw group (90.62\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.99min) (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). In the follow-up, the score of Orhtcord suture at 3 months after surgery (94.07\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.72 points) was better than that of the wire group (90.23\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.23 points) and the screw group (90.37\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.41 points); the difference was statistically significant (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the Lysholm score among the three groups of patients at 6 months after surgery (96.26\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.89, 96.33\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.44, 97.3\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.70) (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). See Table\u0026nbsp;2\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"4 Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eTibial ridge fractures are anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) avulsion fractures. Previous studies have found that this type of injury is most common in children (between 8 and 14 years old), but it has also been observed in adults. Tibial ridge fractures account for 2\u0026ndash;5% of all pediatric knee injuries and 3% of all adult ACL injuries, with an incidence of approximately 3 per 100,000 children per year. 8 Although tibial ridge fractures are relatively rare in adults in previous studies, with the popularity of electric vehicles and frequent traffic accidents in recent years, the number of adult ridge fractures has been increasing year by year.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn previous studies, Noyes FR\u003csup\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e studied the biomechanics of anterior cruciate ligament failure caused by anterior cruciate ligament insertion injury in primates and found that the tibial intercondylar ridge is a bony protuberance between the medial and lateral condylar articular surfaces of the tibia. The anterior and posterior positions of the protuberance are the attachment points of the meniscus and the anterior cruciate ligament. It is anatomically divided into four different areas - the medial and lateral intercondylar spines and the anterior and posterior recesses, and serves as the attachment points of the cruciate ligament and the meniscus. Type I intercondylar ridge fractures can be treated conservatively due to their relatively stable position, but for type II and type III fractures, due to the instability of the fracture, if not promptly treated surgically, the anterior cruciate ligament will fail\u003csup\u003e10\u003c/sup\u003e, which will in turn affect the stability of the knee joint, cause meniscus tearing, and eventually cause articular cartilage wear and development of osteoarthritis. Therefore, the goal of treatment is to restore stability and eliminate mechanical obstruction through anatomical reduction and stable internal fixation, which will help to resume exercise early, improve the quality of life, and thus avoid further joint damage.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTraditional surgery for intercondylar ridge fractures is open fracture reduction and internal fixation. In the 1980s, people began to use arthroscopic minimally invasive techniques to treat intercondylar ridge fractures. With the continuous development and maturity of arthroscopic technology, it has become the mainstream method for treating intercondylar ridge fractures\u003csup\u003e11\u003c/sup\u003e. Current surgical methods for treating intercondylar ridge fractures include Kirschner wires, metal screws, wire anchors, and various biomaterials, such as Orthcord sutures and Ethicon sutures. Each of these various treatment options has its own advantages and disadvantages. There is no unified gold standard for which treatment option is better. Although there are many controversies about the preferred method for treating type II and type III fractures, the main difference is the choice of fixation\u003csup\u003e12\u003c/sup\u003e. For example, Kirschner wire fixation, although economical and convenient, studies have shown\u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003e that Kirschner wires cannot firmly fix comminuted and small fracture fragments. In the long term, due to the risk of infection, loosening, and dislocation of the tail end of the Kirschner wire, it cannot be used as the preferred method.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegarding metal screws, Coyle et al.\u003csup\u003e14\u003c/sup\u003e believed that metal screws are suitable for larger fracture fragments, and that the nut poses a risk of cutting the ACL. Poor screw positioning can easily cause intercondylar fossa impact and aggravate cartilage damage. Liao et al.\u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003e reported that there was no difference between absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in repairing tibial intercondylar eminence fractures. The study by Sekiya et al.\u003csup\u003e16\u003c/sup\u003e showed that titanium plates with loops are also a easy, effective, and strong internal fixation method. In addition, related studies have also shown that suture fixation has greater advantages than screws and wires. Wust et al.\u003csup\u003e17\u003c/sup\u003e reported that Orthcord fiber sutures have better biomechanical properties than traditional arthroscopic repair of absorbable latex polydioxanone\u003csup\u003e18\u003c/sup\u003e. Tsukada et al.\u003csup\u003e19\u003c/sup\u003ecompared the biomechanical effects of different methods such as hollow nails and high-strength sutures in the treatment of tibial intercondylar eminence fractures and proposed that the fixation strength of suture fixation is not weaker than that of hollow nails. In addition, compared with screws, sutures cause less damage to the anterior cruciate ligament and are more reliable. They have achieved very good results in clinical studies.. Eggers et al.\u003csup\u003e20\u003c/sup\u003e found that suture fixation provides greater strength than screw fixation in a porcine model.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the current study, all patients had good follow-up results compared with preoperative results in terms of both radiological and clinical examination. This supports the effectiveness of the Orthcord suture technique in repairing adult tibial intercondylar eminence fractures. This suggests that the Orthcord suture method is a very effective method for treating adult tibial intercondylar eminence fractures. This view is also supported by a systematic retrospective analysis by Eggers et al. 21, who compared different internal fixation methods such as wires, screws, non-absorbable sutures, and anchors. Although different methods can achieve good treatment results, the Orthcord suture has less irritation to the joint and does not require secondary removal of the internal fixator, and studies have shown that the Orthocord suture combines flexibility and fixation strength, and the knot safety is better than that of the Aixibang \u003csup\u003e22\u003c/sup\u003e. At the same time, in our study, there were 2 cases of internal fixation fracture in the steel wire group, which is an unavoidable situation when using steel wire fixation. The cutting force generated by the steel wire on various parts of the knee joint can directly affect or limit the patient's early postoperative activities, and even cause traumatic arthritis\u003csup\u003e23\u003c/sup\u003e. The knee joint is a multi-activity weight-bearing joint, and the fracture will inevitably produce stress on the steel wire during the growth process, causing metal fatigue to a certain extent, and eventually leading to the fracture of the internal fixation. However, there was no such complication for patients using Orthcord sutures. In addition, in terms of treatment costs, both steel wires and screws need to be removed a second time, especially the removal of screws requires the help of arthroscopy, which will eventually lead to costs far higher than the Orthcord suture group. And Orthocord sutures are non-absorbable polyethylene and PDS synthetic sterile sutures with good biocompatibility. They not only have the characteristics of high strength and high wear resistance, but also have less cutting force on soft tissues, thus ensuring the stability of the bone fragment during postoperative knee flexion and extension exercises\u003csup\u003e24\u0026ndash;25\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn addition, in terms of surgical technique, the key requirement for the reduction of intercondylar spine fractures is not to destroy the posterior fibers of the fracture fragment. When fixing, it is only necessary to press down the front end of the tilted part to achieve the requirements of anatomical reduction. During the reduction process, it is often found that the anterior horn of the meniscus or the transverse ligament of the knee is stuck in the gap between the broken ends of the intercondylar spine fracture. At this time, the transverse ligament of the knee or the meniscus should be properly handled. In most cases, the transverse ligament of the knee needs to be planed so that the bone bed can be fully exposed to fully expose the surgical field for easy reduction. Intercondylar spine fractures are rarely combined with anterior cruciate ligament rupture or tibial plateau fracture. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries are mostly partial ruptures. For those with anterior cruciate ligament ruptures, primary or secondary ligament reconstruction should be performed according to the ligament rupture. For those with tibial plateau fractures, the tibial plateau fracture should be reduced at the same time, and then the intercondylar spine fracture should be reduced and fixed internally. Compared with other surgeries, sutures do not need to be shaped, which greatly shortens the operation time and can better restore the tension of the anterior cruciate ligament\u003csup\u003e26\u0026ndash;29\u003c/sup\u003e. Currently, many surgical methods have been developed for the treatment of tibial intercondylar eminence fractures\u003csup\u003e30\u0026ndash;33\u003c/sup\u003e, all of which can restore the anatomical structure of the intercondylar ridge fracture and restore the tension of the anterior cruciate ligament. However, there are still many problems to be solved, such as knee extension dysfunction and postoperative anterior cruciate ligament laxity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis surgery has many advantages, including: arthroscopic surgery has lower morbidity and faster recovery compared to open surgery. Compared with screw and wire fixation, this technique uses suture fixation, eliminating the possibility of secondary surgery to remove traditional internal fixators. This technique fixes the lower end of the anterior cruciate with better stability and minimizes ligament creep. It also eliminates physical damage, implant irritation, and impact caused by poor fixation position caused by internal fixators.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHowever, this study also has some limitations. First, as a retrospective analysis, the current study only provides limited clinical diagnosis and treatment evidence and lacks mechanical analysis. Second, the sample size is relatively small, and the study will continue and extend the follow-up time. Third, this study did not include type IV comminuted fractures and small avulsed bone fragments, which still need further supplementary research.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"5 Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eUsing Orhtcord sutures to treat intercondylar ridge fractures under arthroscopy can shorten the hospital stay and operation time, and greatly reduce the cost of hospitalization. It can achieve better short-term (3 months) recovery effect on the basis of avoiding secondary surgery, and the fixation effect is not weaker than that of conventional screws and wires when fully weight-bearing recovery is finally achieved.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Nanyang Orthopedic Hospital; KJGG123). The patients/participants provided written informed consent to participate in this study.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and materials\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study was supported by the Henan Provincial Health Commission Project Plan (No. KJGG123) and the 2023 Weifang Science and Technology Development Plan (Medical) Project (No. 2023YX115); 2024 Weifang Health Commission Scientific Research Project Plan (No. WFWSJK-2024-133)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor contributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRF-Z and HB-L designed this study. Data were acquired byYQ-W,YX-Q and CY-W. RF-Zand YQ-W analyzed the data. All authors participated in the interpretation of the data. All reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eCorrespondence to: HongBo Liu,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDepartment of Sports Medicine,\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWeifang Yidu Central Hospital,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWeiFang 262500, ShanDong, P.R. China\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eE-mail address: [email protected]\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTuca M., Bernal N., Luderowski E., Green D.W. Tibial spine avulsion fractures: Treatment update. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2019;31:103\u0026ndash;111. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMeyers M.H., McKeever K.F. Fracture of the intercondylar eminence of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959;41-A:209\u0026ndash;220. discussion 220-222. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMeyers MH, McKeever FM. Fracture of the intercondylar eminence of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1959;41:209-222.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZaricznyj B. Avulsion fracture of the tibial eminence: Treatment by open reduction and pinning. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977;59:1111-1114.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTibial Spine Avulsion Fracture Fixation Using a Re-tensionable All-Suture Construct Stokes DJ, Sanchez RA, Williams BT, Strassman AK, Shinsako KK, DiFelice GS, Frank RM.Arthrosc Tech. 2024 Apr 4;13(7):102983. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.102983. eCollection 2024 Jul.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDeFroda S.F., Hodax J.D., Shah K.N., Cruz A.I. Tibial eminence fracture repair with double Hewson suture passer technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2017;6:e1275\u0026ndash;e1279.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEvangelopoulos D S,Kohls S，SchwienbacheＲS，et al．Collagen application reduces complication rates of mid-substance ACL tears treated with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization，2017，25( 8) : 2414-2419\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStrauss E.J., Kaplan D.J., Weinberg M.E., Egol J., Jazrawi L.M. Arthroscopic management of tibial spine avulsion fractures: Principles and techniques. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26:360\u0026ndash;367.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNoyes FR, DeLucas JL, Torvik PJ. Biomechanics of anterior cruciate ligament failure: an analysis of strainW.K. Accousti, R.B. Willis / Orthop Clin N Am 34 (2003) 365\u0026ndash;375 373rate sensitivity and mechanisms of failure in primates. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974;56(2):236 \u0026ndash; 53.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMalige A, Baghdadi S, Hast MW, Schmidt EC, Shea KG, Ganley TJ. Biomechanical properties of common graft choices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review.2022 May;95:105636. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTuca M., Bernal N., Luderowski E., Green D.W. Tibial spine avulsion fractures: Treatment update. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2019;31:103\u0026ndash;111. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLi J, Yu Y, Liu C, Su X, Liao W, Li Z. Arthroscopic fixation of tibial eminence fractures: A biomechanical comparative study of screw, suture, and suture anchor. Arthroscopy 2018;34:1608-1616.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYonghong，fan .Arthroscopic treatment of tibial intercondylar spine in children using proximal Kirschner wire tension band fixation via epiphysis Analysis of therapeutic effect，2019，34：177-178.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCoyle C，Jagernauth S，Ramachandran M. Tibial eminence fractures in the paediatric population： a systematic review. J Child Orthop， 2014，8（2）：149-159.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLi J, Yu Y, Liu C, Su X, Liao W, Li Z. Arthroscopic fixation of tibial eminence fractures: A biomechanical comparative study of screw, suture, and suture anchor. Arthroscopy 2018;34:1608-1616\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiao W., Li Z., Zhang H., Li J., Wang K., Yang Y. Arthroscopic fixation of tibial eminence fractures: A clinical comparative study of nonabsorbable sutures versus absorbable suture anchors. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:1639\u0026ndash;1650. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTuca M., Bernal N., Luderowski E., Green D.W. Tibial spine avulsion fractures: Treatment update. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2019;31:103\u0026ndash;111. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000719.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYuan L., Shi R., Chen Z., Ding W., Tan H. The most economical arthroscopic suture fixation for tibial intercondylar eminence avulsion fracture without any implant. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2022;17:327. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03219-w.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTsukada H, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Hiraga Y, Toh S. A biomechanical comparison of repair techniques for anterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fracture under cyclic loading. Arthroscopy 2005;21:1197-1201\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEggers AK, Becker C, Weimann A, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of different fixation methods for tibial eminence fractures. Am J Sports Med 2007;35:404-410.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEggers AK, Becker C, Weimann A, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of different fixation methods for tibial eminence fracture. Am J.Sports Med, 2007, 35(3): 404⁃410.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIlahi OA, Younas SA, Ho DM, et al. Security of knots tied with ethibond, fiberwire, orthocord, or ultrabraid. ,2008, 36(12): 2407⁃2414.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStrauss E.J., Kaplan D.J., Weinberg M.E., Egol J., Jazrawi L.M. Arthroscopic Management of Tibial Spine Avulsion Fractures: Principles and Techniques. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2018;26:360\u0026ndash;367.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRudran B, Little C, Wiik A, Logishetty K.Tibial Plateau Fracture: Anatomy, Diagnosis and Management 2020 Oct 2;81(10):1-9.doi: 10.12968\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eshinch，LeeDJ，Ｃhoilh，etal．Ｃlinicaandradio－logicalout comes of arthroscpically assisted can nulated screw fixation for tibial eminence fracture in children and adlolescents．BMC Musculoske let Disrod，2018.19（1）:41\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTibial Spine Avulsion Fracture Fixation Using a Re-tensionable All-Suture Construct.Arthrosc Tech. 2024 Jul; 13(7): 102983.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKobayashi S., Harato K., Udagawa K., Masumoto K., Jinnouchi M., Toyoda T., Niki Y. Arthroscopic Treatment of Tibial Eminence Avulsion Fracture with Suture Tensioning Technique. Arthrosc. Tech. 2018;7:e251\u0026ndash;e256. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.08.078. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGreen D., Tuca M., Luderowski E., Gausden E., Goodbody C., Konin G. A new, MRI-based classification system for tibial spine fractures changes clinical treatment recommendations when compared to Myers and Mckeever. Knee Surgery Sport. Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2019;27:86\u0026ndash;92. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5039-7. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSekiya H., Takatoku K., Kimura A., Kanaya Y., Fukushima T., Takeshita K. Arthroscopic Fixation with EndoButton for Tibial Eminence Fractures Visualised through a Proximal Superomedial Portal: A Surgical Technique. J. Orthop. Surg. 2016;24:417\u0026ndash;420. doi: 10.1177/1602400329.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChu Y., Hu T., Chen M., Jiang C., Wu Z., Shi J. Preliminary clinical outcomes of the double-row anchor suture-bridge technique for the fixation of tibial intercondylar eminence fractures in adults: A 12-months minimal follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2021;22:1\u0026ndash;9. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-03948-9.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDung T.T., Du H.G., Long N.H., Son L.M., Thanh D.X., Son D.N., Tuyen N.T., Van Minh D., Phương N.H., Nam V.T., et al. Arthroscopic fixation of ACL avulsion fracture in the saint pault hospital: A review of treatment outcomes: Cohort study. Ann. Med. Surg. 2019;48:91\u0026ndash;94. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.07.008.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eArthroscopic treatment of tibial intercondylar eminence fractures in skeletally immature patients with bioabsorbable nails. Pediatr Med Chir. 2022 Oct 28;44(s1). doi: 10.4081/pmc.2022.299.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e\n"},{"header":"Figure","content":"\u003cp\u003eA female patient was hospitalized for tram injury. Her knee joint was obviously swollen. X-ray examination of the knee joint showed a fracture of the lower insertion point of the anterior cruciate ligament and a raised fracture fragment (the red arrows in the figure show the intercondylar ridge fracture 1a \u0026amp; 1b)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to X-rays, intra-articular fractures usually require CT three-dimensional reconstruction to further clarify the fracture situation. Three-dimensional reconstruction can show displacement of the lower insertion point of the fracture.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs shown in Figure 3a, an arthroscopic approach is established to clear the blood in the joint to expose the fracture fragment and thoroughly clean the bone bed. 3b, an anteromedial and anterolateral bone tunnels are established under the guidance of the locator.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs shown in Figure 3a, an arthroscopic approach is established to clear the blood in the joint to expose the fracture fragment and thoroughly clean the bone bed. 3b, an anteromedial and anterolateral bone tunnels are established under the guidance of the locator.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ecleaning the blood clots around the fracture, the ligament-connected fracture fragment was seen to be lifted up (4a \u0026amp; 4b), which was consistent with the preoperative MRI examination results. (The red arrow in Figure 4c shows that the anterior cruciate ligament is loose, the fracture fragment is lifted up, and the ligament loses tension)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDuring the operation, Kirschner wires were used to temporarily fix the fracture fragments (4d) to maintain a stable position, and an anterior cruciate ligament locator was used to create a tibial bone tunnel (4e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter the bone tunnel was made, Orthcord sutures were introduced and cross-fixed. The tension of the anterior cruciate ligament was restored (4f). The wound was minimally invasive and beautiful. The first dressing change after the operation was minimally invasive and did not require suture removal. It was beautiful and did not require suture removal (4g).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePostoperative knee joint MRI (5a \u0026amp; 5b) was performed. MRI showed that the tension of the anterior cruciate ligament was significantly restored compared with that before the operation (indicated by the red arrow: Figure 5a shows that the anterior cruciate ligament lost tension, and Figure 5b shows that the ligament tension was restored after fixation)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePostoperative review of the knee joint CT three-dimensional reconstruction showed that the fracture was well reduced (5c) was the preoperative CT, and postoperative (5d) showed that the fracture was well reduced.\u003c/p\u003e\n"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"intercondylar eminence fracture, anterior cruciate ligament lower insertion avulsion fracture, Orhtcord suture, arthroscopic assisted surgery","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5256408/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5256408/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground: \u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;To explore the efficacy of arthroscopically assisted fixation of type II and type III tibial intercondylar eminence fractures with Orthcord sutures.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethod:\u003c/strong\u003e A retrospective analysis was performed on 80 patients with intercondylar eminence fractures admitted to our hospital from April 2020 to March 2024. According to different surgical methods, the patients were divided into special suture fixation group (n = 30), cannulated screw fixation group (n = 24), and wire fixation group (n = 26). The suture group used arthroscopic orthcord sutures to fix tibial intercondylar eminence fractures, and the cannulated screw group used cannulated compression screws for fixation. Patients in the wire group underwent arthroscopic wire fixation. The basic information of all patients was collected and followed up for 1 year. The Lysholm score of the knee joint was performed at 3 months and 1 year after surgery. The patients' general data, surgical conditions, operation time, blood loss, hospitalization costs, postoperative recovery (Lysholm score of knee joint at 3 months and 1 year after surgery) and other data were analyzed by variance analysis. P \u0026lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResult: \u003c/strong\u003eThere was no statistical difference in the general data of all patients. One-year follow-up showed that all patients had achieved bone healing without infection, displacement, or bone malformation. The hospitalization time in the wire group was (11 ± 1.02) days, the screw group was (11.58 ± 1.61) days, and the Orhtcord suture group was shortened to (10.03 ± 1.07) days. The differences among the three groups were statistically significant (P \u0026lt; 0.05). At the same time, the cost of Orhtcord suture surgery (1310.7 ± 0.29) $ was significantly lower than that of the other two groups (P＜0.05). The operation time of the suture group (68.13±1.11min) was significantly shorter than that of the wire group (76.76±11.57min) and the screw group (90.62±1.99min) (P＜0.05). In the follow-up, the score of Orhtcord suture 3 months after operation (94.07±2.72 points) was better than that of the wire group (90.23±5.23 points) and the screw group (90.37±5.41 points); the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the Lysholm score of the three groups of patients 6 months after operation (96.26±1.89, 96.33±2.44, 97.3±1.70) (P＞0.05).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusion:\u003c/strong\u003e The use of Orhtcord sutures in the arthroscopically assisted treatment of intercondylar ridge fractures can shorten the length of hospital stay and surgery, while greatly reducing hospitalization costs. It can achieve better short-term (3 months) recovery effects while avoiding secondary surgery, and ultimately show no weaker fixation effect than conventional screws and wires when fully weight-bearing is restored.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Clinical efficacy analysis of arthroscopically assisted Orthcord suture fixation in the treatment of tibial intercondylar eminence fractures: a retrospective case-control study","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-10-23 09:00:16","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5256408/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"a9d56689-e665-4810-8045-6427110e90c4","owner":[],"postedDate":"October 23rd, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-01-24T04:38:11+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-10-23 09:00:16","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5256408","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5256408","identity":"rs-5256408","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}