Innovation and Bank Capital Adequacy: An Empirical Assessment across European Economies

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14

This study empirically assessed how different types of innovation, particularly SME process innovations and information, positively impact bank capital adequacy in European economies, while innovation outputs and productivity sometimes correlate with financial stress.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14 · read from full text

This preprint studies how innovation dynamics relate to banks’ capital adequacy, measured by the Bank Capital to Asset Ratio (CAR), across 39 European nations from 2018 to 2025 using multidimensional static/dynamic panel models and a Decision Tree Regression approach, along with clustering, regression, and variable-importance analyses. It differentiates innovation inputs (e.g., trademark applications, innovator share), innovation outputs (e.g., new-to-marketing and new-to-firm product sales), and productivity factors, finding that SME process innovation and information are positively linked with CAR and greater financial stability, while some innovation outputs and productivity indicators can be inversely associated with financial stress, and pre-stage inputs may increase uncertainty and systematic risk. The decision tree identifies innovative product sales and labor productivity as the most robust CAR determinants with direction-dependent effects. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores the connection between innovation dynamics and the Bank Capital to Asset Ratio (CAR) in the context of 39 European nations from 2018 to 2025. With a multidimensional panel data approach that incorporates a combination of static and dynamic panel models and machine learning algorithms—specifically Decision Tree Regression—the study conducts a data-oriented analysis of the impact of various types of innovation on the resilience of the banking sector. The study differentiates innovation inputs (e.g., trademark applications, innovator share), outputs (e.g., new-to-marketing and new-to-firm product sales), and productivity factors and factors permitting a finely grained comprehension of innovation inputs and financial consequences. Cluster analysis is applied to classify countries into innovation performance groups and is followed by regression and variable importance calculations. The study identifies that process innovations executed by small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are positively linked with CAR and that information is associated with greater financial stability, whereas innovation outputs and productivity indicators at times relate inversely and register corresponding financial stress in the face of innovation-driven transitions. Further, pre-stage innovation inputs may raise banks' uncertainty and register systematic risk escalation. The model of a Decision Tree also reveals the sales of innovative products and labor productivity to be the most robust determinants of CAR with varied directional impacts between them. These results document the innovation-finance nexus complexity and refute the supposition that innovation equally strengthens economic prudence. The study contributes new knowledge to the literature through the combination of the assessment of financial prudency with the type of innovation and provides clear policy directions for the synchronization of innovation strategies with macroprudency aims across the European region. JEL CODES: G21, O31, C38, O52, E44.
Full text 12,397 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Innovation and Bank Capital Adequacy: An Empirical Assessment across European Economies | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Innovation and Bank Capital Adequacy: An Empirical Assessment across European Economies Massimo Arnone, Alberto Costantiello, Carlo Drago, Angelo Leogrande This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7497736/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract This paper explores the connection between innovation dynamics and the Bank Capital to Asset Ratio (CAR) in the context of 39 European nations from 2018 to 2025. With a multidimensional panel data approach that incorporates a combination of static and dynamic panel models and machine learning algorithms—specifically Decision Tree Regression—the study conducts a data-oriented analysis of the impact of various types of innovation on the resilience of the banking sector. The study differentiates innovation inputs (e.g., trademark applications, innovator share), outputs (e.g., new-to-marketing and new-to-firm product sales), and productivity factors and factors permitting a finely grained comprehension of innovation inputs and financial consequences. Cluster analysis is applied to classify countries into innovation performance groups and is followed by regression and variable importance calculations. The study identifies that process innovations executed by small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are positively linked with CAR and that information is associated with greater financial stability, whereas innovation outputs and productivity indicators at times relate inversely and register corresponding financial stress in the face of innovation-driven transitions. Further, pre-stage innovation inputs may raise banks' uncertainty and register systematic risk escalation. The model of a Decision Tree also reveals the sales of innovative products and labor productivity to be the most robust determinants of CAR with varied directional impacts between them. These results document the innovation-finance nexus complexity and refute the supposition that innovation equally strengthens economic prudence. The study contributes new knowledge to the literature through the combination of the assessment of financial prudency with the type of innovation and provides clear policy directions for the synchronization of innovation strategies with macroprudency aims across the European region. JEL CODES: G21, O31, C38, O52, E44. Innovation Bank Capital Financial Stability Decision Tree Regression Europe Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7497736","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":507930354,"identity":"dcfed6a8-86f1-47b2-86e6-13e277b01934","order_by":0,"name":"Massimo Arnone","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Catania","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Massimo","middleName":"","lastName":"Arnone","suffix":""},{"id":507930355,"identity":"df146b80-e752-43fd-8589-fbc8f27e4fc8","order_by":1,"name":"Alberto Costantiello","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"LUM University Giuseppe Degennaro","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Alberto","middleName":"","lastName":"Costantiello","suffix":""},{"id":507930356,"identity":"a92ade6a-455b-4db9-b08a-508e5a43ed33","order_by":2,"name":"Carlo Drago","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Unicusano University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Carlo","middleName":"","lastName":"Drago","suffix":""},{"id":507930357,"identity":"716eda22-067b-4827-b40d-a0f2bb8d5293","order_by":3,"name":"Angelo Leogrande","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Lum University Giuseppe Degennaro","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Angelo","middleName":"","lastName":"Leogrande","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-08-31 00:48:23","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7497736/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7497736/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":90480464,"identity":"71b27d3b-882a-46f8-957c-75b44e03eb9f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-03 07:59:33","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":624346,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"InnovationandBankCapitalAdequacy.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7497736/v1_covered_1c06715b-8bb3-48d6-979c-9caf0b824189.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eInnovation and Bank Capital Adequacy: An Empirical Assessment across European Economies\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Innovation, Bank Capital, Financial Stability, Decision Tree Regression, Europe","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7497736/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7497736/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThis paper explores the connection between innovation dynamics and the Bank Capital to Asset Ratio (CAR) in the context of 39 European nations from 2018 to 2025. With a multidimensional panel data approach that incorporates a combination of static and dynamic panel models and machine learning algorithms—specifically Decision Tree Regression—the study conducts a data-oriented analysis of the impact of various types of innovation on the resilience of the banking sector. The study differentiates innovation inputs (e.g., trademark applications, innovator share), outputs (e.g., new-to-marketing and new-to-firm product sales), and productivity factors and factors permitting a finely grained comprehension of innovation inputs and financial consequences. Cluster analysis is applied to classify countries into innovation performance groups and is followed by regression and variable importance calculations. The study identifies that process innovations executed by small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are positively linked with CAR and that information is associated with greater financial stability, whereas innovation outputs and productivity indicators at times relate inversely and register corresponding financial stress in the face of innovation-driven transitions. Further, pre-stage innovation inputs may raise banks' uncertainty and register systematic risk escalation. The model of a Decision Tree also reveals the sales of innovative products and labor productivity to be the most robust determinants of CAR with varied directional impacts between them. These results document the innovation-finance nexus complexity and refute the supposition that innovation equally strengthens economic prudence. The study contributes new knowledge to the literature through the combination of the assessment of financial prudency with the type of innovation and provides clear policy directions for the synchronization of innovation strategies with macroprudency aims across the European region.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eJEL CODES: \u003c/strong\u003eG21, O31, C38, O52, E44.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Innovation and Bank Capital Adequacy: An Empirical Assessment across European Economies","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-09-03 07:51:17","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7497736/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"8bd783af-4ef0-42e0-823a-b1317eec47b0","owner":[],"postedDate":"September 3rd, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-09-03T07:51:17+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-09-03 07:51:17","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7497736","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7497736","identity":"rs-7497736","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0