How should we approach the management of pelvic pain?
review
OA: closed
public-domain-us
Abstract
Pelvic pain is a common debilitating condition. Most investigations are invasive, expensive and usually negative. Although a positive diagnosis of endometriosis justifies a recognized treatment programme, the majority of women with negative investigations are left without a diagnosis and often accused of psychological abnormalities. The reasons for the negative investigations are just as likely to be due to the inadequate techniques of the operator as the lack of pathological signs. The early use of menstrual suppression with GnRH analogue allows pain relief sooner in the majority of sufferers and separates those with pain related to the menstrual cycle, from whatever cause, from those whose pain is not related to pelvic physiology and who would not benefit from further medication or operative therapy. The majority, who have obtained relief from the analogue therapy, then have time to discuss alternative long-term treatments without the feeling of desperation that chronic monthly pelvic pain can produce.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-21T06:08:07.822426+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:10:40.754221+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-23T06:15:37.550144+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine