Redefining the Risk of Surgery for Clinical Stage IIIA (N2) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of the STS GTSD and ESTS Registry

Abstract BackgroundManagement of clinical stage IIIA-N2 (cIIIA-N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. We evaluated treatment strategies and outcomes in cIIIA-N2 NSCLC patients who underwent pulmonary resection in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database (STS GTSD) and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) Registry.MethodsThe STS GTSD and ESTS Registry were queried for patients who underwent pulmonary resection for cIIIA-N2 NSCLC between 2012 and 2016. Demographic variables, treatment strategies, and outcome measures were collected and analyzed. Significance of differences was determined using the X2 test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables.ResultsPulmonary resection was performed in 4279 cIIIA-N2 NSCLC patients (2928 STS GTSD; 1351 ESTS). Induction therapy was administered to 49%. Lobectomy was performed in 67.1% and pneumonectomy in 13%. Lobectomy was associated with 19.2% major morbidity and 1.6% operative mortality, while pneumonectomy was associated with 34.1% and 5%, respectively. Induction therapy was associated with a higher rate of major morbidity or mortality than upfront surgery (23.2% vs. 19.5%, p=0.004), driven by pneumonectomy (40.7% vs. 30.3%, p=0.012) rather than lobectomy (20.3% vs. 18.8%, p=0.31).ConclusionsPulmonary resection for cIIIA-N2 NSCLC is associated with low rates of operative morbidity and mortality, with lobectomy having lower morbidity and mortality than pneumonectomy. Induction therapy, particularly chemoradiotherapy, is associated with a higher rate of composite morbidity or mortality than upfront surgery in pneumonectomy patients but not lobectomy patients.