Shrinking the skin: Motion results in compressive mislocalization of stimuli applied 10 s post-motion
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Localizing touch on the skin requires integration of multiple spatial signals, including reference landmarks and motion cues. It is well known that motion patterns can bias the perceived endpoint of motion. However, it is unknown whether static touch presented post-motion is also distorted. To investigate this, we presented space-changing motion patterns and tested position perception 1 s and 10 s post motion. We used a brush moving along the forearm at 15 cm s-1, brushing 4.5 cm skin patches near the elbow and near the wrist, skipping a 10-cm long metal-shielded patch in the middle (‘numb spot’). It accelerated to 100 cm s-1 across the shielded gap in an attempt to create an illusion of continuous motion between the separate brushed areas. After several such deceptive motions, 12 participants indicated the locations touched by a von Frey filament near the elbow and wrist, all within the previously brushed areas. Localization responses shifted 4 – 10 mm toward the numb spot in the skipped-patch condition compared to controls with either continuous brushing across the full forearm, or brushing the same patches without acceleration. This spatial distortion was equally strong 1 s and 10 s after motion offset with only isolated location-specific differences between delays. In addition, participants’ sketches indicated a reduction in perceived gap size. We propose that participants used the brushed fields as reference frame for localisation, with the high-velocity motion compressing the perceived space between them. This means that motion-defined boundaries can serve as spatial landmarks for static touch.
Full text
3,507 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Localizing touch on the skin requires integration of multiple spatial signals, including reference landmarks and motion cues. It is well known that motion patterns can bias the perceived endpoint of motion. However, it is unknown whether static touch presented post-motion is also distorted. To investigate this, we presented space-changing motion patterns and tested position perception 1 s and 10 s post motion. We used a brush moving along the forearm at 15 cm s-1, brushing 4.5 cm skin patches near the elbow and near the wrist, skipping a 10-cm long metal-shielded patch in the middle (‘numb spot’). It accelerated to 100 cm s-1 across the shielded gap in an attempt to create an illusion of continuous motion between the separate brushed areas. After several such deceptive motions, 12 participants indicated the locations touched by a von Frey filament near the elbow and wrist, all within the previously brushed areas. Localization responses shifted 4 – 10 mm toward the numb spot in the skipped-patch condition compared to controls with either continuous brushing across the full forearm, or brushing the same patches without acceleration. This spatial distortion was equally strong 1 s and 10 s after motion offset with only isolated location-specific differences between delays. In addition, participants’ sketches indicated a reduction in perceived gap size. We propose that participants used the brushed fields as reference frame for localisation, with the high-velocity motion compressing the perceived space between them. This means that motion-defined boundaries can serve as spatial landmarks for static touch.
Supplementary Material
File (fig10perceivedintensity.tif)
- Download
- 1.73 MB
File (fig11explanation.tif)
- Download
- 777.11 KB
File (fig12rfsexpansionposshift.tif)
- Download
- 1.40 MB
File (fig1abridging.tif)
- Download
- 9.84 MB
File (fig2brushingconditions.tif)
- Download
- 32.11 MB
File (fig3motiontrials.tif)
- Download
- 45.10 MB
File (fig4variableerrorgroup.tif)
- Download
- 1.27 MB
File (fig5regression.tif)
- Download
- 1.63 MB
File (fig6resultsarmarrows.tif)
- Download
- 2.86 MB
File (fig7resultsarmandarrowsposttest.tif)
- Download
- 1.30 MB
File (fig8drawings.tif)
- Download
- 3.25 MB
File (fig9.resultsfromdrawingsind.tif)
- Download
- 2.21 MB
File (maintextclear.docx)
- Download
- 108.33 KB
File (maintextmarked.docx)
- Download
- 111.31 KB
Information & Authors
Information
Version history
Peer review timeline
Published
European Journal of Neuroscience
Version of Record1 Apr 2025Published
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License.
Collection
Keywords
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Usage
268views
173downloads
Citations
Download citation
Tatjana Seizova-Cajic, Jack Brooks, Janet Taylor.
Shrinking the skin: Motion results in compressive mislocalization of stimuli applied 10 s post-motion. Authorea. 23 January 2025.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.173766581.18079475/v1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.173766581.18079475/v1
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Ask this paper
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-07-18T06:52:13.688204+00:00