RawBench: A Comprehensive Benchmarking Framework for Raw Nanopore Signal Analysis Techniques

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Nanopore sequencing technologies continue to advance rapidly, offering critical benefits such as real-time analysis, the ability to sequence extremely long DNA fragments (up to millions of bases in a single read), and the option to selectively stop sequencing a molecule before completion. Traditionally, the raw electrical signals generated during sequencing are converted into DNA sequences through a process called basecalling , which typically relies on large neural network models. While accurate, these models are computationally intensive and often require high-end GPUs to process the vast volume of raw signal data. This presents a significant challenge for real-time processing, particularly on edge devices with limited computational resources, ultimately restricting the scalability and deployment of nanopore sequencing in resourceconstrained settings. Raw signal analysis has emerged as a promising alternative to these resource-intensive approaches. While attempts have been made to benchmark conventional basecalling methods, existing evaluation frameworks 1) overlook raw signal analysis techniques, 2) lack the flexibility to accommodate new raw signal analysis tools easily, and 3) fail to include the latest improvements in nanopore datasets. Our goal is to provide an extensible benchmarking framework that enables designing and comparing new methods for raw signal analysis. To this end, we introduce RawBench, the first flexible framework for evaluating raw nanopore signal analysis techniques. RawBench provides modular evaluation of three core pipeline components: 1) reference genome encoding (using different pore models), 2) signal encoding (through various segmentation methods), and 3) representation matching (via different data structures). We extensively evaluate raw signal analysis techniques in terms of 1) quality and performance for read mapping, quality and performance for read classification, and 3) quality of raw signal analysis-assisted basecalling. Our evaluations show that raw signal analysis can achieve competitive quality while significantly reducing resource requirements, particularly in settings where real-time processing or edge deployment is necessary. CCS Concepts Computing methodologies → Bioinformatics ; Evaluation methodologies ; • Applied computing → Computational genomics . ACM Reference Format Furkan Eris, Ulysse McConnell, Can Firtina, and Onur Mutlu. 2025. RawBench: A Comprehensive Benchmarking Framework for Raw Nanopore Signal Analysis Techniques. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (BCB ‘25), October 11–15, 2025, Philadelphia, PA, USA . ACM, New York, NY, USA, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3765612.3767302
Full text 2,916 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Nanopore sequencing technologies continue to advance rapidly, offering critical benefits such as real-time analysis, the ability to sequence extremely long DNA fragments (up to millions of bases in a single read), and the option to selectively stop sequencing a molecule before completion. Traditionally, the raw electrical signals generated during sequencing are converted into DNA sequences through a process called basecalling, which typically relies on large neural network models. While accurate, these models are computationally intensive and often require high-end GPUs to process the vast volume of raw signal data. This presents a significant challenge for real-time processing, particularly on edge devices with limited computational resources, ultimately restricting the scalability and deployment of nanopore sequencing in resourceconstrained settings. Raw signal analysis has emerged as a promising alternative to these resource-intensive approaches. While attempts have been made to benchmark conventional basecalling methods, existing evaluation frameworks 1) overlook raw signal analysis techniques, 2) lack the flexibility to accommodate new raw signal analysis tools easily, and 3) fail to include the latest improvements in nanopore datasets. Our goal is to provide an extensible benchmarking framework that enables designing and comparing new methods for raw signal analysis. To this end, we introduce RawBench, the first flexible framework for evaluating raw nanopore signal analysis techniques. RawBench provides modular evaluation of three core pipeline components: 1) reference genome encoding (using different pore models), 2) signal encoding (through various segmentation methods), and 3) representation matching (via different data structures). We extensively evaluate raw signal analysis techniques in terms of 1) quality and performance for read mapping, quality and performance for read classification, and 3) quality of raw signal analysis-assisted basecalling. Our evaluations show that raw signal analysis can achieve competitive quality while significantly reducing resource requirements, particularly in settings where real-time processing or edge deployment is necessary. CCS Concepts Computing methodologies → Bioinformatics; Evaluation methodologies; • Applied computing → Computational genomics. ACM Reference Format Furkan Eris, Ulysse McConnell, Can Firtina, and Onur Mutlu. 2025. RawBench: A Comprehensive Benchmarking Framework for Raw Nanopore Signal Analysis Techniques. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (BCB ‘25), October 11–15, 2025, Philadelphia, PA, USA. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3765612.3767302 Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes furkan6olm{at}gmail.com umcconnell{at}student.ethz.ch

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0