Goserline versus danazol in the treatment of endometriosis

In: Annals of King Edward Medical University · 2016 · vol. 12(1) · doi:10.21649/akemu.v12i1.823 · W2424139623
article OA: diamond CC0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to achieve symptoms relief of endometriosis with a drug having better efficacy and least side effects. Study Design: Experimental. Place & Duration of Study: Lady Willingdon Hospital, Lahore from March, 2003 to Feb. 2005. Subjects & Methods: The trial was conducted on two groups; one group (n = 20) received goserline and other group (n=20) received danazol for 6 months. Patients were followed for relief of symptoms including dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, lower abdominal pain and menstrual irregularity and appearance of side effects. Results: The results depicted that in Danazol group 50% pain relief was found in 5 patients (25%) while in goserline group in 4 patients (20%). 75% pain relief was seen in 7 patients (35%) in danazol group and 8 patients (40%) in goserline group. 100% of improvement in pain found in equal number of patient that is 8(40%) in both groups. Both drugs were effective in pain relief (P >0.05), Goserline had less side effects as compared to Danazol (P<0.05). Conclusion: Goserline and Danazol are equally effective in symptomatic relief of endometriosis while side effects favoured use of GnRH agonist.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisdysmenorrheadyspareunia

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK