Developing machine-learning-based amyloid predictors with Cross-Beta DB
This study developed and benchmarked machine learning predictors for amyloid formation using the novel Cross-Beta DB dataset, with the random-forest-based Cross-Beta RF Predictor showing improved performance over existing methods.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
The paper describes the creation of Cross-Beta DB, a database of naturally formed cross-β amyloids, motivated by the role of amyloid aggregation in disease and function and the need for dedicated datasets for benchmarking computational predictors. Using the Cross-Beta DB dataset, the authors trained and benchmarked multiple machine-learning amyloidogenicity predictors and report that a random-forest-based model, Cross-Beta RF Predictor, outperformed existing methods. The main limitation stated is the historical lack of datasets specifically dedicated to naturally occurring cross-β amyloids, which the new database is intended to address, while the work focuses on cross-β structures (typically regions longer than ~15 residues) rather than other aggregation forms. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,690 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00