How Does the Number of Response Options Impact the Psychometric Properties of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale?

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is the most frequently used measure of self-esteem in the social sciences and it is often administered with a different number of response options. However, it is unclear how the number of response options impacts the psychometric properties of this measure. Across three experiments (Ns = 739, 2,358, and 1,461), we evaluated how different response options of the Rosenberg influenced (1) internal consistency estimates, (2) distributions of scores, and (3) associations with criterion-related variables. Internal consistency estimates were lowest for a 2-point format compared to response formats with more options. Using 4 or more response options better approximated a normal distribution. We found no consistent evidence that criterion-related correlations increased with more response options. Collectively, these results suggest that the Rosenberg should be administered with at least four response options and we favor a 5-point Likert-type option for practical reasons.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0