Structural basis of insulin receptor antagonism by bivalent site 1-site 2 ligands

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-05

This paper elucidates the structural mechanisms by which bivalent ligands bind to distinct sites on the insulin receptor, leading to antagonism.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-05 · read from full text

The paper investigates the structural basis for how bivalent insulin receptor ligands that bind both insulin receptor site 1 and site 2, specifically the antagonists S961 and Ins-AC-S2 (and contrasted with the agonist S597), inhibit or activate the insulin receptor. Using cryo-EM, the authors show that S961 and Ins-AC-S2 bind an inactive conformation of the insulin receptor, explaining their antagonism, and they identify that agonist versus antagonist activity depends on whether the site 1 and site 2 binding modules are presented in the site 1–site 2 versus site 2–site 1 order. They also report differences in binding mechanisms between S961 and Ins-AC-S2, including how each ligand displaces or engages the αCT region, and they describe a novel binding interface for Ins-AC-S2. The work explicitly notes its relevance to informing development of next-generation IR antagonists for congenital hyperinsulinism, but does not provide direct functional outcome limitations beyond the structural analysis. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ABSTRACT Congenital hyperinsulinism (HI) is a rare genetic disease characterized by overproduction of insulin. One class of potential HI treatments is insulin receptor (IR) antagonists like S961 and Ins-AC-S2, peptides composed of binding segments for each of the IR sites capable of binding insulin: site 1 and site 2. Notably, S597 – containing the same IR binding segments as S961 but in the opposite order (site 2-site 1) – is an IR agonist rather than an antagonist. Using cryo-EM, we show how both S961 and Ins-AC-S2 bind an inactive conformation of IR, thereby explaining their antagonism. Furthermore, our structures reveal how agonist vs. antagonist activity is dictated by the order of site 1- and site 2-binding modules in bivalent ligands. Additionally, we uncover subtle differences between the binding mechanisms of S961 and Ins-AC-S2 to IR, which include displacement or engagement of αCT, respectively, and a novel binding interface between the Ins-AC-S2 insulin and the receptor. These structural insights may inform development of next generation IR antagonists for treatment of HI.
Full text 1,178 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Congenital hyperinsulinism (HI) is a rare genetic disease characterized by overproduction of insulin. One class of potential HI treatments is insulin receptor (IR) antagonists like S961 and Ins-AC-S2, peptides composed of binding segments for each of the IR sites capable of binding insulin: site 1 and site 2. Notably, S597 – containing the same IR binding segments as S961 but in the opposite order (site 2-site 1) – is an IR agonist rather than an antagonist. Using cryo-EM, we show how both S961 and Ins-AC-S2 bind an inactive conformation of IR, thereby explaining their antagonism. Furthermore, our structures reveal how agonist vs. antagonist activity is dictated by the order of site 1- and site 2-binding modules in bivalent ligands. Additionally, we uncover subtle differences between the binding mechanisms of S961 and Ins-AC-S2 to IR, which include displacement or engagement of αCT, respectively, and a novel binding interface between the Ins-AC-S2 insulin and the receptor. These structural insights may inform development of next generation IR antagonists for treatment of HI. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0