Enhanced Credit Risk Management in Financial Institutions Using Regression Analysis

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Credit risk assessment is crucial for financial institutions, including savings and credit cooperative societies, to evaluate borrower creditworthiness and mitigate default risks. Traditional predictive analytics methods, such as linear regression and decision trees have been widely used. However, they often fall short of capturing complex, non-linear relationships inherent in financial data, leading to suboptimal risk predictions. This study introduces an enhanced predictive analytics model that uses polynomial logistic regression, augmented with Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) and ridge regression. The model captures the intricate dynamics between key risk factors such as interest rates, income stability, and collateral value to give better performance. The model was trained and validated on credit risk dataset from Kaggle which achieved an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.95, indicating a strong capability to distinguish between defaulters and non-defaulters. Comparative analyses with alternative machine learning models that include XGBoost and Random Forest demonstrated that while these models offer high predictive accuracy, they often require extensive hyperparameter tuning and lack interpretability. In contrast, the proposed logistic regression model balanced predictive performance with interpretability and computational efficiency, making it a better for credit risk management in financial institutions.
Full text 2,492 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Credit risk assessment is crucial for financial institutions, including savings and credit cooperative societies, to evaluate borrower creditworthiness and mitigate default risks. Traditional predictive analytics methods, such as linear regression and decision trees have been widely used. However, they often fall short of capturing complex, non-linear relationships inherent in financial data, leading to suboptimal risk predictions. This study introduces an enhanced predictive analytics model that uses polynomial logistic regression, augmented with Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) and ridge regression. The model captures the intricate dynamics between key risk factors such as interest rates, income stability, and collateral value to give better performance. The model was trained and validated on credit risk dataset from Kaggle which achieved an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.95, indicating a strong capability to distinguish between defaulters and non-defaulters. Comparative analyses with alternative machine learning models that include XGBoost and Random Forest demonstrated that while these models offer high predictive accuracy, they often require extensive hyperparameter tuning and lack interpretability. In contrast, the proposed logistic regression model balanced predictive performance with interpretability and computational efficiency, making it a better for credit risk management in financial institutions. Supplementary Material File (refined formated paper 16.05.25 fin.docx) - Download - 198.04 KB Information & Authors Information Version history Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License.

Keywords

Authors Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 336views 158downloads Citations Download citation Jemimah Kilonzo, Michael Kimwele, Erick Omuya. Enhanced Credit Risk Management in Financial Institutions Using Regression Analysis. Authorea. 08 May 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174673444.41758234/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174673444.41758234/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-11T06:40:09.570059+00:00