The Choice of Breeding Objectives and Selection Criteria Decided by Breeders of Various Goat Breeds and Factors Influencing Them

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

Knowledge of breeding objectives and selection criteria is essential for a successful breeding program. A questionnaire was prepared and distributed among breeders of various goat breeds in the Abu-Dhabi Emirate to explore their breeding objectives and selection criteria for the various goat breeds that they raise. A total of 293 different goat herds, with a total of 49,911 heads of goats, were investigated. A stepwise logistic regression was applied using the LOGIST procedure of SAS. The results suggest that goat breeders in the UAE are breeding goats mainly for meat production (94%), adaptability to the environment (40%), and disease resistance (35%). Only a few breeders considered milk production (21%) as a breeding objective. Factors that influenced breeders’ decisions on breeding objectives were the breed of goat, region, property type, and herd size. Nine out of the twelve doe selection criteria chosen by goat breeders are considered objective selection criteria, and only three are subjective selection criteria. Growth rate, fertility, twinning ability, and body morphology selection criteria were considered the most important on average by Emirati goat breeders, with a medium proportion (60–65%). Goat breeders have put slightly more pressure on buck subjective criteria. The most important buck selection criteria were growth rate (80%) and body morphology (76%), then fertility, buck being one of twins, and breed purity, with averages of 50-55%. Although increasing meat production was the main breeding objective, an effective breeding program must incorporate different selection criteria for does and bucks, considering differences in breeds, regions, property types, and herd sizes.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-20T11:00:21.680559+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0