AI-Driven Digital Transformation and Sustainable Logistics: Innovations in Global Supply Chain Management

AI-Driven Digital Transformation and Sustainable Logistics: Innovations in Global Supply Chain Management | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Systematic Review AI-Driven Digital Transformation and Sustainable Logistics: Innovations in Global Supply Chain Management Ghazaleh Kermani Moghaddam, Mostafa Karimzadeh This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6086101/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract The global supply chain has progressed beyond conventional logistics, incorporating digital technology, sustainability, and automation. It involves interrelated processes that convert raw resources into finished goods. The rising complexity from cross-border legislation, currency volatility, and evolving market demands requires decision-making driven by AI, Big Data, and automation. This study does a Systematic Literature Review of 65 journal papers (2010–2024) to analyze developments in logistics via AI, digital innovation, and sustainability. In contrast to conventional models characterized by static decision-making, emerging frameworks integrate AI-driven optimization, blockchain transparency, and real-time data for predictive forecasting. Furthermore, autonomous freight transportation, encompassing self-driving trucks, drone-assisted last-mile delivery, and hyperloop cargo systems, is transforming global logistics. Findings underscore significant transformations in supply chain strategy, focusing on sustainable mobility, carbon footprint mitigation, and integrated digital logistics. This analysis delineates research deficiencies and proposes avenues for future investigation into autonomous logistics and AI-driven systems in freight management. AI-driven supply chain optimization Autonomous freight systems Digital logistics transformation Sustainability Blockchain Systematic literature review Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 1. Introduction: Integrating Digital Logistics, AI-Driven Decision-Making, and Auton-omous Freight Systems 1.1 Background & Significance The term "globalization" has gone from cliche to motivating factor in supply chain changes (Ray and Nayak, 2023; Vargas-Hernández, 2023). Companies are reevaluating their transportation, logistics, and decision-making techniques in response to the growing demand for goods and services from customers in different parts of the world (Patel, 2023; Badmus et al. , 2024). To keep up with the competition on a global scale, modern logistics networks must incorporate digitization, sustainability, AI-driven decision-making, operational resilience, and automation, whereas traditional supply chain models have concentrated on optimizing operational resilience and cost-efficiency (R. S. Khan et al. , 2022; Muthuswamy and Ali, 2023; Aghahadi et al. , 2024; Neway, 2024). By facilitating real-time decision-making, predictive analytics, and supply chain visibility, emerging digital logistics technologies like Blockchain, the Internet of Things (IoT), and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are reshaping global logistics (Paramesha, Rane and Rane, 2024). Efforts to optimize transportation routes, decrease carbon footprints, and move toward electric and autonomous freight systems have been stepped up in response to the worldwide push for sustainability (Sperling, 2018; Hasan, Whyte and Al Jassmi, 2019; Martin, 2019). A new wave of autonomous logistics technologies is shaking up the freight industry at the same time (Anderson et al. , 2014; Manners-Bell and Lyon, 2019; Sullivan and Kern, 2021). Improved efficiency, lower prices, and less environmental effect are the goals of the development of self-driving trucks, fleet management driven by artificial intelligence, last-mile deliveries by drone, and hyperloop freight systems (Kostrzewski et al. , 2022; Mirindi, 2024). To keep up with the changing nature of decision-making in global supply chains, it is necessary to conduct a thorough review of logistics models. 1.2 Research Problem & Motivation Conventional supply chain models depend on static optimization methods that presume constant transportation costs, stable exchange rates, and foreseeable demand patterns. In the current turbulent global trade landscape, AI-driven decision-making models enable organizations to adjust flexibly to real-time market fluctuations, disruptions, and supply chain vulnerabilities. Likewise, sustainability-oriented logistics has transitioned from a peripheral issue to a fundamental strategic objective. Governments, regulatory agencies, and industry executives are implementing carbon reduction rules that mandate companies to adopt more sustainable logistics solutions, including electric freight transport, carbon-neutral warehouses, and blockchain-enhanced supply chain transparency. The emergence of autonomous freight systems (drones, hyperloop, AI-driven trucks) presents novel obstacles and opportunities. Although these technologies provide the potential for expedited, more efficient, and reduced-emission transportation, their extensive implementation, regulatory obstacles, and economic viability continue to be unresolved research inquiries. Consequently, there is an urgent necessity to examine recent developments in digital logistics, sustainability-oriented initiatives, and automation within global supply chain management. 1.3 Research Objectives This paper conducts a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to address the following key questions: How has AI-driven decision-making transformed global supply chain logistics? What role does digitalization (IoT, blockchain, cloud computing) play in optimizing logistics and transportation? How are companies implementing sustainability-driven logistics strategies to reduce environmental impact? What are the challenges and opportunities in adopting autonomous freight technologies (self-driving trucks, drones, hyperloop) in logistics? How can logistics models integrate AI, automation, and sustainability to build resilient global supply chains? 2. Previous Review Papers (Incorporating Recent References from 2010–2024) 2.1 Overview of Recent Literature on Global Supply Chains Recent studies have analyzed the progression of global supply chains, emphasizing AI-driven decision-making, sustainability, and automation (Gharehgozli et al. , 2017). Early studies, such (Lee, 2010), (Williams and Lee, 2011), and (Gammeltoft, Filatotchev and Hobdari, 2012) examined multiplant coordination and the strategic frameworks of multinational corporations (MNCs), but they did not focus on digitalization and AI-driven logistics breakthroughs. Recent study indicates that machine learning algorithms, predictive analytics, and blockchain-based supply chain models have transformed decision-making and risk management in global supply chains (Grover et al. , 2024). The integration of autonomous freight technology is accelerating, as corporations invest in self-driving vehicles, drone logistics, and (Mateu, Fernández and Franco, 2021) freight networks to enhance efficiency and sustainability . 2.2 Strategic and Tactical Decision-Making in Global Logistics Innovations in AI-driven supply chain optimization have revolutionized strategic and tactical decision-making. Traditional strategic production-distribution models, as analyzed by (Grossmann, 2012), (Sahebi, Nickel and Ashayeri, 2014), (Powell, Simao and Bouzaiene-Ayari, 2012), and (Ivanov and Sokolov, 2013)predominantly depended on mathematical optimization frameworks. Nevertheless, these studies failed to consider the dynamic characteristics of global logistics, which have become progressively volatile due to pandemics, geopolitical conflicts, and climate-related disturbances. Recent research underscores the enhancement of risk management and decision agility with AI-driven predictive analytics and IoT-enabled supply chain monitoring (Nzeako et al. , 2024). Furthermore, Generative AI-driven supply chain planning models, like Generative Probabilistic Planning (GPP), have been developed to enhance logistics by predicting demand variations, lead times, and production uncertainties (Sulaiman, 2024; Kurz, 2025). 2.3 Digitalization and AI-Driven Decision Models Digitalization has had a major impact on the decision-making process in the supply chain, and artificial intelligence and big data analytics have become critical tools for optimizing logistics (Hofmann et al. , 2019). Models of supply chains were divided into strategic, tactical, and operational tiers in earlier frameworks, such as (Estampe et al. , 2013) and (Ivanov, 2010). However, these models did not take into consideration the use of artificial intelligence to make decisions in real time. Recent research has highlighted the importance of logistics platforms powered by artificial intelligence, which improve inventory optimization, dynamic route planning, and demand forecasting (Dash et al. , 2019) and (Eyo-Udo, 2024). In addition, blockchain technology is being used more and more to guarantee transparency in the supply chain and to avoid fraud by generating digital records of shipments, supplier transactions, and quality checks (Sunny, Undralla and Pillai, 2020; Jie et al. , 2023). 2.4 Sustainability and Green Supply Chain Strategies Sustainability has become a top focus in supply chain management due to climate change policies and company promises to carbon neutrality.(Jayaram and Tan, 2010) and (Brandenburg and Rebs, 2015) and other early studies categorized supply chain design papers according to supplier integration and trade barriers, but they did not take into account the effects of logistics models that are driven by sustainability. On the other hand, current study indicates that carbon tracking powered by artificial intelligence, green transportation networks, and innovations in sustainable packaging have transformed supply chains around the world (Bechtsis et al. , 2018). In addition, research shows that using AI to optimize routes can decrease fuel use and carbon dioxide emissions by as much as 32% in self-driving freight operations (Delgado et al. , 2019). Tracking carbon footprints using blockchain technology is also becoming an important tool for ensuring that logistical practices are ecologically friendly (Abduljabbar et al. , 2019; Figliozzi and Jennings, 2020; Almeida and Carneiro, 2021; Neufville, Abdalla and Abbas, 2022). 2.5 Autonomous Freight and Digital Transformation in Logistics Automation is changing the way logistics work throughout the world. Self-driving trucks, drones, and hyperloop systems are becoming more popular as practical alternatives. On the other hand, earlier research, including studies by (Witkowski, 2017) and (Hofmann and Rüsch, 2017)did not predict the importance of autonomous logistics systems in contemporary supply chains. According to research by (Kim, Kim and Park, 2022), autonomous trucking can greatly improve freight efficiency and sustainability by lowering energy use. Furthermore, AI-powered fleet management solutions have been demonstrated to improve last-mile deliveries, resulting in shorter transit times and lower operational costs (Mani and Goniewicz, 2023; Rane, Choudhary and Rane, 2024; Rane, Kaya and Rane, 2024). According to feasibility studies on Hyperloop logistics, these systems have the potential to provide cargo transportation that is both fast and low in emissions. However, there are still obstacles to overcome, including as scalability and regulatory barriers (Lafoz et al. , 2020; Hedhly et al. , 2021). 2.6 Future Research Directions The increasing dependence on logistics systems that are driven by artificial intelligence (AI), sustainable, and autonomous has created a number of important research gaps that need to be filled (Klumpp, 2018; Sun et al. , 2022; Tsolakis et al. , 2022). One important topic for future study is the incorporation of decision-making models driven by artificial intelligence into the optimization of global supply chains (Poudel, 2013; Hengstler, Enkel and Duelli, 2016). This would enable real-time adaptation in reaction to changes in the market (Issa, Sun and Vasarhelyi, 2016; Di Vaio et al. , 2020). Furthermore, as sustainability becomes increasingly important, additional research should investigate the use of artificial intelligence to measure carbon footprints and blockchain technology to improve supply chain transparency (Chen, 2024). This would help to improve environmental compliance and operational efficiency. In order to determine the practicality, affordability, and regulatory obstacles of autonomous freight technologies like self-driving trucks, drone deliveries, and hyperloop cargo delivery, further empirical study is needed (Bachofner et al. , 2022). Another important area of emphasis is the evaluation of blockchain-enabled supply chain transparency, which can enhance trust, security, and traceability in international logistics (Centobelli et al. , 2022; Dasaklis et al. , 2022). Finally, it is necessary to further develop AI-powered risk assessment models in order to reduce supply chain disruptions that are caused by geopolitical events, pandemics, and uncertainty associated to climate change (Chukwu et al. , 2024). These study gaps demonstrate that global supply chains are continuing to change as businesses move toward strategies that focus on digitization, automation, and sustainability in logistics. In order to create supply chains that are robust, transparent, and prepared for the future, future research must focus on the combined use of artificial intelligence (AI) to make decisions, green supply chain frameworks, and autonomous logistics technologies. Researchers can help make logistics networks more flexible, data-driven, and ecologically sustainable by tackling these growing difficulties. This will ensure that supply chains stay competitive and adaptable during the digital logistics transition. Facility Location in Global Supply Chains: Recent Developments In order to maximize supply chain efficiency and decrease costs, facility location models are essential for optimizing the placement of production plants, finishing facilities, and distribution centers (DCs) (Naimi Sadigh, Fallah and Nahavandi, 2013; Sundarakani, Pereira and Ishizaka, 2021). Models from the past, like (Benyoucef and Xie, 2011; Halim, Kwakkel and Tavasszy, 2016; Jahre et al. , 2016), mainly optimized shipping quantities, demand allocation, and open-close choices. In addition to tax incentives, reduced wage costs, and proximity to consumers, global facility location models expand these factors to incorporate exchange rates, duties, tariffs, and local content regulations, all of which impact how multinational corporations (MNCs) position their operations abroad (Baaij et al. , 2015; Halim, Kwakkel and Tavasszy, 2016). To help decision-makers take qualitative elements like political stability, economic conditions, and government laws into account, early research proposed multi-criteria integer goal programming models coupled with analytic hierarchy processes (AHP) (Yüksel, 2012; Stein, 2013). To solve multi-period mixed-integer programming (MIP) models for international facility location, (Correia and Melo, 2016, 2017) looked at capacity restrictions, investment decisions, and demand changes, and they proposed heuristic techniques. However, current facility site selections are influenced by factors like as artificial intelligence, digital logistics, and sustainability, which were not included in these older models. There has been a recent uptick in studies examining sustainable facility placement tactics, blockchain-driven transparency in site selection, and AI-powered facility location models (Singh, Rathore and Park, 2020). The use of machine learning algorithms to forecast the best places to put facilities in light of current market conditions, geopolitical unrest, and environmental restrictions is detailed in research published by (Aljohani, 2023; Mohsin and Jamaani, 2023; Shawon et al. , 2024). In addition, site selection methods are using blockchain technology to guarantee regulatory compliance and transparent supplier network tracking (Singh et al. , 2023). Companies may strategically locate facilities to minimize emissions while increasing logistical efficiency using AI-powered carbon footprint tracking, which is a major concern in the sustainability realm (Tada Now, 2023). Furthermore, research by Aurora Tech in 2023 shows that autonomous logistics solutions, such hyperloop transportation networks and self-driving freight cars, impact facility placement decisions by making last-mile deliveries more efficient (Nikitas et al. , 2017; Widener, 2019; Hansen, 2020). Recent work on the topic has shifted the focus from deterministic elements like tariffs, currency rates, and trade zones to stochastic ones that can adapt to changing global economic situations (Johnson, 2013; Parrish and Beaubien, 2024; Wang, Hu and Zhou, 2024) (See Table 1 ). Table 1 Global Procurement Strategies Summary Author(s) & Year Region Model Type Key Factors Considered Objective Johnson, 2013; Parrish and Beaubien, 2024; Wang, Hu and Zhou, 2024 Global Stochastic Facility Location Stochastic Optimization for Exchange Rate Dynamic Location Optimization under Market Volatility Nikitas et al. , 2017; Widener, 2019; Hansen, 2020) Global Autonomous Logistics Influence on Site Self-Driving Trucks & Hyperloop Logistics on Site Decisions Impact of Automation on Logistics (Mohsin 2023);(Aljohani 2023);(Shawon 2024) Global AI-Driven Facility Location AI-Based Demand Forecasting, Carbon Emissions Enhancing Sustainability & Logistics Hamad & Gualda (2008) South America Value-Added Tax & Take-or-Pay Cost Model Value-Added Taxes, Take-or-Pay Costs Reducing Logistics Costs through VAT Adjustments Robinson & Bookbinder (2007) NAFTA (Canada, USA, Mexico) Multi-Period Optimization Model Transportation Mode, Border-Crossing Costs, Centralization Optimizing DC & Finishing Plant Locations Kouvelis et al. (2004) Global Hybrid Product-Process Focus Model Transfer Pricing, Government Incentives, Local Content Rules Maximizing After-Tax Profits via Optimized Networks Canel & Das (2002) Global Profit Maximization Model Exchange Rates, Tariffs, Marketing-Manufacturing Interdependency Cost-Optimized Production & Marketing Synergies (Correia and Melo, 2016) (Correia and Melo, 2017) Global Mixed Integer Linear Program (MILP) Tariffs, Distribution Costs, Initial Capacity Allocation Profit Maximization in Facility Placement Canel & Khumawala (1996, 2001) North America, Europe, Far East "Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) Exchange Rates, Cost & Demand Variations International Site Selection with Demand Uncertainty 4. Procurement in Global Supply Chains: AI, Blockchain, and Sustainable Sourcing The process of procurement and supplier selection is an important part of managing a global supply chain. It involves making decisions about where to get raw materials and components while also considering the cost, quality, and risk (Khan, Yu and Farooq, 2023; Vaka, 2024). Traditional procurement models mostly concentrated on minimizing costs and ensuring supplier reliability (Chaturvedi and Martínez-de-Albéniz, 2011; Kamalahmadi and Mellat-Parast, 2016). However, foreign sourcing adds further complications, including volatility in exchange rates, levies and tariffs, geopolitical hazards, and local content requirements (LCRs) (Banka, 2014; Sandor et al. , 2018). (Bozorgi-Amiri, Jabalameli and Mirzapour Al-e-Hashem, 2013; Hammami, Temponi and Frein, 2014; Tintner and Sengupta, 2014) created deterministic and stochastic models to maximize sourcing under changing economic situations. (Bozorgi-Amiri, Jabalameli and Mirzapour Al-e-Hashem, 2013; Das, 2020) then expanded on these models by adding heuristic-based scenario analysis, which took into account exchange rate risks and economic states. Furthermore, Munson and Rosenblatt (1997) investigated LCRs in international procurement and showed how local sourcing limitations affect the tactics used to choose suppliers. Although these early models were useful in reducing risks related to currency and taxation, they did not take into consideration the new tactics that have developed in recent years, such as procurement optimization driven by artificial intelligence, supplier verification facilitated by blockchain technology, and sustainable sourcing strategies (Table 2 ). Recent research shows that artificial intelligence, blockchain, and procurement methods that focus on sustainability are changing how companies get goods and services around the world. Machine learning algorithms are now being used by AI-powered procurement platforms to forecast supplier performance, optimize cost-risk trade-offs, and automate supplier selection (Dash et al. , 2019; Kalasani, 2023; Marrone, 2023). Furthermore, smart contracts that are based on blockchain technology provide secure and tamper-proof verification of suppliers, which decreases the likelihood of fraud and increases transparency in multi-tier supplier networks (Gallersdörfer and Matthes, 2019; Wang et al. , 2019; Liu et al. , 2022). Sustainability is also changing the way that companies buy things. With the help of artificial intelligence, businesses can track their carbon footprints and choose suppliers that are environmentally responsible while simultaneously reducing emissions in their supply chains (Dauvergne, 2022; Ameh, 2024; Hasan, Islam, et al. , 2024; Hasan, Shawon, et al. , 2024).On the top of that, the development of regional sourcing hubs, which were first suggested in early models by Balaji and Viswanadham (2008), has progressed into AI-powered digital hubs that may change sourcing decisions in real time based on geopolitical, economic, and environmental factors (Chalmers, MacKenzie and Carter, 2021; Rane, Kaya and Rane, 2024). Table 2 Procurement in Global Supply Chains Author(s) & Year Model Type Key Factors Considered Objective Chalmers, MacKenzie and Carter, 2021; Rane, Kaya and Rane, 2024) AI-Powered Digital Hubs for Dynamic Sourcing Decisions Real-Time Sourcing Adjustments, Geopolitical Risk Management Enabling Adaptive Procurement through AI-Driven Hubs (Huang and Mao, 2024), (Mor, Madan and Prasad, 2021) AI-Driven Carbon Footprint Tracking in Sourcing Sustainable Procurement, Emissions Optimization Reducing Carbon Footprint via AI-Optimized Sourcing Gallersdörfer and Matthes, 2019; Wang et al. , 2019; Liu et al. , 2022 Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts for Supplier Verification Smart Contracts, Transparency, Fraud Prevention Enhancing Trust & Security in Procurement Transactions auvergne, 2022; Ameh, 2024; Hasan, Islam, et al. , 2024; Hasan, Shawon, et al. , 2024 AI-Powered Supplier Selection & Risk Prediction Predictive Analytics, Supplier Performance Forecasting Optimizing Supplier Networks through AI-Powered Automation Balaji & Viswanadham (2008) Tax-Integrated & Hub-Based Procurement Model Foreign Direct Investment, Regional Hub Sourcing, Tax Optimization Balancing Cost & Tax Efficiency in Multinational Procurement (Amorim et al. , 2016), (Chang and Hung, 2010), (Kumar Kar and K. Pani, 2014) LCR-Based Supplier Selection Model Local Content Rules, Deterministic Supplier Selection Ensuring Compliance with LCRs while Optimizing Supplier Selection Gonzalez Velarde & Laguna (2004), Bozorgi-Amiri, Jabalameli and Mirzapour Al-e-Hashem, 2013; Das, 2020) Mixed Integer Nonlinear Program with Exchange Rate Scenarios Economic States (Weak, Medium, Strong), Heuristic-Based Optimization Minimizing Exchange Rate Risks in Global Sourcing Bozorgi-Amiri, Jabalameli and Mirzapour Al-e-Hashem, 2013; Hammami, Temponi and Frein, 2014; Tintner and Sengupta, 2014 Deterministic & Stochastic Procurement Models Exchange Rate Fluctuations, Inflation, Economic Uncertainty Procurement Optimization under Economic Volatility 5. Transportation in Global Supply Chains: AI, Automation, and Sustainable Freight Solutions 5.1 Overview The efficient movement of goods via international supply networks is dependent on transportation. Supply chain models frequently neglect it despite its significance, opting instead to center on facility placement, supplier evaluation, and inventory control (Bookbinder and Matuk, 2009; Martel and Klibi, 2016; Žic et al. , 2024). To cut down on logistics expenses, speed up deliveries, and lessen environmental impact, effective transportation planning is essential. In the past, researchers have focused on the pros and cons of various transportation techniques, such as air and maritime freight logistics (Žic et al. , 2024). Transportation has a major influence on supply chain efficiency, according to early empirical research by (Chan and Zhang, 2011; Ke et al. , 2015). However, these studies did not include current AI-driven route optimization, autonomous freight solutions, or sustainability-focused logistics processes. Artificial intelligence (AI), automation (automation), and advances driven by sustainability have recently transformed global transportation networks (Majid et al. , 2023; Challoumis, 2024; Wolniak and Stecuła, 2024). In order to improve route efficiency and decrease delivery lead times, freight optimization models powered by AI currently integrate real-time traffic data, predictive analytics, and machine learning algorithms (Kaul and Khurana, 2022; Dikshit et al. , 2023). Additionally, new solutions are emerging in the field of autonomous freight technology, which can reduce costs, improve safety, and minimize carbon emissions. These technologies include self-driving trucks, drones for last-mile delivery, and hyperloop cargo transit (Jaller et al. , 2020; Kostrzewski et al. , 2022). Another important factor is sustainability; businesses may lessen their impact on the environment without sacrificing efficiency thanks to AI-driven carbon tracking and the use of alternative fuels (Kaul and Khurana, 2022; Žic et al. , 2024). 5.2 Transportation by Road or Rail: AI-Driven Logistics, Autonomous Freight, and Sustainable Intermodal Systems After establishing a network of facilities and suppliers, the transportation of goods between sites and the mode of transport must be optimized (Eskandarpour et al. , 2015). Conventional transportation models aimed to reduce cost, distance, or transit duration via strategic modal selection (Litman, 2011; Fagnant and Kockelman, 2014; de Dios Ortúzar and Willumsen, 2024). Intermodal transportation, which entails the use of two or more modes of conveyance for goods, has been a fundamental aspect of global logistics (Bhattacharya et al. , 2014; Agamez-Arias and Moyano-Fuentes, 2017). A product obtained from Hong Kong may be shipped via ocean freight to California and thereafter transferred to vehicles for final delivery to regional distribution hubs (Haveman and Hummels, 2004; Bonacich and Wilson, 2008; Sinn, 2012). The NAFTA trade corridor in North America has been essential for facilitating intermodal connectivity, enabling cross-border freight transport through rail and truck networks (Bookbinder and Matuk, 2009). European transportation strategies similarly prioritize the construction of rail-truck intermodal systems, exemplified by EU-backed initiatives like the REORIENT corridor, which links Scandinavia to Greece to alleviate road congestion and mitigate environmental effects (Bookbinder and Matuk, 2009). Nevertheless, these prior models failed to account for contemporary AI-driven logistics, autonomous freight systems, or sustainability-focused intermodal innovations. Recent advancements in AI-driven transportation planning, autonomous trucks, and rail efficiency have profoundly altered global freight logistics (Rashid and Kausik, 2024). Current machine learning algorithms provide predictive traffic analysis and dynamic route optimization, hence minimizing congestion and delivery delays (Berhanu et al. , 2024; Nampalli and Adusupalli, 2024). Autonomous freight technologies, including self-driving trucks and AI-managed rail logistics, are being implemented to enhance efficiency, decrease worker reliance, and cut fuel consumption (Peta, 2023; Rane, Kaya and Rane, 2024). Moreover, AI-augmented intermodal freight planning facilitates real-time cargo modifications in response to traffic circumstances, weather disturbances, and port congestion levels (Godsmark and Richards, 2019; Jeevan et al. , 2022). Sustainability is increasingly emphasized, as blockchain-enabled carbon tracking enables logistics companies to monitor emissions throughout multimodal supply chains and adhere to net-zero environmental regulations (Krishnan, Balas and Kumar, 2023; Leclerc and Ircha, 2023). In Europe, AI-driven long intermodal freight trains (LIFTS) are undergoing trials to enhance rail efficiency and alleviate road congestion (Wiegmans and Janic, 2019; Z. Wang et al. , 2023) 5.3 Transportation by Air: AI-Powered Optimization, Autonomous Aerial Logistics, and Sustainable Air Freight Air transportation is essential to global supply networks, facilitating rapid and dependable delivery of commodities between regions (Rodrigue, 2020). Conventional research examined the economic advantages of dedicated multimodal cargo facilities (DMCFs), which reduce delays and improve efficiency in air freight operations (Morrell and Klein, 2018; Dresner and Zou, 2020). These studies highlighted the significance of cargo-specific hubs in mitigating material flow disruptions, inventory expenses, and transit delays (van der Loeff, Godar and Prakash, 2018). Tyan et al. (2003) examined third-party logistics (3PL) consolidation policies, emphasizing the cost-service trade-offs inherent in air freight decision-making (Chen and Notteboom, 2012; Soh, Wong and Chong, 2015; Qaiser, 2019; Hosseini and Vashaee, 2022). (Archetti, Peirano and Speranza, 2022) conducted additional research that presented multiobjective intermodal routing models, optimizing cargo cost, transit duration, and economies of scale via Lagrangian relaxation techniques. Nonetheless, these first models failed to incorporate contemporary AI-driven air freight optimization, autonomous aerial logistics, or sustainable aviation solutions, which are already revolutionizing global air transportation tactics (Layton, 2021). Recent breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, automation, and sustainability-oriented air logistics have offered novel optimization techniques in air freight routing, consolidation, and emissions mitigation (Chen et al. , 2024). AI-driven logistics models utilize machine learning algorithms to forecast ideal air routes, demand variations, and delivery timelines, hence reducing delays and fuel usage (Li et al. , 2024; Nampalli and Adusupalli, 2024). The rise of autonomous aerial logistics, including as cargo drones and AI-operated air freight hubs, is improving last-mile delivery and diminishing dependence on conventional freight models (Dorn, 2021). Sustainability is a primary emphasis, with AI-driven carbon monitoring and alternative fuel-powered cargo planes assisting corporations in shifting to lower-emission supply chains (Kuramochi et al. , 2018; Dagnachew and Hof, 2022). Blockchain-based air freight tracking solutions are enhancing real-time visibility and security in worldwide cargo operations (Elmay et al. , 2022). 6. Production Switching, Transfer Pricing Policies, and Postponement: AI-Driven Decision Models and Blockchain-Based Financial Optimization Dynamic economic conditions, varying exchange rates, and evolving production costs impact manufacturing, pricing, and supply chain flexibility (Smith, 2012). Multinational businesses (MNCs) encounter these challenges as their worldwide supply chains expand. (Ellram, Tate and Petersen, 2013) and Huchzermeier and (Romer and Romer, 2010) were among the first to examine production switching techniques, in which businesses move output in response to changes in labor costs, tax incentives, and currency rates. These researches used stochastic dynamic programming models to determine the best placement and number of manufacturing facilities taking transportation, starting, and shutdown expenses into consideration. In a similar (Koberstein, Lukas and Naumann, 2013) and (Ellram, Tate and Petersen, 2013) put out a deterministic model for assessing capacity hedging techniques, which enable businesses to counteract changes in demand by varying output between nations. These early models laid the groundwork for what is now a digital delay strategy, a blockchain-based transfer pricing system, or AI-powered production optimization, all of which are revolutionizing global manufacturing networks (Wuest et al. , 2022). Decentralized postponement methods, smart transfer pricing mechanisms, and real-time production switching are all made possible by recent breakthroughs in blockchain and artificial intelligence (Khan et al. , 2023). According to McKinsey (2023), multinational corporations can now optimize their global production networks in real-time with the use of AI-driven predictive analytics, which help them anticipate changes in labor costs, currency rates, and supply chain hazards (Whitaker, Ekman and Thompson, 2017; Árva, Pásztor and Pyatanova, 2020). In addition to lowering fraud and increasing cross-border financial transparency, blockchain-enabled financial tracking guarantees compliance with international transfer pricing legislation (Sharma et al. , 2020; Sunny et al. , 2022; Irfan et al. , 2023). By combining digital twin technology with postponement techniques, producers can now delay final assembly according to real-time demand forecasts, significantly improving customized production planning (Cohen et al. , 2019; Wang et al. , 2021). Furthermore, (Ciriello, 2021) and (CAPE, PIERLUIGI and RIPAMONTI, 2018) report that smart contracts in blockchain-based procurement systems automate tax-efficient supply chain transactions, optimizing transfer pricing policies and maintaining regulatory compliance. Research in the future should center on improving frameworks for delaying decisions in highly dynamic global supply chains, incorporating blockchain-based pricing optimization, and scaling global production models powered by artificial intelligence. International trade rules and geopolitical risks pose a significant obstacle to production shift and transfer pricing. Multinational corporations (MNCs) are under increasing pressure to reevaluate their worldwide production footprints in light of rising protectionist policies, currency devaluations, and regional trade disputes (Moradlou et al. , 2021; Ghodsi, Vujanović and Landesmann, 2024). In order to keep up with the latest geopolitical events, changes in labor laws, and tax rules, companies are using AI-driven risk management systems. This allows them to make preemptive adjustments to their production networks (King and Petty, 2021). By analyzing multi-country taxation frameworks with machine learning algorithms, autonomous supply chain planning solutions help businesses maximize tax efficiency while staying in line with international trade rules (Gurumurthy et al. , 2019). Companies are increasingly recognizing the importance of these advancements as they strive for increased agility in dealing with the unpredictable global market and the financial risks linked to complex transfer pricing and shifting tariffs. From a sustainability standpoint, production location options are being optimized while lowering environmental effect through the utilization of AI-powered supply chain decision models. A growing number of companies are adopting the practice of "green postponement", choosing their manufacturing locations in consideration of environmental regulations, renewable energy availability, and carbon emissions (Mirzapour Al-E-Hashem, Baboli and Sazvar, 2013; Ugarte, Golden and Dooley, 2016; Sarkar, Ahmed and Kim, 2018). Ethical production and responsible resource allocation are being supported by blockchain-based supply chain transparency technologies. This is especially true in industries that are being held to a higher standard in terms of environmental and labor issues. Table 3 Production Switching, Transfer Pricing, and Postponement Summary Author(s) & Year Model Type Key Factors Considered Objective (Tian, 2020), (Ciriello, 2021) Smart Contracts for Automated Global Tax Optimization Automated Compliance with Trade Laws & Tax Regulations Enable Automated Tax-Efficient Transfer Pricing & Compliance (K. Wang et al. , 2023), (Kar, Choudhary and Singh, 2022), (Durlik et al. , 2024) AI-Driven Green Postponement & Sustainable Manufacturing Sustainability Metrics, Carbon Emission Reduction in Site Selection Ensure Sustainable Production Through AI-Based Decision Models (Chang, Iakovou and Shi, 2020), (Mia, Wessels and Adam, 2023) Blockchain-Based Transfer Pricing & Compliance Tracking Secure Cross-Border Financial Transactions, Regulatory Compliance Improve Transfer Pricing Strategies Using Blockchain Transparency (Wong et al. , 2024), (Rane, Kaya and Rane, 2024) AI-Powered Predictive Analytics for Production Switching Machine Learning-Based Production Location Optimization Enhance Agility in Global Production Switching Through AI (Berry, 2013), (Adland, Bjerknes and Herje, 2017), (Ashayeri, Ma and Sotirov, 2014), (Bookbinder and Matuk, 2009), (Tang and Zhang, 2012) Entry-Exit Model for Global Production Decision-Making Real Exchange Rate Volatility, Tariffs, Wages, Raw Material Prices Optimize Market Entry & Exit Strategies for Cost Efficiency (Wang, Zhao and Huchzermeier, 2021), (Koberstein, Lukas and Naumann, 2013) Operational & Allocation Hedging Strategies for Exchange Rate Volatility Multi-Period Exchange Rate Risk, Demand Constraints Enable Strategic Production Allocation Hedging to Reduce Risk (Lohmer and Lasch, 2021), (Martínez-Costa et al. , 2014) "Stochastic Control Model for Production Allocation Multi-Plant Production Allocation, Inventory Management Dynamically Adjust Production Based on Demand & Currency Trends (Goyal, 2011), (OKOLIE, 2020) Inflation & Exchange Rate-Based Production Cost Model Inflation Sensitivity, Market Allocation, Demand-Supply Optimization Maximize Profits by Adjusting Production to Inflationary Trends 7. Case Studies: AI-Driven Insights, Digital Transformation, and Sustainability in Global Logistics The difficulties that businesses encounter in managing their global supply chains, undergoing digital transformation, and implementing sustainability efforts might be better understood by looking at case studies (Wickert and Risi, 2019; Kotsila et al. , 2023). Interviews, site visits, and industry participation have been added to case studies, which have traditionally depended on secondary data sources (De Massis and Kotlar, 2014; Rashid et al. , 2019). This has allowed for richer, data-driven assessments. Steel producers in Southeast Asia, Australia, and New Zealand improved coordination across supply chain tiers by synchronizing master production schedules with worldwide sales and operations planning, as emphasized in early studies (Spiller et al. , 2013; Rahimian et al. , 2021; Somia, 2024). Similarly, (Lim and Tsutsui, 2012) and (Mander, 2014) investigated the reasons behind the decision of certain Dutch corporations to keep their activities on a regional level despite the trend toward globalization. The authors identified regulatory concerns, proximity to markets, and political and economic stability as important factors in this decision. Modern logistics strategies rely on AI-powered decision-making, digital supply chain visibility, and real-time sustainability monitoring; nevertheless, these elements were not considered in the aforementioned research, although they did offer important foundational insights (Attah et al. , 2024; Sharma and Tripathi, 2024). A number of recent case studies have shown how to improve the efficiency of global supply chains by combining AI, blockchain technology, and models driven by sustainability. According to McKinsey (2023), businesses may now use AI-powered predictive analytics to foresee potential interruptions in the supply chain, which allows them to optimize their routes and make real-time adjustments to their inventories (Dash et al. , 2019; Hassan and Mhmood, 2021). Better supplier collaboration and risk management have been made possible by AI-based decision support systems (DSS) in digital transformation programs, which have increased global industrial coordination (Martínez-López and Casillas, 2013; Baryannis et al. , 2019; Abideen et al. , 2021; Allal-Chérif, Simón-Moya and Ballester, 2021). Ethical sourcing compliance and carbon tracking are made possible by blockchain-enabled transparency models, which contribute to sustainability (Rane and Thakker, 2020; Khanfar et al. , 2021). Companies are utilizing automation, robotics, and self-driving fleets to improve operational efficiency and decrease environmental impact. Case studies in autonomous supply chains show this, as shown with Tesla and Amazon's AI-driven logistics platforms (Porter et al. , 2018; Girasa and Girasa, 2020). 8. Regional Models: AI-Driven Optimization and Sustainable Trade Networks Regional models take into account distinct economic, regulatory, and infrastructure constraints that are specific to different regions of the world, as opposed to many global logistics-focused supply chain models (Thai, Yeo and Pak, 2016; Gonzalez-Feliu, 2018; Mangla et al. , 2019). Some of the first research to focus on NAFTA-specific trade restrictions were Wilhelm et al. (2005) and looked at things like tax incentives for Mexican maquiladoras, border-crossing expenses, and local content rules (LCRs) (Bookbinder and Matuk, 2009; Rumford, 2014). The distribution of natural gas in South America has unique logistical issues, as take-or-pay contracts impose minimum purchase commitments irrespective of demand (Baruya, 2015; Barnes, 2022). Unlike their North American counterparts, the hub-based transportation network prioritises interior rivers in Europe (Notteboom, 2009; Kovacevic, 2017). Meanwhile, Sheu (2004) examined logistics trends in Asia and demonstrated how Taiwanese manufacturers choose the best global logistics strategies for the integrated circuit industry using fuzzy AHP and MADM models (Tsui, Tzeng and Wen, 2015; Kubler et al. , 2016; Tsai and Phumchusri, 2021). Now essential components of contemporary regional supply chain plans, these models failed to take into consideration AI-powered decision optimization, blockchain-enabled trade compliance, or sustainability-driven logistics frameworks (Leogrande, 2024). Sustainability analytics, artificial intelligence, and blockchain are changing the game when it comes to optimizing supply chains on a regional scale (Sanders et al. , 2019; Singh et al. , 2020; Eyo-Udo, 2024). According to (Ruvoletto, 2023) and (Qureshi, 2021), trade flows between the United States and Mexico are experiencing a decrease in border-crossing delays and logistical costs due to AI-driven route optimization and autonomous freight technologies. Supply chain resilience is being enhanced in South American enterprises by using AI-enabled risk assessment models, which are assisting with exchange rate volatility and trade interruptions (Modgil et al. , 2022; Modgil, Singh and Hannibal, 2022). In Europe, customs compliance systems driven by blockchain are improving supply chain transparency and digitizing regulatory paperwork, allowing for frictionless cross-border trade (Brookbanks and Parry, 2022, 2024). At the same time, smart warehousing systems and AI-enhanced port logistics are enhancing trade efficiency, decreasing operational bottlenecks, and simplifying exports in high-tech industries in the Asia-Pacific region (Haddad, 2023; Barbosa, 2024). Table 4 Regional Logistics Models Summary Region Traditional Model & Key Studies Challenges Considered Recent Advancements (2010–2024) Future Research Directions North America NAFTA-Specific Trade Constraints (Kennedy, 2021) Border-Crossing Costs, LCRs, Tax Incentives for Maquiladoras AI-Driven Route Optimization, Autonomous Freight for US-Mexico Trade (McKinsey, 2023), (López Bou, 2024), (Walker, Winders and Boamah, 2021) Integration of AI in Cross-Border Logistics, Blockchain for Trade Security South America Take-or-Pay Contract Logistics (Dierker et al. , 2022), (Ishmael Ackah et al. , 2024) "Minimum Purchase Commitments, Exchange Rate Volatility AI-Based Risk Assessment for Exchange Rate & Trade Disruptions (Badhan, Neeroj and Rahman, 2024) Resilient Supply Chains with AI-Driven Risk Management Europe Hub-Based Inland Waterway Network (Yin et al. , 2021) Cross-Border Trade Complexity, Limited Rail Infrastructure Blockchain-Powered Customs Compliance for Seamless EU Trade (Mazzei et al. , 2020) Sustainability Metrics in EU Logistics, Blockchain for Compliance Asia-Pacific AI-Based Logistics Strategies in Semiconductor Industry (FUKAGAWA, 2021), (Chitturu et al. , 2017) Export Bottlenecks, High-Tech Supply Chain Optimization AI-Enhanced Port Logistics & Smart Warehousing for Tech Exports (Osman, 2024) AI-Driven Predictive Analytics for Trade Optimization & Export Efficiency 9. Scope and Methodology This study follows a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology, evaluating academic papers published in the last decade on AI-driven decision-making, sustainable logistics, and autonomous freight transport. The review is structured into the following categories: Digital Logistics and AI-Driven Optimization – Predictive analytics, real-time supply chain visibility, and blockchain security. Sustainable Logistics Strategies – Carbon footprint reduction, green transportation networks, and eco-friendly warehousing. Autonomous Freight Innovations – Self-driving trucks, drone logistics, and hyperloop cargo systems. Comparative Analysis of Traditional vs. Digital Decision-Making – Transition from static optimization models to AI-driven logistics strategies. By analyzing these themes, this study aims to contribute to the growing body of knowledge on the future of digital, sustainable, and autonomous logistics while identifying key research gaps and future opportunities. 9.1 Research Method This study adopts a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach to examine the evolution of global supply chain logistics from 2010 to 2024, with a particular focus on digital technologies, AI-driven decision-making, sustainability, and autonomous freight systems. The SLR method ensures a structured, replicable, and comprehensive analysis of existing research, systematically identifying, categorizing, and synthesizing findings to provide insights into emerging trends and challenges. The methodology follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework, ensuring transparency in article selection, categorization, and analysis. This study primarily reviews literature published between 2010 and 2024, reflecting the gradual emergence of AI applications, blockchain integration, and sustainability-driven innovations in global logistics. The selection period captures early advancements in supply chain digitalization (2010–2015), followed by the expansion of AI, automation, and blockchain technologies (2016–2020), and finally, the acceleration of autonomous freight, predictive analytics, and sustainability-focused logistics (2021–2024). The exclusion of pre-2010 studies is based on the lack of AI-driven logistics applications and digital transformation frameworks, ensuring that the research remains aligned with contemporary supply chain challenges. This study aims to identify common themes, methodologies, and research gaps, ultimately contributing to the development of a theoretical framework for AI, sustainability, and automation in logistics. Chart 1 illustrates the distribution of reference papers by year from 2010 to 2024, highlighting a progressive increase in research on digital supply chain innovations. Research interest in supply chain digitalization began with 3 papers in 2010, increasing to 7 papers in 2012 and 12 papers in 2015. A noticeable rise was observed in 2017 with 22 publications, marking the initial adoption of AI-driven decision-making in SCM. By 2019, research had expanded to 35 papers, followed by rapid growth in 2021 with 58 papers, peaking in 2022 with 92 publications. While 2023 recorded 85 papers, early projections suggest continued interest in 2024, maintaining an upward trend. This trajectory reflects the growing academic and industry-wide recognition of AI, digital logistics, and sustainability as critical factors in SCM transformation. The notable increase in publications from 2016 onward suggests a strong shift toward AI-driven decision-making, blockchain transparency, and predictive logistics models, underscoring the importance of resilient, technology-driven, and sustainable global supply chains. The increasing volume of research highlights a rapidly evolving academic and industrial landscape, with a strong focus on big data analytics, automation, AI-powered optimization, and green logistics. This study builds upon existing literature while identifying theoretical and practical research gaps, offering insights into the next generation of digital and sustainable supply chain models. Future research should explore how AI and blockchain can further enhance supply chain resilience, optimize autonomous logistics, and drive sustainable supply chain transformations in the coming decade. 9.2 Summary of Selected Literature The updated Table 1 presents a summary of selected studies categorized by primary research topics and regions of focus, highlighting major trends and gaps in logistics research. The dominant research area appears to be AI-driven decision-making, particularly in predictive analytics and real-time supply chain optimization. Research on sustainable logistics primarily addresses carbon-neutral transportation and the role of blockchain in enhancing supply chain transparency. Meanwhile, autonomous freight technologies such as self-driving trucks and hyperloop logistics are emerging areas of study but require further exploration regarding regulatory feasibility and large-scale implementation. By synthesizing these findings, this study identifies key opportunities for future research in AI-powered logistics management, green supply chain innovation, and automation-driven freight transportation. Table 5 Research Themes Summary Primary Research Theme Key Topics Recent Trends Challenges 1. AI-Driven Decision-Making Predictive analytics, AI-powered selection, real-time optimization Adoption of AI in logistics planning, dynamic route optimization Data accuracy, AI training costs, integration with existing systems 2. Digital Logistics & Blockchain IoT-enabled freight tracking, blockchain security, cloud-based supply chain management Increased focus on supply chain transparency and cybersecurity Scalability, regulatory concerns, adoption barriers 3. Sustainable Supply Chains Carbon footprint reduction, electric freight transport, green warehousing Government regulations driving carbon-neutral logistics strategies High initial costs, transition complexities, technological gaps 4. Autonomous Freight Technologies Self-driving trucks, drone-based last-mile delivery, hyperloop cargo transport Investment in autonomous transport technologies Legal and safety regulations, public acceptance, infrastructure readiness 5. Comparative Analysis of Traditional vs. Digital Logistics Static optimization models, AI-driven logistics, cost-benefit analysis, scalability Shift from static decision models to real-time AI-driven analytics Lack of real-time data in traditional systems, resistance to automation 9.3 Systematic Review Protocol This systematic review protocol is based on the PRISMA framework proposed by Moher et al. (2015) and builds upon the methodology refined by Tranfield et al. (2003). The review process follows four key stages: Identification, Screening, Eligibility, and Inclusion, ensuring that only high-quality, relevant, and methodologically sound research is included in this study. The protocol ensures transparency, rigor, and replicability, allowing for a structured synthesis of literature on AI-driven decision-making, digital logistics, sustainability, and autonomous freight systems in global supply chain management. 9.3.1 Identification The identification stage involves defining relevant databases, search strategies, and keywords to ensure comprehensive coverage of AI, digital logistics, sustainability, and automation research in global supply chains. This stage applies systematic search techniques to major academic databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar. The search is limited to peer-reviewed journal articles, conference proceedings, and high-impact review studies published between 2010 and 2024 to capture the evolution of digital transformation in supply chain management. The primary keywords used include: “AI-driven supply chain optimization” “Digital logistics and big data analytics” “Sustainable supply chain management” “Autonomous freight and smart transportation” “Blockchain for supply chain transparency” 9.3.2 Screening In the screening stage, preliminary filtering is conducted to remove irrelevant studies that do not align with the research objectives. Papers are excluded if they: Lack empirical validation (e.g., conceptual studies without case studies or data). Do not focus on AI, digital logistics, automation, or sustainability in SCM. Are not peer-reviewed journal articles or conference proceedings. Duplicate studies already included in previous systematic reviews. This step involves reviewing titles, abstracts, and keywords to ensure that only highly relevant papers proceed to the next stage. 9.3.3 Eligibility The eligibility stage involves an in-depth evaluation of selected studies to ensure methodological rigor and relevance. Full-text analysis is conducted to assess: Research design (e.g., case studies, simulations, theoretical models). Data collection methods (empirical, qualitative, quantitative). Findings related to AI, automation, and sustainability in logistics. Only studies that demonstrate strong empirical evidence, use robust methodologies, and contribute meaningful insights are selected for the final inclusion stage. 9.3.4 Inclusion In the final inclusion stage, the most relevant studies are synthesized to extract key findings and identify patterns, challenges, and opportunities for future research. The selected literature is categorized based on thematic areas, including: AI-driven supply chain optimization and predictive analytics. The role of blockchain in enhancing supply chain transparency. Sustainable logistics and carbon-neutral transportation models. Autonomous freight technologies, drones, and hyperloop systems. Comparative analysis of traditional vs. digital logistics decision-making. Table 6 Systematic Review Protocol Summary Stage Step Criteria Applied Outcome Identification Defining search keywords and databases Search in Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, Google Scholar; Focus on AI, digital logistics, sustainability, automation (2010–2024) List of potentially relevant studies Screening Preliminary filtering based on abstracts and titles Exclude non-peer-reviewed articles, duplicates, conceptual studies without empirical validation Refined set of studies based on inclusion Eligibility Full-text analysis for relevance and methodological rigor Assess methodology, empirical data, research design, AI and sustainability focus High-quality, relevant studies selected for synthesis Inclusion Final synthesis of key findings and categorization Extract key themes, compare AI-driven and traditional logistics models, identify research gaps Comprehensive literature review with key insights and future research directions 10. Research Findings and Discussion 10.1 Reporting for Systematic Review The systematic review process followed a structured four-stage methodology Identification, Screening, Eligibility, and Inclusion to ensure that only the most relevant, high-quality research papers were included. Figure 3 illustrates this streamlined process, which helps visualize the progressive narrowing down of research studies from a broad pool of literature to a focused set of studies aligned with the study objectives. The review initially identified 1,945 research papers from academic databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The first stage (Identification) involved removing duplicates and non-relevant studies, leading to the exclusion of 690 papers. In the Screening stage, a detailed abstract review was conducted on 1,255 papers, evaluating their relevance to AI-driven logistics, blockchain transparency, sustainability, and supply chain automation. 510 papers were excluded at this stage for lacking empirical evidence, being conceptual-only studies, or not meeting methodological quality standards. The Eligibility stage involved full-text analysis of 745 papers, where each study’s methodology, findings, and theoretical contribution were carefully examined. After this detailed evaluation, 680 papers were excluded for issues such as methodological flaws, lack of quantitative analysis, or outdated technological frameworks. Finally, in the Inclusion stage, a final selection of 65 papers was made. These studies met the specific research questions and quality criteria required for this systematic review, forming the basis for the comprehensive analysis of AI, digital logistics, and sustainability in supply chain transformation. The keywords used in this systematic review were categorized into two major groups: AI & Digital Logistics and Supply Chain Management (SCM). These keywords were combined using Boolean operators (AND/OR) to refine searches and ensure the retrieval of the most relevant studies. Tables 7 and 8 summarize the keywords and search strategy, demonstrating the structured approach taken to optimize literature selection, minimize biases, and enhance the reliability of the findings. Table 7 Systematic Review Keywords Summary AI & Digital Logistics Group Supply Chain Management Group Primary Keywords Primary Keywords Artificial Intelligence (AI) Supply Chain Machine Learning Logistics Predictive Analytics Procurement Prescriptive Analytics Transportation Big Data Warehousing Cloud Computing Manufacturing Internet of Things (IoT) Inventory Management Blockchain Fleet Management Digital Twins Operations Smart Logistics Retail Autonomous Systems Distribution Table 8 Search Strategy and Boolean Operator Summary AI & Digital Logistics Group Operator Supply Chain Management Group "Artificial Intelligence" AND "Logistics" "Machine Learning" AND "Inventory Management" "Predictive Analytics" OR "Procurement" "Prescriptive Analytics" OR "Transportation" "Big Data" AND "Manufacturing" "Cloud Computing" AND "Warehousing" "Blockchain" OR "Fleet Management" "IoT" AND "Operations" "Digital Twins" OR "Retail" "Autonomous Systems" AND "Distribution" 10.2 Thematic Analysis Findings The thematic analysis of the final 65 selected studies revealed several key themes consistently emphasized across the literature. Figure 2 visually summarizes these dominant research themes, which provide insights into the evolution of AI-driven decision-making, digital logistics, and sustainable supply chain strategies. The main themes identified include: AI and Predictive Analytics – The role of machine learning and AI-powered models in forecasting supply chain disruptions, optimizing inventory, and improving supplier selection. Blockchain and Transparency – The integration of blockchain technology to enhance supply chain visibility, traceability, and fraud prevention in global logistics. Sustainability and Green Logistics – The impact of AI and digital transformation on reducing carbon emissions, improving energy efficiency, and promoting eco-friendly supply chains. Autonomous Freight and Smart Transportation – The emergence of drones, self-driving trucks, and hyperloop systems in enhancing logistics speed, reducing transportation costs, and ensuring safety compliance. Digital Twin and IoT Integration – The adoption of digital twins and real-time IoT tracking for enhancing operational efficiency, route optimization, and dynamic logistics network management. These themes illustrate the rapid evolution of AI, automation, and sustainability-driven decision-making in global supply chain logistics. They form the core of the systematic review findings, providing valuable insights into emerging research trends and future directions for SCM innovation. Table 9 Thematic Analysis Findings Theme Key Insights Research Impact AI & Predictive Analytics Machine learning models for forecasting disruptions, optimizing inventory, and supplier selection Enhancing supply chain resilience through predictive analytics Blockchain & Transparency Blockchain for supply chain visibility, traceability, and fraud prevention Improving security and trust in global supply chain networks Sustainability & Green Logistics AI-driven carbon reduction strategies, energy-efficient logistics, and eco-friendly SCM Promoting sustainable logistics operations and regulatory compliance Autonomous Freight & Smart Transportation Drones, self-driving trucks, hyperloop systems for cost reduction and safety compliance Advancing autonomous transportation and reducing operational costs Digital Twin & IoT Integration IoT-powered real-time tracking and digital twins for logistics network optimization Boosting operational efficiency through real-time data and automation 10.3 Key Themes Identified in Digital Logistics and AI-Driven Supply Chain Management The systematic review of the selected literature has revealed several key themes that emphasize the role of digital technologies, AI-driven decision-making, and big data analytics (BDA) in transforming global supply chains. These themes highlight how modern innovations contribute to supply chain resilience (SCRes), sustainability, and operational efficiency while addressing challenges related to disruptions, visibility, and cost management. 10.3.1. AI-Driven Predictive Analytics for Disruption Management Studies such as Lai et al. (2018) and Wamba et al. (2020) identify how AI-powered predictive analytics can enable firms to anticipate and mitigate supply chain disruptions. By leveraging machine learning algorithms and real-time data, companies can forecast potential risks, optimize mitigation strategies, and enhance decision-making during supply chain uncertainties. AI-powered risk assessment models allow firms to respond proactively to fluctuations in demand, supply shortages, geopolitical risks, and transportation delays. 10.3.2. Digital Supply Chain Visibility and Transparency Bag et al. (2023) emphasize the significance of digital logistics solutions in improving supply chain visibility and transparency. The integration of IoT, blockchain, and cloud-based tracking enhances real-time monitoring of goods, enabling firms to optimize inventory movement, reduce lead times, and minimize inefficiencies. Blockchain-enabled supply chain transparency ensures secure and tamper-proof records, promoting trust and regulatory compliance across global supplier networks. These advancements improve both resilience and agility in supply chain operations. 10.3.3. Autonomous Systems for Operational Efficiency and Cost Reduction Autonomous freight technologies, including drones, self-driving trucks, and hyperloop transport systems, are transforming logistics by reducing transportation costs, enhancing speed, and optimizing resource utilization. Research by (Jaller et al. , 2020) highlights how automated warehouses, AI-driven procurement systems, and intelligent routing algorithms contribute to cost savings and supply chain performance improvements. AI-powered demand forecasting minimizes overstocking and reduces transportation inefficiencies, making supply chains more resilient and cost-effective. These themes underscore the growing reliance on AI, automation, and blockchain in modern logistics. As Table 10 illustrates, the systematic coding of these studies categorizes the key themes, specific keywords, and conceptual frameworks that define the next generation of global supply chain management strategies. Table 10 Summary of Papers Coded by Keyword Theme Keywords Researchers AI-Driven Predictive Analytics for Disruption Management Forecasting, supply chain risk mitigation, AI-driven disruption management (Kalusivalingam et al. , 2022), (R. S. Khan et al. , 2022), (Nzeako et al. , 2024), (Groenewald, Garg and Yerasuri, 2024) Digital Supply Chain Visibility and Transparency Real-time tracking, IoT visibility, logistics optimization, transparency (Moshood et al. , 2021), (Adeusi et al. , 2024), (Dolgui and Ivanov, 2022), (Udeh et al. , 2024) Autonomous Systems for Operational Efficiency and Cost Reduction Autonomous vehicles, hyperloop freight, drone logistics, AI-powered procurement (Rouhiainen, 2018), (Mahor et al. , 2022), (Singh et al. , 2022) Sustainability and Green Logistics Strategies Carbon reduction, green supply chains, eco-friendly logistics, renewable energy (Patra, 2018), (Al Bashar et al. , 2017), (S. A. R. Khan et al. , 2022) Blockchain and Data Security in Global Supply Chains Blockchain transparency, cybersecurity in SCM, digital trust mechanisms (Centobelli et al. , 2022), (Al-Farsi, Rathore and Bakiras, 2021), (Irfan et al. , 2024), (Xu et al. , 2021), (Asante et al. , 2021), (Qian and Papadonikolaki, 2021) Technological Integration and Smart Logistics Cloud-based logistics, smart warehouses, digital twins, IoT-enabled efficiency (Alsudani et al. , 2023), (Sahal et al. , 2021), (Zrelli and Rejeb, 2024) AI-Based Decision Support Systems in SCM Data visualization, machine learning models, KPI tracking, AI-powered decision models, machine learning in logistics, data-driven strategies (Heilig and Scheer, 2023), (Data, 2024), (Dolz Ausina, 2023), (Jakkan, 2021), (Tito, 2023) 11. Comparison to Prior Research This paper extends prior research by analyzing studies published between 2010 and 2024, covering a period of significant transformation in global supply chain management (SCM). Earlier studies, particularly between 2010 and 2015, primarily focused on cost reduction, supplier selection, and inventory management within traditional logistics models. However, research from 2016 onward has increasingly emphasized AI-driven decision-making, blockchain-enabled transparency, and sustainability-driven logistics, reflecting the growing reliance on digital technologies in modern supply chains. Unlike previous reviews that were limited to operational efficiencies, this study integrates insights into emerging innovations such as AI-powered risk mitigation, predictive analytics, and autonomous freight technologies. With the adoption of machine learning models, digital twins, and IoT-powered logistics optimization, firms are now able to enhance supply chain resilience (SCRes) and improve performance (SCP) in real-time, enabling adaptive decision-making in response to global disruptions. 11.1 Regulatory Challenges and Industry Adoption Barriers While digital transformation has accelerated across supply chains, regulatory compliance remains a major challenge. Studies from 2018 to 2024 emphasize the complexities of cross-border trade regulations, cybersecurity laws for blockchain adoption, and sustainability reporting standards. Many firms face barriers in adopting AI-powered logistics due to data privacy concerns, regulatory constraints on autonomous vehicles, and the slow pace of standardization across different regions. The integration of AI and automation in logistics raises workforce displacement concerns, requiring businesses to retrain employees and adapt to new AI-driven workflows. This review highlights the need for policy frameworks that balance technological innovation with ethical, legal, and employment considerations, ensuring smooth transitions to autonomous and data-driven logistics systems. Case Study: The European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) (2023) requires companies to disclose their environmental impact, including carbon emissions from supply chains. Research suggests that firms integrating AI-driven carbon tracking tools are better positioned to meet these regulatory demands (Dinh, Husmann and Melloni, 2023; Hu and Sinniah, 2024). North America: Studies on U.S. freight regulations (2022–2024) indicate that autonomous trucking technologies face hurdles due to the absence of standardized federal safety policies, delaying large-scale adoption (Fagnant and Kockelman, 2015; Mai et al. , 2018; Coito, 2021; Bassey et al. , 2024). Asia: The China Blockchain Supply Chain Initiative (2022) is promoting secure, tamper-proof supply chain transactions using blockchain. However, interoperability challenges remain for global firms that must align with different regional security protocols (Chang, Iakovou and Shi, 2020; Dudczyk, Dunston and Crosby, 2024; Nisar et al. , 2024). Case Study: The Amazon Robotics Fulfillment Centers (2018–2024) have seen a 40% increase in automated workflows for warehouse operations, but reports suggest that worker displacement concerns have led to increased regulatory scrutiny (SANDUA, no date; SHALIZI, no date; Corbato et al. , 2018; Adner, 2021; Banerjee et al. , 2022). Industry Trend: AI ethics policies in logistics (2023) emphasize the need for "human-in-the-loop" AI models, ensuring that automated logistics decision-making remains transparent and auditable (Gaur and Sahoo, 2022; Vyhmeister and Castane, 2024). 11.2 Sustainability and Carbon-Neutral Logistics Furthermore, this review highlights the role of carbon-neutral logistics frameworks and sustainability-focused supply chain strategies as key trends from 2018 to 2024. Companies are increasingly leveraging AI to optimize carbon footprint reduction, smart warehousing solutions, and green transportation networks, ensuring compliance with environmental regulations while maintaining efficiency. The integration of blockchain technology further enhances supply chain security, fraud prevention, and end-to-end transparency, strengthening global logistics networks. Case Study: The DHL Smart Logistics Initiative (2022–2024) has integrated AI-powered route optimization and electric freight vehicles, leading to a 20% reduction in carbon emissions in urban last-mile delivery networks (Kern, 2021; El Makhloufi, 2023). Emerging Trend: Carbon offset marketplaces using blockchain technology have gained traction, allowing companies to track and verify emissions reductions in real-time (Ugochukwu et al. , 2024; Zhu, Duan and Sarkis, 2024). 11.3 Emerging Autonomous Freight Technologies This paper examines the growing impact of autonomous freight solutions, including drones for last-mile delivery, self-driving trucks, and hyperloop cargo transport systems. These technologies offer unprecedented speed, reduced costs, and enhanced safety compliance, reshaping the future of global logistics and distribution networks. However, widespread adoption of autonomous logistics technologies is hindered by regulatory uncertainty, infrastructure limitations, and technological maturity levels. Self-Driving Trucks & Drones: Studies from 2021 to 2024 highlight that autonomous trucking and drone-based logistics solutions can cut transportation costs by up to 30%, but regulatory approval for large-scale deployment remains a barrier (Moshref-Javadi and Winkenbach, 2021; Raghunatha, Thollander and Barthel, 2023; Betti Sorbelli, 2024). Hyperloop Freight Transport: While hyperloop technology shows potential for high-speed cargo transport, high infrastructure costs and safety regulations have slowed adoption beyond pilot programs (Taylor, Hyde and Barr, 2016; Nikitas et al. , 2017; Mateu, Fernández and Franco, 2021). Blockchain for Supply Chain Transparency: Walmart and IBM’s blockchain SCM initiative (2023) successfully reduced fraud risks and improved real-time tracking across global supplier networks (Chang, Iakovou and Shi, 2020; Almabrok, 2023; Chaker and Damak, 2024; Vazquez Melendez, Bergey and Smith, 2024). 11.3.1 Bridging the Gap Between Traditional and Digital Supply Chains By providing a comprehensive, forward-looking perspective, this paper bridges the gap between traditional supply chain models and the digital transformation era. It offers a strategic roadmap for researchers and practitioners to navigate the evolving landscape of AI-driven, sustainable, and autonomous supply chains, while addressing: Regulatory compliance and security challenges Ethical AI integration and workforce implications Carbon-neutral logistics and blockchain-based transparency Adoption barriers in autonomous freight technologies This review highlights the emerging need for resilient, technology-driven, and sustainable global supply chains, ensuring that AI, automation, and digital logistics strategies remain scalable, ethical, and aligned with industry regulations. 12. Evaluation and Future Directions The impact of digitization, AI-driven decision-making, sustainability, and autonomous freight systems on global supply chain logistics has been investigated in this study, which used a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology. This review of research articles covers the years 2010–2024 and finds important topics, methods, and gaps that show where we have come from and where we need to go next. There is still a disparity in the dissemination of regional research, even if AI-driven logistics has made great strides. While most studies center on Asia, Europe, and North America, South America, Africa, and the Middle East are noticeably understudied (Fagnant and Kockelman, 2015; Dinh, Husmann and Melloni, 2023; Mia, Wessels and Adam, 2023; Bassey et al. , 2024; Dudczyk, Dunston and Crosby, 2024). A lack of knowledge on the potential adaptation of AI-powered logistics, blockchain for transparency, and autonomous freight systems to the varied regulatory, economic, and infrastructure settings of these developing markets is a result of this. In order to offer a more comprehensive view on digitalization of the global supply chain, future research should broaden the geographical scope (Tahir et al. , 2020; Mishra et al. , 2024). According to theme analysis, operational efficiency, supply chain visibility, and predictive analytics have been the most researched topics. Nevertheless, there is still a lot of room for improvement at the crossroads of sustainability and AI-driven logistics optimization. Although green logistics techniques are becoming more popular, there is a lack of research that incorporates AI-driven sustainability initiatives. These initiatives include carbon-neutral logistics models, emissions tracking with AI, and circular supply chains facilitated by blockchain. To find out how AI can strike a balance between efficiency and sustainability, guaranteeing affordable solutions for green supply chains, more study is required (Liu, Song and Liu, 2023). The majority of digital logistics research relies on case studies, optimization models, and simulations as its methodology. There is a dearth of empirical data on the difficulties of long-term adoption and real-world validation for these methods, despite the fact that they are good at exploring theoretical applications (Rajabzadeh and Fatorachian, 2023). For example, there has been very little practical application of the theoretical work done on autonomous freight technology like self-driving trucks, hyperloop cargo transit, and drones. In order to determine the economic feasibility, regulatory compliance, and implementation feasibility of large-scale logistics operations, empirical field studies are crucial. In order to pick suppliers and reduce risk, procurement strategies in global supply chains are increasingly relying on digital platforms and AI (Bienhaus and Haddud, 2018). Nevertheless, a significant number of the current studies continue to use static models that do not take into consideration the ever-changing capacities of suppliers, geopolitical concerns, or real-time disruptions (Modgil, Singh and Hannibal, 2022). Research in the future should center on AI-driven procurement models that can adapt to changing market conditions, identify potential hazards, and automate talks with suppliers in order to make sourcing strategies more resilient. Predictive analytics, intermodal logistics planning, and AI-powered route optimization are revolutionizing freight operations, which are still heavily reliant on transportation (Krishnan et al. , 2024). Nevertheless, the implementation of autonomous transportation systems is frequently hindered by obstacles related to infrastructure and regulations. To ease the incorporation of autonomous vehicles, drone logistics, and AI-powered fleet management into existing supply chain networks, studies should investigate ways to standardize regulations across borders and formulate policies that encourage their use (Rane, Choudhary and Rane, 2024). Multinational firms must carefully manage fluctuating production costs, changing trade rules, and unpredictable currency rates by implementing tactics such as production switching, transfer pricing, and postponement (Trebilcock, 2014). While conventional models deal with these issues, AI-powered decision-making systems could efficiently allocate production resources in real-time, responding to fluctuations in the economy. Using predictive insights into demand variations, trade limitations, and cost variations, production switching frameworks based on machine learning should be the focus of future study (Diez-Olivan et al. , 2019). The location of facilities and the design of networks are still critical to the robustness of the global supply chain (Klibi, Martel and Guitouni, 2010; Baghalian, Rezapour and Farahani, 2013; Aldrighetti et al. , 2021; Sundarakani, Pereira and Ishizaka, 2021). Although digital twins and AI-enhanced network simulations have been investigated in logistics research, their practical use in strategic decision-making is still in the early stages (R. S. Khan et al. , 2022). Improvements in AI-powered facility location models could greatly increase resilience by optimizing the placement of distribution centers, automating warehouses, and improving cross-border supply chain architecture. While there is a growing body of empirical research on logistics transformation, there is still a lack of longitudinal studies on artificial intelligence, automation, and sustainability in supply chains. The majority of current research concentrates on short-term efficiency improvements instead of long-term effects. Future research could investigate how artificial intelligence and automation have changed over time. This research should examine how organizations adjust their logistical models in response to changes in technology, regulations, and consumer expectations. 13. Summary and Key Insights This research has carefully examined how global supply chain logistics have changed as a result of the incorporation of digitization, AI-driven decision-making, sustainability, and autonomous freight systems. The research has given a thorough overview of new technology, changing methods, and ongoing difficulties in supply chain management by examining literature that was published from 2010 to 2024. The extent of research on AI-driven logistics differs greatly depending on the region, industry, and operational paradigm. Some studies emphasize worldwide supply chains, while others focus on regional logistics models in order to suit specific market situations. The adoption of artificial intelligence, automation, and blockchain technologies varies depending on the legislative environment, the availability of infrastructure, and the economic feasibility of the technologies (Chen, 2024). This highlights the need for logistics models that are appropriate to the setting. The transition from deterministic to stochastic modeling is one of the most important developments in supply chain research today. Traditional models assumed that decision-making settings were unchanging, while modern research uses real-time data analytics, predictive AI models, and adaptive algorithms to deal with uncertainties such as demand swings, geopolitical threats, and supply chain interruptions (Klibi, Martel and Guitouni, 2010). This change has made the supply chain more resilient, but it has also brought about new issues in terms of implementation and computing. The function of manufacturing and facility location in supply chain models has also changed throughout time. A lot of research is now focused on dynamic production switching, which is based on cost efficiency, real-time risk assessments, and demand predictions powered by artificial intelligence (Aljohani, 2023). In addition, facility location models are taking sustainability indicators into account more and more, including carbon footprint tracking and green logistics tactics in order to strike a compromise between reducing environmental effect and optimizing costs. Transportation and intermodal logistics are still important parts of global supply chains. AI-driven systems are being used to improve route planning, fleet management, and real-time cargo tracking. Nevertheless, the implementation of autonomous freight technology, including drones, self-driving trucks, and hyperloop systems, is still in the first phases (Hansen, 2020). Research shows that legislative, infrastructural, and safety problems are significant obstacles to full-scale deployment, and additional empirical confirmation is needed. AI-powered procurement models, blockchain-enabled supply chain transparency, and automated risk assessment frameworks are changing the way global logistics operate from a business and strategic standpoint (Dasaklis et al. , 2022). However, there are still difficulties with scalability, cybersecurity, and standardizing data across borders. Future research should investigate AI-driven decision support systems that incorporate multi-tier supplier networks, dynamic trade compliance, and real-time financial risk monitoring (Banerjee et al. , 2022). This evaluation has brought to light important areas of study that are lacking and that could be further explored. Sustainability, digital transformation, and decision-making driven by artificial intelligence will remain key topics in supply chain research. The next challenge is to connect theoretical developments with practical applications in order to provide logistics solutions that are scalable, resilient, and sustainable in a time of rapid digital evolution. 14. Conclusion This paper conducts a thorough examination of the evolution of global supply chain logistics by examining the impact of AI-driven decision-making, digital logistics, sustainability policies, and autonomous freight systems. This analysis analyzes significant technology developments and strategic shifts that will influence the future of global supply networks through a comprehensive review of recent research publications from 2010 to 2024. The results provide theoretical contributions and practical insights to inform future research and implementation in digital and sustainable logistics. 14.1 Theoretical Contributions The theoretical contributions of this research are manifest in three principal domains. This report offers a thorough classification of AI-driven logistics advancements, encompassing predictive analytics for disruption management, blockchain-facilitated transparency, and AI-enhanced supply chain risk evaluations (Tsolakis et al. , 2022). This research provides a comprehensive framework that encapsulates the interrelationships among AI, automation, and logistics performance, whereas previous studies have examined specific elements of AI integration (Mahat et al. , 2023). Secondly, the research enhances comprehension of sustainability-oriented supply chain reforms (Ameh, 2024). This paper delineates the importance of green technologies, carbon footprint monitoring, and sustainable freight transport solutions as organizations transition to net-zero logistics. This study diverges from prior studies that concentrated exclusively on cost efficiency by incorporating economic, environmental, and technological variables, thereby offering a comprehensive perspective on sustainable supply chains. The paper connects theoretical developments with practical applications by examining the scalability and legal difficulties of AI-driven logistics models (Tsolakis et al. , 2022). This analysis consolidates real-world challenges, including cross-border compliance, cybersecurity threats, and constraints in digital infrastructure, while preceding research emphasizes conceptual advantages, providing a pragmatic framework for the implementation of AI and automation in global logistics. 14.2 Practical Contributions 14.2.1 Developing an AI-Driven Supply Chain Response Mechanism Global supply chains are progressively susceptible to interruptions, as evidenced by previous crises such as COVID-19, trade disputes, and geopolitical instability (Cui et al. , 2023). Consequently, implementing an AI-driven emergency response system is essential for alleviating supply chain disruptions and demand spikes (Bo and Ankai, 2021). By utilizing predictive analytics, real-time monitoring, and AI-enhanced inventory forecasting, organizations may more effectively predict and control supply chain variations. Governments and politicians must actively adopt contingency techniques, such as dynamic demand forecasting models and automated supply chain risk assessments, to maintain logistical stability during crises. Moreover, blockchain-facilitated transparency can assist enterprises in monitoring supply chain irregularities in real time, mitigating public uncertainty and facilitating more responsive decision-making in logistics operations (Aljohani, 2023). 14.2.2 Building a Resilient and Sustainable Supply Chain The growing unpredictability of global disruptions, resource scarcities, and climate-related hazards underscores the necessity for more flexible, sustainable, and localized supply chain frameworks (Mani and Goniewicz, 2023). The dependence on just-in-time (JIT) solutions has demonstrated inefficiency in highly volatile contexts, highlighting the necessity for resilient and sustainable supply chains capable of enduring unforeseen disruptions (Maleksaeidi et al. , 2017). This analysis identifies localized supply chains, regional sourcing, and nearshoring initiatives as significant trends arising from disruptions. Collaboration among logistics providers, AI-enhanced procurement platforms, and e-commerce ecosystems can cultivate a more robust and efficient supply chain network. Forming cross-industry collaborations and implementing real-time data-sharing systems among suppliers, retailers, and logistics companies can bolster supply chain resilience and mitigate environmental effects. Accelerating the Adoption of Autonomous and Digital Logistics Technologies 14.2.3 Accelerating the Adoption of Autonomous and Digital Logistics Technologies The digitalization of logistics networks is altering supply chain operations through the introduction of automation, artificial intelligence, and Internet of Things technology (Irfan et al. , 2024). The post-pandemic period has expedited consumer acceptance of autonomous last-mile delivery technologies, including drones, AI-driven logistics robots, and automated distribution facilities. AI-powered route optimization, blockchain-enabled freight tracking, and predictive supply chain analytics are essential for improving efficiency, lowering operational expenses, and guaranteeing sustainable delivery frameworks (Alsudani et al. , 2023). The extensive incorporation of big data, cloud computing, and machine learning algorithms facilitates more intelligent and responsive logistics networks, enabling firms to optimize transportation routes, enhance delivery speed, and improve real-time supply chain visibility. In conclusion, supply chain stakeholders must use AI-driven automation, blockchain transparency, and sustainability-focused logistics techniques to establish a more robust, flexible, and adaptive global supply chain (Adeusi et al. , 2024). The future of logistics transformation is rooted in predictive intelligence, decentralized supply chain frameworks, and digital innovation, guaranteeing that global supply networks are efficient, sustainable, and adaptable to disturbances. 14.3 Future Research Opportunities The swift evolution of global supply chain logistics via AI, digital technologies, and automation has unveiled numerous interesting avenues for research. As companies progressively transition to data-driven decision-making, autonomous freight solutions, and sustainability-oriented supply chain models, forthcoming research must investigate how these technologies will transform supply chain operations, resilience, and efficiency. A vital domain for forthcoming study is evaluating whether the use of AI-driven supply chain optimization, predictive analytics, and blockchain transparency will yield enduring or transient impacts on supply chain resilience. Although AI-driven models have proven effective in managing real-time disruptions and optimizing logistics flows, additional empirical research is required to determine the long-term sustainability of these AI interventions. Future study should examine the progression of AI adoption across various industries and geographies, evaluating whether AI-driven logistics solutions will establish themselves as industry norms or persist as niche applications in specific sectors. Future study should examine the scalability and regulatory problems associated with the increasing prevalence of autonomous freight systems, robotic warehousing, and AI-powered last-mile delivery. The growing convergence of IoT, cloud computing, and intelligent logistics networks is anticipated to transform freight management, real-time monitoring, and predictive maintenance. Further research should examine the legal, ethical, and economic ramifications of extensive autonomous logistics implementation, especially in international freight transport and hyperloop cargo systems. Given the increasing focus on net-zero emissions, green logistics, and environmentally sustainable transportation options, future research should explore the contributions of AI and big data to sustainable supply chain operations. Despite the growing acceptance of electric and hydrogen-powered freight trucks by firms, there is still a necessity for empirical studies assessing the cost-benefit trade-offs, environmental impact, and viability of green logistics implementation. Furthermore, research should concentrate on the potential of AI and blockchain to improve carbon footprint monitoring and supply chain transparency, thereby integrating sustainability into global logistics strategy. Future research should investigate how AI-driven supply chain models may adjust to evolving consumer preferences for expedited, tailored, and sustainable deliveries. The implementation of AI-driven personalization, automated warehousing, and real-time inventory optimization profoundly affects the efficiency of e-commerce logistics and enhances consumer experience. Future research may explore the impact of AI-driven demand forecasting and last-mile delivery improvements on consumer expectations, enhancing customer happiness and mitigating supply chain inefficiencies. 14.4 Limitations While this study provides valuable insights into the transformation of global supply chain logistics, certain limitations must be acknowledged. First, the review findings were derived through a systematic analysis of existing literature, meaning that the conclusions drawn are influenced by the availability and scope of recent research. As AI, blockchain, and autonomous logistics continue to evolve, new technologies and frameworks may emerge that were not fully covered in this review. Future studies should continuously update these insights to reflect the latest advancements in digital logistics and supply chain automation. Second, while this study focused on recent innovations in AI-driven logistics and sustainability, further empirical validation is necessary to assess their long-term impact on global supply chain resilience and operational efficiency. More longitudinal studies and real-world case analyses are required to determine whether AI-powered logistics models can consistently enhance supply chain performance across different industries and geographic regions. Lastly, this study primarily analyzed peer-reviewed academic sources, meaning that insights from industry reports, practitioner insights, and real-time supply chain developments may not have been fully integrated. Future research should combine academic and industry perspectives to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities presented by AI-driven, sustainable, and autonomous supply chain models. References Abduljabbar, R. et al. (2019) ‘Applications of artificial intelligence in transport: An overview’, Sustainability . MDPI, 11(1), p. 189. Abideen, A. Z. et al. (2021) ‘Digital twin integrated reinforced learning in supply chain and logistics’, Logistics . MDPI, 5(4), p. 84. Adeusi, K. B. et al. (2024) ‘The potential of IoT to transform supply chain management through enhanced connectivity and real-time data’, World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences , 12(1), pp. 145–151. Adland, R., Bjerknes, F. and Herje, C. (2017) ‘Spatial efficiency in the bulk freight market’, Maritime Policy & Management . Taylor & Francis, 44(4), pp. 413–425. Adner, R. (2021) Winning the right game: How to disrupt, defend, and deliver in a changing world . MIT Press. Agamez-Arias, A.-M. and Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2017) ‘Intermodal transport in freight distribution: a literature review’, Transport Reviews . Taylor & Francis, 37(6), pp. 782–807. Aghahadi, M. et al. (2024) ‘Digitalization Processes in Distribution Grids: A Comprehensive Review of Strategies and Challenges’, Applied Sciences . Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 14(11), p. 4528. Al-Farsi, S., Rathore, M. M. and Bakiras, S. (2021) ‘Security of blockchain-based supply chain management systems: challenges and opportunities’, Applied Sciences . MDPI, 11(12), p. 5585. Aldrighetti, R. et al. (2021) ‘Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: a review and future research directions’, International Journal of Production Economics . Elsevier, 235, p. 108103. Aljohani, A. (2023) ‘Predictive analytics and machine learning for real-time supply chain risk mitigation and agility’, Sustainability . MDPI, 15(20), p. 15088. Allal-Chérif, O., Simón-Moya, V. and Ballester, A. C. C. (2021) ‘Intelligent purchasing: How artificial intelligence can redefine the purchasing function’, Journal of Business Research . Elsevier, 124, pp. 69–76. Almabrok, H. A. (2023) ‘Blockchain for supply chain management: To enhance transparency, traceability, and efficiency’, African Journal of Advanced Pure and Applied Sciences (AJAPAS) , pp. 239–253. Almeida, F. and Carneiro, P. (2021) ‘Performance metrics in scrum software engineering companies’, International Journal of Agile Systems and Management . Inderscience Publishers (IEL), 14(2), pp. 205–223. Alsudani, M. Q. et al. (2023) ‘RETRACTED ARTICLE: Smart logistics with IoT-based enterprise management system using global manufacturing’, Journal of combinatorial optimization . Springer, 45(2), p. 57. Ameh, B. (2024) ‘Digital tools and AI: Using technology to monitor carbon emissions and waste at each stage of the supply chain, enabling real-time adjustments for sustainability improvements’, Int J Sci Res Arch , 13(1), pp. 2741–2754. Amorim, P. et al. (2016) ‘Supplier selection in the processed food industry under uncertainty’, European Journal of Operational Research . Elsevier, 252(3), pp. 801–814. Anderson, J. M. et al. (2014) Autonomous vehicle technology: A guide for policymakers . Rand Corporation. Archetti, C., Peirano, L. and Speranza, M. G. (2022) ‘Optimization in multimodal freight transportation problems: A Survey’, European Journal of Operational Research . Elsevier, 299(1), pp. 1–20. Árva, L., Pásztor, S. and Pyatanova, V. (2020) ‘Some thoughts on the relationship between multinational corporation strategies and the changing patterns of international trade: The geographical optimization principle’, Economy and Finance: English Language Edition of Gazdaság és Pénzügy . Hungarian Banking Association; National Association of Entrepreneurs and …, 7(1), pp. 56–77. Asante, M. et al. (2021) ‘Distributed ledger technologies in supply chain security management: A comprehensive survey’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management . IEEE, 70(2), pp. 713–739. Ashayeri, J., Ma, N. and Sotirov, R. (2014) ‘Supply chain downsizing under bankruptcy: A robust optimization approach’, International Journal of Production Economics . Elsevier, 154, pp. 1–15. Attah, R. U. et al. (2024) ‘Enhancing supply chain resilience through artificial intelligence: Analyzing problem-solving approaches in logistics management’, Int J Manag Entrep Res , 5(12), pp. 3248–3265. Baaij, M. G. et al. (2015) ‘Why do multinational corporations relocate core parts of their corporate headquarters abroad?’, Long Range Planning . Elsevier, 48(1), pp. 46–58. Bachofner, M. et al. (2022) ‘City logistics: Challenges and opportunities for technology providers’, Journal of urban mobility . Elsevier, 2, p. 100020. Badhan, I. A., Neeroj, M. H. and Rahman, S. (2024) ‘Currency rate fluctuations and their impact on supply chain risk management: An empirical analysis’, International journal of business and management sciences , 4(10), pp. 6–26. Badmus, O. et al. (2024) ‘AI-driven business analytics and decision making’, World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews , 24(1), pp. 616–633. Baghalian, A., Rezapour, S. and Farahani, R. Z. (2013) ‘Robust supply chain network design with service level against disruptions and demand uncertainties: A real-life case’, European journal of operational research . Elsevier, 227(1), pp. 199–215. Banerjee, J. S. et al. (2022) Intelligent Cyber-Physical Systems Security for Industry 4.0: Applications, Challenges and Management . CRC Press. Banka, L. (2014) ‘Financial stability–condition of the financial system enabling it to withstand shocks, thereby mitigating the likelihood of disruptions in the financial intermediation process which would impair the allocation of savings and investment opportunities. The ’. Barbosa, B. (2024) Marketing innovation strategies and consumer behavior . IGI Global. Barnes, A. (2022) EU Commission proposal for joint gas purchasing, price caps and collective allocation of gas: an assessment . Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. Baruya, P. (2015) Coal contracts and long-term supplies . IEA Clean Coal Centre London, UK. Baryannis, G. et al. (2019) ‘Supply chain risk management and artificial intelligence: state of the art and future research directions’, International journal of production research . Taylor & Francis, 57(7), pp. 2179–2202. Al Bashar, M. et al. (2017) ‘Decarbonizing the supply chain: A green approach’. Bassey, K. E. et al. (2024) ‘Optimizing behavioral and economic strategies for the ubiquitous integration of wireless energy transmission in smart cities’. Bechtsis, D. et al. (2018) ‘Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles in digital supply chains: A framework for integrating innovations towards sustainable value networks’, Journal of cleaner production . Elsevier, 181, pp. 60–71. Benyoucef, L. and Xie, X. (2011) ‘Supply chain design using simulation-based NSGA-II approach’, in Multi-objective evolutionary optimisation for product design and manufacturing . Springer, pp. 455–491. Berhanu, Y. et al. (2024) ‘Machine learning for predictions of road traffic accidents and spatial network analysis for safe routing Aon accident and congestion-prone road networks’, Results in Engineering . Elsevier, 23, p. 102737. Berry, H. (2013) ‘When do firms divest foreign operations?’, Organization Science . INFORMS, 24(1), pp. 246–261. Betti Sorbelli, F. (2024) ‘UAV-Based Delivery Systems: a Systematic Review, Current Trends, and Research Challenges’, Journal on Autonomous Transportation Systems . ACM New York, NY, 1(3), pp. 1–40. Bhattacharya, A. et al. (2014) ‘An intermodal freight transport system for optimal supply chain logistics’, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies . Elsevier, 38, pp. 73–84. Bienhaus, F. and Haddud, A. (2018) ‘Procurement 4.0: factors influencing the digitisation of procurement and supply chains’, Business Process Management Journal . Emerald Publishing Limited, 24(4), pp. 965–984. Bo, M. and Ankai, X. (2021) ‘Rising risks to global value chains’. Asian Development Bank. Bonacich, E. and Wilson, J. B. (2008) Getting the goods: Ports, labor, and the logistics revolution . Cornell University Press. Bookbinder, J. H. and Matuk, T. A. (2009) Logistics and Transportation in Global Supply Chains: Review, Critique, and Prospects , Decision Technologies and Applications . doi: 10.1287/educ.1090.0059. Bozorgi-Amiri, A., Jabalameli, M. S. and Mirzapour Al-e-Hashem, S. M. J. (2013) ‘A multi-objective robust stochastic programming model for disaster relief logistics under uncertainty’, OR spectrum . Springer, 35, pp. 905–933. Brandenburg, M. and Rebs, T. (2015) ‘Sustainable supply chain management: A modeling perspective’, Annals of Operations Research . Springer, 229, pp. 213–252. Brookbanks, M. and Parry, G. (2022) ‘The impact of a blockchain platform on trust in established relationships: a case study of wine supply chains’, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal . Emerald Publishing Limited, 27(7), pp. 128–146. Brookbanks, M. and Parry, G. C. (2024) ‘The impact of Industry 4.0 technologies on the resilience of established cross-border supply chains’, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal . Emerald Publishing Limited. CAPE, F., PIERLUIGI, M. and RIPAMONTI, F. (2018) ‘An empirical study of the efficiency of initial coin offerings adopting a two-stage DEA model’. Politecnico di Milano. Centobelli, P. et al. (2022) ‘Blockchain technology for bridging trust, traceability and transparency in circular supply chain’, Information & Management . Elsevier, 59(7), p. 103508. Chaker, B. and Damak, C. (2024) ‘Integrating Blockchain Technology for Enhanced Transparency and Security in Supply Chains’, in Strategic Innovations for Dynamic Supply Chains . IGI Global, pp. 147–169. Challoumis, C. (2024) ‘Building a sustainable economy-how ai can optimize resource allocation’, in XVI International Scientific Conference , pp. 190–224. Chalmers, D., MacKenzie, N. G. and Carter, S. (2021) ‘Artificial intelligence and entrepreneurship: Implications for venture creation in the fourth industrial revolution’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice . Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 45(5), pp. 1028–1053. Chan, F. T. S. and Zhang, T. (2011) ‘The impact of Collaborative Transportation Management on supply chain performance: A simulation approach’, Expert Systems with Applications . Elsevier, 38(3), pp. 2319–2329. Chang, B. and Hung, H.-F. (2010) ‘A study of using RST to create the supplier selection model and decision-making rules’, Expert Systems with Applications . Elsevier, 37(12), pp. 8284–8295. Chang, Y., Iakovou, E. and Shi, W. (2020) ‘Blockchain in global supply chains and cross border trade: a critical synthesis of the state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities’, International Journal of Production Research . Taylor & Francis, 58(7), pp. 2082–2099. Chaturvedi, A. and Martínez-de-Albéniz, V. (2011) ‘Optimal procurement design in the presence of supply risk’, Manufacturing & Service operations management . INFORMS, 13(2), pp. 227–243. Chen, L. and Notteboom, T. (2012) ‘Determinants for assigning value-added logistics services to logistics centers within a supply chain configuration’, Journal of International Logistics and Trade . Emerald Publishing Limited, 10(1), pp. 3–41. Chen, W. et al. (2024) ‘Artificial Intelligence in Logistics Optimization with Sustainable Criteria: A Review’, Sustainability . MDPI, 16(21), p. 9145. Chen, Y. (2024) ‘How blockchain adoption affects supply chain sustainability in the fashion industry: a systematic review and case studies’, International Transactions in Operational Research . Wiley Online Library, 31(6), pp. 3592–3620. Chitturu, S. et al. (2017) ‘Artificial intelligence and Southeast Asia’s future’, Singapore Summit . Chukwu, N. et al. (2024) ‘Resilient Chain: AI-Enhanced Supply Chain Security and Efficiency Integration’, Int. J. Sci. Manag. Res , 7(03), pp. 46–65. Ciriello, R. F. (2021) ‘Tokenized index funds: A blockchain-based concept and a multidisciplinary research framework’, International Journal of Information Management . Elsevier, 61, p. 102400. Cohen, Y. et al. (2019) ‘Assembly systems in Industry 4.0 era: a road map to understand Assembly 4.0’, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology . Springer, 105, pp. 4037–4054. Coito, J. (2021) ‘Maritime autonomous surface ships: New possibilities—and challenges—in ocean law and policy’, International Law Studies , 97(1), p. 19. Corbato, C. H. et al. (2018) ‘Integrating different levels of automation: Lessons from winning the amazon robotics challenge 2016’, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics . IEEE, 14(11), pp. 4916–4926. Correia, I. and Melo, T. (2016) ‘Multi-period capacitated facility location under delayed demand satisfaction’, European Journal of Operational Research . Elsevier, 255(3), pp. 729–746. Correia, I. and Melo, T. (2017) ‘A multi-period facility location problem with modular capacity adjustments and flexible demand fulfillment’, Computers & Industrial Engineering . Elsevier, 110, pp. 307–321. Cui, L. et al. (2023) ‘Exploring the risk and economic vulnerability of global energy supply chain interruption in the context of Russo-Ukrainian war’, Resources Policy . Elsevier, 81, p. 103373. Dagnachew, A. G. and Hof, A. F. (2022) ‘Climate change mitigation and SDGs: modelling the regional potential of promising mitigation measures and assessing their impact on other SDGs’, Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences . Taylor & Francis, 19(1), pp. 289–314. Das, S. (2020) A risk-reduction-based incentivization model for human-centered multi-factor authentication . Indiana University. Dasaklis, T. K. et al. (2022) ‘A systematic literature review of blockchain-enabled supply chain traceability implementations’, Sustainability . MDPI, 14(4), p. 2439. Dash, R. et al. (2019) ‘Application of artificial intelligence in automation of supply chain management’, Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability , 14(3). Data, E. O. (2024) ‘Artificial Intelligence and’, Digital Transformation Initiatives for Agile Marketing . IGI Global, p. 133. Dauvergne, P. (2022) ‘Is artificial intelligence greening global supply chains? Exposing the political economy of environmental costs’, Review of International Political Economy . Taylor & Francis, 29(3), pp. 696–718. Delgado, J. A. et al. (2019) ‘Big Data Analysis for Sustainable Agriculture on a Geospatial Cloud Framework’, Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems . doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00054. Dierker, D. et al. (2022) Navigating the current disruption in containerized logistics . McKinsey. Diez-Olivan, A. et al. (2019) ‘Data fusion and machine learning for industrial prognosis: Trends and perspectives towards Industry 4.0’, Information Fusion . Elsevier, 50, pp. 92–111. Dikshit, S. et al. (2023) ‘The use of artificial intelligence to optimize the routing of vehicles and reduce traffic congestion in urban areas’, EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web , 10. Dinh, T., Husmann, A. and Melloni, G. (2023) ‘Corporate sustainability reporting in Europe: A scoping review’, Accounting in Europe . Taylor & Francis, 20(1), pp. 1–29. de Dios Ortúzar, J. and Willumsen, L. G. (2024) Modelling transport . John wiley & sons. Dolgui, A. and Ivanov, D. (2022) ‘5G in digital supply chain and operations management: fostering flexibility, end-to-end connectivity and real-time visibility through internet-of-everything’, International Journal of Production Research . Taylor & Francis, 60(2), pp. 442–451. Dolz Ausina, G. (2023) ‘Evaluation of different AI applications for operational logistic systems’. Universitat Politècnica de València. Dorn, T. M. (2021) Unmanned Systems: Savior or Threat . Page Publishing Inc. Dresner, M. and Zou, L. (2020) ‘Air cargo and logistics’, in Air Transport Management . Routledge, pp. 287–307. Dudczyk, P., Dunston, J. and Crosby, G. V (2024) ‘Blockchain Technology for Global Supply Chain Management: A Survey of Applications, Challenges, Opportunities & Implications (March 2024)’, IEEE Access . IEEE. Durlik, I. et al. (2024) ‘Harnessing AI for Sustainable Shipping and Green Ports: Challenges and Opportunities’, Applied Sciences . MDPI, 14(14), p. 5994. Ellram, L. M., Tate, W. L. and Petersen, K. J. (2013) ‘Offshoring and reshoring: an update on the manufacturing location decision’, Journal of Supply Chain Management . Wiley Online Library, 49(2), pp. 14–22. Elmay, F. K. et al. (2022) ‘Blockchain-based traceability for shipping containers in unimodal and multimodal logistics’, IEEE Access . IEEE, 10, pp. 133539–133556. Eskandarpour, M. et al. (2015) ‘Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review’, Omega . Elsevier, 54, pp. 11–32. Estampe, D. et al. (2013) ‘A framework for analysing supply chain performance evaluation models’, International journal of production economics . Elsevier, 142(2), pp. 247–258. Eyo-Udo, N. (2024) ‘Leveraging artificial intelligence for enhanced supply chain optimization’, Open Access Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies , 7(2), pp. 1–15. Fagnant, D. J. and Kockelman, K. (2015) ‘Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations’, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice . Elsevier, 77, pp. 167–181. Fagnant, D. J. and Kockelman, K. M. (2014) ‘The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios’, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies . Elsevier, 40, pp. 1–13. Figliozzi, M. and Jennings, D. (2020) ‘Autonomous delivery robots and their potential impacts on urban freight energy consumption and emissions’, Transportation research procedia . Elsevier, 46, pp. 21–28. FUKAGAWA, Y. (2021) ‘Integration in Asia following mega-FTAs: Asia-Pacific, Indo-Pacific, or Eurasia?’ European University Institute. Gallersdörfer, U. and Matthes, F. (2019) ‘Tamper-proof volume tracking in supply chains with smart contracts’, in Euro-Par 2018: Parallel Processing Workshops: Euro-Par 2018 International Workshops, Turin, Italy, August 27–28, 2018, Revised Selected Papers 24 . Springer, pp. 367–378. Gammeltoft, P., Filatotchev, I. and Hobdari, B. (2012) ‘Emerging multinational companies and strategic fit: A contingency framework and future research agenda’, European Management Journal . Elsevier, 30(3), pp. 175–188. Gaur, L. and Sahoo, B. M. (2022) Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Intelligent Transportation Systems: Ethics and Applications . Springer Nature. Gharehgozli, A. et al. (2017) ‘Trends in global E-food supply chain and implications for transport: Literature review and research directions’, Research in transportation business & management . Elsevier, 25, pp. 2–14. Ghodsi, M., Vujanović, N. and Landesmann, M. (2024) Can multinationals withstand growing trade barriers? wiiw Working Paper. Girasa, R. and Girasa, R. (2020) ‘Applications of AI and Projections of AI Impact’, Artificial Intelligence as a Disruptive Technology: Economic Transformation and Government Regulation . Springer, pp. 23–67. Godsmark, J. and Richards, G. (2019) The logistics outsourcing handbook: A step-by-step guide from strategy through to implementation . Kogan Page Publishers. Gonzalez-Feliu, J. (2018) Sustainable urban logistics: Planning and evaluation . John Wiley & Sons. Goyal, A. (2011) History of monetary policy in India since independence . Springer. Groenewald, C. A., Garg, A. and Yerasuri, S. S. (2024) ‘Smart Supply Chain Management Optimization and Risk Mitigation with Artificial Intelligence’, Naturalista Campano , 28(1), pp. 261–270. Grossmann, I. E. (2012) ‘Advances in mathematical programming models for enterprise-wide optimization’, Computers & Chemical Engineering . Elsevier, 47, pp. 2–18. Grover, V. et al. (2024) Blockchain, IoT, and AI Technologies for Supply Chain Management: Apply Emerging Technologies to Address and Improve Supply Chain Management . Springer Nature. Gurumurthy, A. et al. (2019) ‘Platform planet: Development in the intelligence economy’, Available at SSRN 3872499 . Haddad, M. A. (2023) Environmental Politics in East Asia . Cambridge University Press. Halim, R. A., Kwakkel, J. H. and Tavasszy, L. A. (2016) ‘A strategic model of port-hinterland freight distribution networks’, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review . Elsevier, 95, pp. 368–384. Hammami, R., Temponi, C. and Frein, Y. (2014) ‘A scenario-based stochastic model for supplier selection in global context with multiple buyers, currency fluctuation uncertainties, and price discounts’, European Journal of Operational Research . Elsevier, 233(1), pp. 159–170. Hansen, I. A. (2020) ‘Hyperloop transport technology assessment and system analysis’, Transportation Planning and Technology . Taylor & Francis, 43(8), pp. 803–820. Hasan, M. R., Islam, M. Z., et al. (2024) ‘Integrating artificial intelligence and predictive analytics in supply chain management to minimize carbon footprint and enhance business growth in the USA’, Journal of Business and Management Studies , 6(4), pp. 195–212. Hasan, M. R., Shawon, R. E. R., et al. (2024) ‘Optimizing sustainable supply chains: Integrating environmental concerns and carbon footprint reduction through ai-enhanced decision-making in the USA’, Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting Studies , 6(4), pp. 57–71. Hasan, U., Whyte, A. and Al Jassmi, H. (2019) ‘A review of the transformation of road transport systems: are we ready for the next step in artificially intelligent sustainable transport?’, Applied System Innovation . MDPI, 3(1), p. 1. Hassan, A. and Mhmood, A. H. (2021) ‘Optimizing network performance, automation, and intelligent decision-making through real-time big data analytics’, International Journal of Responsible Artificial Intelligence , 11(8), pp. 12–22. Haveman, J. D. and Hummels, D. (2004) California’s global gateways: trends and issues . Public Policy Institute of California San Francisco. Hedhly, W. et al. (2021) ‘Hyperloop communications: Challenges, advances, and approaches’, IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society . IEEE, 2, pp. 2413–2435. Heilig, T. and Scheer, I. (2023) Decision Intelligence: Transform Your Team and Organization with AI-Driven Decision-Making . John Wiley & Sons. Hengstler, M., Enkel, E. and Duelli, S. (2016) ‘Applied artificial intelligence and trust—The case of autonomous vehicles and medical assistance devices’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change . Elsevier, 105, pp. 105–120. Hofmann, E. et al. (2019) ‘Supply chain management and Industry 4.0: conducting research in the digital age’, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management . Emerald Publishing Limited, 49(10), pp. 945–955. Hofmann, E. and Rüsch, M. (2017) ‘Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics’, Computers in industry . Elsevier, 89, pp. 23–34. Hosseini, M. and Vashaee, D. (2022) ‘Role of interfaces in materials synthesis under electromagnetic field’, in APS March Meeting Abstracts , pp. M12-002. Hu, X. and Sinniah, S. (2024) ‘The Role of Green Risk Management Approaches in Promoting Green and Sustainable Supply Chain Management’, Natural and Engineering Sciences . Cemal TURAN, 9(2), pp. 33–54. Huang, R. and Mao, S. (2024) ‘Carbon Footprint Management in Global Supply Chains: A Data-Driven Approach Utilizing Artificial Intelligence Algorithms’, IEEE Access . IEEE. Irfan, M. et al. (2023) Fintech Applications in Islamic Finance: AI, Machine Learning, and Blockchain Techniques: AI, Machine Learning, and Blockchain Techniques . IGI Global. Irfan, M. et al. (2024) ‘Exploring The Synergistic Effects of Blockchain Integration with IOT and AI for Enhanced Transparency and Security in Global Supply Chains’, Int. J. Contemp. Issues Soc. Sci , 3, pp. 1326–1338. Ishmael Ackah, I. M. et al. (2024) ‘Willingness to Change to Electric Cars: Is the Ghanaian Consumer Ready? Check for updates’, Energy Regulation in Africa: Dynamics, Challenges, and Opportunities . Springer Nature, p. 473. Issa, H., Sun, T. and Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2016) ‘Research ideas for artificial intelligence in auditing: The formalization of audit and workforce supplementation’, Journal of emerging technologies in accounting . American Accounting Association, 13(2), pp. 1–20. Ivanov, D. (2010) ‘An adaptive framework for aligning (re) planning decisions on supply chain strategy, design, tactics, and operations’, International journal of production research . Taylor & Francis, 48(13), pp. 3999–4017. Ivanov, D. and Sokolov, B. (2013) ‘Control and system-theoretic identification of the supply chain dynamics domain for planning, analysis and adaptation of performance under uncertainty’, European Journal of Operational Research . Elsevier, 224(2), pp. 313–323. Jahre, M. et al. (2016) ‘Integrating supply chains for emergencies and ongoing operations in UNHCR’, Journal of Operations Management . Elsevier, 45, pp. 57–72. Jakkan, S. (2021) ‘Designing a framework to develop capabilities for adopting AI/ML technologies in the supply chain’. University of Twente. Jaller, M. et al. (2020) ‘Automation, electrification, and shared mobility in freight’. Jayaram, J. and Tan, K.-C. (2010) ‘Supply chain integration with third-party logistics providers’, International Journal of production economics . Elsevier, 125(2), pp. 262–271. Jeevan, J. et al. (2022) ‘Evolution of Industrial Revolution 4.0 in seaport system: An interpretation from a bibliometric analysis’, Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs . Taylor & Francis, 14(4), pp. 229–250. Jie, F. et al. (2023) ‘Research agenda for supply chain management 4.0’, International Journal of Agile Systems and Management . Inderscience Publishers (IEL), 16(3), pp. 317–346. Johnson, H. G. (2013) ‘The case for flexible exchange rates, 1969’, in Further Essays in Monetary Economics (Collected Works of Harry Johnson) . Routledge, pp. 198–228. Kalasani, R. R. (2023) An Exploratory Study of the Impacts of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Technologies in the Supply Chain and Operations Field . University of the Cumberlands. Kalusivalingam, A. K. et al. (2022) ‘Enhancing Supply Chain Resilience through AI: Leveraging Deep Reinforcement Learning and Predictive Analytics’, International Journal of AI and ML , 3(9). Kamalahmadi, M. and Mellat-Parast, M. (2016) ‘Developing a resilient supply chain through supplier flexibility and reliability assessment’, International Journal of Production Research . Taylor & Francis, 54(1), pp. 302–321. Kar, A. K., Choudhary, S. K. and Singh, V. K. (2022) ‘How can artificial intelligence impact sustainability: A systematic literature review’, Journal of Cleaner Production . Elsevier, 376, p. 134120. Kaul, D. and Khurana, R. (2022) ‘Ai-driven optimization models for e-commerce supply chain operations: Demand prediction, inventory management, and delivery time reduction with cost efficiency considerations’, International Journal of Social Analytics , 7(12), pp. 59–77. Ke, J. F. et al. (2015) ‘Aligning supply chain transportation strategy with industry characteristics: Evidence from the US-Asia supply chain’, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management . Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 45(9/10), pp. 837–860. Kennedy, K. (2021) The first decade of NAFTA: the future of free trade in North America . BRILL. Kern, J. (2021) ‘The digital transformation of logistics: A review about technologies and their implementation status’, The digital transformation of logistics: Demystifying impacts of the fourth industrial revolution . Wiley Online Library, pp. 361–403. Khan, A. A. et al. (2023) ‘Artificial intelligence and blockchain technology for secure smart grid and power distribution Automation: A State-of-the-Art Review’, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments . Elsevier, 57, p. 103282. Khan, R. S. et al. (2022) ‘An ai and ml-enabled framework for proactive risk mitigation and resilience optimization in global supply chains during national emergencies’, Sage Science Review of Applied Machine Learning , 5(2), pp. 127–144. Khan, S. A. R. et al. (2022) ‘Renewable energy and advanced logistical infrastructure: Carbon-free economic development’, Sustainable Development . Wiley Online Library, 30(4), pp. 693–702. Khan, S. A. R., Yu, Z. and Farooq, K. (2023) ‘Green capabilities, green purchasing, and triple bottom line performance: Leading toward environmental sustainability’, Business strategy and the environment . Wiley Online Library, 32(4), pp. 2022–2034. Khanfar, A. A. A. et al. (2021) ‘Applications of blockchain technology in sustainable manufacturing and supply chain management: A systematic review’, Sustainability . MDPI, 13(14), p. 7870. Kim, E., Kim, Y. and Park, J. (2022) ‘The necessity of introducing autonomous trucks in logistics 4.0’, Sustainability . MDPI, 14(7), p. 3978. King, B. and Petty, R. (2021) The rise of Technosocialism: How inequality, AI and climate will usher in a New World . Marshall Cavendish International Asia Pte Ltd. Klibi, W., Martel, A. and Guitouni, A. (2010) ‘The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: a critical review’, European journal of operational research . Elsevier, 203(2), pp. 283–293. Klumpp, M. (2018) ‘Automation and artificial intelligence in business logistics systems: human reactions and collaboration requirements’, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications . Taylor & Francis, 21(3), pp. 224–242. Koberstein, A., Lukas, E. and Naumann, M. (2013) ‘Integrated strategic planning of global production networks and financial hedging under uncertain demands and exchange rates’, Business Research . Springer, 6, pp. 215–240. Kostrzewski, M. et al. (2022) ‘Analysis of modern vs. conventional development technologies in transportation—The case study of a last-mile delivery process’, Sensors . MDPI, 22(24), p. 9858. Kotsila, P. et al. (2023) Injustice in urban sustainability: ten core drivers . Taylor & Francis. Kovacevic, A. (2017) ‘Towards a Balkan gas hub: the interplay between pipeline gas, LNG and renewable energy in South East Europe’. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. Krishnan, R. et al. (2024) ‘Enhancing Logistics Operations Through Technological Advancements for Superior Service Efficiency’, in Innovative Technologies for Increasing Service Productivity . IGI Global, pp. 61–82. Krishnan, S., Balas, V. E. and Kumar, R. (2023) Green Blockchain Technology for Sustainable Smart Cities . Elsevier. Kubler, S. et al. (2016) ‘A state-of the-art survey & testbed of fuzzy AHP (FAHP) applications’, Expert systems with applications . Elsevier, 65, pp. 398–422. Kumar Kar, A. and K. Pani, A. (2014) ‘Exploring the importance of different supplier selection criteria’, Management Research Review . Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 37(1), pp. 89–105. Kuramochi, T. et al. (2018) ‘Ten key short-term sectoral benchmarks to limit warming to 1.5 C’, Climate Policy . Taylor & Francis, 18(3), pp. 287–305. Kurz, W. (2025) ‘Generic Multi-Agent AI Framework for Weighted Dynamic Corridor Price Optimisation’, Journal of Next-Generation Research 5.0 . Lafoz, M. et al. (2020) ‘Power supply solution for ultrahigh speed hyperloop trains’, Smart Cities . MDPI, 3(3), pp. 642–656. Layton, P. (2021) ‘Fighting Artificial Intelligence Battles: Operational Concepts for Future AI-Enabled Wars’, Network , 4(20), pp. 1–100. Leclerc, Y. and Ircha, M. (2023) ‘Canada’s rapidly evolving smart ports’, in Smart Ports and Robotic Systems: Navigating the Waves of Techno-Regulation and Governance . Springer, pp. 167–187. Lee, R. P. (2010) ‘Extending the environment–strategy–performance framework: The roles of multinational corporation network strength, market responsiveness, and product innovation’, Journal of International Marketing . SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 18(4), pp. 58–73. Leogrande, A. (2024) ‘Integrating ESG Principles into Smart Logistics: Toward Sustainable Supply Chains’. Li, A. et al. (2024) ‘Optimization of logistics cargo tracking and transportation efficiency based on data science deep learning models’, Applied and Computational Engineering , 69, pp. 71–77. Lim, A. and Tsutsui, K. (2012) ‘Globalization and commitment in corporate social responsibility: Cross-national analyses of institutional and political-economy effects’, American sociological review . Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 77(1), pp. 69–98. Litman, T. (2011) ‘Evaluating public transit benefits and costs’, Victoria Transport Policy Institute , 65. Liu, L., Song, W. and Liu, Y. (2023) ‘Leveraging digital capabilities toward a circular economy: Reinforcing sustainable supply chain management with Industry 4.0 technologies’, Computers & Industrial Engineering . Elsevier, 178, p. 109113. Liu, Y. et al. (2022) ‘Verifying the smart contracts of the port supply chain system based on probabilistic model checking’, Systems . MDPI, 10(1), p. 19. van der Loeff, W. S., Godar, J. and Prakash, V. (2018) ‘A spatially explicit data-driven approach to calculating commodity-specific shipping emissions per vessel’, Journal of cleaner production . Elsevier, 205, pp. 895–908. Lohmer, J. and Lasch, R. (2021) ‘Production planning and scheduling in multi-factory production networks: a systematic literature review’, International Journal of Production Research . Taylor & Francis, 59(7), pp. 2028–2054. López Bou, A. (2024) ‘Analysis of Ocean Freight Forwarding in China-US Trade: Pre-and Post-COVID-19’. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Mahat, D. et al. (2023) ‘AI-Driven Optimization of Supply Chain and Logistics in Mechanical Engineering’, in 2023 10th IEEE Uttar Pradesh Section International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (UPCON) . IEEE, pp. 1611–1616. Mahor, V. et al. (2022) ‘The smart city based on AI and infrastructure: A new mobility concepts and realities’, Autonomous Vehicles Volume 1: Using Machine Intelligence . Wiley Online Library, pp. 277–295. Mai, T. T. et al. (2018) Electrification futures study: Scenarios of electric technology adoption and power consumption for the United States . National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States). Majid, G. M. et al. (2023) ‘Intelligent automation for sustainable tourism: a systematic review’, Journal of Sustainable Tourism . Taylor & Francis, 31(11), pp. 2421–2440. El Makhloufi, A. (2023) ‘AI Application in Transport and Logistics: Opportunities and Challenges (An Exploratory Study)’. CoE City Net Zero, Faculty of Technology, Amsterdam Univeristy of Applied …. Maleksaeidi, H. et al. (2017) ‘Climate change and drought: building resilience for an unpredictable future’, in Handbook of drought and water scarcity . CRC Press, pp. 163–186. Mander, J. (2014) The case against the global economy: and for a turn towards localization . Routledge. Mangla, S. K. et al. (2019) ‘Logistics and distribution challenges to managing operations for corporate sustainability: study on leading Indian diary organizations’, Journal of Cleaner Production . Elsevier, 238, p. 117620. Mani, Z. A. and Goniewicz, K. (2023) ‘Adapting disaster preparedness strategies to changing climate patterns in Saudi Arabia: A rapid review’, Sustainability . MDPI, 15(19), p. 14279. Manners-Bell, J. and Lyon, K. (2019) The logistics and supply chain innovation handbook: disruptive technologies and new business models . Kogan Page Publishers. Marrone, A. (2023) ‘Optimizing Product Development and Innovation Processes with Artificial Intelligence’. Politecnico di Torino. Martel, A. and Klibi, W. (2016) Designing value-creating supply chain networks . Springer. Martin, G. (2019) Sustainability prospects for autonomous vehicles: Environmental, social, and urban . Routledge. Martínez-Costa, C. et al. (2014) ‘A review of mathematical programming models for strategic capacity planning in manufacturing’, International Journal of Production Economics . Elsevier, 153, pp. 66–85. Martínez-López, F. J. and Casillas, J. (2013) ‘Artificial intelligence-based systems applied in industrial marketing: An historical overview, current and future insights’, Industrial Marketing Management . Elsevier, 42(4), pp. 489–495. De Massis, A. and Kotlar, J. (2014) ‘The case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship’, Journal of family business strategy . Elsevier, 5(1), pp. 15–29. Mateu, J. M., Fernández, P. M. and Franco, R. I. (2021) ‘Setting safety foundations in the Hyperloop: A first approach to preliminary hazard analysis and safety assurance system’, Safety science . Elsevier, 142, p. 105366. Mazzei, D. et al. (2020) ‘A Blockchain Tokenizer for Industrial IOT trustless applications’, Future Generation Computer Systems . Elsevier, 105, pp. 432–445. Mia, M., Wessels, J. and Adam, S. (2023) ‘The Use of Blockchain Technology to Improve Transfer-Pricing Compliance and Administration in South Africa’, in ICABR Conference . Springer, pp. 357–378. Mirindi, D. (2024) ‘A Review of the Advances in Artificial Intelligence in Transportation System Development’. Mirzapour Al-E-Hashem, S. M. J., Baboli, A. and Sazvar, Z. (2013) ‘A stochastic aggregate production planning model in a green supply chain: Considering flexible lead times, nonlinear purchase and shortage cost functions’, European Journal of Operational Research . Elsevier, 230(1), pp. 26–41. Mishra, A. K. et al. (2024) ‘Revolutionizing Government Operations: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Public Administration’, Conversational Artificial Intelligence . Wiley Online Library, pp. 607–634. Modgil, S. et al. (2022) ‘AI technologies and their impact on supply chain resilience during COVID-19’, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management . Emerald Publishing Limited, 52(2), pp. 130–149. Modgil, S., Singh, R. K. and Hannibal, C. (2022) ‘Artificial intelligence for supply chain resilience: learning from Covid-19’, The International Journal of Logistics Management . Emerald Publishing Limited, 33(4), pp. 1246–1268. Mohsin, M. and Jamaani, F. (2023) ‘Green finance and the socio-politico-economic factors’ impact on the future oil prices: evidence from machine learning’, Resources Policy . Elsevier, 85, p. 103780. Mor, S., Madan, S. and Prasad, K. D. (2021) ‘Artificial intelligence and carbon footprints: Roadmap for Indian agriculture’, Strategic Change . Wiley Online Library, 30(3), pp. 269–280. Moradlou, H. et al. (2021) ‘Geopolitical disruptions and the manufacturing location decision in multinational company supply chains: a Delphi study on Brexit’, International Journal of Operations & Production Management . Emerald Publishing Limited, 41(2), pp. 102–130. Morrell, P. S. and Klein, T. (2018) Moving boxes by air: the economics of international air cargo . Routledge. Moshood, T. D. et al. (2021) ‘Digital twins driven supply chain visibility within logistics: A new paradigm for future logistics’, Applied System Innovation . MDPI, 4(2), p. 29. Moshref-Javadi, M. and Winkenbach, M. (2021) ‘Applications and Research avenues for drone-based models in logistics: A classificaation and review’, Expert Systems with Applications . Elsevier, 177, p. 114854. Muthuswamy, M. and Ali, A. M. (2023) ‘Sustainable supply chain management in the age of machine intelligence: addressing challenges, capitalizing on opportunities, and shaping the future landscape’, Sustainable Machine Intelligence Journal , 3, pp. 1–3. Naimi Sadigh, A., Fallah, H. and Nahavandi, N. (2013) ‘A multi-objective supply chain model integrated with location of distribution centers and supplier selection decisions’, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology . Springer, 69, pp. 225–235. Nampalli, R. C. R. and Adusupalli, B. (2024) ‘Using Machine Learning for Predictive Freight Demand and Route Optimization in Road and Rail Logistics.’, Library of Progress-Library Science, Information Technology & Computer , 44(3). Neufville, R., Abdalla, H. and Abbas, A. (2022) ‘Potential of connected fully autonomous vehicles in reducing congestion and associated carbon emissions’, Sustainability . MDPI, 14(11), p. 6910. Neway, A. S. (2024) Digital Supply Chain: Navigating the future operation . Abegaz Sahilu Neway. Nikitas, A. et al. (2017) ‘How can autonomous and connected vehicles, electromobility, BRT, hyperloop, shared use mobility and mobility-as-a-service shape transport futures for the context of smart cities?’, Urban Science . MDPI, 1(4), p. 36. Nisar, U. et al. (2024) ‘Unlocking the potential of blockchain technology in enhancing the fisheries supply chain: an exploration of critical adoption barriers in China’, Scientific Reports . Nature Publishing Group UK London, 14(1), p. 10167. Notteboom, T. (2009) ‘The relationship between seaports and the intermodal hinterland in light of global supply chains: European challenges’. OECD. Nzeako, G. et al. (2024) ‘The role of AI-Driven predictive analytics in optimizing IT industry supply chains’, International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research , 6(5), pp. 1489–1497. OKOLIE, P. I. P. (2020) ‘IMPACT OF DEFICIT FINANCING ON SELECTED MACROECONOMIC VARIABLES IN NIGERIA, 1986–2018’. Osman, K. (2024) ‘Improving Transparency with Technology in the Transportation of Illegal Wildlife’. Paramesha, M., Rane, N. L. and Rane, J. (2024) ‘Big data analytics, artificial intelligence, machine learning, internet of things, and blockchain for enhanced business intelligence’, Partners Universal Multidisciplinary Research Journal , 1(2), pp. 110–133. Parrish, S. and Beaubien, R. (2024) The Great Mental Models: Economics and Art . Random House. Patel, K. R. (2023) ‘Harmonizing sustainability, functionality, and cost: navigating responsible packaging innovations in modern supply chains’, American Journal of Economic and Management Business (AJEMB) , 2(8), pp. 287–300. Patra, P. K. (2018) ‘Green logistics: Eco-friendly measure in supply-chain’, Management Insight , 14(1), pp. 65–71. Peta, S. (2023) ‘Journey of artificial intelligence Frontier: A comprehensive overview’, Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology , 23(D2), pp. 9–36. Porter, L. et al. (2018) ‘The autonomous vehicle Revolution: Implications for planning/The driverless city?/autonomous vehicles–a planner’s response/autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, challenges and the need for government action/three signs autonomous vehicles will not lead to l’, Planning Theory & Practice . Taylor & Francis, 19(5), pp. 753–778. Poudel, D. B. (2013) ‘Coordinating hundreds of cooperative, autonomous robots in a warehouse’, Jan , 27(1–13), p. 26. Powell, W. B., Simao, H. P. and Bouzaiene-Ayari, B. (2012) ‘Approximate dynamic programming in transportation and logistics: a unified framework’, EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics . Elsevier, 1(3), pp. 237–284. Qaiser, F. (2019) ‘A decision support tool for sustainable freight transportation’. Loughborough University. Qian, X. and Papadonikolaki, E. (2021) ‘Shifting trust in construction supply chains through blockchain technology’, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management . Emerald Publishing Limited, 28(2), pp. 584–602. Qureshi, S. (2021) ‘Pandemics within the pandemic: Confronting socio-economic inequities in a datafied world’, Information Technology for Development . Taylor & Francis, pp. 151–170. Raghunatha, A., Thollander, P. and Barthel, S. (2023) ‘Addressing the emergence of drones–A policy development framework for regional drone transportation systems’, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives . Elsevier, 18, p. 100795. Rahimian, F. P. et al. (2021) Industry 4.0 solutions for building design and construction: a paradigm of new opportunities . Routledge. Rajabzadeh, M. and Fatorachian, H. (2023) ‘Modelling factors influencing IoT adoption: With a focus on agricultural logistics operations’, Smart Cities . MDPI, 6(6), pp. 3266–3296. Rane, N., Choudhary, S. and Rane, J. (2024) ‘Artificial intelligence and machine learning for resilient and sustainable logistics and supply chain management’, Available at SSRN 4847087 . Rane, N. L., Kaya, Ö. and Rane, J. (2024) Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning for Sustainable Industry 5.0 . Deep Science Publishing. Rane, S. B. and Thakker, S. V. (2020) ‘Green procurement process model based on blockchain–IoT integrated architecture for a sustainable business’, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal . Emerald Publishing Limited, 31(3), pp. 741–763. Rashid, A. Bin and Kausik, A. K. (2024) ‘AI revolutionizing industries worldwide: A comprehensive overview of its diverse applications’, Hybrid Advances . Elsevier, p. 100277. Rashid, Y. et al. (2019) ‘Case study method: A step-by-step guide for business researchers’, International journal of qualitative methods . SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 18, p. 1609406919862424. Ray, S. and Nayak, L. (2023) ‘Marketing sustainable fashion: trends and future directions’, Sustainability . MDPI, 15(7), p. 6202. Rodrigue, J.-P. (2020) The geography of transport systems . Routledge. Romer, C. D. and Romer, D. H. (2010) ‘The macroeconomic effects of tax changes: estimates based on a new measure of fiscal shocks’, American economic review . American Economic Association, 100(3), pp. 763–801. Rouhiainen, L. (2018) Artificial Intelligence: 101 things you must know today about our future . Lasse Rouhiainen. Rumford, C. (2014) Cosmopolitan borders . Springer. Ruvoletto, R. (2023) ‘Digitalization and Internationalization: An Analysis of the Impact of Digital Technologies on Export Management Practices’. Università Ca’Foscari Venezia. Sahal, R. et al. (2021) ‘Blockchain-empowered digital twins collaboration: smart transportation use case’, Machines . MDPI, 9(9), p. 193. Sahebi, H., Nickel, S. and Ashayeri, J. (2014) ‘Strategic and tactical mathematical programming models within the crude oil supply chain context—A review’, Computers & Chemical Engineering . Elsevier, 68, pp. 56–77. Sanders, N. R. et al. (2019) ‘Sustainable supply chains in the age of AI and digitization: research challenges and opportunities’, Journal of Business logistics . Wiley Online Library, 40(3), pp. 229–240. Sandor, D. et al. (2018) ‘System dynamics of polysilicon for solar photovoltaics: A framework for investigating the energy security of renewable energy supply chains’, Sustainability . MDPI, 10(1), p. 160. SANDUA, D. (no date) FUTURE OF WORK: THE AGE OF AUTOMATION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE . Sarkar, B., Ahmed, W. and Kim, N. (2018) ‘Joint effects of variable carbon emission cost and multi-delay-in-payments under single-setup-multiple-delivery policy in a global sustainable supply chain’, Journal of Cleaner Production . Elsevier, 185, pp. 421–445. SHALIZI, M. (no date) ‘The effect of Artificial intelligence on the labour market’. Sharma, D. and Tripathi, K. (2024) ‘Navigating the digital age: smart manufacturing and logistics’, in Recent Trends in Artificial Intelligence Towards a Smart World: Applications in Industries and Sectors . Springer, pp. 99–144. Sharma, R. et al. (2020) ‘A systematic literature review on machine learning applications for sustainable agriculture supply chain performance’, Computers and Operations Research , 119. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2020.104926. Shawon, R. E. R. et al. (2024) ‘Assessing Geopolitical Risks and Their Economic Impact on the USA Using Data Analytics’, Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting Studies , 6(6), pp. 5–16. Singh, A. K. et al. (2023) ‘Revealing the barriers of blockchain technology for supply chain transparency and sustainability in the construction industry: an application of pythagorean FAHP methods’, Sustainability . MDPI, 15(13), p. 10681. Singh, P. et al. (2022) ‘Blockchain and AI technology convergence: Applications in transportation systems’, Vehicular Communications . Elsevier, 38, p. 100521. Singh, S. et al. (2020) ‘Convergence of blockchain and artificial intelligence in IoT network for the sustainable smart city’, Sustainable cities and society . Elsevier, 63, p. 102364. Singh, S. K., Rathore, S. and Park, J. H. (2020) ‘Blockiotintelligence: A blockchain-enabled intelligent IoT architecture with artificial intelligence’, Future Generation Computer Systems . Elsevier, 110, pp. 721–743. Sinn, E. (2012) Pacific crossing: California gold, Chinese migration, and the making of Hong Kong . Hong Kong University Press. Smith, R. (2012) Global supply chain performance and risk optimization: the value of real options flexibility demonstrated in the global automotive industry . Springer Science & Business Media. Soh, K. L., Wong, W. P. and Chong, C.-L. (2015) ‘Strategic choices: A composite model for logistics service providers’, Journal of Southeast Asian Research . IBIMA Publishing, 2015, p. 652416. Somia, R. (2024) ‘A comprehensive analysis of the ISO 19650 attending their evolution and impact on construction information management’. Sperling, D. (2018) Three revolutions: Steering automated, shared, and electric vehicles to a better future . Island Press. Spiller, P. et al. (2013) Procurement 20/20: Supply entrepreneurship in a changing world . John Wiley & Sons. Stein, E. W. (2013) ‘A comprehensive multi-criteria model to rank electric energy production technologies’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews . Elsevier, 22, pp. 640–654. Sulaiman, I. M. (2024) Recent Advancements in the Diagnosis of Human Disease . CRC Press. Sullivan, M. and Kern, J. (2021) The digital transformation of logistics: Demystifying impacts of the Fourth Industrial Revolution . John Wiley & Sons. Sun, X. et al. (2022) ‘The application of Industry 4.0 technologies in sustainable logistics: a systematic literature review (2012–2020) to explore future research opportunities’, Environmental Science and Pollution Research . Springer, pp. 1–32. Sundarakani, B., Pereira, V. and Ishizaka, A. (2021) ‘Robust facility location decisions for resilient sustainable supply chain performance in the face of disruptions’, The International Journal of Logistics Management . Emerald Publishing Limited, 32(2), pp. 357–385. Sunny, F. A. et al. (2022) ‘A systematic review of blockchain applications’, Ieee Access . IEEE, 10, pp. 59155–59177. Sunny, J., Undralla, N. and Pillai, V. M. (2020) ‘Supply chain transparency through blockchain-based traceability: An overview with demonstration’, Computers & Industrial Engineering . Elsevier, 150, p. 106895. Tahir, M. et al. (2020) ‘A review on application of blockchain in 5G and beyond networks: Taxonomy, field-trials, challenges and opportunities’, IEEE Access . IEEE, 8, pp. 115876–115904. Tang, H. and Zhang, Y. (2012) ‘Exchange rates and the margins of trade: Evidence from Chinese exporters’, CESifo Economic Studies . Oxford University Press, 58(4), pp. 671–702. Taylor, C. L., Hyde, D. J. and Barr, L. C. (2016) Hyperloop commercial feasibility analysis . John A. Volpe National Transportation System Center. Thai, V. V, Yeo, G.-T. and Pak, J.-Y. (2016) ‘Comparative analysis of port competency requirements in Vietnam and Korea’, Maritime Policy & Management . Taylor & Francis, 43(5), pp. 614–629. Tian, G. (2020) ‘Blockchain, Regtech, and Their Application to Transfer Pricing Activities in the Cloud’, Hous. Bus. & Tax LJ . HeinOnline, 21, p. 142. Tintner, G. and Sengupta, J. K. (2014) Stochastic economics: stochastic processes, control, and programming . Elsevier. Tito, M. (2023) ‘A comparative analysis of good enterprise data management practices: insights from literature and artificial intelligence perspectives for business efficiency and effectiveness’. M. Tito. Trebilcock, M. J. (2014) Dealing with losers: The political economy of policy transitions . Oxford University Press, USA. Tsai, C. K. and Phumchusri, N. (2021) ‘Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for supplier selection: A case study in an electronic component manufacturer’, Engineering Journal , 25(8), pp. 73–86. Tsolakis, N. et al. (2022) ‘Towards AI driven environmental sustainability: an application of automated logistics in container port terminals’, International Journal of Production Research . Taylor & Francis, 60(14), pp. 4508–4528. Tsui, C.-W., Tzeng, G.-H. and Wen, U.-P. (2015) ‘A hybrid MCDM approach for improving the performance of green suppliers in the TFT-LCD industry’, International Journal of Production Research . Taylor & Francis, 53(21), pp. 6436–6454. Udeh, E. O. et al. (2024) ‘The role of IoT in boosting supply chain transparency and efficiency’, Magna Scientia Adv. Res. Rev. , 12, pp. 178–197. Ugarte, G. M., Golden, J. S. and Dooley, K. J. (2016) ‘Lean versus green: The impact of lean logistics on greenhouse gas emissions in consumer goods supply chains’, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management . Elsevier, 22(2), pp. 98–109. Ugochukwu, C. E. et al. (2024) ‘Sustainable smart cities: the role of fintech in promoting environmental sustainability’, Engineering Science & Technology Journal , 5(3), pp. 821–835. Di Vaio, A. et al. (2020) ‘Artificial intelligence and business models in the sustainable development goals perspective: A systematic literature review’, Journal of Business Research . Elsevier, 121, pp. 283–314. Vaka, D. K. (2024) ‘Enhancing Supplier Relationships: Critical Factors in Procurement Supplier Selection’, Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Data Science , 2(1), pp. 229–233. Vargas-Hernández, J. G. (2023) ‘Strategic organizational sustainability’, in The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Change . Springer, pp. 1–23. Vazquez Melendez, E. I., Bergey, P. and Smith, B. (2024) ‘Blockchain technology for supply chain provenance: increasing supply chain efficiency and consumer trust’, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal . Emerald Publishing Limited. Vyhmeister, E. and Castane, G. G. (2024) ‘When Industry meets trustworthy AI: a systematic review of AI for Industry 5.0’, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03061 . Walker, M., Winders, J. and Boamah, E. F. (2021) ‘Locating artificial intelligence: a research agenda’, Space and Polity . Taylor & Francis, 25(2), pp. 202–219. Wang, J., Zhao, L. and Huchzermeier, A. (2021) ‘Operations-finance interface in risk management: Research evolution and opportunities’, Production and Operations Management . SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 30(2), pp. 355–389. Wang, K. et al. (2023) ‘Investigating the role of artificial intelligence technologies in the construction industry using a Delphi-ANP-TOPSIS hybrid MCDM concept under a fuzzy environment’, Sustainability . MDPI, 15(15), p. 11848. Wang, L., Hu, Y. and Zhou, Y. (2024) ‘Cross-border commodity pricing strategy optimization via mixed neural network for time series analysis’, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.12115 . Wang, S. et al. (2019) ‘Smart contract-based product traceability system in the supply chain scenario’, IEEE access . IEEE, 7, pp. 115122–115133. Wang, X. et al. (2021) ‘New paradigm of data-driven smart customisation through digital twin’, Journal of manufacturing systems . Elsevier, 58, pp. 270–280. Wang, Z. et al. (2023) ‘Promising solutions for railway operations to cope with future challenges—Tackling COVID and beyond’, Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management . Elsevier, 28, p. 100405. Whitaker, J., Ekman, P. and Thompson, S. (2017) ‘How multinational corporations use information technology to manage global operations’, Journal of Computer Information Systems . Taylor & Francis, 57(2), pp. 112–122. Wickert, C. and Risi, D. (2019) Corporate social responsibility . Cambridge University Press. Widener, M. N. (2019) ‘Cubular Corridors: Merging Vertical Urbanism with Accessibility Initiatives’, Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. HeinOnline, 44, p. 87. Wiegmans, B. and Janic, M. (2019) ‘Analysis, modeling, and assessing performances of supply chains served by long-distance freight transport corridors’, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation . Taylor & Francis, 13(4), pp. 278–293. Williams, C. and Lee, S. H. (2011) ‘Entrepreneurial contexts and knowledge coordination within the multinational corporation’, Journal of World Business . Elsevier, 46(2), pp. 253–264. Witkowski, K. (2017) ‘Internet of things, big data, industry 4.0–innovative solutions in logistics and supply chains management’, Procedia engineering . Elsevier, 182, pp. 763–769. Wolniak, R. and Stecuła, K. (2024) ‘Artificial Intelligence in Smart Cities—Applications, Barriers, and Future Directions: A Review’, Smart Cities . MDPI, 7(3), pp. 1346–1389. Wong, L.-W. et al. (2024) ‘Artificial intelligence-driven risk management for enhancing supply chain agility: A deep-learning-based dual-stage PLS-SEM-ANN analysis’, International Journal of Production Research . Taylor & Francis, 62(15), pp. 5535–5555. Wuest, T. et al. (2022) ‘The triple bottom line of smart manufacturing technologies: An economic, environmental, and social perspective’, in The Routledge Handbook of Smart Technologies . Routledge, pp. 312–332. Xu, P. et al. (2021) ‘Blockchain as supply chain technology: considering transparency and security’, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management . Emerald Publishing Limited, 51(3), pp. 305–324. Yin, C. et al. (2021) ‘Interrelations between sea hub ports and inland hinterlands: Perspectives of multimodal freight transport organization and low carbon emissions’, Ocean & Coastal Management . Elsevier, 214, p. 105919. Yüksel, I. (2012) ‘Developing a multi-criteria decision making model for PESTEL analysis’, International Journal of Business and Management . Canadian Center of Science and Education, 7(24), p. 52. Zhu, Q., Duan, Y. and Sarkis, J. (2024) ‘Supply chain carbon transparency to consumers via blockchain: does the truth hurt?’, The International Journal of Logistics Management . Emerald Publishing Limited, 35(3), pp. 833–864. Žic, J. et al. (2024) ‘Exploring Green Inventory Management through Periodic Review Inventory Systems—A Comprehensive Literature Review and Directions for Future Research’, Sustainability . MDPI, 16(13), p. 5544. Zrelli, I. and Rejeb, A. (2024) ‘A bibliometric analysis of IoT applications in logistics and supply chain management’, Heliyon . Elsevier, 10(16). Chart 1 Chart 1 is available in the Supplementary Files section. Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Supplementary Files Chart1.png Chart 1: Growth in AI, Digital Logistics, and Sustainability Research (2010-2024) Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6086101","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Systematic Review","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":419470815,"identity":"a30007ed-41d1-410c-a692-d140e393b5cf","order_by":0,"name":"Ghazaleh Kermani Moghaddam","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6048-6518","institution":"Ferdowsi University of Mashhad","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ghazaleh","middleName":"Kermani","lastName":"Moghaddam","suffix":""},{"id":419470876,"identity":"1cfe0498-ae32-44f5-b1e9-60d245abc7f2","order_by":1,"name":"Mostafa Karimzadeh","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ferdowsi University of Mashhad","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mostafa","middleName":"","lastName":"Karimzadeh","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-02-22 14:26:28","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":true,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true,"humanSubjectConsent":true,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6086101/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6086101/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":77292242,"identity":"74d84367-6fb2-494c-a4a1-f45d30931c3c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-02-27 06:52:39","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":41279,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSystematic Review Process (PRISMA Framework)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6086101/v1/7c1729fe00c5cae24e6b953f.png"},{"id":77292240,"identity":"24220c17-1525-414d-a9a0-194e71f35ed3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-02-27 06:52:39","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":37718,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSummary of Key Research Themes in AI-Driven Supply Chains\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6086101/v1/2d5581d97baed2bbfa8e8156.png"},{"id":77293901,"identity":"6c180c08-1929-4a87-afdb-04ffa32a83e5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-02-27 07:00:39","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":17958,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSystematic Review Process (PRISMA Framework)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6086101/v1/3e9acb64f8e2aede83ed9d28.png"},{"id":77295589,"identity":"cde8fce4-315c-44b7-98ed-b936ee2f4578","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-02-27 07:16:42","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2675640,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6086101/v1/3c9d1d13-2e78-4df1-995f-d9ff6389228a.pdf"},{"id":77293903,"identity":"5c010beb-4388-471f-82e2-0209d70a88fb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-02-27 07:00:39","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":44926,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eChart 1: Growth in AI, Digital Logistics, and Sustainability Research (2010-2024)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Chart1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6086101/v1/5dd1f766c0e29464db9d3e61.png"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAI-Driven Digital Transformation and Sustainable Logistics: Innovations in Global Supply Chain Management\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"1.\tIntroduction: Integrating Digital Logistics, AI-Driven Decision-Making, and Auton-omous Freight Systems","content":"\n\u003ch3\u003e1.1 Background \u0026 Significance\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe term \"globalization\" has gone from cliche to motivating factor in supply chain changes (Ray and Nayak, 2023; Vargas-Hern\u0026aacute;ndez, 2023). Companies are reevaluating their transportation, logistics, and decision-making techniques in response to the growing demand for goods and services from customers in different parts of the world (Patel, 2023; Badmus \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024). To keep up with the competition on a global scale, modern logistics networks must incorporate digitization, sustainability, AI-driven decision-making, operational resilience, and automation, whereas traditional supply chain models have concentrated on optimizing operational resilience and cost-efficiency (R. S. Khan \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022; Muthuswamy and Ali, 2023; Aghahadi \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024; Neway, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBy facilitating real-time decision-making, predictive analytics, and supply chain visibility, emerging digital logistics technologies like Blockchain, the Internet of Things (IoT), and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are reshaping global logistics (Paramesha, Rane and Rane, 2024). Efforts to optimize transportation routes, decrease carbon footprints, and move toward electric and autonomous freight systems have been stepped up in response to the worldwide push for sustainability (Sperling, 2018; Hasan, Whyte and Al Jassmi, 2019; Martin, 2019).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA new wave of autonomous logistics technologies is shaking up the freight industry at the same time (Anderson \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2014; Manners-Bell and Lyon, 2019; Sullivan and Kern, 2021). Improved efficiency, lower prices, and less environmental effect are the goals of the development of self-driving trucks, fleet management driven by artificial intelligence, last-mile deliveries by drone, and hyperloop freight systems (Kostrzewski \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022; Mirindi, 2024). To keep up with the changing nature of decision-making in global supply chains, it is necessary to conduct a thorough review of logistics models.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec2\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e1.2 Research Problem \u0026amp; Motivation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eConventional supply chain models depend on static optimization methods that presume constant transportation costs, stable exchange rates, and foreseeable demand patterns. In the current turbulent global trade landscape, AI-driven decision-making models enable organizations to adjust flexibly to real-time market fluctuations, disruptions, and supply chain vulnerabilities. Likewise, sustainability-oriented logistics has transitioned from a peripheral issue to a fundamental strategic objective. Governments, regulatory agencies, and industry executives are implementing carbon reduction rules that mandate companies to adopt more sustainable logistics solutions, including electric freight transport, carbon-neutral warehouses, and blockchain-enhanced supply chain transparency.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe emergence of autonomous freight systems (drones, hyperloop, AI-driven trucks) presents novel obstacles and opportunities. Although these technologies provide the potential for expedited, more efficient, and reduced-emission transportation, their extensive implementation, regulatory obstacles, and economic viability continue to be unresolved research inquiries. Consequently, there is an urgent necessity to examine recent developments in digital logistics, sustainability-oriented initiatives, and automation within global supply chain management.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e1.3 Research Objectives\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis paper conducts a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to address the following key questions:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eHow has AI-driven decision-making transformed global supply chain logistics?\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat role does digitalization (IoT, blockchain, cloud computing) play in optimizing logistics and transportation?\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eHow are companies implementing sustainability-driven logistics strategies to reduce environmental impact?\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat are the challenges and opportunities in adopting autonomous freight technologies (self-driving trucks, drones, hyperloop) in logistics?\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eHow can logistics models integrate AI, automation, and sustainability to build resilient global supply chains?\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"2. Previous Review Papers (Incorporating Recent References from 2010–2024)","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.1 Overview of Recent Literature on Global Supply Chains\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecent studies have analyzed the progression of global supply chains, emphasizing AI-driven decision-making, sustainability, and automation (Gharehgozli \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2017). Early studies, such (Lee, 2010), (Williams and Lee, 2011), and (Gammeltoft, Filatotchev and Hobdari, 2012) examined multiplant coordination and the strategic frameworks of multinational corporations (MNCs), but they did not focus on digitalization and AI-driven logistics breakthroughs. Recent study indicates that machine learning algorithms, predictive analytics, and blockchain-based supply chain models have transformed decision-making and risk management in global supply chains (Grover \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024). The integration of autonomous freight technology is accelerating, as corporations invest in self-driving vehicles, drone logistics, and (Mateu, Fern\u0026aacute;ndez and Franco, 2021) freight networks to enhance efficiency and sustainability .\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2 Strategic and Tactical Decision-Making in Global Logistics\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eInnovations in AI-driven supply chain optimization have revolutionized strategic and tactical decision-making. Traditional strategic production-distribution models, as analyzed by (Grossmann, 2012), (Sahebi, Nickel and Ashayeri, 2014), (Powell, Simao and Bouzaiene-Ayari, 2012), and (Ivanov and Sokolov, 2013)predominantly depended on mathematical optimization frameworks. Nevertheless, these studies failed to consider the dynamic characteristics of global logistics, which have become progressively volatile due to pandemics, geopolitical conflicts, and climate-related disturbances. Recent research underscores the enhancement of risk management and decision agility with AI-driven predictive analytics and IoT-enabled supply chain monitoring (Nzeako \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024). Furthermore, Generative AI-driven supply chain planning models, like Generative Probabilistic Planning (GPP), have been developed to enhance logistics by predicting demand variations, lead times, and production uncertainties (Sulaiman, 2024; Kurz, 2025).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3 Digitalization and AI-Driven Decision Models\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eDigitalization has had a major impact on the decision-making process in the supply chain, and artificial intelligence and big data analytics have become critical tools for optimizing logistics (Hofmann \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2019). Models of supply chains were divided into strategic, tactical, and operational tiers in earlier frameworks, such as (Estampe \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2013) and (Ivanov, 2010). However, these models did not take into consideration the use of artificial intelligence to make decisions in real time. Recent research has highlighted the importance of logistics platforms powered by artificial intelligence, which improve inventory optimization, dynamic route planning, and demand forecasting (Dash \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2019) and (Eyo-Udo, 2024). In addition, blockchain technology is being used more and more to guarantee transparency in the supply chain and to avoid fraud by generating digital records of shipments, supplier transactions, and quality checks (Sunny, Undralla and Pillai, 2020; Jie \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2023).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.4 Sustainability and Green Supply Chain Strategies\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eSustainability has become a top focus in supply chain management due to climate change policies and company promises to carbon neutrality.(Jayaram and Tan, 2010) and (Brandenburg and Rebs, 2015) and other early studies categorized supply chain design papers according to supplier integration and trade barriers, but they did not take into account the effects of logistics models that are driven by sustainability. On the other hand, current study indicates that carbon tracking powered by artificial intelligence, green transportation networks, and innovations in sustainable packaging have transformed supply chains around the world (Bechtsis \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2018). In addition, research shows that using AI to optimize routes can decrease fuel use and carbon dioxide emissions by as much as 32% in self-driving freight operations (Delgado \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2019). Tracking carbon footprints using blockchain technology is also becoming an important tool for ensuring that logistical practices are ecologically friendly (Abduljabbar \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2019; Figliozzi and Jennings, 2020; Almeida and Carneiro, 2021; Neufville, Abdalla and Abbas, 2022).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.5 Autonomous Freight and Digital Transformation in Logistics\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAutomation is changing the way logistics work throughout the world. Self-driving trucks, drones, and hyperloop systems are becoming more popular as practical alternatives. On the other hand, earlier research, including studies by (Witkowski, 2017) and (Hofmann and R\u0026uuml;sch, 2017)did not predict the importance of autonomous logistics systems in contemporary supply chains. According to research by (Kim, Kim and Park, 2022), autonomous trucking can greatly improve freight efficiency and sustainability by lowering energy use. Furthermore, AI-powered fleet management solutions have been demonstrated to improve last-mile deliveries, resulting in shorter transit times and lower operational costs (Mani and Goniewicz, 2023; Rane, Choudhary and Rane, 2024; Rane, Kaya and Rane, 2024). According to feasibility studies on Hyperloop logistics, these systems have the potential to provide cargo transportation that is both fast and low in emissions. However, there are still obstacles to overcome, including as scalability and regulatory barriers (Lafoz \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2020; Hedhly \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2021).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.6 Future Research Directions\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe increasing dependence on logistics systems that are driven by artificial intelligence (AI), sustainable, and autonomous has created a number of important research gaps that need to be filled (Klumpp, 2018; Sun \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022; Tsolakis \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022). One important topic for future study is the incorporation of decision-making models driven by artificial intelligence into the optimization of global supply chains (Poudel, 2013; Hengstler, Enkel and Duelli, 2016). This would enable real-time adaptation in reaction to changes in the market (Issa, Sun and Vasarhelyi, 2016; Di Vaio \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2020). Furthermore, as sustainability becomes increasingly important, additional research should investigate the use of artificial intelligence to measure carbon footprints and blockchain technology to improve supply chain transparency (Chen, 2024). This would help to improve environmental compliance and operational efficiency. In order to determine the practicality, affordability, and regulatory obstacles of autonomous freight technologies like self-driving trucks, drone deliveries, and hyperloop cargo delivery, further empirical study is needed (Bachofner \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022). Another important area of emphasis is the evaluation of blockchain-enabled supply chain transparency, which can enhance trust, security, and traceability in international logistics (Centobelli \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022; Dasaklis \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022). Finally, it is necessary to further develop AI-powered risk assessment models in order to reduce supply chain disruptions that are caused by geopolitical events, pandemics, and uncertainty associated to climate change (Chukwu \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese study gaps demonstrate that global supply chains are continuing to change as businesses move toward strategies that focus on digitization, automation, and sustainability in logistics. In order to create supply chains that are robust, transparent, and prepared for the future, future research must focus on the combined use of artificial intelligence (AI) to make decisions, green supply chain frameworks, and autonomous logistics technologies. Researchers can help make logistics networks more flexible, data-driven, and ecologically sustainable by tackling these growing difficulties. This will ensure that supply chains stay competitive and adaptable during the digital logistics transition.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eFacility Location in Global Supply Chains: Recent Developments\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn order to maximize supply chain efficiency and decrease costs, facility location models are essential for optimizing the placement of production plants, finishing facilities, and distribution centers (DCs) (Naimi Sadigh, Fallah and Nahavandi, 2013; Sundarakani, Pereira and Ishizaka, 2021). Models from the past, like (Benyoucef and Xie, 2011; Halim, Kwakkel and Tavasszy, 2016; Jahre \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2016), mainly optimized shipping quantities, demand allocation, and open-close choices. In addition to tax incentives, reduced wage costs, and proximity to consumers, global facility location models expand these factors to incorporate exchange rates, duties, tariffs, and local content regulations, all of which impact how multinational corporations (MNCs) position their operations abroad (Baaij \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2015; Halim, Kwakkel and Tavasszy, 2016). To help decision-makers take qualitative elements like political stability, economic conditions, and government laws into account, early research proposed multi-criteria integer goal programming models coupled with analytic hierarchy processes (AHP) (Y\u0026uuml;ksel, 2012; Stein, 2013). To solve multi-period mixed-integer programming (MIP) models for international facility location, (Correia and Melo, 2016, 2017) looked at capacity restrictions, investment decisions, and demand changes, and they proposed heuristic techniques. However, current facility site selections are influenced by factors like as artificial intelligence, digital logistics, and sustainability, which were not included in these older models.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere has been a recent uptick in studies examining sustainable facility placement tactics, blockchain-driven transparency in site selection, and AI-powered facility location models (Singh, Rathore and Park, 2020). The use of machine learning algorithms to forecast the best places to put facilities in light of current market conditions, geopolitical unrest, and environmental restrictions is detailed in research published by (Aljohani, 2023; Mohsin and Jamaani, 2023; Shawon \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024). In addition, site selection methods are using blockchain technology to guarantee regulatory compliance and transparent supplier network tracking (Singh \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2023). Companies may strategically locate facilities to minimize emissions while increasing logistical efficiency using AI-powered carbon footprint tracking, which is a major concern in the sustainability realm (Tada Now, 2023). Furthermore, research by Aurora Tech in 2023 shows that autonomous logistics solutions, such hyperloop transportation networks and self-driving freight cars, impact facility placement decisions by making last-mile deliveries more efficient (Nikitas \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2017; Widener, 2019; Hansen, 2020).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecent work on the topic has shifted the focus from deterministic elements like tariffs, currency rates, and trade zones to stochastic ones that can adapt to changing global economic situations (Johnson, 2013; Parrish and Beaubien, 2024; Wang, Hu and Zhou, 2024) (See Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGlobal Procurement Strategies Summary\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAuthor(s) \u0026amp; Year\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModel Type\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKey Factors Considered\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eObjective\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eJohnson, 2013; Parrish and Beaubien, 2024; Wang, Hu and Zhou, 2024\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGlobal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStochastic Facility Location\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStochastic Optimization for Exchange Rate\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDynamic Location Optimization under Market Volatility\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNikitas \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2017; Widener, 2019; Hansen, 2020)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGlobal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAutonomous Logistics Influence on Site\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSelf-Driving Trucks \u0026amp; Hyperloop Logistics on Site Decisions\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eImpact of Automation on Logistics\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Mohsin 2023);(Aljohani 2023);(Shawon 2024)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGlobal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAI-Driven Facility Location\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAI-Based Demand Forecasting, Carbon Emissions\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnhancing Sustainability \u0026amp; Logistics\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHamad \u0026amp; Gualda (2008)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSouth America\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eValue-Added Tax \u0026amp; Take-or-Pay Cost Model\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eValue-Added Taxes, Take-or-Pay Costs\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReducing Logistics Costs through VAT Adjustments\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRobinson \u0026amp; Bookbinder (2007)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNAFTA (Canada, USA, Mexico)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMulti-Period Optimization Model\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTransportation Mode, Border-Crossing Costs, Centralization\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOptimizing DC \u0026amp; Finishing Plant Locations\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKouvelis et al. (2004)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGlobal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHybrid Product-Process Focus Model\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTransfer Pricing, Government Incentives, Local Content Rules\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMaximizing After-Tax Profits via Optimized Networks\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCanel \u0026amp; Das (2002)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGlobal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eProfit Maximization Model\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExchange Rates, Tariffs, Marketing-Manufacturing Interdependency\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCost-Optimized Production \u0026amp; Marketing Synergies\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Correia and Melo, 2016) (Correia and Melo, 2017)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGlobal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMixed Integer Linear Program (MILP)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTariffs, Distribution Costs, Initial Capacity Allocation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eProfit Maximization in Facility Placement\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCanel \u0026amp; Khumawala (1996, 2001)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNorth America, Europe, Far East\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Mixed Integer Programming (MIP)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExchange Rates, Cost \u0026amp; Demand Variations\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInternational Site Selection with Demand Uncertainty\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"4. Procurement in Global Supply Chains: AI, Blockchain, and Sustainable Sourcing","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe process of procurement and supplier selection is an important part of managing a global supply chain. It involves making decisions about where to get raw materials and components while also considering the cost, quality, and risk (Khan, Yu and Farooq, 2023; Vaka, 2024). Traditional procurement models mostly concentrated on minimizing costs and ensuring supplier reliability (Chaturvedi and Mart\u0026iacute;nez-de-Alb\u0026eacute;niz, 2011; Kamalahmadi and Mellat-Parast, 2016). However, foreign sourcing adds further complications, including volatility in exchange rates, levies and tariffs, geopolitical hazards, and local content requirements (LCRs) (Banka, 2014; Sandor \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2018). (Bozorgi-Amiri, Jabalameli and Mirzapour Al-e-Hashem, 2013; Hammami, Temponi and Frein, 2014; Tintner and Sengupta, 2014) created deterministic and stochastic models to maximize sourcing under changing economic situations. (Bozorgi-Amiri, Jabalameli and Mirzapour Al-e-Hashem, 2013; Das, 2020) then expanded on these models by adding heuristic-based scenario analysis, which took into account exchange rate risks and economic states. Furthermore, Munson and Rosenblatt (1997) investigated LCRs in international procurement and showed how local sourcing limitations affect the tactics used to choose suppliers. Although these early models were useful in reducing risks related to currency and taxation, they did not take into consideration the new tactics that have developed in recent years, such as procurement optimization driven by artificial intelligence, supplier verification facilitated by blockchain technology, and sustainable sourcing strategies (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecent research shows that artificial intelligence, blockchain, and procurement methods that focus on sustainability are changing how companies get goods and services around the world. Machine learning algorithms are now being used by AI-powered procurement platforms to forecast supplier performance, optimize cost-risk trade-offs, and automate supplier selection (Dash \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2019; Kalasani, 2023; Marrone, 2023). Furthermore, smart contracts that are based on blockchain technology provide secure and tamper-proof verification of suppliers, which decreases the likelihood of fraud and increases transparency in multi-tier supplier networks (Gallersd\u0026ouml;rfer and Matthes, 2019; Wang \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2019; Liu \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022). Sustainability is also changing the way that companies buy things. With the help of artificial intelligence, businesses can track their carbon footprints and choose suppliers that are environmentally responsible while simultaneously reducing emissions in their supply chains (Dauvergne, 2022; Ameh, 2024; Hasan, Islam, \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024; Hasan, Shawon, \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024).On the top of that, the development of regional sourcing hubs, which were first suggested in early models by Balaji and Viswanadham (2008), has progressed into AI-powered digital hubs that may change sourcing decisions in real time based on geopolitical, economic, and environmental factors (Chalmers, MacKenzie and Carter, 2021; Rane, Kaya and Rane, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eProcurement in Global Supply Chains\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAuthor(s) \u0026amp; Year\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModel Type\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKey Factors Considered\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eObjective\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChalmers, MacKenzie and Carter, 2021; Rane, Kaya and Rane, 2024)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAI-Powered Digital Hubs for Dynamic Sourcing Decisions\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReal-Time Sourcing Adjustments, Geopolitical Risk Management\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnabling Adaptive Procurement through AI-Driven Hubs\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Huang and Mao, 2024), (Mor, Madan and Prasad, 2021)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAI-Driven Carbon Footprint Tracking in Sourcing\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSustainable Procurement, Emissions Optimization\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReducing Carbon Footprint via AI-Optimized Sourcing\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGallersd\u0026ouml;rfer and Matthes, 2019; Wang \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2019; Liu \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBlockchain-Based Smart Contracts for Supplier Verification\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSmart Contracts, Transparency, Fraud Prevention\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnhancing Trust \u0026amp; Security in Procurement Transactions\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eauvergne, 2022; Ameh, 2024; Hasan, Islam, \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024; Hasan, Shawon, \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAI-Powered Supplier Selection \u0026amp; Risk Prediction\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePredictive Analytics, Supplier Performance Forecasting\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOptimizing Supplier Networks through AI-Powered Automation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBalaji \u0026amp; Viswanadham (2008)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTax-Integrated \u0026amp; Hub-Based Procurement Model\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eForeign Direct Investment, Regional Hub Sourcing, Tax Optimization\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBalancing Cost \u0026amp; Tax Efficiency in Multinational Procurement\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Amorim \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2016), (Chang and Hung, 2010), (Kumar Kar and K. Pani, 2014)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLCR-Based Supplier Selection Model\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLocal Content Rules, Deterministic Supplier Selection\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnsuring Compliance with LCRs while Optimizing Supplier Selection\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGonzalez Velarde \u0026amp; Laguna (2004), Bozorgi-Amiri, Jabalameli and Mirzapour Al-e-Hashem, 2013; Das, 2020)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMixed Integer Nonlinear Program with Exchange Rate Scenarios\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEconomic States (Weak, Medium, Strong), Heuristic-Based Optimization\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMinimizing Exchange Rate Risks in Global Sourcing\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBozorgi-Amiri, Jabalameli and Mirzapour Al-e-Hashem, 2013; Hammami, Temponi and Frein, 2014; Tintner and Sengupta, 2014\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDeterministic \u0026amp; Stochastic Procurement Models\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExchange Rate Fluctuations, Inflation, Economic Uncertainty\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eProcurement Optimization under Economic Volatility\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"5. Transportation in Global Supply Chains: AI, Automation, and Sustainable Freight Solutions","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e\u003cem\u003e5.1\u003c/em\u003e Overview\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe efficient movement of goods via international supply networks is dependent on transportation. Supply chain models frequently neglect it despite its significance, opting instead to center on facility placement, supplier evaluation, and inventory control (Bookbinder and Matuk, 2009; Martel and Klibi, 2016; Žic \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024). To cut down on logistics expenses, speed up deliveries, and lessen environmental impact, effective transportation planning is essential. In the past, researchers have focused on the pros and cons of various transportation techniques, such as air and maritime freight logistics (Žic \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024). Transportation has a major influence on supply chain efficiency, according to early empirical research by (Chan and Zhang, 2011; Ke \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2015). However, these studies did not include current AI-driven route optimization, autonomous freight solutions, or sustainability-focused logistics processes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eArtificial intelligence (AI), automation (automation), and advances driven by sustainability have recently transformed global transportation networks (Majid \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2023; Challoumis, 2024; Wolniak and Stecuła, 2024). In order to improve route efficiency and decrease delivery lead times, freight optimization models powered by AI currently integrate real-time traffic data, predictive analytics, and machine learning algorithms (Kaul and Khurana, 2022; Dikshit \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2023). Additionally, new solutions are emerging in the field of autonomous freight technology, which can reduce costs, improve safety, and minimize carbon emissions. These technologies include self-driving trucks, drones for last-mile delivery, and hyperloop cargo transit (Jaller \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2020; Kostrzewski \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022). Another important factor is sustainability; businesses may lessen their impact on the environment without sacrificing efficiency thanks to AI-driven carbon tracking and the use of alternative fuels (Kaul and Khurana, 2022; Žic \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.2 Transportation by Road or Rail: AI-Driven Logistics, Autonomous Freight, and Sustainable Intermodal Systems\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAfter establishing a network of facilities and suppliers, the transportation of goods between sites and the mode of transport must be optimized (Eskandarpour \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2015). Conventional transportation models aimed to reduce cost, distance, or transit duration via strategic modal selection (Litman, 2011; Fagnant and Kockelman, 2014; de Dios Ort\u0026uacute;zar and Willumsen, 2024). Intermodal transportation, which entails the use of two or more modes of conveyance for goods, has been a fundamental aspect of global logistics (Bhattacharya \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2014; Agamez-Arias and Moyano-Fuentes, 2017). A product obtained from Hong Kong may be shipped via ocean freight to California and thereafter transferred to vehicles for final delivery to regional distribution hubs (Haveman and Hummels, 2004; Bonacich and Wilson, 2008; Sinn, 2012). The NAFTA trade corridor in North America has been essential for facilitating intermodal connectivity, enabling cross-border freight transport through rail and truck networks (Bookbinder and Matuk, 2009). European transportation strategies similarly prioritize the construction of rail-truck intermodal systems, exemplified by EU-backed initiatives like the REORIENT corridor, which links Scandinavia to Greece to alleviate road congestion and mitigate environmental effects (Bookbinder and Matuk, 2009). Nevertheless, these prior models failed to account for contemporary AI-driven logistics, autonomous freight systems, or sustainability-focused intermodal innovations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecent advancements in AI-driven transportation planning, autonomous trucks, and rail efficiency have profoundly altered global freight logistics (Rashid and Kausik, 2024). Current machine learning algorithms provide predictive traffic analysis and dynamic route optimization, hence minimizing congestion and delivery delays (Berhanu \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024; Nampalli and Adusupalli, 2024). Autonomous freight technologies, including self-driving trucks and AI-managed rail logistics, are being implemented to enhance efficiency, decrease worker reliance, and cut fuel consumption (Peta, 2023; Rane, Kaya and Rane, 2024). Moreover, AI-augmented intermodal freight planning facilitates real-time cargo modifications in response to traffic circumstances, weather disturbances, and port congestion levels (Godsmark and Richards, 2019; Jeevan \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022). Sustainability is increasingly emphasized, as blockchain-enabled carbon tracking enables logistics companies to monitor emissions throughout multimodal supply chains and adhere to net-zero environmental regulations (Krishnan, Balas and Kumar, 2023; Leclerc and Ircha, 2023).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn Europe, AI-driven long intermodal freight trains (LIFTS) are undergoing trials to enhance rail efficiency and alleviate road congestion (Wiegmans and Janic, 2019; Z. Wang \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2023)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.3 Transportation by Air: AI-Powered Optimization, Autonomous Aerial Logistics, and Sustainable Air Freight\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAir transportation is essential to global supply networks, facilitating rapid and dependable delivery of commodities between regions (Rodrigue, 2020). Conventional research examined the economic advantages of dedicated multimodal cargo facilities (DMCFs), which reduce delays and improve efficiency in air freight operations (Morrell and Klein, 2018; Dresner and Zou, 2020). These studies highlighted the significance of cargo-specific hubs in mitigating material flow disruptions, inventory expenses, and transit delays (van der Loeff, Godar and Prakash, 2018). Tyan et al. (2003) examined third-party logistics (3PL) consolidation policies, emphasizing the cost-service trade-offs inherent in air freight decision-making (Chen and Notteboom, 2012; Soh, Wong and Chong, 2015; Qaiser, 2019; Hosseini and Vashaee, 2022). (Archetti, Peirano and Speranza, 2022) conducted additional research that presented multiobjective intermodal routing models, optimizing cargo cost, transit duration, and economies of scale via Lagrangian relaxation techniques. Nonetheless, these first models failed to incorporate contemporary AI-driven air freight optimization, autonomous aerial logistics, or sustainable aviation solutions, which are already revolutionizing global air transportation tactics (Layton, 2021).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecent breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, automation, and sustainability-oriented air logistics have offered novel optimization techniques in air freight routing, consolidation, and emissions mitigation (Chen \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024). AI-driven logistics models utilize machine learning algorithms to forecast ideal air routes, demand variations, and delivery timelines, hence reducing delays and fuel usage (Li \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024; Nampalli and Adusupalli, 2024). The rise of autonomous aerial logistics, including as cargo drones and AI-operated air freight hubs, is improving last-mile delivery and diminishing dependence on conventional freight models (Dorn, 2021). Sustainability is a primary emphasis, with AI-driven carbon monitoring and alternative fuel-powered cargo planes assisting corporations in shifting to lower-emission supply chains (Kuramochi \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2018; Dagnachew and Hof, 2022). Blockchain-based air freight tracking solutions are enhancing real-time visibility and security in worldwide cargo operations (Elmay \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"6. Production Switching, Transfer Pricing Policies, and Postponement: AI-Driven Decision Models and Blockchain-Based Financial Optimization","content":"\u003cp\u003eDynamic economic conditions, varying exchange rates, and evolving production costs impact manufacturing, pricing, and supply chain flexibility (Smith, 2012). Multinational businesses (MNCs) encounter these challenges as their worldwide supply chains expand. (Ellram, Tate and Petersen, 2013) and Huchzermeier and (Romer and Romer, 2010) were among the first to examine production switching techniques, in which businesses move output in response to changes in labor costs, tax incentives, and currency rates. These researches used stochastic dynamic programming models to determine the best placement and number of manufacturing facilities taking transportation, starting, and shutdown expenses into consideration. In a similar (Koberstein, Lukas and Naumann, 2013) and (Ellram, Tate and Petersen, 2013) put out a deterministic model for assessing capacity hedging techniques, which enable businesses to counteract changes in demand by varying output between nations. These early models laid the groundwork for what is now a digital delay strategy, a blockchain-based transfer pricing system, or AI-powered production optimization, all of which are revolutionizing global manufacturing networks (Wuest \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDecentralized postponement methods, smart transfer pricing mechanisms, and real-time production switching are all made possible by recent breakthroughs in blockchain and artificial intelligence (Khan \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2023). According to McKinsey (2023), multinational corporations can now optimize their global production networks in real-time with the use of AI-driven predictive analytics, which help them anticipate changes in labor costs, currency rates, and supply chain hazards (Whitaker, Ekman and Thompson, 2017; \u0026Aacute;rva, P\u0026aacute;sztor and Pyatanova, 2020). In addition to lowering fraud and increasing cross-border financial transparency, blockchain-enabled financial tracking guarantees compliance with international transfer pricing legislation (Sharma \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2020; Sunny \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022; Irfan \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2023). By combining digital twin technology with postponement techniques, producers can now delay final assembly according to real-time demand forecasts, significantly improving customized production planning (Cohen \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2019; Wang \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2021). Furthermore, (Ciriello, 2021) and (CAPE, PIERLUIGI and RIPAMONTI, 2018) report that smart contracts in blockchain-based procurement systems automate tax-efficient supply chain transactions, optimizing transfer pricing policies and maintaining regulatory compliance. Research in the future should center on improving frameworks for delaying decisions in highly dynamic global supply chains, incorporating blockchain-based pricing optimization, and scaling global production models powered by artificial intelligence.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eInternational trade rules and geopolitical risks pose a significant obstacle to production shift and transfer pricing. Multinational corporations (MNCs) are under increasing pressure to reevaluate their worldwide production footprints in light of rising protectionist policies, currency devaluations, and regional trade disputes (Moradlou \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2021; Ghodsi, Vujanović and Landesmann, 2024). In order to keep up with the latest geopolitical events, changes in labor laws, and tax rules, companies are using AI-driven risk management systems. This allows them to make preemptive adjustments to their production networks (King and Petty, 2021). By analyzing multi-country taxation frameworks with machine learning algorithms, autonomous supply chain planning solutions help businesses maximize tax efficiency while staying in line with international trade rules (Gurumurthy \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2019). Companies are increasingly recognizing the importance of these advancements as they strive for increased agility in dealing with the unpredictable global market and the financial risks linked to complex transfer pricing and shifting tariffs.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom a sustainability standpoint, production location options are being optimized while lowering environmental effect through the utilization of AI-powered supply chain decision models. A growing number of companies are adopting the practice of \"green postponement\", choosing their manufacturing locations in consideration of environmental regulations, renewable energy availability, and carbon emissions (Mirzapour Al-E-Hashem, Baboli and Sazvar, 2013; Ugarte, Golden and Dooley, 2016; Sarkar, Ahmed and Kim, 2018). Ethical production and responsible resource allocation are being supported by blockchain-based supply chain transparency technologies. This is especially true in industries that are being held to a higher standard in terms of environmental and labor issues.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eProduction Switching, Transfer Pricing, and Postponement Summary\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAuthor(s) \u0026amp; Year\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModel Type\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKey Factors Considered\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eObjective\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Tian, 2020), (Ciriello, 2021)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSmart Contracts for Automated Global Tax Optimization\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAutomated Compliance with Trade Laws \u0026amp; Tax Regulations\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnable Automated Tax-Efficient Transfer Pricing \u0026amp; Compliance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(K. Wang \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2023), (Kar, Choudhary and Singh, 2022), (Durlik \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAI-Driven Green Postponement \u0026amp; Sustainable Manufacturing\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSustainability Metrics, Carbon Emission Reduction in Site Selection\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnsure Sustainable Production Through AI-Based Decision Models\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Chang, Iakovou and Shi, 2020), (Mia, Wessels and Adam, 2023)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBlockchain-Based Transfer Pricing \u0026amp; Compliance Tracking\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSecure Cross-Border Financial Transactions, Regulatory Compliance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eImprove Transfer Pricing Strategies Using Blockchain Transparency\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Wong \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024), (Rane, Kaya and Rane, 2024)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAI-Powered Predictive Analytics for Production Switching\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMachine Learning-Based Production Location Optimization\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnhance Agility in Global Production Switching Through AI\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Berry, 2013), (Adland, Bjerknes and Herje, 2017), (Ashayeri, Ma and Sotirov, 2014), (Bookbinder and Matuk, 2009), (Tang and Zhang, 2012)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEntry-Exit Model for Global Production Decision-Making\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReal Exchange Rate Volatility, Tariffs, Wages, Raw Material Prices\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOptimize Market Entry \u0026amp; Exit Strategies for Cost Efficiency\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Wang, Zhao and Huchzermeier, 2021), (Koberstein, Lukas and Naumann, 2013)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOperational \u0026amp; Allocation Hedging Strategies for Exchange Rate Volatility\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMulti-Period Exchange Rate Risk, Demand Constraints\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnable Strategic Production Allocation Hedging to Reduce Risk\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Lohmer and Lasch, 2021), (Mart\u0026iacute;nez-Costa \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2014)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Stochastic Control Model for Production Allocation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMulti-Plant Production Allocation, Inventory Management\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDynamically Adjust Production Based on Demand \u0026amp; Currency Trends\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Goyal, 2011), (OKOLIE, 2020)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInflation \u0026amp; Exchange Rate-Based Production Cost Model\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInflation Sensitivity, Market Allocation, Demand-Supply Optimization\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMaximize Profits by Adjusting Production to Inflationary Trends\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"7. Case Studies: AI-Driven Insights, Digital Transformation, and Sustainability in Global Logistics","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe difficulties that businesses encounter in managing their global supply chains, undergoing digital transformation, and implementing sustainability efforts might be better understood by looking at case studies (Wickert and Risi, 2019; Kotsila \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2023). Interviews, site visits, and industry participation have been added to case studies, which have traditionally depended on secondary data sources (De Massis and Kotlar, 2014; Rashid \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2019). This has allowed for richer, data-driven assessments. Steel producers in Southeast Asia, Australia, and New Zealand improved coordination across supply chain tiers by synchronizing master production schedules with worldwide sales and operations planning, as emphasized in early studies (Spiller \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2013; Rahimian \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2021; Somia, 2024). Similarly, (Lim and Tsutsui, 2012) and (Mander, 2014) investigated the reasons behind the decision of certain Dutch corporations to keep their activities on a regional level despite the trend toward globalization. The authors identified regulatory concerns, proximity to markets, and political and economic stability as important factors in this decision. Modern logistics strategies rely on AI-powered decision-making, digital supply chain visibility, and real-time sustainability monitoring; nevertheless, these elements were not considered in the aforementioned research, although they did offer important foundational insights (Attah \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024; Sharma and Tripathi, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA number of recent case studies have shown how to improve the efficiency of global supply chains by combining AI, blockchain technology, and models driven by sustainability. According to McKinsey (2023), businesses may now use AI-powered predictive analytics to foresee potential interruptions in the supply chain, which allows them to optimize their routes and make real-time adjustments to their inventories (Dash \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2019; Hassan and Mhmood, 2021). Better supplier collaboration and risk management have been made possible by AI-based decision support systems (DSS) in digital transformation programs, which have increased global industrial coordination (Mart\u0026iacute;nez-L\u0026oacute;pez and Casillas, 2013; Baryannis \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2019; Abideen \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2021; Allal-Ch\u0026eacute;rif, Sim\u0026oacute;n-Moya and Ballester, 2021). Ethical sourcing compliance and carbon tracking are made possible by blockchain-enabled transparency models, which contribute to sustainability (Rane and Thakker, 2020; Khanfar \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2021). Companies are utilizing automation, robotics, and self-driving fleets to improve operational efficiency and decrease environmental impact. Case studies in autonomous supply chains show this, as shown with Tesla and Amazon's AI-driven logistics platforms (Porter \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2018; Girasa and Girasa, 2020).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"8. Regional Models: AI-Driven Optimization and Sustainable Trade Networks","content":"\u003cp\u003eRegional models take into account distinct economic, regulatory, and infrastructure constraints that are specific to different regions of the world, as opposed to many global logistics-focused supply chain models (Thai, Yeo and Pak, 2016; Gonzalez-Feliu, 2018; Mangla \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2019). Some of the first research to focus on NAFTA-specific trade restrictions were Wilhelm et al. (2005) and looked at things like tax incentives for Mexican maquiladoras, border-crossing expenses, and local content rules (LCRs) (Bookbinder and Matuk, 2009; Rumford, 2014). The distribution of natural gas in South America has unique logistical issues, as take-or-pay contracts impose minimum purchase commitments irrespective of demand (Baruya, 2015; Barnes, 2022). Unlike their North American counterparts, the hub-based transportation network prioritises interior rivers in Europe (Notteboom, 2009; Kovacevic, 2017). Meanwhile, Sheu (2004) examined logistics trends in Asia and demonstrated how Taiwanese manufacturers choose the best global logistics strategies for the integrated circuit industry using fuzzy AHP and MADM models (Tsui, Tzeng and Wen, 2015; Kubler \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2016; Tsai and Phumchusri, 2021). Now essential components of contemporary regional supply chain plans, these models failed to take into consideration AI-powered decision optimization, blockchain-enabled trade compliance, or sustainability-driven logistics frameworks (Leogrande, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSustainability analytics, artificial intelligence, and blockchain are changing the game when it comes to optimizing supply chains on a regional scale (Sanders \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2019; Singh \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2020; Eyo-Udo, 2024). According to (Ruvoletto, 2023) and (Qureshi, 2021), trade flows between the United States and Mexico are experiencing a decrease in border-crossing delays and logistical costs due to AI-driven route optimization and autonomous freight technologies. Supply chain resilience is being enhanced in South American enterprises by using AI-enabled risk assessment models, which are assisting with exchange rate volatility and trade interruptions (Modgil \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022; Modgil, Singh and Hannibal, 2022). In Europe, customs compliance systems driven by blockchain are improving supply chain transparency and digitizing regulatory paperwork, allowing for frictionless cross-border trade (Brookbanks and Parry, 2022, 2024). At the same time, smart warehousing systems and AI-enhanced port logistics are enhancing trade efficiency, decreasing operational bottlenecks, and simplifying exports in high-tech industries in the Asia-Pacific region (Haddad, 2023; Barbosa, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab4\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 4\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegional Logistics Models Summary\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTraditional Model \u0026amp; Key Studies\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChallenges Considered\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecent Advancements (2010\u0026ndash;2024)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFuture Research Directions\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNorth America\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNAFTA-Specific Trade Constraints (Kennedy, 2021)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBorder-Crossing Costs, LCRs, Tax Incentives for Maquiladoras\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAI-Driven Route Optimization, Autonomous Freight for US-Mexico Trade (McKinsey, 2023), (L\u0026oacute;pez Bou, 2024), (Walker, Winders and Boamah, 2021)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntegration of AI in Cross-Border Logistics, Blockchain for Trade Security\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSouth America\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTake-or-Pay Contract Logistics (Dierker \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022), (Ishmael Ackah \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Minimum Purchase Commitments, Exchange Rate Volatility\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAI-Based Risk Assessment for Exchange Rate \u0026amp; Trade Disruptions (Badhan, Neeroj and Rahman, 2024)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eResilient Supply Chains with AI-Driven Risk Management\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEurope\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHub-Based Inland Waterway Network (Yin \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2021)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCross-Border Trade Complexity, Limited Rail Infrastructure\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBlockchain-Powered Customs Compliance for Seamless EU Trade (Mazzei \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2020)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSustainability Metrics in EU Logistics, Blockchain for Compliance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAsia-Pacific\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAI-Based Logistics Strategies in Semiconductor Industry (FUKAGAWA, 2021), (Chitturu \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2017)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExport Bottlenecks, High-Tech Supply Chain Optimization\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAI-Enhanced Port Logistics \u0026amp; Smart Warehousing for Tech Exports (Osman, 2024)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAI-Driven Predictive Analytics for Trade Optimization \u0026amp; Export Efficiency\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"9. Scope and Methodology","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study follows a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology, evaluating academic papers published in the last decade on AI-driven decision-making, sustainable logistics, and autonomous freight transport. The review is structured into the following categories:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDigital Logistics and AI-Driven Optimization \u0026ndash; Predictive analytics, real-time supply chain visibility, and blockchain security. Sustainable Logistics Strategies \u0026ndash; Carbon footprint reduction, green transportation networks, and eco-friendly warehousing.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAutonomous Freight Innovations \u0026ndash; Self-driving trucks, drone logistics, and hyperloop cargo systems. Comparative Analysis of Traditional vs. Digital Decision-Making \u0026ndash; Transition from static optimization models to AI-driven logistics strategies. By analyzing these themes, this study aims to contribute to the growing body of knowledge on the future of digital, sustainable, and autonomous logistics while identifying key research gaps and future opportunities.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec20\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e9.1 Research Method\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study adopts a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach to examine the evolution of global supply chain logistics from 2010 to 2024, with a particular focus on digital technologies, AI-driven decision-making, sustainability, and autonomous freight systems. The SLR method ensures a structured, replicable, and comprehensive analysis of existing research, systematically identifying, categorizing, and synthesizing findings to provide insights into emerging trends and challenges. The methodology follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework, ensuring transparency in article selection, categorization, and analysis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study primarily reviews literature published between 2010 and 2024, reflecting the gradual emergence of AI applications, blockchain integration, and sustainability-driven innovations in global logistics. The selection period captures early advancements in supply chain digitalization (2010\u0026ndash;2015), followed by the expansion of AI, automation, and blockchain technologies (2016\u0026ndash;2020), and finally, the acceleration of autonomous freight, predictive analytics, and sustainability-focused logistics (2021\u0026ndash;2024). The exclusion of pre-2010 studies is based on the lack of AI-driven logistics applications and digital transformation frameworks, ensuring that the research remains aligned with contemporary supply chain challenges. This study aims to identify common themes, methodologies, and research gaps, ultimately contributing to the development of a theoretical framework for AI, sustainability, and automation in logistics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eChart \u003cspan refid=\"Str1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e illustrates the distribution of reference papers by year from 2010 to 2024, highlighting a progressive increase in research on digital supply chain innovations. Research interest in supply chain digitalization began with 3 papers in 2010, increasing to 7 papers in 2012 and 12 papers in 2015. A noticeable rise was observed in 2017 with 22 publications, marking the initial adoption of AI-driven decision-making in SCM. By 2019, research had expanded to 35 papers, followed by rapid growth in 2021 with 58 papers, peaking in 2022 with 92 publications. While 2023 recorded 85 papers, early projections suggest continued interest in 2024, maintaining an upward trend. This trajectory reflects the growing academic and industry-wide recognition of AI, digital logistics, and sustainability as critical factors in SCM transformation. The notable increase in publications from 2016 onward suggests a strong shift toward AI-driven decision-making, blockchain transparency, and predictive logistics models, underscoring the importance of resilient, technology-driven, and sustainable global supply chains.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe increasing volume of research highlights a rapidly evolving academic and industrial landscape, with a strong focus on big data analytics, automation, AI-powered optimization, and green logistics. This study builds upon existing literature while identifying theoretical and practical research gaps, offering insights into the next generation of digital and sustainable supply chain models. Future research should explore how AI and blockchain can further enhance supply chain resilience, optimize autonomous logistics, and drive sustainable supply chain transformations in the coming decade.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec21\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e9.2 Summary of Selected Literature\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe updated Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e presents a summary of selected studies categorized by primary research topics and regions of focus, highlighting major trends and gaps in logistics research. The dominant research area appears to be AI-driven decision-making, particularly in predictive analytics and real-time supply chain optimization. Research on sustainable logistics primarily addresses carbon-neutral transportation and the role of blockchain in enhancing supply chain transparency. Meanwhile, autonomous freight technologies such as self-driving trucks and hyperloop logistics are emerging areas of study but require further exploration regarding regulatory feasibility and large-scale implementation. By synthesizing these findings, this study identifies key opportunities for future research in AI-powered logistics management, green supply chain innovation, and automation-driven freight transportation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab5\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 5\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eResearch Themes Summary\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePrimary Research Theme\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKey Topics\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecent Trends\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChallenges\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1. AI-Driven Decision-Making\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePredictive analytics, AI-powered selection, real-time optimization\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdoption of AI in logistics planning, dynamic route optimization\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eData accuracy, AI training costs, integration with existing systems\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2. Digital Logistics \u0026amp; Blockchain\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIoT-enabled freight tracking, blockchain security, cloud-based supply chain management\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIncreased focus on supply chain transparency and cybersecurity\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eScalability, regulatory concerns, adoption barriers\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3. Sustainable Supply Chains\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCarbon footprint reduction, electric freight transport, green warehousing\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGovernment regulations driving carbon-neutral logistics strategies\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHigh initial costs, transition complexities, technological gaps\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4. Autonomous Freight Technologies\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSelf-driving trucks, drone-based last-mile delivery, hyperloop cargo transport\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInvestment in autonomous transport technologies\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLegal and safety regulations, public acceptance, infrastructure readiness\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5. Comparative Analysis of Traditional vs. Digital Logistics\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStatic optimization models, AI-driven logistics, cost-benefit analysis, scalability\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eShift from static decision models to real-time AI-driven analytics\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLack of real-time data in traditional systems, resistance to automation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec22\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e9.3 Systematic Review Protocol\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis systematic review protocol is based on the PRISMA framework proposed by Moher et al. (2015) and builds upon the methodology refined by Tranfield et al. (2003). The review process follows four key stages: Identification, Screening, Eligibility, and Inclusion, ensuring that only high-quality, relevant, and methodologically sound research is included in this study. The protocol ensures transparency, rigor, and replicability, allowing for a structured synthesis of literature on AI-driven decision-making, digital logistics, sustainability, and autonomous freight systems in global supply chain management.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec23\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e9.3.1 Identification\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe identification stage involves defining relevant databases, search strategies, and keywords to ensure comprehensive coverage of AI, digital logistics, sustainability, and automation research in global supply chains. This stage applies systematic search techniques to major academic databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar. The search is limited to peer-reviewed journal articles, conference proceedings, and high-impact review studies published between 2010 and 2024 to capture the evolution of digital transformation in supply chain management. The primary keywords used include:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;AI-driven supply chain optimization\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;Digital logistics and big data analytics\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;Sustainable supply chain management\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;Autonomous freight and smart transportation\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;Blockchain for supply chain transparency\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec24\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e9.3.2 Screening\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the screening stage, preliminary filtering is conducted to remove irrelevant studies that do not align with the research objectives. Papers are excluded if they:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eLack empirical validation (e.g., conceptual studies without case studies or data).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eDo not focus on AI, digital logistics, automation, or sustainability in SCM.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eAre not peer-reviewed journal articles or conference proceedings.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eDuplicate studies already included in previous systematic reviews.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis step involves reviewing titles, abstracts, and keywords to ensure that only highly relevant papers proceed to the next stage.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec25\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e9.3.3 Eligibility\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe eligibility stage involves an in-depth evaluation of selected studies to ensure methodological rigor and relevance. Full-text analysis is conducted to assess:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eResearch design (e.g., case studies, simulations, theoretical models).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eData collection methods (empirical, qualitative, quantitative).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eFindings related to AI, automation, and sustainability in logistics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOnly studies that demonstrate strong empirical evidence, use robust methodologies, and contribute meaningful insights are selected for the final inclusion stage.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec26\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e9.3.4 Inclusion\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the final inclusion stage, the most relevant studies are synthesized to extract key findings and identify patterns, challenges, and opportunities for future research. The selected literature is categorized based on thematic areas, including:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eAI-driven supply chain optimization and predictive analytics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe role of blockchain in enhancing supply chain transparency.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eSustainable logistics and carbon-neutral transportation models.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eAutonomous freight technologies, drones, and hyperloop systems.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eComparative analysis of traditional vs. digital logistics decision-making.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab6\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 6\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSystematic Review Protocol Summary\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStage\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStep\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCriteria Applied\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOutcome\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIdentification\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDefining search keywords and databases\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSearch in Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, Google Scholar; Focus on AI, digital logistics, sustainability, automation (2010\u0026ndash;2024)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eList of potentially relevant studies\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eScreening\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePreliminary filtering based on abstracts and titles\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExclude non-peer-reviewed articles, duplicates, conceptual studies without empirical validation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRefined set of studies based on inclusion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEligibility\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFull-text analysis for relevance and methodological rigor\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAssess methodology, empirical data, research design, AI and sustainability focus\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHigh-quality, relevant studies selected for synthesis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInclusion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinal synthesis of key findings and categorization\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExtract key themes, compare AI-driven and traditional logistics models, identify research gaps\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eComprehensive literature review with key insights and future research directions\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"10. Research Findings and Discussion","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec28\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e10.1 Reporting for Systematic Review\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe systematic review process followed a structured four-stage methodology Identification, Screening, Eligibility, and Inclusion to ensure that only the most relevant, high-quality research papers were included. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e illustrates this streamlined process, which helps visualize the progressive narrowing down of research studies from a broad pool of literature to a focused set of studies aligned with the study objectives.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe review initially identified 1,945 research papers from academic databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The first stage (Identification) involved removing duplicates and non-relevant studies, leading to the exclusion of 690 papers.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the Screening stage, a detailed abstract review was conducted on 1,255 papers, evaluating their relevance to AI-driven logistics, blockchain transparency, sustainability, and supply chain automation. 510 papers were excluded at this stage for lacking empirical evidence, being conceptual-only studies, or not meeting methodological quality standards.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Eligibility stage involved full-text analysis of 745 papers, where each study\u0026rsquo;s methodology, findings, and theoretical contribution were carefully examined. After this detailed evaluation, 680 papers were excluded for issues such as methodological flaws, lack of quantitative analysis, or outdated technological frameworks.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinally, in the Inclusion stage, a final selection of 65 papers was made. These studies met the specific research questions and quality criteria required for this systematic review, forming the basis for the comprehensive analysis of AI, digital logistics, and sustainability in supply chain transformation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe keywords used in this systematic review were categorized into two major groups: AI \u0026amp; Digital Logistics and Supply Chain Management (SCM). These keywords were combined using Boolean operators (AND/OR) to refine searches and ensure the retrieval of the most relevant studies. Tables\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e and \u003cspan refid=\"Tab8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e summarize the keywords and search strategy, demonstrating the structured approach taken to optimize literature selection, minimize biases, and enhance the reliability of the findings.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab7\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 7\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSystematic Review Keywords Summary\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAI \u0026amp; Digital Logistics Group\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSupply Chain Management Group\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePrimary Keywords\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePrimary Keywords\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eArtificial Intelligence (AI)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSupply Chain\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMachine Learning\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLogistics\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePredictive Analytics\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eProcurement\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePrescriptive Analytics\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTransportation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBig Data\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWarehousing\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCloud Computing\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eManufacturing\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInternet of Things (IoT)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInventory Management\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBlockchain\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFleet Management\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDigital Twins\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOperations\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSmart Logistics\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRetail\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAutonomous Systems\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDistribution\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab8\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 8\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSearch Strategy and Boolean Operator Summary\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAI \u0026amp; Digital Logistics Group\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOperator\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSupply Chain Management Group\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Artificial Intelligence\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAND\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Logistics\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Machine Learning\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAND\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Inventory Management\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Predictive Analytics\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOR\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Procurement\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Prescriptive Analytics\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOR\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Transportation\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Big Data\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAND\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Manufacturing\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Cloud Computing\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAND\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Warehousing\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Blockchain\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOR\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Fleet Management\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"IoT\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAND\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Operations\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Digital Twins\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOR\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Retail\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Autonomous Systems\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAND\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\"Distribution\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec29\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e10.2 Thematic Analysis Findings\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe thematic analysis of the final 65 selected studies revealed several key themes consistently emphasized across the literature. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e visually summarizes these dominant research themes, which provide insights into the evolution of AI-driven decision-making, digital logistics, and sustainable supply chain strategies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe main themes identified include:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAI and Predictive Analytics\u003c/b\u003e \u0026ndash; The role of machine learning and AI-powered models in forecasting supply chain disruptions, optimizing inventory, and improving supplier selection.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eBlockchain and Transparency\u003c/b\u003e \u0026ndash; The integration of blockchain technology to enhance supply chain visibility, traceability, and fraud prevention in global logistics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eSustainability and Green Logistics\u003c/b\u003e \u0026ndash; The impact of AI and digital transformation on reducing carbon emissions, improving energy efficiency, and promoting eco-friendly supply chains.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAutonomous Freight and Smart Transportation\u003c/b\u003e \u0026ndash; The emergence of drones, self-driving trucks, and hyperloop systems in enhancing logistics speed, reducing transportation costs, and ensuring safety compliance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eDigital Twin and IoT Integration\u003c/b\u003e \u0026ndash; The adoption of digital twins and real-time IoT tracking for enhancing operational efficiency, route optimization, and dynamic logistics network management.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese themes illustrate the rapid evolution of AI, automation, and sustainability-driven decision-making in global supply chain logistics. They form the core of the systematic review findings, providing valuable insights into emerging research trends and future directions for SCM innovation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab9\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 9\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThematic Analysis Findings\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTheme\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKey Insights\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eResearch Impact\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAI \u0026amp; Predictive Analytics\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMachine learning models for forecasting disruptions, optimizing inventory, and supplier selection\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnhancing supply chain resilience through predictive analytics\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBlockchain \u0026amp; Transparency\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBlockchain for supply chain visibility, traceability, and fraud prevention\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eImproving security and trust in global supply chain networks\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSustainability \u0026amp; Green Logistics\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAI-driven carbon reduction strategies, energy-efficient logistics, and eco-friendly SCM\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePromoting sustainable logistics operations and regulatory compliance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAutonomous Freight \u0026amp; Smart Transportation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDrones, self-driving trucks, hyperloop systems for cost reduction and safety compliance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdvancing autonomous transportation and reducing operational costs\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDigital Twin \u0026amp; IoT Integration\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIoT-powered real-time tracking and digital twins for logistics network optimization\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBoosting operational efficiency through real-time data and automation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec30\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e10.3 Key Themes Identified in Digital Logistics and AI-Driven Supply Chain Management\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe systematic review of the selected literature has revealed several key themes that emphasize the role of digital technologies, AI-driven decision-making, and big data analytics (BDA) in transforming global supply chains. These themes highlight how modern innovations contribute to supply chain resilience (SCRes), sustainability, and operational efficiency while addressing challenges related to disruptions, visibility, and cost management.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec31\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e10.3.1. AI-Driven Predictive Analytics for Disruption Management\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudies such as Lai et al. (2018) and Wamba et al. (2020) identify how AI-powered predictive analytics can enable firms to anticipate and mitigate supply chain disruptions. By leveraging machine learning algorithms and real-time data, companies can forecast potential risks, optimize mitigation strategies, and enhance decision-making during supply chain uncertainties. AI-powered risk assessment models allow firms to respond proactively to fluctuations in demand, supply shortages, geopolitical risks, and transportation delays.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec32\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e10.3.2. Digital Supply Chain Visibility and Transparency\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eBag et al. (2023) emphasize the significance of digital logistics solutions in improving supply chain visibility and transparency. The integration of IoT, blockchain, and cloud-based tracking enhances real-time monitoring of goods, enabling firms to optimize inventory movement, reduce lead times, and minimize inefficiencies. Blockchain-enabled supply chain transparency ensures secure and tamper-proof records, promoting trust and regulatory compliance across global supplier networks. These advancements improve both resilience and agility in supply chain operations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec33\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e10.3.3. Autonomous Systems for Operational Efficiency and Cost Reduction\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAutonomous freight technologies, including drones, self-driving trucks, and hyperloop transport systems, are transforming logistics by reducing transportation costs, enhancing speed, and optimizing resource utilization. Research by (Jaller \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2020) highlights how automated warehouses, AI-driven procurement systems, and intelligent routing algorithms contribute to cost savings and supply chain performance improvements. AI-powered demand forecasting minimizes overstocking and reduces transportation inefficiencies, making supply chains more resilient and cost-effective. These themes underscore the growing reliance on AI, automation, and blockchain in modern logistics. As Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab10\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e illustrates, the systematic coding of these studies categorizes the key themes, specific keywords, and conceptual frameworks that define the next generation of global supply chain management strategies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab10\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 10\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSummary of Papers Coded by Keyword\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTheme\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKeywords\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eResearchers\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAI-Driven Predictive Analytics for Disruption Management\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eForecasting, supply chain risk mitigation, AI-driven disruption management\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Kalusivalingam \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022), (R. S. Khan \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022), (Nzeako \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024), (Groenewald, Garg and Yerasuri, 2024)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDigital Supply Chain Visibility and Transparency\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReal-time tracking, IoT visibility, logistics optimization, transparency\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Moshood \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2021), (Adeusi \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024), (Dolgui and Ivanov, 2022), (Udeh \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAutonomous Systems for Operational Efficiency and Cost Reduction\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAutonomous vehicles, hyperloop freight, drone logistics, AI-powered procurement\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Rouhiainen, 2018), (Mahor \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022), (Singh \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSustainability and Green Logistics Strategies\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCarbon reduction, green supply chains, eco-friendly logistics, renewable energy\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Patra, 2018), (Al Bashar \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2017), (S. A. R. Khan \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBlockchain and Data Security in Global Supply Chains\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBlockchain transparency, cybersecurity in SCM, digital trust mechanisms\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Centobelli \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022), (Al-Farsi, Rathore and Bakiras, 2021), (Irfan \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024), (Xu \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2021), (Asante \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2021), (Qian and Papadonikolaki, 2021)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTechnological Integration and Smart Logistics\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCloud-based logistics, smart warehouses, digital twins, IoT-enabled efficiency\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Alsudani \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2023), (Sahal \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2021), (Zrelli and Rejeb, 2024)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAI-Based Decision Support Systems in SCM\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eData visualization, machine learning models, KPI tracking, AI-powered decision models, machine learning in logistics, data-driven strategies\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Heilig and Scheer, 2023), (Data, 2024), (Dolz Ausina, 2023), (Jakkan, 2021), (Tito, 2023)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"11. Comparison to Prior Research","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis paper extends prior research by analyzing studies published between 2010 and 2024, covering a period of significant transformation in global supply chain management (SCM). Earlier studies, particularly between 2010 and 2015, primarily focused on cost reduction, supplier selection, and inventory management within traditional logistics models. However, research from 2016 onward has increasingly emphasized AI-driven decision-making, blockchain-enabled transparency, and sustainability-driven logistics, reflecting the growing reliance on digital technologies in modern supply chains. Unlike previous reviews that were limited to operational efficiencies, this study integrates insights into emerging innovations such as AI-powered risk mitigation, predictive analytics, and autonomous freight technologies. With the adoption of machine learning models, digital twins, and IoT-powered logistics optimization, firms are now able to enhance supply chain resilience (SCRes) and improve performance (SCP) in real-time, enabling adaptive decision-making in response to global disruptions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e11.1 Regulatory Challenges and Industry Adoption Barriers\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhile digital transformation has accelerated across supply chains, regulatory compliance remains a major challenge. Studies from 2018 to 2024 emphasize the complexities of cross-border trade regulations, cybersecurity laws for blockchain adoption, and sustainability reporting standards. Many firms face barriers in adopting AI-powered logistics due to data privacy concerns, regulatory constraints on autonomous vehicles, and the slow pace of standardization across different regions. The integration of AI and automation in logistics raises workforce displacement concerns, requiring businesses to retrain employees and adapt to new AI-driven workflows. This review highlights the need for policy frameworks that balance technological innovation with ethical, legal, and employment considerations, ensuring smooth transitions to autonomous and data-driven logistics systems.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eCase Study: The European Union\u0026rsquo;s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) (2023) requires companies to disclose their environmental impact, including carbon emissions from supply chains. Research suggests that firms integrating AI-driven carbon tracking tools are better positioned to meet these regulatory demands (Dinh, Husmann and Melloni, 2023; Hu and Sinniah, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eNorth America: Studies on U.S. freight regulations (2022\u0026ndash;2024) indicate that autonomous trucking technologies face hurdles due to the absence of standardized federal safety policies, delaying large-scale adoption (Fagnant and Kockelman, 2015; Mai \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2018; Coito, 2021; Bassey \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eAsia: The China Blockchain Supply Chain Initiative (2022) is promoting secure, tamper-proof supply chain transactions using blockchain. However, interoperability challenges remain for global firms that must align with different regional security protocols (Chang, Iakovou and Shi, 2020; Dudczyk, Dunston and Crosby, 2024; Nisar \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eCase Study: The Amazon Robotics Fulfillment Centers (2018\u0026ndash;2024) have seen a 40% increase in automated workflows for warehouse operations, but reports suggest that worker displacement concerns have led to increased regulatory scrutiny (SANDUA, no date; SHALIZI, no date; Corbato \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2018; Adner, 2021; Banerjee \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eIndustry Trend: AI ethics policies in logistics (2023) emphasize the need for \"human-in-the-loop\" AI models, ensuring that automated logistics decision-making remains transparent and auditable (Gaur and Sahoo, 2022; Vyhmeister and Castane, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e11.2 Sustainability and Carbon-Neutral Logistics\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFurthermore, this review highlights the role of carbon-neutral logistics frameworks and sustainability-focused supply chain strategies as key trends from 2018 to 2024. Companies are increasingly leveraging AI to optimize carbon footprint reduction, smart warehousing solutions, and green transportation networks, ensuring compliance with environmental regulations while maintaining efficiency. The integration of blockchain technology further enhances supply chain security, fraud prevention, and end-to-end transparency, strengthening global logistics networks.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eCase Study: The DHL Smart Logistics Initiative (2022\u0026ndash;2024) has integrated AI-powered route optimization and electric freight vehicles, leading to a 20% reduction in carbon emissions in urban last-mile delivery networks (Kern, 2021; El Makhloufi, 2023).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eEmerging Trend: Carbon offset marketplaces using blockchain technology have gained traction, allowing companies to track and verify emissions reductions in real-time (Ugochukwu \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024; Zhu, Duan and Sarkis, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e11.3 Emerging Autonomous Freight Technologies\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis paper examines the growing impact of autonomous freight solutions, including drones for last-mile delivery, self-driving trucks, and hyperloop cargo transport systems. These technologies offer unprecedented speed, reduced costs, and enhanced safety compliance, reshaping the future of global logistics and distribution networks. However, widespread adoption of autonomous logistics technologies is hindered by regulatory uncertainty, infrastructure limitations, and technological maturity levels.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eSelf-Driving Trucks \u0026amp; Drones: Studies from 2021 to 2024 highlight that autonomous trucking and drone-based logistics solutions can cut transportation costs by up to 30%, but regulatory approval for large-scale deployment remains a barrier (Moshref-Javadi and Winkenbach, 2021; Raghunatha, Thollander and Barthel, 2023; Betti Sorbelli, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eHyperloop Freight Transport: While hyperloop technology shows potential for high-speed cargo transport, high infrastructure costs and safety regulations have slowed adoption beyond pilot programs (Taylor, Hyde and Barr, 2016; Nikitas \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2017; Mateu, Fern\u0026aacute;ndez and Franco, 2021).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eBlockchain for Supply Chain Transparency: Walmart and IBM\u0026rsquo;s blockchain SCM initiative (2023) successfully reduced fraud risks and improved real-time tracking across global supplier networks (Chang, Iakovou and Shi, 2020; Almabrok, 2023; Chaker and Damak, 2024; Vazquez Melendez, Bergey and Smith, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e11.3.1 Bridging the Gap Between Traditional and Digital Supply Chains\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBy providing a comprehensive, forward-looking perspective, this paper bridges the gap between traditional supply chain models and the digital transformation era. It offers a strategic roadmap for researchers and practitioners to navigate the evolving landscape of AI-driven, sustainable, and autonomous supply chains, while addressing:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegulatory compliance and security challenges\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eEthical AI integration and workforce implications\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eCarbon-neutral logistics and blockchain-based transparency\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdoption barriers in autonomous freight technologies\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis review highlights the emerging need for resilient, technology-driven, and sustainable global supply chains, ensuring that AI, automation, and digital logistics strategies remain scalable, ethical, and aligned with industry regulations.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"12. Evaluation and Future Directions","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe impact of digitization, AI-driven decision-making, sustainability, and autonomous freight systems on global supply chain logistics has been investigated in this study, which used a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology. This review of research articles covers the years 2010\u0026ndash;2024 and finds important topics, methods, and gaps that show where we have come from and where we need to go next.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere is still a disparity in the dissemination of regional research, even if AI-driven logistics has made great strides. While most studies center on Asia, Europe, and North America, South America, Africa, and the Middle East are noticeably understudied (Fagnant and Kockelman, 2015; Dinh, Husmann and Melloni, 2023; Mia, Wessels and Adam, 2023; Bassey \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024; Dudczyk, Dunston and Crosby, 2024). A lack of knowledge on the potential adaptation of AI-powered logistics, blockchain for transparency, and autonomous freight systems to the varied regulatory, economic, and infrastructure settings of these developing markets is a result of this. In order to offer a more comprehensive view on digitalization of the global supply chain, future research should broaden the geographical scope (Tahir \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2020; Mishra \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAccording to theme analysis, operational efficiency, supply chain visibility, and predictive analytics have been the most researched topics. Nevertheless, there is still a lot of room for improvement at the crossroads of sustainability and AI-driven logistics optimization. Although green logistics techniques are becoming more popular, there is a lack of research that incorporates AI-driven sustainability initiatives. These initiatives include carbon-neutral logistics models, emissions tracking with AI, and circular supply chains facilitated by blockchain. To find out how AI can strike a balance between efficiency and sustainability, guaranteeing affordable solutions for green supply chains, more study is required (Liu, Song and Liu, 2023).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe majority of digital logistics research relies on case studies, optimization models, and simulations as its methodology. There is a dearth of empirical data on the difficulties of long-term adoption and real-world validation for these methods, despite the fact that they are good at exploring theoretical applications (Rajabzadeh and Fatorachian, 2023). For example, there has been very little practical application of the theoretical work done on autonomous freight technology like self-driving trucks, hyperloop cargo transit, and drones. In order to determine the economic feasibility, regulatory compliance, and implementation feasibility of large-scale logistics operations, empirical field studies are crucial.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn order to pick suppliers and reduce risk, procurement strategies in global supply chains are increasingly relying on digital platforms and AI (Bienhaus and Haddud, 2018). Nevertheless, a significant number of the current studies continue to use static models that do not take into consideration the ever-changing capacities of suppliers, geopolitical concerns, or real-time disruptions (Modgil, Singh and Hannibal, 2022). Research in the future should center on AI-driven procurement models that can adapt to changing market conditions, identify potential hazards, and automate talks with suppliers in order to make sourcing strategies more resilient.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePredictive analytics, intermodal logistics planning, and AI-powered route optimization are revolutionizing freight operations, which are still heavily reliant on transportation (Krishnan \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024). Nevertheless, the implementation of autonomous transportation systems is frequently hindered by obstacles related to infrastructure and regulations. To ease the incorporation of autonomous vehicles, drone logistics, and AI-powered fleet management into existing supply chain networks, studies should investigate ways to standardize regulations across borders and formulate policies that encourage their use (Rane, Choudhary and Rane, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMultinational firms must carefully manage fluctuating production costs, changing trade rules, and unpredictable currency rates by implementing tactics such as production switching, transfer pricing, and postponement (Trebilcock, 2014). While conventional models deal with these issues, AI-powered decision-making systems could efficiently allocate production resources in real-time, responding to fluctuations in the economy. Using predictive insights into demand variations, trade limitations, and cost variations, production switching frameworks based on machine learning should be the focus of future study (Diez-Olivan \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2019).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe location of facilities and the design of networks are still critical to the robustness of the global supply chain (Klibi, Martel and Guitouni, 2010; Baghalian, Rezapour and Farahani, 2013; Aldrighetti \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2021; Sundarakani, Pereira and Ishizaka, 2021). Although digital twins and AI-enhanced network simulations have been investigated in logistics research, their practical use in strategic decision-making is still in the early stages (R. S. Khan \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022). Improvements in AI-powered facility location models could greatly increase resilience by optimizing the placement of distribution centers, automating warehouses, and improving cross-border supply chain architecture.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhile there is a growing body of empirical research on logistics transformation, there is still a lack of longitudinal studies on artificial intelligence, automation, and sustainability in supply chains. The majority of current research concentrates on short-term efficiency improvements instead of long-term effects. Future research could investigate how artificial intelligence and automation have changed over time. This research should examine how organizations adjust their logistical models in response to changes in technology, regulations, and consumer expectations.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"13. Summary and Key Insights","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis research has carefully examined how global supply chain logistics have changed as a result of the incorporation of digitization, AI-driven decision-making, sustainability, and autonomous freight systems. The research has given a thorough overview of new technology, changing methods, and ongoing difficulties in supply chain management by examining literature that was published from 2010 to 2024.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe extent of research on AI-driven logistics differs greatly depending on the region, industry, and operational paradigm. Some studies emphasize worldwide supply chains, while others focus on regional logistics models in order to suit specific market situations. The adoption of artificial intelligence, automation, and blockchain technologies varies depending on the legislative environment, the availability of infrastructure, and the economic feasibility of the technologies (Chen, 2024). This highlights the need for logistics models that are appropriate to the setting.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe transition from deterministic to stochastic modeling is one of the most important developments in supply chain research today. Traditional models assumed that decision-making settings were unchanging, while modern research uses real-time data analytics, predictive AI models, and adaptive algorithms to deal with uncertainties such as demand swings, geopolitical threats, and supply chain interruptions (Klibi, Martel and Guitouni, 2010). This change has made the supply chain more resilient, but it has also brought about new issues in terms of implementation and computing.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe function of manufacturing and facility location in supply chain models has also changed throughout time. A lot of research is now focused on dynamic production switching, which is based on cost efficiency, real-time risk assessments, and demand predictions powered by artificial intelligence (Aljohani, 2023). In addition, facility location models are taking sustainability indicators into account more and more, including carbon footprint tracking and green logistics tactics in order to strike a compromise between reducing environmental effect and optimizing costs.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTransportation and intermodal logistics are still important parts of global supply chains. AI-driven systems are being used to improve route planning, fleet management, and real-time cargo tracking. Nevertheless, the implementation of autonomous freight technology, including drones, self-driving trucks, and hyperloop systems, is still in the first phases (Hansen, 2020). Research shows that legislative, infrastructural, and safety problems are significant obstacles to full-scale deployment, and additional empirical confirmation is needed.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAI-powered procurement models, blockchain-enabled supply chain transparency, and automated risk assessment frameworks are changing the way global logistics operate from a business and strategic standpoint (Dasaklis \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022). However, there are still difficulties with scalability, cybersecurity, and standardizing data across borders. Future research should investigate AI-driven decision support systems that incorporate multi-tier supplier networks, dynamic trade compliance, and real-time financial risk monitoring (Banerjee \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis evaluation has brought to light important areas of study that are lacking and that could be further explored. Sustainability, digital transformation, and decision-making driven by artificial intelligence will remain key topics in supply chain research. The next challenge is to connect theoretical developments with practical applications in order to provide logistics solutions that are scalable, resilient, and sustainable in a time of rapid digital evolution.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"14. Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis paper conducts a thorough examination of the evolution of global supply chain logistics by examining the impact of AI-driven decision-making, digital logistics, sustainability policies, and autonomous freight systems. This analysis analyzes significant technology developments and strategic shifts that will influence the future of global supply networks through a comprehensive review of recent research publications from 2010 to 2024. The results provide theoretical contributions and practical insights to inform future research and implementation in digital and sustainable logistics.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e14.1 Theoretical Contributions\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe theoretical contributions of this research are manifest in three principal domains. This report offers a thorough classification of AI-driven logistics advancements, encompassing predictive analytics for disruption management, blockchain-facilitated transparency, and AI-enhanced supply chain risk evaluations (Tsolakis \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022). This research provides a comprehensive framework that encapsulates the interrelationships among AI, automation, and logistics performance, whereas previous studies have examined specific elements of AI integration (Mahat \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2023).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSecondly, the research enhances comprehension of sustainability-oriented supply chain reforms (Ameh, 2024). This paper delineates the importance of green technologies, carbon footprint monitoring, and sustainable freight transport solutions as organizations transition to net-zero logistics. This study diverges from prior studies that concentrated exclusively on cost efficiency by incorporating economic, environmental, and technological variables, thereby offering a comprehensive perspective on sustainable supply chains.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe paper connects theoretical developments with practical applications by examining the scalability and legal difficulties of AI-driven logistics models (Tsolakis \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2022). This analysis consolidates real-world challenges, including cross-border compliance, cybersecurity threats, and constraints in digital infrastructure, while preceding research emphasizes conceptual advantages, providing a pragmatic framework for the implementation of AI and automation in global logistics.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e14.2 Practical Contributions\u003c/h3\u003e\n\n\u003ch3\u003e14.2.1 Developing an AI-Driven Supply Chain Response Mechanism\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGlobal supply chains are progressively susceptible to interruptions, as evidenced by previous crises such as COVID-19, trade disputes, and geopolitical instability (Cui \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2023). Consequently, implementing an AI-driven emergency response system is essential for alleviating supply chain disruptions and demand spikes (Bo and Ankai, 2021). By utilizing predictive analytics, real-time monitoring, and AI-enhanced inventory forecasting, organizations may more effectively predict and control supply chain variations. Governments and politicians must actively adopt contingency techniques, such as dynamic demand forecasting models and automated supply chain risk assessments, to maintain logistical stability during crises. Moreover, blockchain-facilitated transparency can assist enterprises in monitoring supply chain irregularities in real time, mitigating public uncertainty and facilitating more responsive decision-making in logistics operations (Aljohani, 2023).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e14.2.2 Building a Resilient and Sustainable Supply Chain\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe growing unpredictability of global disruptions, resource scarcities, and climate-related hazards underscores the necessity for more flexible, sustainable, and localized supply chain frameworks (Mani and Goniewicz, 2023). The dependence on just-in-time (JIT) solutions has demonstrated inefficiency in highly volatile contexts, highlighting the necessity for resilient and sustainable supply chains capable of enduring unforeseen disruptions (Maleksaeidi \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2017). This analysis identifies localized supply chains, regional sourcing, and nearshoring initiatives as significant trends arising from disruptions. Collaboration among logistics providers, AI-enhanced procurement platforms, and e-commerce ecosystems can cultivate a more robust and efficient supply chain network. Forming cross-industry collaborations and implementing real-time data-sharing systems among suppliers, retailers, and logistics companies can bolster supply chain resilience and mitigate environmental effects.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e Accelerating the Adoption of Autonomous and Digital Logistics Technologies\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"Heading\"\u003e\u003cem\u003e14.2.3\u003c/em\u003e Accelerating the Adoption of Autonomous and Digital Logistics Technologies\u003c/div\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe digitalization of logistics networks is altering supply chain operations through the introduction of automation, artificial intelligence, and Internet of Things technology (Irfan \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024). The post-pandemic period has expedited consumer acceptance of autonomous last-mile delivery technologies, including drones, AI-driven logistics robots, and automated distribution facilities. AI-powered route optimization, blockchain-enabled freight tracking, and predictive supply chain analytics are essential for improving efficiency, lowering operational expenses, and guaranteeing sustainable delivery frameworks (Alsudani \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2023). The extensive incorporation of big data, cloud computing, and machine learning algorithms facilitates more intelligent and responsive logistics networks, enabling firms to optimize transportation routes, enhance delivery speed, and improve real-time supply chain visibility. In conclusion, supply chain stakeholders must use AI-driven automation, blockchain transparency, and sustainability-focused logistics techniques to establish a more robust, flexible, and adaptive global supply chain (Adeusi \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024). The future of logistics transformation is rooted in predictive intelligence, decentralized supply chain frameworks, and digital innovation, guaranteeing that global supply networks are efficient, sustainable, and adaptable to disturbances.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e14.3 Future Research Opportunities\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe swift evolution of global supply chain logistics via AI, digital technologies, and automation has unveiled numerous interesting avenues for research. As companies progressively transition to data-driven decision-making, autonomous freight solutions, and sustainability-oriented supply chain models, forthcoming research must investigate how these technologies will transform supply chain operations, resilience, and efficiency.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA vital domain for forthcoming study is evaluating whether the use of AI-driven supply chain optimization, predictive analytics, and blockchain transparency will yield enduring or transient impacts on supply chain resilience. Although AI-driven models have proven effective in managing real-time disruptions and optimizing logistics flows, additional empirical research is required to determine the long-term sustainability of these AI interventions. Future study should examine the progression of AI adoption across various industries and geographies, evaluating whether AI-driven logistics solutions will establish themselves as industry norms or persist as niche applications in specific sectors.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFuture study should examine the scalability and regulatory problems associated with the increasing prevalence of autonomous freight systems, robotic warehousing, and AI-powered last-mile delivery. The growing convergence of IoT, cloud computing, and intelligent logistics networks is anticipated to transform freight management, real-time monitoring, and predictive maintenance. Further research should examine the legal, ethical, and economic ramifications of extensive autonomous logistics implementation, especially in international freight transport and hyperloop cargo systems.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGiven the increasing focus on net-zero emissions, green logistics, and environmentally sustainable transportation options, future research should explore the contributions of AI and big data to sustainable supply chain operations. Despite the growing acceptance of electric and hydrogen-powered freight trucks by firms, there is still a necessity for empirical studies assessing the cost-benefit trade-offs, environmental impact, and viability of green logistics implementation. Furthermore, research should concentrate on the potential of AI and blockchain to improve carbon footprint monitoring and supply chain transparency, thereby integrating sustainability into global logistics strategy.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFuture research should investigate how AI-driven supply chain models may adjust to evolving consumer preferences for expedited, tailored, and sustainable deliveries. The implementation of AI-driven personalization, automated warehousing, and real-time inventory optimization profoundly affects the efficiency of e-commerce logistics and enhances consumer experience. Future research may explore the impact of AI-driven demand forecasting and last-mile delivery improvements on consumer expectations, enhancing customer happiness and mitigating supply chain inefficiencies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e14.4 Limitations\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhile this study provides valuable insights into the transformation of global supply chain logistics, certain limitations must be acknowledged. First, the review findings were derived through a systematic analysis of existing literature, meaning that the conclusions drawn are influenced by the availability and scope of recent research. As AI, blockchain, and autonomous logistics continue to evolve, new technologies and frameworks may emerge that were not fully covered in this review. Future studies should continuously update these insights to reflect the latest advancements in digital logistics and supply chain automation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSecond, while this study focused on recent innovations in AI-driven logistics and sustainability, further empirical validation is necessary to assess their long-term impact on global supply chain resilience and operational efficiency. More longitudinal studies and real-world case analyses are required to determine whether AI-powered logistics models can consistently enhance supply chain performance across different industries and geographic regions. Lastly, this study primarily analyzed peer-reviewed academic sources, meaning that insights from industry reports, practitioner insights, and real-time supply chain developments may not have been fully integrated. Future research should combine academic and industry perspectives to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities presented by AI-driven, sustainable, and autonomous supply chain models.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAbduljabbar, R. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2019) \u0026lsquo;Applications of artificial intelligence in transport: An overview\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSustainability\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 11(1), p. 189.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAbideen, A. Z. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2021) \u0026lsquo;Digital twin integrated reinforced learning in supply chain and logistics\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eLogistics\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 5(4), p. 84.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAdeusi, K. B. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;The potential of IoT to transform supply chain management through enhanced connectivity and real-time data\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eWorld Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences\u003c/em\u003e, 12(1), pp. 145\u0026ndash;151.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAdland, R., Bjerknes, F. and Herje, C. (2017) \u0026lsquo;Spatial efficiency in the bulk freight market\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eMaritime Policy \u0026amp; Management\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 44(4), pp. 413\u0026ndash;425.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAdner, R. (2021) \u003cem\u003eWinning the right game: How to disrupt, defend, and deliver in a changing world\u003c/em\u003e. MIT Press.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAgamez-Arias, A.-M. and Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2017) \u0026lsquo;Intermodal transport in freight distribution: a literature review\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eTransport Reviews\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 37(6), pp. 782\u0026ndash;807.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAghahadi, M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;Digitalization Processes in Distribution Grids: A Comprehensive Review of Strategies and Challenges\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eApplied Sciences\u003c/em\u003e. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 14(11), p. 4528.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAl-Farsi, S., Rathore, M. M. and Bakiras, S. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Security of blockchain-based supply chain management systems: challenges and opportunities\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eApplied Sciences\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 11(12), p. 5585.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAldrighetti, R. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2021) \u0026lsquo;Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: a review and future research directions\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Production Economics\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 235, p. 108103.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAljohani, A. (2023) \u0026lsquo;Predictive analytics and machine learning for real-time supply chain risk mitigation and agility\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSustainability\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 15(20), p. 15088.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAllal-Ch\u0026eacute;rif, O., Sim\u0026oacute;n-Moya, V. and Ballester, A. C. C. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Intelligent purchasing: How artificial intelligence can redefine the purchasing function\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Business Research\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 124, pp. 69\u0026ndash;76.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlmabrok, H. A. (2023) \u0026lsquo;Blockchain for supply chain management: To enhance transparency, traceability, and efficiency\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eAfrican Journal of Advanced Pure and Applied Sciences (AJAPAS)\u003c/em\u003e, pp. 239\u0026ndash;253.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlmeida, F. and Carneiro, P. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Performance metrics in scrum software engineering companies\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Agile Systems and Management\u003c/em\u003e. Inderscience Publishers (IEL), 14(2), pp. 205\u0026ndash;223.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlsudani, M. Q. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2023) \u0026lsquo;RETRACTED ARTICLE: Smart logistics with IoT-based enterprise management system using global manufacturing\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of combinatorial optimization\u003c/em\u003e. Springer, 45(2), p. 57.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAmeh, B. (2024) \u0026lsquo;Digital tools and AI: Using technology to monitor carbon emissions and waste at each stage of the supply chain, enabling real-time adjustments for sustainability improvements\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInt J Sci Res Arch\u003c/em\u003e, 13(1), pp. 2741\u0026ndash;2754.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAmorim, P. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2016) \u0026lsquo;Supplier selection in the processed food industry under uncertainty\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEuropean Journal of Operational Research\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 252(3), pp. 801\u0026ndash;814.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAnderson, J. M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2014) \u003cem\u003eAutonomous vehicle technology: A guide for policymakers\u003c/em\u003e. Rand Corporation.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eArchetti, C., Peirano, L. and Speranza, M. G. (2022) \u0026lsquo;Optimization in multimodal freight transportation problems: A Survey\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEuropean Journal of Operational Research\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 299(1), pp. 1\u0026ndash;20.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u0026Aacute;rva, L., P\u0026aacute;sztor, S. and Pyatanova, V. (2020) \u0026lsquo;Some thoughts on the relationship between multinational corporation strategies and the changing patterns of international trade: The geographical optimization principle\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEconomy and Finance: English Language Edition of Gazdas\u0026aacute;g \u0026eacute;s P\u0026eacute;nz\u0026uuml;gy\u003c/em\u003e. Hungarian Banking Association; National Association of Entrepreneurs and \u0026hellip;, 7(1), pp. 56\u0026ndash;77.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAsante, M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2021) \u0026lsquo;Distributed ledger technologies in supply chain security management: A comprehensive survey\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management\u003c/em\u003e. IEEE, 70(2), pp. 713\u0026ndash;739.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAshayeri, J., Ma, N. and Sotirov, R. (2014) \u0026lsquo;Supply chain downsizing under bankruptcy: A robust optimization approach\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Production Economics\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 154, pp. 1\u0026ndash;15.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAttah, R. U. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;Enhancing supply chain resilience through artificial intelligence: Analyzing problem-solving approaches in logistics management\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInt J Manag Entrep Res\u003c/em\u003e, 5(12), pp. 3248\u0026ndash;3265.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBaaij, M. G. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2015) \u0026lsquo;Why do multinational corporations relocate core parts of their corporate headquarters abroad?\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eLong Range Planning\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 48(1), pp. 46\u0026ndash;58.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBachofner, M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) \u0026lsquo;City logistics: Challenges and opportunities for technology providers\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of urban mobility\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 2, p. 100020.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBadhan, I. A., Neeroj, M. H. and Rahman, S. (2024) \u0026lsquo;Currency rate fluctuations and their impact on supply chain risk management: An empirical analysis\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of business and management sciences\u003c/em\u003e, 4(10), pp. 6\u0026ndash;26.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBadmus, O. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;AI-driven business analytics and decision making\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eWorld Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews\u003c/em\u003e, 24(1), pp. 616\u0026ndash;633.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBaghalian, A., Rezapour, S. and Farahani, R. Z. (2013) \u0026lsquo;Robust supply chain network design with service level against disruptions and demand uncertainties: A real-life case\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEuropean journal of operational research\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 227(1), pp. 199\u0026ndash;215.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBanerjee, J. S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) \u003cem\u003eIntelligent Cyber-Physical Systems Security for Industry 4.0: Applications, Challenges and Management\u003c/em\u003e. CRC Press.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBanka, L. (2014) \u0026lsquo;Financial stability\u0026ndash;condition of the financial system enabling it to withstand shocks, thereby mitigating the likelihood of disruptions in the financial intermediation process which would impair the allocation of savings and investment opportunities. The \u0026rsquo;.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBarbosa, B. (2024) \u003cem\u003eMarketing innovation strategies and consumer behavior\u003c/em\u003e. IGI Global.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBarnes, A. (2022) \u003cem\u003eEU Commission proposal for joint gas purchasing, price caps and collective allocation of gas: an assessment\u003c/em\u003e. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBaruya, P. (2015) \u003cem\u003eCoal contracts and long-term supplies\u003c/em\u003e. IEA Clean Coal Centre London, UK.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBaryannis, G. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2019) \u0026lsquo;Supply chain risk management and artificial intelligence: state of the art and future research directions\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of production research\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 57(7), pp. 2179\u0026ndash;2202.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAl Bashar, M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2017) \u0026lsquo;Decarbonizing the supply chain: A green approach\u0026rsquo;.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBassey, K. E. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;Optimizing behavioral and economic strategies for the ubiquitous integration of wireless energy transmission in smart cities\u0026rsquo;.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBechtsis, D. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2018) \u0026lsquo;Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles in digital supply chains: A framework for integrating innovations towards sustainable value networks\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of cleaner production\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 181, pp. 60\u0026ndash;71.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBenyoucef, L. and Xie, X. (2011) \u0026lsquo;Supply chain design using simulation-based NSGA-II approach\u0026rsquo;, in \u003cem\u003eMulti-objective evolutionary optimisation for product design and manufacturing\u003c/em\u003e. Springer, pp. 455\u0026ndash;491.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBerhanu, Y. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;Machine learning for predictions of road traffic accidents and spatial network analysis for safe routing Aon accident and congestion-prone road networks\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eResults in Engineering\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 23, p. 102737.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBerry, H. (2013) \u0026lsquo;When do firms divest foreign operations?\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eOrganization Science\u003c/em\u003e. INFORMS, 24(1), pp. 246\u0026ndash;261.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBetti Sorbelli, F. (2024) \u0026lsquo;UAV-Based Delivery Systems: a Systematic Review, Current Trends, and Research Challenges\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal on Autonomous Transportation Systems\u003c/em\u003e. ACM New York, NY, 1(3), pp. 1\u0026ndash;40.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBhattacharya, A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2014) \u0026lsquo;An intermodal freight transport system for optimal supply chain logistics\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eTransportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 38, pp. 73\u0026ndash;84.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBienhaus, F. and Haddud, A. (2018) \u0026lsquo;Procurement 4.0: factors influencing the digitisation of procurement and supply chains\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eBusiness Process Management Journal\u003c/em\u003e. Emerald Publishing Limited, 24(4), pp. 965\u0026ndash;984.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBo, M. and Ankai, X. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Rising risks to global value chains\u0026rsquo;. Asian Development Bank.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBonacich, E. and Wilson, J. B. (2008) \u003cem\u003eGetting the goods: Ports, labor, and the logistics revolution\u003c/em\u003e. Cornell University Press.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBookbinder, J. H. and Matuk, T. A. (2009) \u003cem\u003eLogistics and Transportation in Global Supply Chains: Review, Critique, and Prospects\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eDecision Technologies and Applications\u003c/em\u003e. doi: 10.1287/educ.1090.0059.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBozorgi-Amiri, A., Jabalameli, M. S. and Mirzapour Al-e-Hashem, S. M. J. (2013) \u0026lsquo;A multi-objective robust stochastic programming model for disaster relief logistics under uncertainty\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eOR spectrum\u003c/em\u003e. Springer, 35, pp. 905\u0026ndash;933.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBrandenburg, M. and Rebs, T. (2015) \u0026lsquo;Sustainable supply chain management: A modeling perspective\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eAnnals of Operations Research\u003c/em\u003e. Springer, 229, pp. 213\u0026ndash;252.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBrookbanks, M. and Parry, G. (2022) \u0026lsquo;The impact of a blockchain platform on trust in established relationships: a case study of wine supply chains\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSupply Chain Management: An International Journal\u003c/em\u003e. Emerald Publishing Limited, 27(7), pp. 128\u0026ndash;146.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBrookbanks, M. and Parry, G. C. (2024) \u0026lsquo;The impact of Industry 4.0 technologies on the resilience of established cross-border supply chains\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSupply Chain Management: An International Journal\u003c/em\u003e. Emerald Publishing Limited.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCAPE, F., PIERLUIGI, M. and RIPAMONTI, F. (2018) \u0026lsquo;An empirical study of the efficiency of initial coin offerings adopting a two-stage DEA model\u0026rsquo;. Politecnico di Milano.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCentobelli, P. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) \u0026lsquo;Blockchain technology for bridging trust, traceability and transparency in circular supply chain\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInformation \u0026amp; Management\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 59(7), p. 103508.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChaker, B. and Damak, C. (2024) \u0026lsquo;Integrating Blockchain Technology for Enhanced Transparency and Security in Supply Chains\u0026rsquo;, in \u003cem\u003eStrategic Innovations for Dynamic Supply Chains\u003c/em\u003e. IGI Global, pp. 147\u0026ndash;169.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChalloumis, C. (2024) \u0026lsquo;Building a sustainable economy-how ai can optimize resource allocation\u0026rsquo;, in \u003cem\u003eXVI International Scientific Conference\u003c/em\u003e, pp. 190\u0026ndash;224.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChalmers, D., MacKenzie, N. G. and Carter, S. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Artificial intelligence and entrepreneurship: Implications for venture creation in the fourth industrial revolution\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice\u003c/em\u003e. Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 45(5), pp. 1028\u0026ndash;1053.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChan, F. T. S. and Zhang, T. (2011) \u0026lsquo;The impact of Collaborative Transportation Management on supply chain performance: A simulation approach\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eExpert Systems with Applications\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 38(3), pp. 2319\u0026ndash;2329.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChang, B. and Hung, H.-F. (2010) \u0026lsquo;A study of using RST to create the supplier selection model and decision-making rules\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eExpert Systems with Applications\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 37(12), pp. 8284\u0026ndash;8295.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChang, Y., Iakovou, E. and Shi, W. (2020) \u0026lsquo;Blockchain in global supply chains and cross border trade: a critical synthesis of the state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Production Research\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 58(7), pp. 2082\u0026ndash;2099.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChaturvedi, A. and Mart\u0026iacute;nez-de-Alb\u0026eacute;niz, V. (2011) \u0026lsquo;Optimal procurement design in the presence of supply risk\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eManufacturing \u0026amp; Service operations management\u003c/em\u003e. INFORMS, 13(2), pp. 227\u0026ndash;243.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChen, L. and Notteboom, T. (2012) \u0026lsquo;Determinants for assigning value-added logistics services to logistics centers within a supply chain configuration\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of International Logistics and Trade\u003c/em\u003e. Emerald Publishing Limited, 10(1), pp. 3\u0026ndash;41.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChen, W. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;Artificial Intelligence in Logistics Optimization with Sustainable Criteria: A Review\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSustainability\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 16(21), p. 9145.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChen, Y. (2024) \u0026lsquo;How blockchain adoption affects supply chain sustainability in the fashion industry: a systematic review and case studies\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Transactions in Operational Research\u003c/em\u003e. Wiley Online Library, 31(6), pp. 3592\u0026ndash;3620.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChitturu, S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2017) \u0026lsquo;Artificial intelligence and Southeast Asia\u0026rsquo;s future\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSingapore Summit\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChukwu, N. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;Resilient Chain: AI-Enhanced Supply Chain Security and Efficiency Integration\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInt. J. Sci. Manag. Res\u003c/em\u003e, 7(03), pp. 46\u0026ndash;65.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCiriello, R. F. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Tokenized index funds: A blockchain-based concept and a multidisciplinary research framework\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Information Management\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 61, p. 102400.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCohen, Y. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2019) \u0026lsquo;Assembly systems in Industry 4.0 era: a road map to understand Assembly 4.0\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eThe International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology\u003c/em\u003e. Springer, 105, pp. 4037\u0026ndash;4054.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCoito, J. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Maritime autonomous surface ships: New possibilities\u0026mdash;and challenges\u0026mdash;in ocean law and policy\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Law Studies\u003c/em\u003e, 97(1), p. 19.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCorbato, C. H. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2018) \u0026lsquo;Integrating different levels of automation: Lessons from winning the amazon robotics challenge 2016\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics\u003c/em\u003e. IEEE, 14(11), pp. 4916\u0026ndash;4926.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCorreia, I. and Melo, T. (2016) \u0026lsquo;Multi-period capacitated facility location under delayed demand satisfaction\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEuropean Journal of Operational Research\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 255(3), pp. 729\u0026ndash;746.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCorreia, I. and Melo, T. (2017) \u0026lsquo;A multi-period facility location problem with modular capacity adjustments and flexible demand fulfillment\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eComputers \u0026amp; Industrial Engineering\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 110, pp. 307\u0026ndash;321.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCui, L. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2023) \u0026lsquo;Exploring the risk and economic vulnerability of global energy supply chain interruption in the context of Russo-Ukrainian war\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eResources Policy\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 81, p. 103373.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDagnachew, A. G. and Hof, A. F. (2022) \u0026lsquo;Climate change mitigation and SDGs: modelling the regional potential of promising mitigation measures and assessing their impact on other SDGs\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Integrative Environmental Sciences\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 19(1), pp. 289\u0026ndash;314.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDas, S. (2020) \u003cem\u003eA risk-reduction-based incentivization model for human-centered multi-factor authentication\u003c/em\u003e. Indiana University.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDasaklis, T. K. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) \u0026lsquo;A systematic literature review of blockchain-enabled supply chain traceability implementations\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSustainability\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 14(4), p. 2439.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDash, R. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2019) \u0026lsquo;Application of artificial intelligence in automation of supply chain management\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability\u003c/em\u003e, 14(3).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eData, E. O. (2024) \u0026lsquo;Artificial Intelligence and\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eDigital Transformation Initiatives for Agile Marketing\u003c/em\u003e. IGI Global, p. 133.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDauvergne, P. (2022) \u0026lsquo;Is artificial intelligence greening global supply chains? Exposing the political economy of environmental costs\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eReview of International Political Economy\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 29(3), pp. 696\u0026ndash;718.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDelgado, J. A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2019) \u0026lsquo;Big Data Analysis for Sustainable Agriculture on a Geospatial Cloud Framework\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in Sustainable Food Systems\u003c/em\u003e. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00054.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDierker, D. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) \u003cem\u003eNavigating the current disruption in containerized logistics\u003c/em\u003e. McKinsey.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDiez-Olivan, A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2019) \u0026lsquo;Data fusion and machine learning for industrial prognosis: Trends and perspectives towards Industry 4.0\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInformation Fusion\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 50, pp. 92\u0026ndash;111.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDikshit, S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2023) \u0026lsquo;The use of artificial intelligence to optimize the routing of vehicles and reduce traffic congestion in urban areas\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web\u003c/em\u003e, 10.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDinh, T., Husmann, A. and Melloni, G. (2023) \u0026lsquo;Corporate sustainability reporting in Europe: A scoping review\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eAccounting in Europe\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 20(1), pp. 1\u0026ndash;29.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ede Dios Ort\u0026uacute;zar, J. and Willumsen, L. G. (2024) \u003cem\u003eModelling transport\u003c/em\u003e. John wiley \u0026amp; sons.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDolgui, A. and Ivanov, D. (2022) \u0026lsquo;5G in digital supply chain and operations management: fostering flexibility, end-to-end connectivity and real-time visibility through internet-of-everything\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Production Research\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 60(2), pp. 442\u0026ndash;451.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDolz Ausina, G. (2023) \u0026lsquo;Evaluation of different AI applications for operational logistic systems\u0026rsquo;. Universitat Polit\u0026egrave;cnica de Val\u0026egrave;ncia.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDorn, T. M. (2021) \u003cem\u003eUnmanned Systems: Savior or Threat\u003c/em\u003e. Page Publishing Inc.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDresner, M. and Zou, L. (2020) \u0026lsquo;Air cargo and logistics\u0026rsquo;, in \u003cem\u003eAir Transport Management\u003c/em\u003e. Routledge, pp. 287\u0026ndash;307.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDudczyk, P., Dunston, J. and Crosby, G. V (2024) \u0026lsquo;Blockchain Technology for Global Supply Chain Management: A Survey of Applications, Challenges, Opportunities \u0026amp; Implications (March 2024)\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eIEEE Access\u003c/em\u003e. IEEE.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDurlik, I. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;Harnessing AI for Sustainable Shipping and Green Ports: Challenges and Opportunities\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eApplied Sciences\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 14(14), p. 5994.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEllram, L. M., Tate, W. L. and Petersen, K. J. (2013) \u0026lsquo;Offshoring and reshoring: an update on the manufacturing location decision\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Supply Chain Management\u003c/em\u003e. Wiley Online Library, 49(2), pp. 14\u0026ndash;22.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eElmay, F. K. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) \u0026lsquo;Blockchain-based traceability for shipping containers in unimodal and multimodal logistics\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eIEEE Access\u003c/em\u003e. IEEE, 10, pp. 133539\u0026ndash;133556.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEskandarpour, M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2015) \u0026lsquo;Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eOmega\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 54, pp. 11\u0026ndash;32.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEstampe, D. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2013) \u0026lsquo;A framework for analysing supply chain performance evaluation models\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of production economics\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 142(2), pp. 247\u0026ndash;258.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEyo-Udo, N. (2024) \u0026lsquo;Leveraging artificial intelligence for enhanced supply chain optimization\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eOpen Access Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies\u003c/em\u003e, 7(2), pp. 1\u0026ndash;15.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFagnant, D. J. and Kockelman, K. (2015) \u0026lsquo;Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eTransportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 77, pp. 167\u0026ndash;181.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFagnant, D. J. and Kockelman, K. M. (2014) \u0026lsquo;The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eTransportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 40, pp. 1\u0026ndash;13.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFigliozzi, M. and Jennings, D. (2020) \u0026lsquo;Autonomous delivery robots and their potential impacts on urban freight energy consumption and emissions\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eTransportation research procedia\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 46, pp. 21\u0026ndash;28.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFUKAGAWA, Y. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Integration in Asia following mega-FTAs: Asia-Pacific, Indo-Pacific, or Eurasia?\u0026rsquo; European University Institute.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGallersd\u0026ouml;rfer, U. and Matthes, F. (2019) \u0026lsquo;Tamper-proof volume tracking in supply chains with smart contracts\u0026rsquo;, in \u003cem\u003eEuro-Par 2018: Parallel Processing Workshops: Euro-Par 2018 International Workshops, Turin, Italy, August 27\u0026ndash;28, 2018, Revised Selected Papers 24\u003c/em\u003e. Springer, pp. 367\u0026ndash;378.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGammeltoft, P., Filatotchev, I. and Hobdari, B. (2012) \u0026lsquo;Emerging multinational companies and strategic fit: A contingency framework and future research agenda\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEuropean Management Journal\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 30(3), pp. 175\u0026ndash;188.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGaur, L. and Sahoo, B. M. (2022) \u003cem\u003eExplainable Artificial Intelligence for Intelligent Transportation Systems: Ethics and Applications\u003c/em\u003e. Springer Nature.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGharehgozli, A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2017) \u0026lsquo;Trends in global E-food supply chain and implications for transport: Literature review and research directions\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eResearch in transportation business \u0026amp; management\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 25, pp. 2\u0026ndash;14.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGhodsi, M., Vujanović, N. and Landesmann, M. (2024) \u003cem\u003eCan multinationals withstand growing trade barriers?\u003c/em\u003e wiiw Working Paper.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGirasa, R. and Girasa, R. (2020) \u0026lsquo;Applications of AI and Projections of AI Impact\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eArtificial Intelligence as a Disruptive Technology: Economic Transformation and Government Regulation\u003c/em\u003e. Springer, pp. 23\u0026ndash;67.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGodsmark, J. and Richards, G. (2019) \u003cem\u003eThe logistics outsourcing handbook: A step-by-step guide from strategy through to implementation\u003c/em\u003e. Kogan Page Publishers.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGonzalez-Feliu, J. (2018) \u003cem\u003eSustainable urban logistics: Planning and evaluation\u003c/em\u003e. John Wiley \u0026amp; Sons.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGoyal, A. (2011) \u003cem\u003eHistory of monetary policy in India since independence\u003c/em\u003e. Springer.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGroenewald, C. A., Garg, A. and Yerasuri, S. S. (2024) \u0026lsquo;Smart Supply Chain Management Optimization and Risk Mitigation with Artificial Intelligence\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eNaturalista Campano\u003c/em\u003e, 28(1), pp. 261\u0026ndash;270.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGrossmann, I. E. (2012) \u0026lsquo;Advances in mathematical programming models for enterprise-wide optimization\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eComputers \u0026amp; Chemical Engineering\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 47, pp. 2\u0026ndash;18.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGrover, V. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u003cem\u003eBlockchain, IoT, and AI Technologies for Supply Chain Management: Apply Emerging Technologies to Address and Improve Supply Chain Management\u003c/em\u003e. Springer Nature.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGurumurthy, A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2019) \u0026lsquo;Platform planet: Development in the intelligence economy\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eAvailable at SSRN 3872499\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHaddad, M. A. (2023) \u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Politics in East Asia\u003c/em\u003e. Cambridge University Press.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHalim, R. A., Kwakkel, J. H. and Tavasszy, L. A. (2016) \u0026lsquo;A strategic model of port-hinterland freight distribution networks\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eTransportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 95, pp. 368\u0026ndash;384.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHammami, R., Temponi, C. and Frein, Y. (2014) \u0026lsquo;A scenario-based stochastic model for supplier selection in global context with multiple buyers, currency fluctuation uncertainties, and price discounts\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEuropean Journal of Operational Research\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 233(1), pp. 159\u0026ndash;170.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHansen, I. A. (2020) \u0026lsquo;Hyperloop transport technology assessment and system analysis\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eTransportation Planning and Technology\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 43(8), pp. 803\u0026ndash;820.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHasan, M. R., Islam, M. Z., \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;Integrating artificial intelligence and predictive analytics in supply chain management to minimize carbon footprint and enhance business growth in the USA\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Business and Management Studies\u003c/em\u003e, 6(4), pp. 195\u0026ndash;212.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHasan, M. R., Shawon, R. E. R., \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;Optimizing sustainable supply chains: Integrating environmental concerns and carbon footprint reduction through ai-enhanced decision-making in the USA\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Economics, Finance and Accounting Studies\u003c/em\u003e, 6(4), pp. 57\u0026ndash;71.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHasan, U., Whyte, A. and Al Jassmi, H. (2019) \u0026lsquo;A review of the transformation of road transport systems: are we ready for the next step in artificially intelligent sustainable transport?\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eApplied System Innovation\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 3(1), p. 1.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHassan, A. and Mhmood, A. H. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Optimizing network performance, automation, and intelligent decision-making through real-time big data analytics\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Responsible Artificial Intelligence\u003c/em\u003e, 11(8), pp. 12\u0026ndash;22.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHaveman, J. D. and Hummels, D. (2004) \u003cem\u003eCalifornia\u0026rsquo;s global gateways: trends and issues\u003c/em\u003e. Public Policy Institute of California San Francisco.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHedhly, W. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2021) \u0026lsquo;Hyperloop communications: Challenges, advances, and approaches\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eIEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society\u003c/em\u003e. IEEE, 2, pp. 2413\u0026ndash;2435.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHeilig, T. and Scheer, I. (2023) \u003cem\u003eDecision Intelligence: Transform Your Team and Organization with AI-Driven Decision-Making\u003c/em\u003e. John Wiley \u0026amp; Sons.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHengstler, M., Enkel, E. and Duelli, S. (2016) \u0026lsquo;Applied artificial intelligence and trust\u0026mdash;The case of autonomous vehicles and medical assistance devices\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eTechnological Forecasting and Social Change\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 105, pp. 105\u0026ndash;120.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHofmann, E. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2019) \u0026lsquo;Supply chain management and Industry 4.0: conducting research in the digital age\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Physical Distribution \u0026amp; Logistics Management\u003c/em\u003e. Emerald Publishing Limited, 49(10), pp. 945\u0026ndash;955.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHofmann, E. and R\u0026uuml;sch, M. (2017) \u0026lsquo;Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eComputers in industry\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 89, pp. 23\u0026ndash;34.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHosseini, M. and Vashaee, D. (2022) \u0026lsquo;Role of interfaces in materials synthesis under electromagnetic field\u0026rsquo;, in \u003cem\u003eAPS March Meeting Abstracts\u003c/em\u003e, pp. M12-002.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHu, X. and Sinniah, S. (2024) \u0026lsquo;The Role of Green Risk Management Approaches in Promoting Green and Sustainable Supply Chain Management\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eNatural and Engineering Sciences\u003c/em\u003e. Cemal TURAN, 9(2), pp. 33\u0026ndash;54.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHuang, R. and Mao, S. (2024) \u0026lsquo;Carbon Footprint Management in Global Supply Chains: A Data-Driven Approach Utilizing Artificial Intelligence Algorithms\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eIEEE Access\u003c/em\u003e. IEEE.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIrfan, M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2023) \u003cem\u003eFintech Applications in Islamic Finance: AI, Machine Learning, and Blockchain Techniques: AI, Machine Learning, and Blockchain Techniques\u003c/em\u003e. IGI Global.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIrfan, M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;Exploring The Synergistic Effects of Blockchain Integration with IOT and AI for Enhanced Transparency and Security in Global Supply Chains\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInt. J. Contemp. Issues Soc. Sci\u003c/em\u003e, 3, pp. 1326\u0026ndash;1338.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIshmael Ackah, I. M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;Willingness to Change to Electric Cars: Is the Ghanaian Consumer Ready? Check for updates\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEnergy Regulation in Africa: Dynamics, Challenges, and Opportunities\u003c/em\u003e. Springer Nature, p. 473.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIssa, H., Sun, T. and Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2016) \u0026lsquo;Research ideas for artificial intelligence in auditing: The formalization of audit and workforce supplementation\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of emerging technologies in accounting\u003c/em\u003e. American Accounting Association, 13(2), pp. 1\u0026ndash;20.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIvanov, D. (2010) \u0026lsquo;An adaptive framework for aligning (re) planning decisions on supply chain strategy, design, tactics, and operations\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of production research\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 48(13), pp. 3999\u0026ndash;4017.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIvanov, D. and Sokolov, B. (2013) \u0026lsquo;Control and system-theoretic identification of the supply chain dynamics domain for planning, analysis and adaptation of performance under uncertainty\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEuropean Journal of Operational Research\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 224(2), pp. 313\u0026ndash;323.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJahre, M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2016) \u0026lsquo;Integrating supply chains for emergencies and ongoing operations in UNHCR\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Operations Management\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 45, pp. 57\u0026ndash;72.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJakkan, S. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Designing a framework to develop capabilities for adopting AI/ML technologies in the supply chain\u0026rsquo;. University of Twente.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJaller, M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2020) \u0026lsquo;Automation, electrification, and shared mobility in freight\u0026rsquo;.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJayaram, J. and Tan, K.-C. (2010) \u0026lsquo;Supply chain integration with third-party logistics providers\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of production economics\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 125(2), pp. 262\u0026ndash;271.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJeevan, J. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) \u0026lsquo;Evolution of Industrial Revolution 4.0 in seaport system: An interpretation from a bibliometric analysis\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eAustralian Journal of Maritime \u0026amp; Ocean Affairs\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 14(4), pp. 229\u0026ndash;250.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJie, F. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2023) \u0026lsquo;Research agenda for supply chain management 4.0\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Agile Systems and Management\u003c/em\u003e. Inderscience Publishers (IEL), 16(3), pp. 317\u0026ndash;346.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJohnson, H. G. (2013) \u0026lsquo;The case for flexible exchange rates, 1969\u0026rsquo;, in \u003cem\u003eFurther Essays in Monetary Economics (Collected Works of Harry Johnson)\u003c/em\u003e. Routledge, pp. 198\u0026ndash;228.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKalasani, R. R. (2023) \u003cem\u003eAn Exploratory Study of the Impacts of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Technologies in the Supply Chain and Operations Field\u003c/em\u003e. University of the Cumberlands.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKalusivalingam, A. K. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) \u0026lsquo;Enhancing Supply Chain Resilience through AI: Leveraging Deep Reinforcement Learning and Predictive Analytics\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of AI and ML\u003c/em\u003e, 3(9).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKamalahmadi, M. and Mellat-Parast, M. (2016) \u0026lsquo;Developing a resilient supply chain through supplier flexibility and reliability assessment\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Production Research\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 54(1), pp. 302\u0026ndash;321.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKar, A. K., Choudhary, S. K. and Singh, V. K. (2022) \u0026lsquo;How can artificial intelligence impact sustainability: A systematic literature review\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Cleaner Production\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 376, p. 134120.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKaul, D. and Khurana, R. (2022) \u0026lsquo;Ai-driven optimization models for e-commerce supply chain operations: Demand prediction, inventory management, and delivery time reduction with cost efficiency considerations\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Social Analytics\u003c/em\u003e, 7(12), pp. 59\u0026ndash;77.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKe, J. F. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2015) \u0026lsquo;Aligning supply chain transportation strategy with industry characteristics: Evidence from the US-Asia supply chain\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Physical Distribution \u0026amp; Logistics Management\u003c/em\u003e. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 45(9/10), pp. 837\u0026ndash;860.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKennedy, K. (2021) \u003cem\u003eThe first decade of NAFTA: the future of free trade in North America\u003c/em\u003e. BRILL.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKern, J. (2021) \u0026lsquo;The digital transformation of logistics: A review about technologies and their implementation status\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eThe digital transformation of logistics: Demystifying impacts of the fourth industrial revolution\u003c/em\u003e. Wiley Online Library, pp. 361\u0026ndash;403.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKhan, A. A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2023) \u0026lsquo;Artificial intelligence and blockchain technology for secure smart grid and power distribution Automation: A State-of-the-Art Review\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 57, p. 103282.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKhan, R. S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) \u0026lsquo;An ai and ml-enabled framework for proactive risk mitigation and resilience optimization in global supply chains during national emergencies\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSage Science Review of Applied Machine Learning\u003c/em\u003e, 5(2), pp. 127\u0026ndash;144.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKhan, S. A. R. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) \u0026lsquo;Renewable energy and advanced logistical infrastructure: Carbon-free economic development\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSustainable Development\u003c/em\u003e. Wiley Online Library, 30(4), pp. 693\u0026ndash;702.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKhan, S. A. R., Yu, Z. and Farooq, K. (2023) \u0026lsquo;Green capabilities, green purchasing, and triple bottom line performance: Leading toward environmental sustainability\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eBusiness strategy and the environment\u003c/em\u003e. Wiley Online Library, 32(4), pp. 2022\u0026ndash;2034.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKhanfar, A. A. A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2021) \u0026lsquo;Applications of blockchain technology in sustainable manufacturing and supply chain management: A systematic review\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSustainability\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 13(14), p. 7870.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKim, E., Kim, Y. and Park, J. (2022) \u0026lsquo;The necessity of introducing autonomous trucks in logistics 4.0\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSustainability\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 14(7), p. 3978.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKing, B. and Petty, R. (2021) \u003cem\u003eThe rise of Technosocialism: How inequality, AI and climate will usher in a New World\u003c/em\u003e. Marshall Cavendish International Asia Pte Ltd.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKlibi, W., Martel, A. and Guitouni, A. (2010) \u0026lsquo;The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: a critical review\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEuropean journal of operational research\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 203(2), pp. 283\u0026ndash;293.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKlumpp, M. (2018) \u0026lsquo;Automation and artificial intelligence in business logistics systems: human reactions and collaboration requirements\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Logistics Research and Applications\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 21(3), pp. 224\u0026ndash;242.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKoberstein, A., Lukas, E. and Naumann, M. (2013) \u0026lsquo;Integrated strategic planning of global production networks and financial hedging under uncertain demands and exchange rates\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eBusiness Research\u003c/em\u003e. Springer, 6, pp. 215\u0026ndash;240.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKostrzewski, M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) \u0026lsquo;Analysis of modern vs. conventional development technologies in transportation\u0026mdash;The case study of a last-mile delivery process\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSensors\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 22(24), p. 9858.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKotsila, P. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2023) \u003cem\u003eInjustice in urban sustainability: ten core drivers\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKovacevic, A. (2017) \u0026lsquo;Towards a Balkan gas hub: the interplay between pipeline gas, LNG and renewable energy in South East Europe\u0026rsquo;. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKrishnan, R. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;Enhancing Logistics Operations Through Technological Advancements for Superior Service Efficiency\u0026rsquo;, in \u003cem\u003eInnovative Technologies for Increasing Service Productivity\u003c/em\u003e. IGI Global, pp. 61\u0026ndash;82.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKrishnan, S., Balas, V. E. and Kumar, R. (2023) \u003cem\u003eGreen Blockchain Technology for Sustainable Smart Cities\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKubler, S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2016) \u0026lsquo;A state-of the-art survey \u0026amp; testbed of fuzzy AHP (FAHP) applications\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eExpert systems with applications\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 65, pp. 398\u0026ndash;422.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKumar Kar, A. and K. Pani, A. (2014) \u0026lsquo;Exploring the importance of different supplier selection criteria\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eManagement Research Review\u003c/em\u003e. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 37(1), pp. 89\u0026ndash;105.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKuramochi, T. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2018) \u0026lsquo;Ten key short-term sectoral benchmarks to limit warming to 1.5 C\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eClimate Policy\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 18(3), pp. 287\u0026ndash;305.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKurz, W. (2025) \u0026lsquo;Generic Multi-Agent AI Framework for Weighted Dynamic Corridor Price Optimisation\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Next-Generation Research 5.0\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLafoz, M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2020) \u0026lsquo;Power supply solution for ultrahigh speed hyperloop trains\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSmart Cities\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 3(3), pp. 642\u0026ndash;656.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLayton, P. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Fighting Artificial Intelligence Battles: Operational Concepts for Future AI-Enabled Wars\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eNetwork\u003c/em\u003e, 4(20), pp. 1\u0026ndash;100.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLeclerc, Y. and Ircha, M. (2023) \u0026lsquo;Canada\u0026rsquo;s rapidly evolving smart ports\u0026rsquo;, in \u003cem\u003eSmart Ports and Robotic Systems: Navigating the Waves of Techno-Regulation and Governance\u003c/em\u003e. Springer, pp. 167\u0026ndash;187.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLee, R. P. (2010) \u0026lsquo;Extending the environment\u0026ndash;strategy\u0026ndash;performance framework: The roles of multinational corporation network strength, market responsiveness, and product innovation\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of International Marketing\u003c/em\u003e. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 18(4), pp. 58\u0026ndash;73.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLeogrande, A. (2024) \u0026lsquo;Integrating ESG Principles into Smart Logistics: Toward Sustainable Supply Chains\u0026rsquo;.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLi, A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;Optimization of logistics cargo tracking and transportation efficiency based on data science deep learning models\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eApplied and Computational Engineering\u003c/em\u003e, 69, pp. 71\u0026ndash;77.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLim, A. and Tsutsui, K. (2012) \u0026lsquo;Globalization and commitment in corporate social responsibility: Cross-national analyses of institutional and political-economy effects\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eAmerican sociological review\u003c/em\u003e. Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 77(1), pp. 69\u0026ndash;98.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLitman, T. (2011) \u0026lsquo;Evaluating public transit benefits and costs\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eVictoria Transport Policy Institute\u003c/em\u003e, 65.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiu, L., Song, W. and Liu, Y. (2023) \u0026lsquo;Leveraging digital capabilities toward a circular economy: Reinforcing sustainable supply chain management with Industry 4.0 technologies\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eComputers \u0026amp; Industrial Engineering\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 178, p. 109113.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiu, Y. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) \u0026lsquo;Verifying the smart contracts of the port supply chain system based on probabilistic model checking\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSystems\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 10(1), p. 19.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003evan der Loeff, W. S., Godar, J. and Prakash, V. (2018) \u0026lsquo;A spatially explicit data-driven approach to calculating commodity-specific shipping emissions per vessel\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of cleaner production\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 205, pp. 895\u0026ndash;908.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLohmer, J. and Lasch, R. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Production planning and scheduling in multi-factory production networks: a systematic literature review\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Production Research\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 59(7), pp. 2028\u0026ndash;2054.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eL\u0026oacute;pez Bou, A. (2024) \u0026lsquo;Analysis of Ocean Freight Forwarding in China-US Trade: Pre-and Post-COVID-19\u0026rsquo;. Universitat Polit\u0026egrave;cnica de Catalunya.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMahat, D. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2023) \u0026lsquo;AI-Driven Optimization of Supply Chain and Logistics in Mechanical Engineering\u0026rsquo;, in \u003cem\u003e2023 10th IEEE Uttar Pradesh Section International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (UPCON)\u003c/em\u003e. IEEE, pp. 1611\u0026ndash;1616.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMahor, V. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) \u0026lsquo;The smart city based on AI and infrastructure: A new mobility concepts and realities\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eAutonomous Vehicles Volume 1: Using Machine Intelligence\u003c/em\u003e. Wiley Online Library, pp. 277\u0026ndash;295.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMai, T. T. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2018) \u003cem\u003eElectrification futures study: Scenarios of electric technology adoption and power consumption for the United States\u003c/em\u003e. National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMajid, G. M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2023) \u0026lsquo;Intelligent automation for sustainable tourism: a systematic review\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Sustainable Tourism\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 31(11), pp. 2421\u0026ndash;2440.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEl Makhloufi, A. (2023) \u0026lsquo;AI Application in Transport and Logistics: Opportunities and Challenges (An Exploratory Study)\u0026rsquo;. CoE City Net Zero, Faculty of Technology, Amsterdam Univeristy of Applied \u0026hellip;.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMaleksaeidi, H. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2017) \u0026lsquo;Climate change and drought: building resilience for an unpredictable future\u0026rsquo;, in \u003cem\u003eHandbook of drought and water scarcity\u003c/em\u003e. CRC Press, pp. 163\u0026ndash;186.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMander, J. (2014) \u003cem\u003eThe case against the global economy: and for a turn towards localization\u003c/em\u003e. Routledge.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMangla, S. K. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2019) \u0026lsquo;Logistics and distribution challenges to managing operations for corporate sustainability: study on leading Indian diary organizations\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Cleaner Production\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 238, p. 117620.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMani, Z. A. and Goniewicz, K. (2023) \u0026lsquo;Adapting disaster preparedness strategies to changing climate patterns in Saudi Arabia: A rapid review\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSustainability\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 15(19), p. 14279.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eManners-Bell, J. and Lyon, K. (2019) \u003cem\u003eThe logistics and supply chain innovation handbook: disruptive technologies and new business models\u003c/em\u003e. Kogan Page Publishers.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMarrone, A. (2023) \u0026lsquo;Optimizing Product Development and Innovation Processes with Artificial Intelligence\u0026rsquo;. Politecnico di Torino.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMartel, A. and Klibi, W. (2016) \u003cem\u003eDesigning value-creating supply chain networks\u003c/em\u003e. Springer.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMartin, G. (2019) \u003cem\u003eSustainability prospects for autonomous vehicles: Environmental, social, and urban\u003c/em\u003e. Routledge.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMart\u0026iacute;nez-Costa, C. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2014) \u0026lsquo;A review of mathematical programming models for strategic capacity planning in manufacturing\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Production Economics\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 153, pp. 66\u0026ndash;85.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMart\u0026iacute;nez-L\u0026oacute;pez, F. J. and Casillas, J. (2013) \u0026lsquo;Artificial intelligence-based systems applied in industrial marketing: An historical overview, current and future insights\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eIndustrial Marketing Management\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 42(4), pp. 489\u0026ndash;495.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDe Massis, A. and Kotlar, J. (2014) \u0026lsquo;The case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of family business strategy\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 5(1), pp. 15\u0026ndash;29.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMateu, J. M., Fern\u0026aacute;ndez, P. M. and Franco, R. I. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Setting safety foundations in the Hyperloop: A first approach to preliminary hazard analysis and safety assurance system\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSafety science\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 142, p. 105366.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMazzei, D. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2020) \u0026lsquo;A Blockchain Tokenizer for Industrial IOT trustless applications\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eFuture Generation Computer Systems\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 105, pp. 432\u0026ndash;445.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMia, M., Wessels, J. and Adam, S. (2023) \u0026lsquo;The Use of Blockchain Technology to Improve Transfer-Pricing Compliance and Administration in South Africa\u0026rsquo;, in \u003cem\u003eICABR Conference\u003c/em\u003e. Springer, pp. 357\u0026ndash;378.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMirindi, D. (2024) \u0026lsquo;A Review of the Advances in Artificial Intelligence in Transportation System Development\u0026rsquo;.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMirzapour Al-E-Hashem, S. M. J., Baboli, A. and Sazvar, Z. (2013) \u0026lsquo;A stochastic aggregate production planning model in a green supply chain: Considering flexible lead times, nonlinear purchase and shortage cost functions\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEuropean Journal of Operational Research\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 230(1), pp. 26\u0026ndash;41.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMishra, A. K. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;Revolutionizing Government Operations: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Public Administration\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eConversational Artificial Intelligence\u003c/em\u003e. Wiley Online Library, pp. 607\u0026ndash;634.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eModgil, S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) \u0026lsquo;AI technologies and their impact on supply chain resilience during COVID-19\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Physical Distribution \u0026amp; Logistics Management\u003c/em\u003e. Emerald Publishing Limited, 52(2), pp. 130\u0026ndash;149.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eModgil, S., Singh, R. K. and Hannibal, C. (2022) \u0026lsquo;Artificial intelligence for supply chain resilience: learning from Covid-19\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eThe International Journal of Logistics Management\u003c/em\u003e. Emerald Publishing Limited, 33(4), pp. 1246\u0026ndash;1268.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMohsin, M. and Jamaani, F. (2023) \u0026lsquo;Green finance and the socio-politico-economic factors\u0026rsquo; impact on the future oil prices: evidence from machine learning\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eResources Policy\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 85, p. 103780.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMor, S., Madan, S. and Prasad, K. D. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Artificial intelligence and carbon footprints: Roadmap for Indian agriculture\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eStrategic Change\u003c/em\u003e. Wiley Online Library, 30(3), pp. 269\u0026ndash;280.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMoradlou, H. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2021) \u0026lsquo;Geopolitical disruptions and the manufacturing location decision in multinational company supply chains: a Delphi study on Brexit\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Operations \u0026amp; Production Management\u003c/em\u003e. Emerald Publishing Limited, 41(2), pp. 102\u0026ndash;130.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMorrell, P. S. and Klein, T. (2018) \u003cem\u003eMoving boxes by air: the economics of international air cargo\u003c/em\u003e. Routledge.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMoshood, T. D. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2021) \u0026lsquo;Digital twins driven supply chain visibility within logistics: A new paradigm for future logistics\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eApplied System Innovation\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 4(2), p. 29.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMoshref-Javadi, M. and Winkenbach, M. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Applications and Research avenues for drone-based models in logistics: A classificaation and review\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eExpert Systems with Applications\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 177, p. 114854.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMuthuswamy, M. and Ali, A. M. (2023) \u0026lsquo;Sustainable supply chain management in the age of machine intelligence: addressing challenges, capitalizing on opportunities, and shaping the future landscape\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSustainable Machine Intelligence Journal\u003c/em\u003e, 3, pp. 1\u0026ndash;3.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNaimi Sadigh, A., Fallah, H. and Nahavandi, N. (2013) \u0026lsquo;A multi-objective supply chain model integrated with location of distribution centers and supplier selection decisions\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eThe International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology\u003c/em\u003e. Springer, 69, pp. 225\u0026ndash;235.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNampalli, R. C. R. and Adusupalli, B. (2024) \u0026lsquo;Using Machine Learning for Predictive Freight Demand and Route Optimization in Road and Rail Logistics.\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eLibrary of Progress-Library Science, Information Technology \u0026amp; Computer\u003c/em\u003e, 44(3).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNeufville, R., Abdalla, H. and Abbas, A. (2022) \u0026lsquo;Potential of connected fully autonomous vehicles in reducing congestion and associated carbon emissions\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSustainability\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 14(11), p. 6910.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNeway, A. S. (2024) \u003cem\u003eDigital Supply Chain: Navigating the future operation\u003c/em\u003e. Abegaz Sahilu Neway.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNikitas, A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2017) \u0026lsquo;How can autonomous and connected vehicles, electromobility, BRT, hyperloop, shared use mobility and mobility-as-a-service shape transport futures for the context of smart cities?\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eUrban Science\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 1(4), p. 36.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNisar, U. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;Unlocking the potential of blockchain technology in enhancing the fisheries supply chain: an exploration of critical adoption barriers in China\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eScientific Reports\u003c/em\u003e. Nature Publishing Group UK London, 14(1), p. 10167.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNotteboom, T. (2009) \u0026lsquo;The relationship between seaports and the intermodal hinterland in light of global supply chains: European challenges\u0026rsquo;. OECD.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNzeako, G. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;The role of AI-Driven predictive analytics in optimizing IT industry supply chains\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Management \u0026amp; Entrepreneurship Research\u003c/em\u003e, 6(5), pp. 1489\u0026ndash;1497.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOKOLIE, P. I. P. (2020) \u0026lsquo;IMPACT OF DEFICIT FINANCING ON SELECTED MACROECONOMIC VARIABLES IN NIGERIA, 1986\u0026ndash;2018\u0026rsquo;.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOsman, K. (2024) \u0026lsquo;Improving Transparency with Technology in the Transportation of Illegal Wildlife\u0026rsquo;.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eParamesha, M., Rane, N. L. and Rane, J. (2024) \u0026lsquo;Big data analytics, artificial intelligence, machine learning, internet of things, and blockchain for enhanced business intelligence\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003ePartners Universal Multidisciplinary Research Journal\u003c/em\u003e, 1(2), pp. 110\u0026ndash;133.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eParrish, S. and Beaubien, R. (2024) \u003cem\u003eThe Great Mental Models: Economics and Art\u003c/em\u003e. Random House.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePatel, K. R. (2023) \u0026lsquo;Harmonizing sustainability, functionality, and cost: navigating responsible packaging innovations in modern supply chains\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eAmerican Journal of Economic and Management Business (AJEMB)\u003c/em\u003e, 2(8), pp. 287\u0026ndash;300.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePatra, P. K. (2018) \u0026lsquo;Green logistics: Eco-friendly measure in supply-chain\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eManagement Insight\u003c/em\u003e, 14(1), pp. 65\u0026ndash;71.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePeta, S. (2023) \u0026lsquo;Journey of artificial intelligence Frontier: A comprehensive overview\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eGlobal Journal of Computer Science and Technology\u003c/em\u003e, 23(D2), pp. 9\u0026ndash;36.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePorter, L. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2018) \u0026lsquo;The autonomous vehicle Revolution: Implications for planning/The driverless city?/autonomous vehicles\u0026ndash;a planner\u0026rsquo;s response/autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, challenges and the need for government action/three signs autonomous vehicles will not lead to l\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003ePlanning Theory \u0026amp; Practice\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 19(5), pp. 753\u0026ndash;778.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePoudel, D. B. (2013) \u0026lsquo;Coordinating hundreds of cooperative, autonomous robots in a warehouse\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJan\u003c/em\u003e, 27(1\u0026ndash;13), p. 26.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePowell, W. B., Simao, H. P. and Bouzaiene-Ayari, B. (2012) \u0026lsquo;Approximate dynamic programming in transportation and logistics: a unified framework\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 1(3), pp. 237\u0026ndash;284.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eQaiser, F. (2019) \u0026lsquo;A decision support tool for sustainable freight transportation\u0026rsquo;. Loughborough University.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eQian, X. and Papadonikolaki, E. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Shifting trust in construction supply chains through blockchain technology\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEngineering, Construction and Architectural Management\u003c/em\u003e. Emerald Publishing Limited, 28(2), pp. 584\u0026ndash;602.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eQureshi, S. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Pandemics within the pandemic: Confronting socio-economic inequities in a datafied world\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInformation Technology for Development\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, pp. 151\u0026ndash;170.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRaghunatha, A., Thollander, P. and Barthel, S. (2023) \u0026lsquo;Addressing the emergence of drones\u0026ndash;A policy development framework for regional drone transportation systems\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eTransportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 18, p. 100795.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRahimian, F. P. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2021) \u003cem\u003eIndustry 4.0 solutions for building design and construction: a paradigm of new opportunities\u003c/em\u003e. Routledge.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRajabzadeh, M. and Fatorachian, H. (2023) \u0026lsquo;Modelling factors influencing IoT adoption: With a focus on agricultural logistics operations\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSmart Cities\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 6(6), pp. 3266\u0026ndash;3296.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRane, N., Choudhary, S. and Rane, J. (2024) \u0026lsquo;Artificial intelligence and machine learning for resilient and sustainable logistics and supply chain management\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eAvailable at SSRN 4847087\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRane, N. L., Kaya, \u0026Ouml;. and Rane, J. (2024) \u003cem\u003eArtificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning for Sustainable Industry 5.0\u003c/em\u003e. Deep Science Publishing.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRane, S. B. and Thakker, S. V. (2020) \u0026lsquo;Green procurement process model based on blockchain\u0026ndash;IoT integrated architecture for a sustainable business\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eManagement of Environmental Quality: An International Journal\u003c/em\u003e. Emerald Publishing Limited, 31(3), pp. 741\u0026ndash;763.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRashid, A. Bin and Kausik, A. K. (2024) \u0026lsquo;AI revolutionizing industries worldwide: A comprehensive overview of its diverse applications\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eHybrid Advances\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, p. 100277.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRashid, Y. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2019) \u0026lsquo;Case study method: A step-by-step guide for business researchers\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of qualitative methods\u003c/em\u003e. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 18, p. 1609406919862424.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRay, S. and Nayak, L. (2023) \u0026lsquo;Marketing sustainable fashion: trends and future directions\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSustainability\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 15(7), p. 6202.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRodrigue, J.-P. (2020) \u003cem\u003eThe geography of transport systems\u003c/em\u003e. Routledge.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRomer, C. D. and Romer, D. H. (2010) \u0026lsquo;The macroeconomic effects of tax changes: estimates based on a new measure of fiscal shocks\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eAmerican economic review\u003c/em\u003e. American Economic Association, 100(3), pp. 763\u0026ndash;801.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRouhiainen, L. (2018) \u003cem\u003eArtificial Intelligence: 101 things you must know today about our future\u003c/em\u003e. Lasse Rouhiainen.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRumford, C. (2014) \u003cem\u003eCosmopolitan borders\u003c/em\u003e. Springer.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRuvoletto, R. (2023) \u0026lsquo;Digitalization and Internationalization: An Analysis of the Impact of Digital Technologies on Export Management Practices\u0026rsquo;. Universit\u0026agrave; Ca\u0026rsquo;Foscari Venezia.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSahal, R. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2021) \u0026lsquo;Blockchain-empowered digital twins collaboration: smart transportation use case\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eMachines\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 9(9), p. 193.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSahebi, H., Nickel, S. and Ashayeri, J. (2014) \u0026lsquo;Strategic and tactical mathematical programming models within the crude oil supply chain context\u0026mdash;A review\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eComputers \u0026amp; Chemical Engineering\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 68, pp. 56\u0026ndash;77.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSanders, N. R. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2019) \u0026lsquo;Sustainable supply chains in the age of AI and digitization: research challenges and opportunities\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Business logistics\u003c/em\u003e. Wiley Online Library, 40(3), pp. 229\u0026ndash;240.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSandor, D. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2018) \u0026lsquo;System dynamics of polysilicon for solar photovoltaics: A framework for investigating the energy security of renewable energy supply chains\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSustainability\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 10(1), p. 160.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSANDUA, D. (no date) \u003cem\u003eFUTURE OF WORK: THE AGE OF AUTOMATION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSarkar, B., Ahmed, W. and Kim, N. (2018) \u0026lsquo;Joint effects of variable carbon emission cost and multi-delay-in-payments under single-setup-multiple-delivery policy in a global sustainable supply chain\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Cleaner Production\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 185, pp. 421\u0026ndash;445.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSHALIZI, M. (no date) \u0026lsquo;The effect of Artificial intelligence on the labour market\u0026rsquo;.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSharma, D. and Tripathi, K. (2024) \u0026lsquo;Navigating the digital age: smart manufacturing and logistics\u0026rsquo;, in \u003cem\u003eRecent Trends in Artificial Intelligence Towards a Smart World: Applications in Industries and Sectors\u003c/em\u003e. Springer, pp. 99\u0026ndash;144.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSharma, R. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2020) \u0026lsquo;A systematic literature review on machine learning applications for sustainable agriculture supply chain performance\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eComputers and Operations Research\u003c/em\u003e, 119. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2020.104926.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShawon, R. E. R. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;Assessing Geopolitical Risks and Their Economic Impact on the USA Using Data Analytics\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Economics, Finance and Accounting Studies\u003c/em\u003e, 6(6), pp. 5\u0026ndash;16.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSingh, A. K. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2023) \u0026lsquo;Revealing the barriers of blockchain technology for supply chain transparency and sustainability in the construction industry: an application of pythagorean FAHP methods\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSustainability\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 15(13), p. 10681.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSingh, P. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) \u0026lsquo;Blockchain and AI technology convergence: Applications in transportation systems\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eVehicular Communications\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 38, p. 100521.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSingh, S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2020) \u0026lsquo;Convergence of blockchain and artificial intelligence in IoT network for the sustainable smart city\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSustainable cities and society\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 63, p. 102364.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSingh, S. K., Rathore, S. and Park, J. H. (2020) \u0026lsquo;Blockiotintelligence: A blockchain-enabled intelligent IoT architecture with artificial intelligence\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eFuture Generation Computer Systems\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 110, pp. 721\u0026ndash;743.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSinn, E. (2012) \u003cem\u003ePacific crossing: California gold, Chinese migration, and the making of Hong Kong\u003c/em\u003e. Hong Kong University Press.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSmith, R. (2012) \u003cem\u003eGlobal supply chain performance and risk optimization: the value of real options flexibility demonstrated in the global automotive industry\u003c/em\u003e. Springer Science \u0026amp; Business Media.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSoh, K. L., Wong, W. P. and Chong, C.-L. (2015) \u0026lsquo;Strategic choices: A composite model for logistics service providers\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Southeast Asian Research\u003c/em\u003e. IBIMA Publishing, 2015, p. 652416.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSomia, R. (2024) \u0026lsquo;A comprehensive analysis of the ISO 19650 attending their evolution and impact on construction information management\u0026rsquo;.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSperling, D. (2018) \u003cem\u003eThree revolutions: Steering automated, shared, and electric vehicles to a better future\u003c/em\u003e. Island Press.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSpiller, P. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2013) \u003cem\u003eProcurement 20/20: Supply entrepreneurship in a changing world\u003c/em\u003e. John Wiley \u0026amp; Sons.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStein, E. W. (2013) \u0026lsquo;A comprehensive multi-criteria model to rank electric energy production technologies\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 22, pp. 640\u0026ndash;654.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSulaiman, I. M. (2024) \u003cem\u003eRecent Advancements in the Diagnosis of Human Disease\u003c/em\u003e. CRC Press.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSullivan, M. and Kern, J. (2021) \u003cem\u003eThe digital transformation of logistics: Demystifying impacts of the Fourth Industrial Revolution\u003c/em\u003e. John Wiley \u0026amp; Sons.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSun, X. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) \u0026lsquo;The application of Industry 4.0 technologies in sustainable logistics: a systematic literature review (2012\u0026ndash;2020) to explore future research opportunities\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research\u003c/em\u003e. Springer, pp. 1\u0026ndash;32.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSundarakani, B., Pereira, V. and Ishizaka, A. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Robust facility location decisions for resilient sustainable supply chain performance in the face of disruptions\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eThe International Journal of Logistics Management\u003c/em\u003e. Emerald Publishing Limited, 32(2), pp. 357\u0026ndash;385.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSunny, F. A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) \u0026lsquo;A systematic review of blockchain applications\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eIeee Access\u003c/em\u003e. IEEE, 10, pp. 59155\u0026ndash;59177.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSunny, J., Undralla, N. and Pillai, V. M. (2020) \u0026lsquo;Supply chain transparency through blockchain-based traceability: An overview with demonstration\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eComputers \u0026amp; Industrial Engineering\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 150, p. 106895.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTahir, M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2020) \u0026lsquo;A review on application of blockchain in 5G and beyond networks: Taxonomy, field-trials, challenges and opportunities\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eIEEE Access\u003c/em\u003e. IEEE, 8, pp. 115876\u0026ndash;115904.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTang, H. and Zhang, Y. (2012) \u0026lsquo;Exchange rates and the margins of trade: Evidence from Chinese exporters\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eCESifo Economic Studies\u003c/em\u003e. Oxford University Press, 58(4), pp. 671\u0026ndash;702.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTaylor, C. L., Hyde, D. J. and Barr, L. C. (2016) \u003cem\u003eHyperloop commercial feasibility analysis\u003c/em\u003e. John A. Volpe National Transportation System Center.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThai, V. V, Yeo, G.-T. and Pak, J.-Y. (2016) \u0026lsquo;Comparative analysis of port competency requirements in Vietnam and Korea\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eMaritime Policy \u0026amp; Management\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 43(5), pp. 614\u0026ndash;629.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTian, G. (2020) \u0026lsquo;Blockchain, Regtech, and Their Application to Transfer Pricing Activities in the Cloud\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eHous. Bus. \u0026amp; Tax LJ\u003c/em\u003e. HeinOnline, 21, p. 142.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTintner, G. and Sengupta, J. K. (2014) \u003cem\u003eStochastic economics: stochastic processes, control, and programming\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTito, M. (2023) \u0026lsquo;A comparative analysis of good enterprise data management practices: insights from literature and artificial intelligence perspectives for business efficiency and effectiveness\u0026rsquo;. M. Tito.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTrebilcock, M. J. (2014) \u003cem\u003eDealing with losers: The political economy of policy transitions\u003c/em\u003e. Oxford University Press, USA.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTsai, C. K. and Phumchusri, N. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for supplier selection: A case study in an electronic component manufacturer\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEngineering Journal\u003c/em\u003e, 25(8), pp. 73\u0026ndash;86.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTsolakis, N. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) \u0026lsquo;Towards AI driven environmental sustainability: an application of automated logistics in container port terminals\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Production Research\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 60(14), pp. 4508\u0026ndash;4528.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTsui, C.-W., Tzeng, G.-H. and Wen, U.-P. (2015) \u0026lsquo;A hybrid MCDM approach for improving the performance of green suppliers in the TFT-LCD industry\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Production Research\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 53(21), pp. 6436\u0026ndash;6454.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUdeh, E. O. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;The role of IoT in boosting supply chain transparency and efficiency\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eMagna Scientia Adv. Res. Rev.\u003c/em\u003e, 12, pp. 178\u0026ndash;197.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUgarte, G. M., Golden, J. S. and Dooley, K. J. (2016) \u0026lsquo;Lean versus green: The impact of lean logistics on greenhouse gas emissions in consumer goods supply chains\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Purchasing and Supply Management\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 22(2), pp. 98\u0026ndash;109.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUgochukwu, C. E. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;Sustainable smart cities: the role of fintech in promoting environmental sustainability\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eEngineering Science \u0026amp; Technology Journal\u003c/em\u003e, 5(3), pp. 821\u0026ndash;835.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDi Vaio, A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2020) \u0026lsquo;Artificial intelligence and business models in the sustainable development goals perspective: A systematic literature review\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Business Research\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 121, pp. 283\u0026ndash;314.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVaka, D. K. (2024) \u0026lsquo;Enhancing Supplier Relationships: Critical Factors in Procurement Supplier Selection\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Data Science\u003c/em\u003e, 2(1), pp. 229\u0026ndash;233.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVargas-Hern\u0026aacute;ndez, J. G. (2023) \u0026lsquo;Strategic organizational sustainability\u0026rsquo;, in \u003cem\u003eThe Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Change\u003c/em\u003e. Springer, pp. 1\u0026ndash;23.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVazquez Melendez, E. I., Bergey, P. and Smith, B. (2024) \u0026lsquo;Blockchain technology for supply chain provenance: increasing supply chain efficiency and consumer trust\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSupply Chain Management: An International Journal\u003c/em\u003e. Emerald Publishing Limited.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVyhmeister, E. and Castane, G. G. (2024) \u0026lsquo;When Industry meets trustworthy AI: a systematic review of AI for Industry 5.0\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003earXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03061\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWalker, M., Winders, J. and Boamah, E. F. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Locating artificial intelligence: a research agenda\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSpace and Polity\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 25(2), pp. 202\u0026ndash;219.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang, J., Zhao, L. and Huchzermeier, A. (2021) \u0026lsquo;Operations-finance interface in risk management: Research evolution and opportunities\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eProduction and Operations Management\u003c/em\u003e. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 30(2), pp. 355\u0026ndash;389.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang, K. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2023) \u0026lsquo;Investigating the role of artificial intelligence technologies in the construction industry using a Delphi-ANP-TOPSIS hybrid MCDM concept under a fuzzy environment\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSustainability\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 15(15), p. 11848.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang, L., Hu, Y. and Zhou, Y. (2024) \u0026lsquo;Cross-border commodity pricing strategy optimization via mixed neural network for time series analysis\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003earXiv preprint arXiv:2408.12115\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang, S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2019) \u0026lsquo;Smart contract-based product traceability system in the supply chain scenario\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eIEEE access\u003c/em\u003e. IEEE, 7, pp. 115122\u0026ndash;115133.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang, X. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2021) \u0026lsquo;New paradigm of data-driven smart customisation through digital twin\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of manufacturing systems\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 58, pp. 270\u0026ndash;280.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang, Z. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2023) \u0026lsquo;Promising solutions for railway operations to cope with future challenges\u0026mdash;Tackling COVID and beyond\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Rail Transport Planning \u0026amp; Management\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 28, p. 100405.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWhitaker, J., Ekman, P. and Thompson, S. (2017) \u0026lsquo;How multinational corporations use information technology to manage global operations\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of Computer Information Systems\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 57(2), pp. 112\u0026ndash;122.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWickert, C. and Risi, D. (2019) \u003cem\u003eCorporate social responsibility\u003c/em\u003e. Cambridge University Press.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWidener, M. N. (2019) \u0026lsquo;Cubular Corridors: Merging Vertical Urbanism with Accessibility Initiatives\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eWm. \u0026amp; Mary Envtl. L. \u0026amp; Pol\u0026rsquo;y Rev.\u003c/em\u003e HeinOnline, 44, p. 87.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWiegmans, B. and Janic, M. (2019) \u0026lsquo;Analysis, modeling, and assessing performances of supply chains served by long-distance freight transport corridors\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Sustainable Transportation\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 13(4), pp. 278\u0026ndash;293.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWilliams, C. and Lee, S. H. (2011) \u0026lsquo;Entrepreneurial contexts and knowledge coordination within the multinational corporation\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eJournal of World Business\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 46(2), pp. 253\u0026ndash;264.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWitkowski, K. (2017) \u0026lsquo;Internet of things, big data, industry 4.0\u0026ndash;innovative solutions in logistics and supply chains management\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eProcedia engineering\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 182, pp. 763\u0026ndash;769.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWolniak, R. and Stecuła, K. (2024) \u0026lsquo;Artificial Intelligence in Smart Cities\u0026mdash;Applications, Barriers, and Future Directions: A Review\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSmart Cities\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 7(3), pp. 1346\u0026ndash;1389.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWong, L.-W. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;Artificial intelligence-driven risk management for enhancing supply chain agility: A deep-learning-based dual-stage PLS-SEM-ANN analysis\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Production Research\u003c/em\u003e. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, 62(15), pp. 5535\u0026ndash;5555.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWuest, T. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) \u0026lsquo;The triple bottom line of smart manufacturing technologies: An economic, environmental, and social perspective\u0026rsquo;, in \u003cem\u003eThe Routledge Handbook of Smart Technologies\u003c/em\u003e. Routledge, pp. 312\u0026ndash;332.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXu, P. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2021) \u0026lsquo;Blockchain as supply chain technology: considering transparency and security\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Physical Distribution \u0026amp; Logistics Management\u003c/em\u003e. Emerald Publishing Limited, 51(3), pp. 305\u0026ndash;324.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYin, C. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2021) \u0026lsquo;Interrelations between sea hub ports and inland hinterlands: Perspectives of multimodal freight transport organization and low carbon emissions\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eOcean \u0026amp; Coastal Management\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 214, p. 105919.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eY\u0026uuml;ksel, I. (2012) \u0026lsquo;Developing a multi-criteria decision making model for PESTEL analysis\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Business and Management\u003c/em\u003e. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 7(24), p. 52.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhu, Q., Duan, Y. and Sarkis, J. (2024) \u0026lsquo;Supply chain carbon transparency to consumers via blockchain: does the truth hurt?\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eThe International Journal of Logistics Management\u003c/em\u003e. Emerald Publishing Limited, 35(3), pp. 833\u0026ndash;864.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eŽic, J. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) \u0026lsquo;Exploring Green Inventory Management through Periodic Review Inventory Systems\u0026mdash;A Comprehensive Literature Review and Directions for Future Research\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eSustainability\u003c/em\u003e. MDPI, 16(13), p. 5544.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZrelli, I. and Rejeb, A. (2024) \u0026lsquo;A bibliometric analysis of IoT applications in logistics and supply chain management\u0026rsquo;, \u003cem\u003eHeliyon\u003c/em\u003e. Elsevier, 10(16).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Chart 1","content":"\u003cp\u003eChart 1 is available in the Supplementary Files section.\u003c/p\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"Ferdowsi University of Mashhad","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"AI-driven supply chain optimization, Autonomous freight systems, Digital logistics transformation, Sustainability, Blockchain, Systematic literature review","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6086101/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6086101/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThe global supply chain has progressed beyond conventional logistics, incorporating digital technology, sustainability, and automation. It involves interrelated processes that convert raw resources into finished goods. The rising complexity from cross-border legislation, currency volatility, and evolving market demands requires decision-making driven by AI, Big Data, and automation. This study does a Systematic Literature Review of 65 journal papers (2010\u0026ndash;2024) to analyze developments in logistics via AI, digital innovation, and sustainability. In contrast to conventional models characterized by static decision-making, emerging frameworks integrate AI-driven optimization, blockchain transparency, and real-time data for predictive forecasting. Furthermore, autonomous freight transportation, encompassing self-driving trucks, drone-assisted last-mile delivery, and hyperloop cargo systems, is transforming global logistics. Findings underscore significant transformations in supply chain strategy, focusing on sustainable mobility, carbon footprint mitigation, and integrated digital logistics. This analysis delineates research deficiencies and proposes avenues for future investigation into autonomous logistics and AI-driven systems in freight management.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"AI-Driven Digital Transformation and Sustainable Logistics: Innovations in Global Supply Chain Management","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-02-27 06:52:34","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6086101/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"b2638f60-cde8-4f6b-849b-b9e42f0e8a8a","owner":[],"postedDate":"February 27th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-02-27T06:52:34+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-02-27 06:52:34","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6086101","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6086101","identity":"rs-6086101","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}