NON-TOXIC ACID-FREE GLYOXAL FIXATIVE FOR VETERINARY HISTOPATHOLOGY, IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR ANALYSIS

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

This study found that a non-toxic, acid-free glyoxal fixative preserved gross features, ultrastructure, and molecular analysis outcomes comparably or better than formaldehyde, with some exceptions for erythrocyte and mast cell staining.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Formaldehyde fixation is worldwide the most used system for histopathological examination. However, its toxicity is well known, and preservation of proteins and nucleic acids is not optimal. Alternative fixatives warranting similar morphological quality of tissues and costs, but lacking toxicity and allowing better preservation of proteins and nucleic acids would therefore increase both safety of operators and quality of molecular analysis in pathology. This multi-institutional study aimed to compare the morphological, histochemical, immunohistochemical (IHC), and molecular analyses outcomes of a newly patented, non-toxic, acid-free Glyoxal (GAF) fixative with neutral buffered formaldehyde (NBF). Tissues from a total of 73 subjects were analyzed, including 13 necropsies. Gross features were preserved after GAF fixation, with no tissue hardening or discoloration. Cellular ultrastructure was also better preserved with GAF and histology and histochemistry on GAF-fixed samples showed good results when compared to NBF-fixed samples, with the exception of loss of tinctorial affinity of erythrocytes and mast cell granules. IHC analyses also showed comparable results with only slight and rare protocol adjustment. DNA and RNA yields were higher from GAF-fixed samples (P<0.05) and the tested genes ( p53 and COX1 ) were better amplified. RNA scope showed positive results for c-KIT expression in GAF-fixed mast cell tumors. Based on these data, the non-toxic GAF fixative allows good macroscopical, histological and immunohistochemical analyses of tissue samples, including on-field application, and better molecular analyses when compared to NBF. This represents a promising possibility for teaching, diagnostic, and research in veterinary pathology.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-18T06:52:13.688204+00:00