Integrating Quantum Mechanics into Protein-Ligand Docking: Toward Higher Accuracy and Reliability

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract I introduce two new methods, QFVina and QFVinardo, for protein-ligand docking that leverage precomputed high-quality conformational libraries with QM-optimized geometries and ab initio DFT-D4-based conformational rankings and strain energies. These methods provide greater accuracy in docking-based virtual screening by addressing the inaccuracies in intramolecular relative energies of conformations, a critical component often misrepresented in flexible ligand docking calculations. I demonstrate that numerous force field-based methods widely used today exhibit substantial errors in conformational relative energies, and that it is unrealistic to expect better accuracy from the faster scoring functions typically employed in docking. Consistent with these findings, I show that traditional flexible ligand docking often produces geometries with significant strain energies and large deviations, with magnitudes comparable to the protein-ligand binding energies themselves and much larger than the differences we aim to estimate in docking hitlists. By using physically realistic ligand conformations with accurate strain energies in the scoring function, QFVina and QFVinardo produce markedly different docking results, even with the same docking parameters and scoring functions for protein-ligand interaction energies. I analyzed these differences in docking hitlists and selected protein-ligand interactions using three protein targets from COVID-19 research.
Full text 10,403 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Integrating Quantum Mechanics into Protein-Ligand Docking: Toward Higher Accuracy and Reliability | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Integrating Quantum Mechanics into Protein-Ligand Docking: Toward Higher Accuracy and Reliability Laszlo Fusti-Molnar This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5433993/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract I introduce two new methods, QFVina and QFVinardo, for protein-ligand docking that leverage precomputed high-quality conformational libraries with QM-optimized geometries and ab initio DFT-D4-based conformational rankings and strain energies. These methods provide greater accuracy in docking-based virtual screening by addressing the inaccuracies in intramolecular relative energies of conformations, a critical component often misrepresented in flexible ligand docking calculations. I demonstrate that numerous force field-based methods widely used today exhibit substantial errors in conformational relative energies, and that it is unrealistic to expect better accuracy from the faster scoring functions typically employed in docking. Consistent with these findings, I show that traditional flexible ligand docking often produces geometries with significant strain energies and large deviations, with magnitudes comparable to the protein-ligand binding energies themselves and much larger than the differences we aim to estimate in docking hitlists. By using physically realistic ligand conformations with accurate strain energies in the scoring function, QFVina and QFVinardo produce markedly different docking results, even with the same docking parameters and scoring functions for protein-ligand interaction energies. I analyzed these differences in docking hitlists and selected protein-ligand interactions using three protein targets from COVID-19 research. Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files QFDockingCovid19Paper1CSVs.tar.gz Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5433993","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":385030193,"identity":"c807cf6d-103c-4111-b4a6-6b9a24b1e5a3","order_by":0,"name":"Laszlo Fusti-Molnar","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"QuantumFuture Scientific Buda","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Laszlo","middleName":"","lastName":"Fusti-Molnar","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-11-11 18:08:11","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5433993/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5433993/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":73243922,"identity":"8f517a94-a79f-4538-9d90-139b5208727e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-01-08 06:46:59","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2869525,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"QFDocking1v2.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5433993/v1_covered_6a8605ea-90dc-409f-bcae-1c47aec673aa.pdf"},{"id":70660691,"identity":"2d7ac94a-04bd-494d-b355-a507b2196210","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-12-05 10:51:35","extension":"gz","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":9454,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"QFDockingCovid19Paper1CSVs.tar.gz","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5433993/v1/d9b9bed971e9f558673209ba.gz"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Integrating Quantum Mechanics into Protein-Ligand Docking: Toward Higher Accuracy and Reliability","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5433993/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5433993/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eI introduce two new methods, QFVina and QFVinardo, for protein-ligand docking that leverage precomputed high-quality conformational libraries with QM-optimized geometries and \u003cem\u003eab initio\u003c/em\u003e DFT-D4-based conformational rankings and strain energies. These methods provide greater accuracy in docking-based virtual screening by addressing the inaccuracies in intramolecular relative energies of conformations, a critical component often misrepresented in flexible ligand docking calculations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eI demonstrate that numerous force field-based methods widely used today exhibit substantial errors in conformational relative energies, and that it is unrealistic to expect better accuracy from the faster scoring functions typically employed in docking. Consistent with these findings, I show that traditional flexible ligand docking often produces geometries with significant strain energies and large deviations, with magnitudes comparable to the protein-ligand binding energies themselves and much larger than the differences we aim to estimate in docking hitlists.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBy using physically realistic ligand conformations with accurate strain energies in the scoring function, QFVina and QFVinardo produce markedly different docking results, even with the same docking parameters and scoring functions for protein-ligand interaction energies. I analyzed these differences in docking hitlists and selected protein-ligand interactions using three protein targets from COVID-19 research.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Integrating Quantum Mechanics into Protein-Ligand Docking: Toward Higher Accuracy and Reliability","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-12-05 10:43:30","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5433993/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"9313673a-dcbe-43e4-bdfa-33df1bfd1f75","owner":[],"postedDate":"December 5th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-01-08T06:38:46+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-12-05 10:43:30","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5433993","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5433993","identity":"rs-5433993","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0