The differences between findings at laparoscopy and at subsequent fertility surgery
other
OA: closed
public-domain-us
AI-generated summary
In 42 patients, re-laparoscopy revealed significantly fewer discrepancies from subsequent fertility microsurgery findings compared to initial laparoscopy, supporting the utility of meticulous surgical assessment.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
In a series of 42 patients, the findings during fertility microsurgery were compared to the findings at both laparoscopy performed by referring gynaecologists and re-laparoscopy performed in our regimen. Since significantly fewer discrepancies were found in the latter group, this re-laparoscopy may be considered useful and justified. The importance of meticulous laparoscopy is emphasized.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-20T09:27:46.357103+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:09:35.489789+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-25T06:33:09.130943+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine