Introduction
Dysmenorrhea affects nearly 80% of adolescents, with severe
cases that may indicate rare Müllerian duct anomalies, such
as “accessory cavitated uterine mass (ACUM)” (1). ACUM is
characterized by progressive worsening of dysmenorrhea,
potentially related to gubernaculum dysfunction, and the
presence of a non-communicating, accessory uterine cavity,
without other uterine anomalies (2-4). Differential diagnoses
include juvenile cystic adenomyosis, rudimentary cavitated
uterine horns, and degenerated leiomyomas. Diagnostic
criteria for ACUM include an isolated accessory cavitated mass;
a normal uterus, fallopian tubes, and ovaries; excised mass
with confirmatory histopathological examination; an accessory
cavity lined by endometrial epithelium with glands and stroma;
chocolate-brown fluid content; and no adenomyosis except
for small foci of myometrium adjacent to the mass. ACUMs are
typically located on the anterior uterine wall (3).
ACUM is an uncommon pathological condition, primarily
observed in young individuals, characterized by severe
dysmenorrhea and recurrent pelvic pain (5). The
accompanying pain often localizes to the side of the mass
and does not respond well to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs (NSAIDs) or combined oral contraceptives (COC) (3).
The primary treatment for ACUM is surgical excision, which
provides permanent relief and recovery. We present a 17-year-
old adolescent girl diagnosed with ACUM, detailing her
diagnostic process, surgical management, and follow-up visits.
Address for Correspondence: Mehmet Tunç
e-mail:
[email protected] ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8646-0619
DOI: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2025.2025-10-5
Cite this article as: Tunç M, Önalan G, Coşkun M, Haberal AN, Kuşçu ÜE. Accessory cavitated uterine mass: A rare cause of severe dysmenorrhea with
literature review. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc.
Received: October 13, 2025 Accepted: December 15, 2025 Epub: January 22, 2026
Abstract
We present a rare Müllerian anomaly known as “accessory cavitated uterine mass (ACUM),” which causes severe, refractory dysmenorrhea, and
review the literature. A 17-year-old patient experienced severe, cyclic left-sided pelvic pain, correlating with menstruation. Magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) revealed a cystic lesion surrounded by myometrial tissue. Medical treatment with oral contraceptives was unsuccessful.
Laparoscopic excision of the mass was performed, and histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of ACUM. At six months postoperatively, she
remained asymptomatic, and follow-up MRI showed a normal-appearing uterus. ACUM is a rare Müllerian anomaly that is challenging to diagnose
preoperatively, even with advanced imaging. Surgical excision remains the definitive treatment. This case highlights the importance of clinicians
considering Müllerian anomalies in adolescents presenting with severe dysmenorrhea. [J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. ]
Keywords
Accessory cavitated uterine mass, ACUM, severe dysmenorrhea, Müllerian anomaly, juvenile cystic adenomyosis
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
2Department of Radiology, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
3Department of Pathology, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
Mehmet Tunç1, Göğşen Önalan1, Mehmet Coşkun2, Asuman Nihan Haberal3, Ülkü Esra Kuşçu1
Accessory cavitated uterine mass: A rare cause of
severe dysmenorrhea
Tunç et al.
ACUM: A rare cause of severe dysmenorrhea and review of the literature
Case report
A left-sided 27x10 mm mass with a hemorrhagic component
on the anterior corpus of the uterus, suggesting a non-
communicating uterine horn, was detected by pelvic ultrasound
in a 17-year-old patient with severe cyclic dysmenorrhea. Pelvic
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a hemorrhagic
segment within the mass, surrounded by myometrial tissue
(Figure 1). Laparoscopic mass excision with diagnostic
hysteroscopy was scheduled to assess for any ostia from the
cavitated mass into the endometrial cavity, after refractory pain
during medical treatment with COC.
Both tubal ostia were patent during hysteroscopy, which
revealed a regular endometrial cavity without signs of any
accessory cavity or ostia.
Subsequently, laparoscopic resection of the mass was
performed (Figures 2-5). A brief video of the operation is
available in Video 1. The following steps were performed
during surgery. Firstly, the opening of the anterior surface of the
uterine peritoneum. After that, a uterine mass was observed
on the left side of the uterus. The incision was extended along
the left round ligament. Unipolar cautery was used for the
excision of the mass. During cauterization, chocolate-brown
colored endometriotic fluid was released from the cavitated
uterine mass. The fluid was aspirated from the cavitated mass.
Following that step, the ACUM was enucleated from the uterus.
After the excision of the mass, the resulting uterine defect was
repaired with V-Loc™ suture.
The procedure was well tolerated with no postoperative
complications. She was discharged the next day. Histopathology
confirmed the endometrial glands and stroma within the
cavity tissue, with small foci of adenomyosis in the adjacent
myometrium. At six months postoperatively, she reported
resolution of dysmenorrhea with regular menstrual cycles, and
Figure 1. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging image
of the mass (accessory cavitated uterine mass)
Figure 2. Opening of the anterior surface of the uterine
peritoneum
Figure 3. Endometrial lumen of the accessory cavitated
uterine mass
Figure 4. Suturing of the myometrial defect
Tunç et al.
ACUM: A rare cause of severe dysmenorrhea and review of the literature
follow-up MRI showed a normal appearing uterus (Figure 6).
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient and
her parents for both the surgical procedure and the publication
of this case report, with approval of the Başkent University Non-
Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (approval
number: 22/226, date: 28.12.2022).board.
Discussion
This case report illustrates ACUM, highlighting its symptoms,
diagnostic evaluation (pelvic ultrasound and MRI), medical
management, surgical excision, and follow-up. The initial
physical examination revealed a mass on ultrasound and
pelvic MRI consistent with ACUM. Medical treatment provided
minimal relief, leading to laparoscopic resection. The patient’s
symptoms completely resolved following the excision.
ACUM is a rare Müllerian anomaly and is often difficult to
diagnose preoperatively due to its infrequent occurrence and
similarities to other pelvic conditions. In adolescents, severe
cyclic dysmenorrhea, refractory to NSAIDs or COCs, should raise
suspicion for Müllerian anomalies. The differential diagnosis
should include pedunculated myomas, endometriomas, and
para-ovarian cysts (6). Literature describes similar lesions under
various names, including juvenile cystic adenomyoma, cystic
adenomyoma, cystic adenomyosis, and accessory cavitated
mass. The term ACUM is now preferred and has replaced the
term “juvenile cystic adenomyoma” due to reflecting the nature
of the condition more accurately, as described by Takeda et al.
(7). Recently, Sachedina Parhar et al. (8) proposed the term
“accessory uterine cavities” for this entity. Precise diagnosis
depends on intraoperative and histopathological findings.
Our case meets the established diagnostic criteria for ACUM (3).
While MRI can suggest the diagnosis, definitive confirmation
requires surgical excision and histopathological examination
(9). Video footage from the presented patient’s surgery
illustrates the drainage of chocolate-brown fluid, indicative of
old blood, as previously reported (6). Histopathological analysis
noted small foci of adenomyosis in the myometrium adjacent
to the mass. Notably, our case differed from most reported
cases of ACUM, which typically present on the right side of the
uterus (10).
Conclusion
ACUM remains a rare form of Müllerian anomaly and is
difficult to diagnose preoperatively despite advanced imaging
techniques. Surgical excision performed through laparotomy
or laparoscopy remains the definitive treatment. Laparoscopic
procedures are associated with a lower complication rate
and higher operative satisfaction (11). This aim of this report
was to highlight this rare condition and so remind clinicians
to consider Müllerian anomalies in this patient demographic.
This report highlights the need to consider ACUM in the
differential diagnosis of severe dysmenorrhea. It underscores
the importance of including ACUM in the differential diagnosis
and highlights the effectiveness of surgical excision for long
term relief. Moreover, we offer a step-by-step video for ACUM
excision. The complete resolution of our patient’s symptoms
without complications highlights the effectiveness and safety
of the surgical approach.
Video 1.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2025.2025-10-5.video1
Ethics
Ethics Committee Approval: This study was approved by the
Başkent University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics
Committee (approval number: 22/226, date: 28.12.2022).
Figure 6. Magnetic resonance imaging image of the uterus
after surgery
Figure 5. Final appearance of the uterus
Tunç et al.
ACUM: A rare cause of severe dysmenorrhea and review of the literature
Informed Consent: Written informed consent was obtained
from the patient and her parents for both the surgical procedure
and the publication.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by the
authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study
received no financial support.
References
1. Agarwal AK, Agarwal A. A study of dysmenorrhea during
menstruation in adolescent girls. Indian J Community Med. 2010;
35: 159-64.
2. Deng F, Liu K, Huang Y, Chen Q, Wang L, Xiao X, et al. Successful
treatment of a rare giant accessory cavitated uterine mass: a case
report. J Int Med Res. 2024; 52: 3000605241252238.
3. Acién P , Bataller A, Fernández F, Acién MI, Rodríguez JM, Mayol MJ.
New cases of accessory and cavitated uterine masses (ACUM): a
significant cause of severe dysmenorrhea and recurrent pelvic pain
in young women. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27: 683-94.
4. Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saravelos SH, Gordts S, Exacoustos
C, Van Schoubroeck D, et al. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE
consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Gynecol Surg.
2016; 13: 1-16.
5. Garofalo A, Alemanno MG, Sochirca O, Pilloni E, Garofalo G,
Chiadò Fiorio Tin M, et al. Accessory and cavitated uterine mass
in an adolescent with severe dysmenorrhoea: from the ultrasound
diagnosis to surgical treatment. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017; 37: 259-61.
6. Paul PG, Chopade G, Das T, Dhivya N, Patil S, Thomas M. Accessory
cavitated uterine mass: a rare cause of severe dysmenorrhea in
young women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22: 1300-3.
7. Takeda A, Sakai K, Mitsui T, Nakamura H. Laparoscopic
management of juvenile cystic adenomyoma of the uterus: report
of two cases and review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol.
2007; 14: 370-4.
8. Sachedina Parhar A, Mellor A, Moeed S, Grover SR. Accessory
uterine cavities: a review of cases and an appeal for standard
terminology. Fertil Steril. 2025; 123: 1101-13.
9. Bedaiwy MA, Henry DN, Elguero S, Pickett S, Greenfield M.
Accessory and cavitated uterine mass with functional endometrium
in an adolescent: diagnosis and laparoscopic excision technique. J
Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013; 26: e89-91.
10. Acién P , Acién M, Fernández F, José Mayol M, Aranda I. The cavitated
accessory uterine mass: a Müllerian anomaly in women with an
otherwise normal uterus. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116: 1101-9.
11. Otten LA, Lama S, Otten JW , Winkler K, Ralser DJ, Egger EK, et al.
Clinical comparison of laparoscopic and open surgical approaches
for uterus-preserving myomectomy: a retrospective analysis on
patient-reported outcome, postoperative morbidity and pregnancy
outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025; 311: 1359-69.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.