A systematic review and ALE meta-analysis of cognitive control, motivation and effort-based decision-making in schizophrenia and mood disorders: Implications for multidimensional apathy

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Background Apathy is present in about 50% of patients suffering from schizophrenia (SZ) and mood disorders (MD). Even though these two disorders are different, in psychiatry, apathy refers typically to the same unidimensional clinical entity, sharing the same pathophysiological processes and symptoms regardless of the underlying diagnosis. Neurology proposes another perspective: three forms of apathy —emotional, executive, and initiative— are related to a disturbance in motivational processing, cognitive control, and effort-based decision-making, respectively. We explored whether this latter model can be applied in psychiatry by identifying differences between SZ and MD through a PRISMA meta-analysis of imaging studies on motivational, cognitive control, and effort-based decision-making networks. Methods We searched the Sleuth BrainMap database for studies on SZ, MD, and/or healthy controls using tasks that explore motivation, cognitive control, and effort-based decision-making. Twenty-eight functional MRI studies were identified and included for a coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation analysis. Results In SZ, hypoactivity in the motivational structures, a specific hyperactivity in the right cerebellar vermis that has previously been linked to emotional blunting and apathy, and a lack of activation during effort-based decision-making that could imply an impaired reward processing, suggest a dominant form of emotional apathy. In MD, hypoactivity in both cognitive control and motivational structures, which has previously been linked to the co-occurrence of executive difficulty and amotivation, suggests a dominant mix of emotional/executive apathy. Conclusions Despite a small number of studies, our results could help target new individualized treatment strategies in precision psychiatry based on a multidimensional approach to apathy. Graphical abstract The results of this meta-analysis highlight different activation profiles in SZ and in MD during motivational, cognitive control, and effort-based decision-making tasks, suggesting a dominant form of emotional apathy in SZ and a dominant coexistence of emotional and executive apathy in MD.
Full text 2,270 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Apathy is present in about 50% of patients suffering from schizophrenia (SZ) and mood disorders (MD). Even though these two disorders are different, in psychiatry, apathy refers typically to the same unidimensional clinical entity, sharing the same pathophysiological processes and symptoms regardless of the underlying diagnosis. Neurology proposes another perspective: three forms of apathy —emotional, executive, and initiative— are related to a disturbance in motivational processing, cognitive control, and effort-based decision-making, respectively. We explored whether this latter model can be applied in psychiatry by identifying differences between SZ and MD through a PRISMA meta-analysis of imaging studies on motivational, cognitive control, and effort-based decision-making networks.

Methods

We searched the Sleuth BrainMap database for studies on SZ, MD, and/or healthy controls using tasks that explore motivation, cognitive control, and effort-based decision-making. Twenty-eight functional MRI studies were identified and included for a coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation analysis.

Results

In SZ, hypoactivity in the motivational structures, a specific hyperactivity in the right cerebellar vermis that has previously been linked to emotional blunting and apathy, and a lack of activation during effort-based decision-making that could imply an impaired reward processing, suggest a dominant form of emotional apathy. In MD, hypoactivity in both cognitive control and motivational structures, which has previously been linked to the co-occurrence of executive difficulty and amotivation, suggests a dominant mix of emotional/executive apathy.

Conclusions

Despite a small number of studies, our results could help target new individualized treatment strategies in precision psychiatry based on a multidimensional approach to apathy. Graphical abstractThe results of this meta-analysis highlight different activation profiles in SZ and in MD during motivational, cognitive control, and effort-based decision-making tasks, suggesting a dominant form of emotional apathy in SZ and a dominant coexistence of emotional and executive apathy in MD. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-21T06:50:27.635823+00:00