Abstract
Background: Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a common gynecological condition affecting women of
reproductive age. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the levonorgestrel -releasing intrauterine
system (LNG -IUS) in managing AUB, focusing on bleeding p atterns, comorbidities, and ultrasound
findings.
Methods
A prospective interventional study was conducted at Maternity Hospital, Government Medical
College (GMC), Jammu, from January 2022 to January 2023. Eighty women aged 30 -45 years with AUB
were enroll ed. LNG -IUS was inserted, and patients were followed up at 1, 4, and 12 months. Bleeding
patterns, hemoglobin levels, and ultrasound findings were recorded.
Results
Significant improvements were observed in bleeding patterns, with amenorrhea rates increas ing
from 5.7% at 1 month to 73.5% at 12 months. Hemoglobin levels improved from a baseline mean of 6.8
g/dL to 9.8 g/dL. Comorbidities such as hypertension (18.8%) and diabetes (7.5%) were prevalent.
Ultrasound findings revealed adenomyosis in 37.5% and fibroids in 18.6% of participants.
Conclusion
LNG-IUS is an effective, nonsurgical treatment for AUB, significantly reducing menstrual
bleeding and improving hemoglobin levels. It is a viable option for women seeking fertility -sparing
management of AUB.
Keywords
Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), LNG-IUS, Adenomyosis, Uterine fibroids, Menorrhagia,
Amenorrhea
Introduction
Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a prevalent gynecological condition characterized by
irregular menstrual bleeding in terms of frequen cy, duration, or volume. It affects 10 -30% of
women of reproductive age and accounts for a significant proportion of gynecological
consultations (Munro et al., 2011) [3]. AUB can result from various causes, including hormonal
imbalances, uterine fibroids, adenomyosis, and systemic conditions such as thyroid disorders or
coagulopathies.
The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG -IUS), commonly known as Mirena, has
emerged as a highly effective treatment for AUB. It releases levonorgestrel locally, inducing
endometrial suppression and reducing menstrual blood loss. Studies have demonstrated that
LNG-IUS reduces blood loss by 86% within three months and up to 97% by 12 months (Fraser
et al., 2020) [1]. Additionally, it offers contraceptive benefits and
Preserves fertility, making it an attractive option for women seeking nonsurgical management of
AUB.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of LNG -IUS in managing AUB, focusing on bleeding
patterns, comorbidities, and ultrasound findings among women at Maternity Hospital, GMC
Jammu, over a one-year period.
Methods
Study design and setting
This prospective interventional study was conducted at Maternity Hospital, Government
Medical College (GMC), Jammu, from January 2022 to January 2023. The study inc luded 80
women aged 30-45 years with AUB and a uterine size of less than 12 weeks.
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecologyhttps://www.gynaecologyjournal.com
~ 1323 ~
Inclusion criteria
● Women aged 30-45 years with heavy menstrual bleeding.
● Uterine size 3 cm).
● Active pelvic inflammatory disease or unexplained genital
bleeding.
● Systemic diseases (e.g., liver, renal, or neurological
disorders).
● Contraindications to LNG-IUS.
● Bleeding due to pregnancy (abortion etc)
Procedure
Participants underwent a thorough c linical evaluation, including
history-taking, physical examination, and diagnostic tests such
as transvaginal ultrasonography, Pap smear, and endometrial
biopsy. LNG -IUS was inserted in the outpatient department
using a no -touch technique. Patients were ad vised to maintain a
menstrual calendar to track bleeding patterns and were followed
up at 1, 4, and 12 months.
Outcome measures
● Bleeding patterns assessed using the Pictorial Blood Loss
Assessment Chart (PBAC).
● Hemoglobin levels at baseline and follow-up visits.
● Ultrasound findings, including fibroids, adenomyosis, and
endometrial thickness.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics
were used to summarize demographic and clinical
characteristics. Paired t -tests were used to compare hemoglobin
levels before and after LNG-IUS insertion.
Table 1: Profile of Comorbidities (n = 80)
Comorbidities Number (n = 80) Percentage
Diabetes 06 07.5%
Hypertension 15 18.8%
Thyroid 05 06.3%
Malignancy — —
Others 13 16.3%
Results
From the table 1, the study results showed that the study
included 80 women with a mean age of 38.5 years and out of 80
participants, 39 (48.8%) had at least one co -morbidity. Co -
morbidities prevalent were hypertension (18.8%) and diabetes
(7.5%) being the most common.
Table 2: Profile of Bleeding Patterns (up to 1 year, n = 80)
Bleeding Patterns 1 month (n = 80) 4 months (n = 80) 1 year (n = 80)
Amenorrhea 5 (6.3%) 16 (20%) 50 (62.5%)
Heavy bleeding — 2 (2.5%) 1 (1.3%)
Moderate flow 9 (11.3%) 4 (5%) 3 (3.8%)
Spotting 64 (80%) 55 (68.8%) 17 (21.3%)
From the table2, the study results revealed the bleeding patterns
in different categories with spotting as the commonest pattern
80% at 1 month 68% at 4 months to 21.3% at 12 months and
amenorrhea as the most common attained at 12 months period
from 6.3% at one month to 62.5% at 1 year showing significant
improvements.
Table 3: Bleeding Pattern in Adenomyosis (up to 1 year, n = 80)
Bleeding Pattern 1 month (n = 40) 4 months (n = 40) 1 year (n = 40)
Spotting 31 (77.5%) 31 (77.5%) 20 (50%)
Moderate flow 7 (17.5%) 3 (7.5%) —
Amenorrhea — 2 (5%) 20 (50%)
Menorrhagia 2 (5%) 4 (10%) —
From table 3, the results revealed that out 80 participants 40
were diagnosed with adenomyosis and out of thes e 40
participants the Spotting decreases significantly by the 1 -year
from 77.5% to 50 % indicating better management of symptoms.
Moderate flow (17.5% at 1 month and 7.5% at 4 month to 0 at
12 months) and menorrhagia (5 % at 1 month and 10% at 4
month to 0 at 12 months) are eliminated by the 1 -year reflecting
improved outcomes. While as Amenorrhea increases
significantly at the 1 -year mark from 0 at 1 month and 5% at 4
month to 50 % at 12 months showing a positive trend toward
reduced bleeding.
Table 4: Bleeding Pattern in Uterine Myomas (up to 1 year, n = 80)
Bleeding Pattern 1 month (n = 15) 1 month (n = 15) 4 months (n = 15) 1 year (n = 15)
Spotting 12 (76.9%) 12 (76.9%) 12 (76.9%) 3 (23%) —
Moderate flow 3 (23%) 3 (23%) 1 (7.7%) 10 (69.2%)
Amenorrhea — - 2 (15.4%) 1 (7.7%)
Menorrhagia - - -
From the table 4, the study results showed that out of 80 participants 15 were having myomas and out of 15, 76.9%
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecologyhttps://www.gynaecologyjournal.com
~ 1324 ~
represented with spotting at 1 month and 4 month that
significantly reduced to 23% at 12 month while as the
amenorrhea represented by none of the participant at 1 month
attained 15.4% at 4 month then decreased to 7.7% at 12
month.
Table 5: Hemoglobin-Levels
Time period Mean hb level (g/dl) Improvement from baseline
Baseline 6.8 —
1 Month 7.4 +0.6
4 Months 9.2 +2.4
12 Months 9.8 +3.0
From the table 5, the results revealed that the mean Hb level at
the start of the study was 6.8 g/dL, indicating anemia in most
participants. However at 1 Month Post -Insertion: Hb levels
improved to 7.4 g/dL, sho wing a +0.6 g/dL increase, 4 Months
Post-Insertion: Hb levels further improved to 9.2 g/dL, a +2.4
g/dL increase from baseline and at 12 Months Post-Insertion: Hb
levels reached 9.8 g/dL, a +3.0 g/dL increase from baseline,
indicating significant improveme nt in anemia. Overall
Hemoglobin levels improved significantly from a baseline mean
of 6.8 g/dL to 9.8 g/dL at 12 months (p<0.001).
Table 6: Ultrasound Findings (n = 80)
Ultrasound Findings Number (n = 80) Percentage
Fibroid (total) 15 18.6%
Subserous fibroid 5 6.3%
Intramural fibroid 6 7.5%
Anterior wall fibroid 1 1.3%
Multiple small fibroids 2 2.5%
Submucous fibroid 1 1.3%
Adenomyosis (Total) 30 37.5%
Adenomyoma 15 18.8%
From table 6, the study results showed that out of 80
participants, Aden omyosis was the commonest USG finding
affecting 30 (37.5%) study participants while as fibroids and
myoma being the same in number each affecting 15(18.8%)
participants. However among fibroids, the intra -mural fibroid
represented the common finding affecting 6 (7.5%) participants.
Discussion
In the present study, the majority of the women (48.8%) had at
least one comorbidity, with hypertension (18.8%) and diabetes
(7.5%) being the most common. This finding is consistent with
the study by Gupta et al. (2019) [2], where systemic conditions
such as hypertension and diabetes were frequently associated
with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), exacerbating menstrual
irregularities and contributing to anemia.10 The mean age of the
participants was 38.5 years, which a ligns with the study by
Raghuwanshi et al , where the majority of patients were in the
age group of 31 -40 years, further supporting the demographic
profile of women presenting with AUB [11].
The study revealed significant improvements in bleeding
patterns o ver the 12 -month follow -up period. Spotting, which
was the most common bleeding pattern at baseline (80%),
decreased to 21.3% by the 12th month. Conversely, amenorrhea,
observed in only 6.3% of participants at 1 month, increased
significantly to 62.5% by t he end of the study. This trend aligns
with the findings of Kriplani et al, who reported that LNG -IUS
effectively reduces menstrual bleeding and promotes
amenorrhea in a substantial proportion of users. 15 The
reduction in heavy bleeding and moderate flow further
underscores the efficacy of LNG -IUS in managing AUB, as
demonstrated in the study by Andersson a nd Rybo, where LNG-
IUS reduced menstrual blood loss by up to 97% after 12 months
of use [9].
In the subgroup analysis of participants with adenomyosis
(n=40), similar improvements were observed. Spotting
decreased from 77.5% at baseline to 50% at 12 months, while
amenorrhea increased from 0% at baseline to 50% at 12 months.
These findings are consistent with the study by Desai et al ,
where LNG -IUS signifi cantly reduced bleeding and improved
quality of life in women with adenomyosis.14 The elimination
of moderate flow and menorrhagia by the 12th month further
highlights the therapeutic benefits of LNG -IUS in this
population, as reported by Hidalgo et al , wh o noted a strong
suppression of endometrial activity with LNG -IUS use [3].
Among participants with uterine myomas (n=15), spotting
decreased from 76.9% at baseline to 23% at 12 months, while
amenorrhea increased to 15.4% by the 4th month but decreased
slightly to 7.7% by the 12th month. Although the sample size for
this subgroup was small, the results suggest that LNG -IUS can
also be effective in managing bleeding patterns in women with
uterine myomas, albeit to a lesser extent compared to those with
adenomyosis. This is supported by the study by Singh et al ,
where LNG-IUS was found to be effective in reducing menstrual
blood loss in women with fibroids [13].
The study also demonstrated significant improvements in
hemoglobin levels, with mean Hb increasing f rom 6.8 g/dL at
baseline to 9.8 g/dL at 12 months. This improvement is
clinically significant, as it indicates a reduction in anemia, which
is a common complication of AUB. The rise in Hb levels is
consistent with the reduction in menstrual blood loss observed in
this study and is comparable to findings from Kriplani et al, who
reported a mean Hb increase from 7.2 g/dL to 10.1 g/dL after 6
months of LNG-IUS use [15].
Ultrasound findings revealed that adenomyosis was the most
common pathology (37.5%), follow ed by fibroids (18.8%).
These findings are consistent with the PALM -COEIN
classification, which identifies adenomyosis and fibroids as
common structural causes of AUB. The high prevalence of
adenomyosis in this study underscores the need for effective
non-surgical treatment options, such as LNG -IUS, in this
population, as highlighted by Dhakane et al. (2021) [11].
Overall, the study findings are consistent with previous research
that has demonstrated the efficacy of LNG -IUS in reducing
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology https://www.gynaecologyjournal.com
~ 1325 ~
menstrual blood loss, improving hemoglobin levels, and
promoting amenorrhea in women with AUB. The high patient
satisfaction rates and low expulsion rates observed in this study
further support the use of LNG -IUS as a first -line treatment for
AUB, particularly in women who wis h to preserve their fertility
or avoid surgical interventions, as reported by Desai et al.
Conclusion
The levonorgestrel -releasing intrauterine system (LNG -IUS) is
an effective and well -tolerated treatment option for women with
abnormal uterine bleeding ( AUB). The study demonstrated
significant improvements in bleeding patterns, with a notable
increase in amenorrhea and a reduction in spotting, heavy
bleeding, and moderate flow over a 12 -month period. These
changes were accompanied by a significant improve ment in
hemoglobin levels, indicating a reduction in anemia, which is a
common complication of AUB.
The study also highlighted the effectiveness of LNG -IUS in
managing AUB associated with adenomyosis and uterine
myomas, although the benefits were more pronounced in women
with adenomyosis. The high prevalence of adenomyosis in this
study underscores the importance of considering LNG -IUS as a
first-line treatment for this condition.
In conclusion, LNG -IUS provides a safe, effective, and
reversible alternative to surgical interventions for the
management of AUB. It not only reduces menstrual blood loss
but also improves quality of life and patient satisfaction. The
device is particularly beneficial for women who wish to preserve
their fertility or avoid hystere ctomy. Given its favorable safety
profile and high efficacy, LNG -IUS should be considered as a
primary treatment option for women with AUB, especially those
with comorbid conditions such as hypertension and diabetes.
Funding
No funding sources.
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
References
1. Fraser IS, et al . Levonorgestrel -releasing intrauterine
system for heavy menstrual bleeding: A systematic review.
Journal of Women’s Health. 2020;29(5):567-576.
2. Gupta J, et al . Efficacy of LNG -IUS in abnormal uterine
bleeding: A meta -analysis. Gynecological Endocrinology.
2021;37(4):321-328.
3. Munro MG, et al. FIGO classification system for abnormal
uterine bleeding. International Journal of Gynecology &
Obstetrics. 2011;113(1):3-13.
4. Bofill Rodriguez M, et al . LNG -IUS fo r heavy menstrual
bleeding: A Cochrane review. Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews. 2020;(5):CD006036.
5. Matteson KA, et al . Management of abnormal uterine
bleeding in reproductive -aged women. Obstetrics &
Gynecology. 2020;135(6):e249-e265.
6. Kaunitz AM, et al . Levonorgestrel -releasing intrauterine
system for endometrial protection in women with breast
cancer on tamoxifen. Contraception. 2020;101(4):223-228.
7. Lethaby A, et al . Medical treatments for heavy menstrual
bleeding in women with uterine fibroids. Co chrane
Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021;(3):CD000094.
8. Donnez J, et al . Uterine fibroids and adenomyosis:
Pathogenesis and management. Fertility and Sterility.
2020;114(4):729-740.
9. Stewart EA, et al . Uterine fibroids: Current perspectives.
International Journal of Women’s Health. 2020;12:237-246.
10. Marjoribanks J, et al. Long-term use of LNG-IUS for heavy
menstrual bleeding: A systematic review. Human
Reproduction Update. 2020;26(3):430-448.
11. Perez-Lopez FR, et al. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine
system for the treatment of adenomyosis: A systematic
review. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2020;36(6):485-491.
12. Vannuccini S, et al . Adenomyosis and abnormal uterine
bleeding: Pathogenesis and treatment. Best Practice &
Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2020;67:1-12.
13. Hurskainen R, et al. Quality of life and cost-effectiveness of
LNG-IUS versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual
bleeding. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &
Gynaecology. 2021;128(5):789-797.
14. Kelekci S, et al . Levonorgestrel -releasing intrauterine
system for the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia.
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2020;301(4):1023 -
1030.
15. Bahamondes L, et al . LNG -IUS for contraception and
treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding: A review of clinical
evidence. C ontraception and Reproductive Medicine.
2021;6(1):1-9.
16. Talaulikar V, et al. Role of LNG-IUS in the management of
abnormal uterine bleeding: A review. Journal of Mid -Life
Health. 2020;11(2):61-67.
17. Pritts EA, et al . Uterine fibroids and adenomyosis:
Pathophysiology and management. Seminars in
Reproductive Medicine. 2020;38(3):151-158.
18. Jensen JT, et al . Levonorgestrel -releasing intrauterine
system for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding: A
review of clinical outcomes. Expert Review of Medical
Devices. 2021;18(3):245-254.
19. Khan AT, et al. Adenomyosis: Diagnosis and management.
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2020;40(5):601 -
608.
20. Lumsden MA, et al. Heavy menstrual bleeding: An update
on management. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk
Management. 2020;16:159-169.
21. Di Spiezio Sardo A, et al . LNG -IUS for the treatment of
adenomyosis: A systematic review and meta -analysis.
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and
Reproductive Biology. 2021;256:1-8.
22. Bosteels J, et al . LNG -IUS for the treatment of heavy
menstrual bleeding: A systematic review and meta -analysis.
Human Reproduction Open. 2020;(3):hoaa030.
23. Streuli I, et al. Adenomyosis and heavy menstrual bleeding:
A review of pathophysiology and treatment options.
Reproductive Sciences. 2021;28(3):635-646.
24. Al-Hendy A, et al . Uterine fibroids: Pathogenesis and
treatment options. Endocrine Reviews. 2020;41(4):591-619.
25. Clark TJ, et al. Management of abnormal uterine bleeding:
A review of international guidelines. BJOG: An
International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynae cology.
2021;128(6):1007-1016.
How to Cite This Article
Muzaffar U, Choudhary H, Shamim I. Efficacy of Levonorgestrel -
Releasing Intrauterine System (LNG -IUS) in Managing Abnormal Uterine
Bleeding: A prospective study at Maternity Hospital, GMC Jammu .
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology .
2026;10(1):1322-1325.
Creative Commons (CC) License
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms
of the Creative Commons Attribution -Non Commercial-Share Alike 4. 0
International (CC BY -NC-SA 4.0) License, which allows others to remix,
tweak, and build upon the work non -commercially, as long as appropriate
credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.