WHAT MOTIVATES WOMEN TO TAKE PART IN CLINICAL AND BASIC SCIENCE ENDOMETRIOSIS RESEARCH?*
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This study found that women primarily volunteer for endometriosis research due to potential health benefits for themselves or others and scientific advancement, with financial compensation and pleasing their doctor being weak motivators.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to identify factors motivating women to take part in endometriosis research and to determine if these factors differ for women participating in clinical versus basic science studies. METHODS: A consecutive series of 24 women volunteering for participation in endometriosis-related research were asked to indicate, in their own words, why they chose to volunteer. In addition, the women were asked to rate, on a scale of 0 to 10, sixteen potentially motivating factors. The information was gathered in the form of an anonymous self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: Strong motivating factors (mean score > 8) included potential benefit to other women's health, improvement to one's own condition, and participation in scientific advancement. Weak motivating factors (mean score < 3) included financial compensation, making one's doctor happy, and use of 'natural' products. No difference was detected between clinical and basic science study participants. CONCLUSION: This study is the first study to specifically investigate the factors that motivate women to take part in endometriosis research. Understanding why women choose to take part in such research is important to the integrity of the informed consent process. The factors most strongly motivating women to participate in endometriosis research related to improving personal or public health; the weakest, to financial compensation and pleasing the doctor.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (3)
- Laparoscopic endometriosis treatment: Is it better? 1993
- Laparoscopic endometriosis treatment: is it better? 1993
- Cumulative pregnancy rates in infertile women with endometriosis. 1988
Cited by (2)
References (18)
- Cumulative pregnancy rates in infertile women with endometriosis. via openalex
- Laparoscopic endometriosis treatment: is it better? via openalex
- Laparoscopic endometriosis treatment: Is it better? via openalex
- W1982968065 via openalex
- W1988060963 via openalex
- W1988957357 via openalex
- W1992142227 via openalex
- W2031612057 via openalex
- W2062462938 via openalex
- W2077402012 via openalex
- W2080064490 via openalex
- W2081197785 via openalex
- W2112504141 via openalex
- W2140191831 via openalex
- W2160119656 via openalex
- W2239729290 via openalex
- W1966728252 via openalex
- W1621884446 via openalex
Cited by (2)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-14T06:17:53.580500+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:14:48.452140+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-14T06:35:54.356137+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK