Confidence-Aware Dual-Graph Calibration for Noise-Robust Relation Extraction in Low-Resource Scenarios

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

The paper studies noise-robust relation extraction under low-resource conditions by proposing Confidence-Aware Dual-Graph Calibration (CDGC), which builds two complementary graph views over each sentence: a fixed syntactic dependency graph and a learnable semantic affinity graph. Using a Structure-Guided Semantic Calibration module, it injects syntactic priors to regularize semantic edges, and it applies a confidence-aware denoising scheme based on structural–semantic predictive inconsistency (Jensen–Shannon divergence) to reweight instances and perform confidence-adaptive nucleus pruning without requiring additional clean denoising supervision. Experiments on TACRED, FewRel, SemEval-2010 Task 8, and DocRED show improved extraction performance and better probabilistic calibration, though the work is presented as a preprint under-review and relies on these specific NLP benchmarks and simulated low-resource/noisy-label protocols. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Relation Extraction (RE) models often struggle in real-world settings with data scarcity and noisy supervision, where limited training samples amplify overfitting to spurious correlations and unreliable evidence. Graph-based approaches can exploit structural cues, yet they face a key trade-off: syntactic dependency graphs provide stable but potentially incomplete (and parser-dependent) structures, whereas learnable semantic affinity graphs are more flexible but prone to noisy connections, especially in low-resource regimes.To address these challenges, we propose Confidence-Aware Dual-Graph Calibration (CDGC), a unified framework for noise-robust RE. CDGC constructs two complementary views over the same sentence: a fixed syntactic dependency graph for structural guidance and a learnable semantic affinity graph for contextual interactions. We introduce a Structure-Guided Semantic Calibration module that injects syntactic priors to regularize dense semantic affinities and suppress spurious semantic edges. Furthermore, we devise a confidence-aware denoising strategy that measures structural--semantic predictive inconsistency via Jensen--Shannon divergence, and uses it to reweight unreliable instances and perform confidence-adaptive nucleus pruning on the semantic graph, without requiring additional clean supervision for denoising.Extensive experiments on TACRED, FewRel, and SemEval-2010 Task 8 under diverse low-resource and noisy-label protocols show that CDGC consistently outperforms strong structural and noise-robust baselines; for example, on TACRED with 10% training data and 30% label noise, CDGC improves micro-F1 from 48.7 to 53.2 (+4.5) over RoBERTa. Beyond extraction performance, we explicitly evaluate probabilistic calibration and show that CDGC yields substantially more reliable confidence estimates, reducing ECE from 0.142 to 0.051 and Brier score from 0.354 to 0.185 on the same setting. Additionally, we evaluate on DocRED to demonstrate that the dual-graph framework generalizes to document-level reasoning under low-resource clean supervision.
Full text 13,367 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Confidence-Aware Dual-Graph Calibration for Noise-Robust Relation Extraction in Low-Resource Scenarios | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Confidence-Aware Dual-Graph Calibration for Noise-Robust Relation Extraction in Low-Resource Scenarios Jiafeng Suo, Jian Fang, He wang, Yang Xiao This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8872718/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 6 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Relation Extraction (RE) models often struggle in real-world settings with data scarcity and noisy supervision, where limited training samples amplify overfitting to spurious correlations and unreliable evidence. Graph-based approaches can exploit structural cues, yet they face a key trade-off: syntactic dependency graphs provide stable but potentially incomplete (and parser-dependent) structures, whereas learnable semantic affinity graphs are more flexible but prone to noisy connections, especially in low-resource regimes.To address these challenges, we propose Confidence-Aware Dual-Graph Calibration (CDGC), a unified framework for noise-robust RE. CDGC constructs two complementary views over the same sentence: a fixed syntactic dependency graph for structural guidance and a learnable semantic affinity graph for contextual interactions. We introduce a Structure-Guided Semantic Calibration module that injects syntactic priors to regularize dense semantic affinities and suppress spurious semantic edges. Furthermore, we devise a confidence-aware denoising strategy that measures structural--semantic predictive inconsistency via Jensen--Shannon divergence, and uses it to reweight unreliable instances and perform confidence-adaptive nucleus pruning on the semantic graph, without requiring additional clean supervision for denoising.Extensive experiments on TACRED, FewRel, and SemEval-2010 Task 8 under diverse low-resource and noisy-label protocols show that CDGC consistently outperforms strong structural and noise-robust baselines; for example, on TACRED with 10% training data and 30% label noise, CDGC improves micro-F1 from 48.7 to 53.2 (+4.5) over RoBERTa. Beyond extraction performance, we explicitly evaluate probabilistic calibration and show that CDGC yields substantially more reliable confidence estimates, reducing ECE from 0.142 to 0.051 and Brier score from 0.354 to 0.185 on the same setting. Additionally, we evaluate on DocRED to demonstrate that the dual-graph framework generalizes to document-level reasoning under low-resource clean supervision. relation extraction noisy supervision graph neural networks calibration Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Reviewers agreed at journal 31 Mar, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 19 Feb, 2026 Reviewers invited by journal 19 Feb, 2026 Editor assigned by journal 17 Feb, 2026 Submission checks completed at journal 17 Feb, 2026 First submitted to journal 13 Feb, 2026 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8872718","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":595280443,"identity":"0a854ebb-14f5-4ed8-9390-4ee3aa3daf06","order_by":0,"name":"Jiafeng Suo","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Jilin Communications Polytechnic","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jiafeng","middleName":"","lastName":"Suo","suffix":""},{"id":595280445,"identity":"e1a73e56-56b2-468a-897c-7cb2ba88e38c","order_by":1,"name":"Jian Fang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Jilin Communications Polytechnic","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jian","middleName":"","lastName":"Fang","suffix":""},{"id":595280448,"identity":"8f2322ed-03bc-4ac5-9f44-7d17128717a4","order_by":2,"name":"He wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Jilin Communications Polytechnic","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"He","middleName":"","lastName":"wang","suffix":""},{"id":595280453,"identity":"c571193e-e27b-42f8-93d0-daad844750c8","order_by":3,"name":"Yang Xiao","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Jilin Communications Polytechnic","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yang","middleName":"","lastName":"Xiao","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-02-13 14:08:10","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8872718/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8872718/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":103506294,"identity":"5728723f-4734-4545-8580-15aa15153685","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-26 13:34:55","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":992394,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"upload.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8872718/v1_covered_a5706c34-ceeb-4290-ad45-8508a7348184.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Confidence-Aware Dual-Graph Calibration for Noise-Robust Relation Extraction in Low-Resource Scenarios","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"neural-processing-letters","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"nepl","sideBox":"Learn more about [Neural Processing Letters](http://link.springer.com/journal/11063)","snPcode":"11063","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/11063/3","title":"Neural Processing Letters","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"relation extraction, noisy supervision, graph neural networks, calibration","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8872718/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8872718/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eRelation Extraction (RE) models often struggle in real-world settings with data scarcity and noisy supervision, where limited training samples amplify overfitting to spurious correlations and unreliable evidence. Graph-based approaches can exploit structural cues, yet they face a key trade-off: syntactic dependency graphs provide stable but potentially incomplete (and parser-dependent) structures, whereas learnable semantic affinity graphs are more flexible but prone to noisy connections, especially in low-resource regimes.To address these challenges, we propose Confidence-Aware Dual-Graph Calibration (CDGC), a unified framework for noise-robust RE. CDGC constructs two complementary views over the same sentence: a fixed syntactic dependency graph for structural guidance and a learnable semantic affinity graph for contextual interactions. We introduce a Structure-Guided Semantic Calibration module that injects syntactic priors to regularize dense semantic affinities and suppress spurious semantic edges. Furthermore, we devise a confidence-aware denoising strategy that measures structural--semantic predictive inconsistency via Jensen--Shannon divergence, and uses it to reweight unreliable instances and perform confidence-adaptive nucleus pruning on the semantic graph, without requiring additional clean supervision for denoising.Extensive experiments on TACRED, FewRel, and SemEval-2010 Task 8 under diverse low-resource and noisy-label protocols show that CDGC consistently outperforms strong structural and noise-robust baselines; for example, on TACRED with 10% training data and 30% label noise, CDGC improves micro-F1 from 48.7 to 53.2 (+4.5) over RoBERTa. Beyond extraction performance, we explicitly evaluate probabilistic calibration and show that CDGC yields substantially more reliable confidence estimates, reducing ECE from 0.142 to 0.051 and Brier score from 0.354 to 0.185 on the same setting. Additionally, we evaluate on DocRED to demonstrate that the dual-graph framework generalizes to document-level reasoning under low-resource clean supervision.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Confidence-Aware Dual-Graph Calibration for Noise-Robust Relation Extraction in Low-Resource Scenarios","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-02-24 15:00:06","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8872718/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"101014778361650530771886115899349322158","date":"2026-03-31T15:59:07+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"258420339988445764739523369755762091394","date":"2026-02-19T14:47:31+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2026-02-19T11:09:02+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2026-02-17T07:38:22+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2026-02-17T07:36:22+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Neural Processing Letters","date":"2026-02-13T13:57:08+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"neural-processing-letters","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"nepl","sideBox":"Learn more about [Neural Processing Letters](http://link.springer.com/journal/11063)","snPcode":"11063","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/11063/3","title":"Neural Processing Letters","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"6de34e4c-17c5-4c4b-9dd8-b1fd4a430dd3","owner":[],"postedDate":"February 24th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-02-24T15:00:06+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-02-24 15:00:06","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8872718","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8872718","identity":"rs-8872718","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-20T11:00:21.680559+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0