Abstract
Cellulose-based materials used in endometriosis surgeries, can trigger histiocytic reactions that mimic
mucinous lesions. These two cases highlight diagnostic challenges due to misleading special stain
positivity. Accurate biopsy interpretation requires attention to histologic features and detailed
surgical history to avoid misdiagnosis.
Keywords
endometriosis, cellulose based material, mucinous lesions, granuloma
__________________________________________________________________________________
Introduction
Endometriosis is a recurring condition affecting
women of reproductive age. Peritoneal
biopsies are routinely employed for its
diagnosis. According to a study done in 2023,
up to 28% of patients may require additional
surgical intervention within ten years following
complete excision of endometriosis due to
reappearance of symptoms (1). As a result,
repeat biopsies are not uncommon in these
cases; however, endometriosis may not always
be detected in subsequent biopsies. Instead,
post-surgical changes may be observed.
Intraoperative use of haemostatic products
can induce tissue reactions that may lead to
diagnostic histopathology challenges.
Cellulose based materials (CBM) are among
the factors contributing to such complications.
Oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC), which is
a cellulose -based material (CBM), marketed
under the brand Surgicel®, is a widely utilized
haemostatic agent in surgical procedures. This
product facilitates clot formation and
effectively manages minor bleeding (2). While
generally safe and efficien t, its use has been
associated with complications such as foreign
body reactions and granuloma formation,
which can manifest months or years post -
surgery. Special histochemical stains on
subsequent biopsies can complicate the
diagnosis, showing features th at mimic
mucinous lesions, characterized by
intracytoplasmic positivity for mucin stains
such as alcian blue, mucicarmine and and
Periodic Acid-Schiff with diastase
digestion(PAS-D)(3). In addition, they can be
positive for fungal stains such as Grocott
Methenamine Silver (GMS) and Periodic Acid -
Schiff (PAS). Another CBM, Oxiplex gel, is used
intraoperatively to reduce intra -abdominal
adhesion formation. Comprising
carboxymethylcellulose and polyethylene
oxide, Oxiplex gel can induce tissue reactions
similar to those seen with ORC(4).
In this report, we present two cases where the
prior application of CBM during surgical
procedures led to confusing results with
Corresponding author: Dr E.K.D.M. Wickramaratne
Clinipath Pathology, 310, Selby Street North, Osborne Park,
Western Australia
[email protected]
This is an open access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
(CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author
and source are attributed and materials are shared under the same license.
DOI: Journal of Diagnostic Pathology 2025;20(1):10-14.
11
special stains in peritoneal biopsies performed
for the investigation of endometriosis.
Case History
Case 1
A 34-year-old woman with a history of
extensive endometriosis underwent prior
surgical intervention for endometrioma
drainage. During the previous procedure,
Surgicel® was applied as a haemostatic agent.
The subsequent peritoneal biopsy showed
granulomas and aggregates of foamy
histiocytes. These cells demonstrated
positivity for mucin stains, including Alcian
blue, mucicarmine and PAS-D. Additionally, the
specimen was positive for the fungal stain GMS
(Figures 1 and 2). No evidence of
endometriosis was identified in this biopsy.
Case 2
A 40-year-old woman presented with chronic
pelvic pain . She had a history of primary
subfertility and had undergone two previous
laparoscopic procedures abroad, with one
performed in South Africa approximately 11
years prior (records unavailable) and another
in New Zealand approximately 8-9 years prior.
In February 2019, a laparoscopy revealed
extensive intra -abdominal adhesions .
Histological assessment confirmed
endometriosis, which was excised from the
anterior broad ligament peritonea, pelvic
sidewalls and the pouch of Douglas. Oxiplex
was applied to all surgical sites. In July 2022,
the patient underwen t laparoscopic
adhesiolysis for treatment of histologically
confirmed endometriosis from the right
uterosacral ligament and right pelvic sidewall.
Oxiplex was used again during the procedure.
A biopsy from the right anterior broad
ligament peritoneum revealed only reactive
changes, with no histological evidence of
endometriosis. The specimen exhibited groups
of histiocytic cells associated with foreign
material, which were positive for mucin stains
Alcian blue and mucicarmine. PAS staining was
positive but not resistant to diastase digestion.
GMS also demonstrated positivity.
The features of the two cases are summarised
in table 1.
A
B
Figure 1: A - Haematoxylin and eosin-stained section of case 1 showing aggregates of large cells
containing mucin-like material (x400), B - PAS-D positivity in the large mucinous-like cells (x100)
DOI: Journal of Diagnostic Pathology 2025;20(1):10-14.
12
Case 1 Case 2
Age (years) 34 40
Number of previous surgeries 1 4
Type of haemostat used Surgicel® Oxiplex (2 previous surgeries)
Histology Granulomas and aggregates
of foamy histiocytes.
No endometriosis.
Groups of histiocytes with
foreign material.
No endometriosis.
Special stains Alcian blue Positive Positive
Mucicarmine Positive Positive
PAS Positive
(Resistant to diastase)
Positive
(Not resistant to diastase)
GMS Positive Positive
Discussion
These two cases involved distinct CBM types
but showed similar histological features and
special stain characteristics . The first case
involved Surgicel®, which is an ORC derived
from decomposed wood pulp, regenerated
into continuous cellulose fibers (5). Its
haemostatic properties involve pseudo -clot
formation, increased coagulation factor
concentration, and lowering of pH.
Additionally, Surgicel® exhibits in vitro
bactericidal properties against many
bacteria(6). Typically left in -situ post -surgery
for absorption (5), its degradation timeline
varies ( two to six weeks), with granuloma
formation reported between two to thirty-six
months post -implantation(6). Surgicel's pH -
lowering effect can exacerbate local
inflammation(2,5). Degradation reactions
include blood -material interactions,
Figure 2: Figure 2: A - Alcian blue positivity in the large cells mucinous-like cells in case 1 (x40),
B - GMS positivity in the large mucinous-like cells (x40)
Table 1: Summary of clinical and histological findings of the cases
DOI: Journal of Diagnostic Pathology 2025;20(1):10-14.
13
provisional matrix formation, and acute and
chronic inflammation with foreign body
reactions(2,5,6). First described by Ito et al in
1989 as a granuloma to oxidized cellulose (7),
Surgicel-induced granulomas have since been
reported in various anatomical sites including
the gastrointestinal tract, ovaries, thyroid,
mediastinum, nasal cavity, liver, kidney, heart,
brain and adrenal glands(2,7,8).
Patients may present with non -specific
symptoms such as fever, anorexia and weight
loss mimicking malignancy(5). These reactions
can be mistaken for abscesses or tumour
recurrence on postoperative imaging as well,
leading to additional procedures (6,8).
Recognition of these granulomas is important
and pathologists should be familiar with this
condition(2). In the two cases described here,
the cells contained basophilic material
resembling mucin in the haematoxylin and
eosin stained sections, which were also
positive for mucin stains raising the suspicion
of a mucinous lesion. These histopathological
changes have been previously described in
other cases, as laminated fragments within
phagocytic cells with a proteinaceous
background(2). Gao et al. reported a
histopathological appearance characterized by
plump-to-flattened epithelioid cells containing
basophilic material associated with
multinucleated foreign body -giant cells.
However, unlike in the two cases described,
both the epithelioid cells and the basophil ic
Material
tested negative for mucin on PAS
stain(7).
Studies have also described instances where
mucin stains, such as Alcian blue and similar
dyes have a high affinity to cellulose(9).
Staining methods like Grocott methenamine
silver (GMS), Congo red, and PAS can also
highlight cellulose, due to properties similar to
those of native wood (10). In the two cases
reported GMS showed false positivity, similar
to that previously described. In 1994 Kershisnik
et al. reported cases of five women treated
with oxidized regenerated cellulose during
abdominal surgery, that showed collections of
large cells beneath the mesothelial surface
with small, bland nuclei and abundant granular
basophilic cytoplasm. The cells exhibited bright
red staining with mucicarmine, along with
Alcian blue and PAS -D positivity. Such lesions
can be mistaken for mucinous lesions and
diagnosis can be particularly challenging due to
strong mucicarmine and mucin stain positivity
in histiocytic cytoplasm(3). In 2009 Tang et al.
repoted as case related to ORC in which
microscopic examination of rectal serosa
revealed mononuclear cells within the sub
mesothelial stroma, displaying positive
staining with mucicarmine and PAS-D, thereby
complicating diagnosis (11). To minimize the
risk of Surgicel granuloma formation, only the
minimal amount required to achieve
haemostasis should be used, and any excess
should be promptly removed once bleeding is
controlled (5). It is also important to document
its application in the surgical records (2).
In the second case, histological features were
attributed to Oxiplex. Intra -abdominal
surgeries carry risks of peritoneal adhesions,
which can lead to chronic pelvic pain, impaired
fertility, and, in severe cases, intestinal
obstruction with ileus. To miti gate these risks,
a laparoscopically applicable absorbable gel,
Oxiplex (Intercoat, Ethicon, Norderstedt,
Germany), was recently introduced(4). This gel
contains carboxymethylcellulose and
polyethylene oxide, both known to reduce
adhesion formation by pote ntially coating
tissues and inhibiting fibrin interactions on
peritoneal surfaces(4). However, this material
can also cause foreign body type reactions in
tissues causing later histopathological
evaluation challenging. A case report
highlighted initial diagnostic confusion during
frozen section analysis due to excessive foreign
body reacti on to pools of Oxiplex gel,
resembling pseudomyxoma peritonei (4). This
confusion can arise, particularly in frozen
sections, if the pathologist is unaware of
Oxiplex gel use in the patient's history.
Notably, mucin staining with PAS was negative
in this case, unlike the findings in our cases.
Conclusion
Careful histological examination and clinical
history are crucial for an accurate diagnosis.
Pathologists must be aware of the pitfalls of
misinterpreting mucin stains and recognise
DOI: Journal of Diagnostic Pathology 2025;20(1):10-14.
14
mimickers of mucinous morphology. Key
histological features include the histiocytic
nature of lesions and the absence of
cytological atypia, along with a history of prior
use of CBMs at the surgical site. Special stains
can be misleading, falsely staining for mucin,
hence careful microscopic examination and an
accurate clinical history are required for
diagnosis. Distinguishing between
endometriotic deposits and foreign body
reactions during laparoscopy is difficult as both
conditions have a similar appear ance
intraoperatively. When reporting these cases,
additional tissue levels to identify
endometriotic glands and stroma is important
to confirm the presence or absence of
endometriosis as they can also co -exist.
Combining detailed clinical history with
thorough pathological examination is essential
for accurately diagnosing biopsies from
patients investigated and ma naged for
endometriosis.
References
1. Roman H, Chanavaz-Lacheray I, Hennetier C,
Tuech JJ, Dennis T, Verspyck E, et al. Long-term
risk of repeated surgeries in women managed
for endometriosis: a 1,092 patient-series. Fertil
Steril. 2023 Oct;120(4):870 -9.
doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.05.156.
2. Alameer E. Surgicel® granuloma mimicking
recurrent thyroid tumor after thyroidectomy: a
case report and literature review. Cureus. 2023
Oct6;15(10):e46587.
doi:10.7759/cureus.46587.
3. Kershisnik MM, Ro JY, Cannon GH, Ordonez
NG, Ayala AG, Silva EG. Histiocytic reaction in
pelvic peritoneum associated with oxidized
regenerated cellulose. Am J Clin Pathol. 1995
Feb;103(1):27-30. doi:10.1093/ajcp/103.1.27.
4. Wachter DL, Thiel F, Agaimy A. Foreign body
reaction after laparoscopic Oxiplex
administration mimicking peritoneal
adenomucinosis: a potential pitfall in frozen
section. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2012;31(5):542 -
4.
5. Wang H, Chen P. Surgicel® (oxidized
regenerated cellulose) granuloma mimicking
local recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumor:
a case report. Oncol Lett. 2013;5(5):1497 -500.
doi:10.3892/ol.2013.1218.
6. Agudelo-Arrieta M, Sierra Peña JA, Suárez
MJ, Omaña -Álvarez L, Feo Lee OH. Brain
Surgiceloma and concomitant brain abscess by
Cutibacterium acnes: a case report. Interdiscip
Neurosurg Adv Tech Case Manag.
2023;31:101684.
doi:10.1016/j.inat.2023.101684.
7. Gao HW, Lin CK, Yu CP, Yu MS, Chen A.
Oxidized cellulose (Surgicel®) granuloma
mimicking a primary ovarian tumor. Int J
Gynecol Pathol. 2002;21(4):422-3.
8. Lin B, Yang H, Cui M, Li Y, Yu J. Surgicel ™
application in intracranial hemorrhage surgery
contributed to giant -cell granuloma in a
patient with hypertension: case report and
review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol.
2014;12:101. doi:10.1186/1477-7819-12-101.
9. Hubbe M, et al. Analytical staining review.
Bioresources. 2019;14(3):7387-7464.
10. Lewin-Smith MR, Kalasinsky VF, Mullick FG.
Histochemical identification of
microcrystalline cellulose, calcium oxalate, and
talc in tissue sections. Arch Pathol Lab Med.
2011 Aug;135(8):963.
11. Tang KW -K, Lamaro V, Jaworski R.
Peritoneal histiocytic reaction associated with
oxidised regenerated cellulose, a form of
mucicarminophilic histiocytosis. Pathology.
2009 Oct;41(6):598 -600.
doi:10.1080/00313020903071579.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.