Global Patterns and Evolution of Lithium Battery Carbon Emission Research from a Bibliometric Perspective

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14

This bibliometric study analyzed global research on lithium battery carbon emissions from 2008-2025, revealing a shift from technology to environmental and circular economy considerations driven by electric vehicle growth and recycling demand.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14 · read from full text

This preprint uses bibliometric methods to map global research patterns and thematic evolution in lithium battery carbon emissions, drawing records from the Web of Science Core Collection for 2008–2025 and analyzing publication trends, collaborations, keyword co-occurrence, and journal/institution characteristics using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and RStudio. The authors report a three-phase increase in annual publications (2008–2014 germination, 2015–2019 steady growth, 2020–2025 explosive growth), with China and the U.S. dominating output and influence, and Europe/Asia-Pacific contributing via broader international collaboration. Core themes are organized around a Technology–Environment–Circulation framework emphasizing lithium-ion batteries, life cycle assessment, and recycling, alongside a shift from technology optimization toward environmental assessment, circular economy concepts, and later digital governance. The study’s limitation is that it is restricted to Web of Science records and presents statistical mapping rather than experimental or mechanistic findings. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract This study employed bibliometric methods to analyze the global research patterns and evolutionary pathways in lithium battery carbon emissions from the Web of Science Core Collection database spanning 2008 to 2025. With the rise of the global electric vehicle market and the advancement of carbon neutrality policies, this field has evolved from a peripheral topic to a core energy‑environment topic. Using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and RStudio, the research examines publication trends, national and regional collaboration, keyword co‑occurrence, thematic evolution, and core journals and institutions. The main findings indicate that annual publication volume exhibits a three-phase growth trajectory: Initial Germination Period (2008–2014), Steady Growth Period (2015–2019), and Explosive Growth Period (2020–2025). This progression appears closely linked to electric vehicle adoption and rising demand for battery recycling. The landscape is dominated by China and the U.S., with China leading in publication volume and the United States exerting greater influence on research impact. Europe and Asia-Pacific contribute through diversified international collaboration. Research themes coalesce around a Technology–Environment–Circulation ternary framework, with core keywords including “lithium-ion battery,” “life cycle assessment,” and “recycling.” The field has progressed from technological optimization to environmental assessment and circular economy considerations, and more recently shift toward digital governance. Journal analysis reveals pronounced interdisciplinary characteristics, with publications spanning energy, environmental, and multidisciplinary fields. These findings provide a statistical foundation for understanding the dynamic evolution of this field. Future research should emphasize multidisciplinary integration, policy coordination, and systematic evaluation of battery recycling technologies to inform international collaboration and sustainable development policy.
Full text 11,664 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Global Patterns and Evolution of Lithium Battery Carbon Emission Research from a Bibliometric Perspective | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Systematic Review Global Patterns and Evolution of Lithium Battery Carbon Emission Research from a Bibliometric Perspective Xiaojing Yi, Shaowei Huo This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8654596/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract This study employed bibliometric methods to analyze the global research patterns and evolutionary pathways in lithium battery carbon emissions from the Web of Science Core Collection database spanning 2008 to 2025. With the rise of the global electric vehicle market and the advancement of carbon neutrality policies, this field has evolved from a peripheral topic to a core energy‑environment topic. Using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and RStudio, the research examines publication trends, national and regional collaboration, keyword co‑occurrence, thematic evolution, and core journals and institutions. The main findings indicate that annual publication volume exhibits a three-phase growth trajectory: Initial Germination Period (2008–2014), Steady Growth Period (2015–2019), and Explosive Growth Period (2020–2025). This progression appears closely linked to electric vehicle adoption and rising demand for battery recycling. The landscape is dominated by China and the U.S., with China leading in publication volume and the United States exerting greater influence on research impact. Europe and Asia-Pacific contribute through diversified international collaboration. Research themes coalesce around a Technology–Environment–Circulation ternary framework, with core keywords including “lithium-ion battery,” “life cycle assessment,” and “recycling.” The field has progressed from technological optimization to environmental assessment and circular economy considerations, and more recently shift toward digital governance. Journal analysis reveals pronounced interdisciplinary characteristics, with publications spanning energy, environmental, and multidisciplinary fields. These findings provide a statistical foundation for understanding the dynamic evolution of this field. Future research should emphasize multidisciplinary integration, policy coordination, and systematic evaluation of battery recycling technologies to inform international collaboration and sustainable development policy. Lithium battery Carbon emissions Bibliometrics Visualization analysis Technology-Environment-Circulation Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8654596","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Systematic Review","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":589725689,"identity":"031494a2-49ae-4e07-a4f8-3b217fc3ffcb","order_by":0,"name":"Xiaojing Yi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"China Jiliang University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xiaojing","middleName":"","lastName":"Yi","suffix":""},{"id":589725690,"identity":"8f116ac0-050b-4325-aaea-5cc927bd464c","order_by":1,"name":"Shaowei Huo","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"China National Institute of Standardization","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shaowei","middleName":"","lastName":"Huo","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-01-21 03:23:44","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8654596/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8654596/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":108437335,"identity":"eaa1aa04-cd93-4baf-b5bc-0378c69f01fd","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-05-04 15:55:37","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1824380,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"newincludeauthorinformationlinenumberLithiumBatteryCarbonEm.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8654596/v1_covered_9426d7e4-2ba3-4baa-a3ac-3501ce0f7737.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Global Patterns and Evolution of Lithium Battery Carbon Emission Research from a Bibliometric Perspective","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Lithium battery, Carbon emissions, Bibliometrics, Visualization analysis, Technology-Environment-Circulation","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8654596/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8654596/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThis study employed bibliometric methods to analyze the global research patterns and evolutionary pathways in lithium battery carbon emissions from the Web of Science Core Collection database spanning 2008 to 2025. With the rise of the global electric vehicle market and the advancement of carbon neutrality policies, this field has evolved from a peripheral topic to a core energy‑environment topic. Using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and RStudio, the research examines publication trends, national and regional collaboration, keyword co‑occurrence, thematic evolution, and core journals and institutions. The main findings indicate that annual publication volume exhibits a three-phase growth trajectory: Initial Germination Period (2008\u0026ndash;2014), Steady Growth Period (2015\u0026ndash;2019), and Explosive Growth Period (2020\u0026ndash;2025). This progression appears closely linked to electric vehicle adoption and rising demand for battery recycling. The landscape is dominated by China and the U.S., with China leading in publication volume and the United States exerting greater influence on research impact. Europe and Asia-Pacific contribute through diversified international collaboration. Research themes coalesce around a Technology\u0026ndash;Environment\u0026ndash;Circulation ternary framework, with core keywords including \u0026ldquo;lithium-ion battery,\u0026rdquo; \u0026ldquo;life cycle assessment,\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;recycling.\u0026rdquo; The field has progressed from technological optimization to environmental assessment and circular economy considerations, and more recently shift toward digital governance. Journal analysis reveals pronounced interdisciplinary characteristics, with publications spanning energy, environmental, and multidisciplinary fields. These findings provide a statistical foundation for understanding the dynamic evolution of this field. Future research should emphasize multidisciplinary integration, policy coordination, and systematic evaluation of battery recycling technologies to inform international collaboration and sustainable development policy.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Global Patterns and Evolution of Lithium Battery Carbon Emission Research from a Bibliometric Perspective","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-02-16 03:11:13","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8654596/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"54e0c2a7-2652-4d9b-a40f-3675c149e73f","owner":[],"postedDate":"February 16th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[{"type":"decision","content":"Rejected","date":"2026-05-04T15:40:16+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-05-04T15:55:24+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-02-16 03:11:13","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8654596","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8654596","identity":"rs-8654596","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0