DNA damage hypersensitivity in chicken primordial germ cells limits CRISPR-Cas9 editing and supports an shRNA-based screening approach

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Chickens ( Gallus gallus ) are uniquely suited for germline studies because their primordial germ cells (PGCs) can be propagated long-term in vitro and used for germline transmission. To develop a loss-of-function screening platform in chicken PGCs, we compared three perturbation methods: CRISPR/Cas9 knockout, CRISPR interference (CRISPRi), and shRNA-mediated knockdown. We found that CRISPR/Cas9 editing causes severe toxicity in PGCs, with DNA damage hypersensitivity over 20-fold greater than in somatic cells, and with distinct DNA damage checkpoint responses between male (ZZ) and female (ZW) lines. CRISPRi using dCas9-KRAB was ineffective in chicken—likely because of species-specific epigenetic constraints—whereas shRNA knockdown produced robust, nontoxic gene silencing. These results identify DNA damage hypersensitivity as a major barrier to nuclease-based editing in the germline and establish RNAi as a feasible platform for genome-wide functional screening in chicken PGCs.
Full text 997 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Chickens (Gallus gallus) are uniquely suited for germline studies because their primordial germ cells (PGCs) can be propagated long-term in vitro and used for germline transmission. To develop a loss-of-function screening platform in chicken PGCs, we compared three perturbation methods: CRISPR/Cas9 knockout, CRISPR interference (CRISPRi), and shRNA-mediated knockdown. We found that CRISPR/Cas9 editing causes severe toxicity in PGCs, with DNA damage hypersensitivity over 20-fold greater than in somatic cells, and with distinct DNA damage checkpoint responses between male (ZZ) and female (ZW) lines. CRISPRi using dCas9-KRAB was ineffective in chicken—likely because of species-specific epigenetic constraints—whereas shRNA knockdown produced robust, nontoxic gene silencing. These results identify DNA damage hypersensitivity as a major barrier to nuclease-based editing in the germline and establish RNAi as a feasible platform for genome-wide functional screening in chicken PGCs.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-13T06:45:44.122212+00:00