Options for Future European Reusable Booster Stages: Evaluation and Comparison of VTHL and VTVL Return Methods

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07+body, 2026-07-05

This study evaluates and compares vertical take-off, vertical landing (VTVL) and vertical take-off, horizontal landing (VTHL) methods for European reusable booster stages.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-05 · read from full text

This paper reports on the DLR-led ENTRAIN parametric system study comparing two reusable rocket booster return strategies: vertical take-off vertical landing (VTVL) and vertical take-off horizontal landing (VTHL). The authors design multiple launcher concepts varying propellant combinations, staging velocities, and engine cycles, and then evaluate them for performance, technical difficulties, operational aspects, size, mass, and complexity. A major limitation stated in the provided text is that the work is presented as a preprint (not peer reviewed at the time of posting), later published in CEAS Space Journal. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract In the past the majority of system studies on reusable space transportation performed within Europe focused on concepts relying on lift-generating wings for recovery. Recently, vertically landing concepts similar to those deployed successfully by SpaceX have moved to the center of technical attention. Both recovery and landing strategies have their pros and cons and it is not obvious what would be a sound choice for Europe. Therefore, the German Aerospace Center DLR initiated a parametric system study, named ENTRAIN, that evaluates the impact of different return options on the launcher design on a technical level: the vertical take-off, vertical landing method (VTVL) as used by SpaceX compared to the vertical take-off, horizontal landing (VTHL) method as used for the Space Shuttle. Within this study, launchers were designed using different propellant combinations, staging velocities and engine cycles. The designed launchers are evaluated in this paper regarding performance, technical difficulties, operational aspects, size, mass and complexity.
Full text 13,258 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Options for Future European Reusable Booster Stages: Evaluation and Comparison of VTHL and VTVL Return Methods | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Options for Future European Reusable Booster Stages: Evaluation and Comparison of VTHL and VTVL Return Methods Sven Stappert, Ingrid Dietlein, Jascha Wilken, Leonid Bussler, and 1 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3972618/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 04 Nov, 2024 Read the published version in CEAS Space Journal → Version 1 posted 10 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract In the past the majority of system studies on reusable space transportation performed within Europe focused on concepts relying on lift-generating wings for recovery. Recently, vertically landing concepts similar to those deployed successfully by SpaceX have moved to the center of technical attention. Both recovery and landing strategies have their pros and cons and it is not obvious what would be a sound choice for Europe. Therefore, the German Aerospace Center DLR initiated a parametric system study, named ENTRAIN, that evaluates the impact of different return options on the launcher design on a technical level: the vertical take-off, vertical landing method (VTVL) as used by SpaceX compared to the vertical take-off, horizontal landing (VTHL) method as used for the Space Shuttle. Within this study, launchers were designed using different propellant combinations, staging velocities and engine cycles. The designed launchers are evaluated in this paper regarding performance, technical difficulties, operational aspects, size, mass and complexity. Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 04 Nov, 2024 Read the published version in CEAS Space Journal → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 23 Jul, 2024 Reviews received at journal 23 Jul, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 03 Jul, 2024 Reviews received at journal 25 Mar, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 28 Feb, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 26 Feb, 2024 Reviewers invited by journal 23 Feb, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 23 Feb, 2024 Submission checks completed at journal 20 Feb, 2024 First submitted to journal 20 Feb, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-3972618","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":273884959,"identity":"525a8927-7b55-4b48-9b07-78a7c1829afc","order_by":0,"name":"Sven Stappert","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt Space Launcher System Analysis (SART) Institute of Space Systems","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sven","middleName":"","lastName":"Stappert","suffix":""},{"id":273884960,"identity":"fc83bf52-4892-4942-90bb-8ac65a7855e1","order_by":1,"name":"Ingrid Dietlein","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt Space Launcher System Analysis (SART) Institute of Space Systems","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ingrid","middleName":"","lastName":"Dietlein","suffix":""},{"id":273884961,"identity":"dec201eb-d6b3-4577-bad8-965f429ecad5","order_by":2,"name":"Jascha Wilken","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt Space Launcher System Analysis (SART) Institute of Space Systems","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jascha","middleName":"","lastName":"Wilken","suffix":""},{"id":273884962,"identity":"bf12145a-03c0-4d19-945b-6625e56e64d3","order_by":3,"name":"Leonid Bussler","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt Space Launcher System Analysis (SART) Institute of Space Systems","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Leonid","middleName":"","lastName":"Bussler","suffix":""},{"id":273884963,"identity":"93ed3dff-cef0-485b-8a75-e6529c98ced3","order_by":4,"name":"Martin Sippel","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt Space Launcher System Analysis (SART) Institute of Space Systems","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Martin","middleName":"","lastName":"Sippel","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-02-20 11:14:18","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3972618/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3972618/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12567-024-00571-x","type":"published","date":"2024-11-04T15:57:52+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":68749971,"identity":"1de16fd4-a404-4c2f-9450-f5d7ce4c0f90","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-11-11 16:08:09","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2610866,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"OptionsFutureEuropeanRLVComparisonReturnMethodsSTAPPERT.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3972618/v1_covered_0c55bab4-d70e-4090-8bd7-263dce007edf.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Options for Future European Reusable Booster Stages: Evaluation and Comparison of VTHL and VTVL Return Methods","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"ceas-space-journal","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"ceas","sideBox":"Learn more about [CEAS Space Journal](http://link.springer.com/journal/12567)","snPcode":"12567","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/12567/3","title":"CEAS Space Journal","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3972618/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3972618/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eIn the past the majority of system studies on reusable space transportation performed within Europe focused on concepts relying on lift-generating wings for recovery. Recently, vertically landing concepts similar to those deployed successfully by SpaceX have moved to the center of technical attention.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBoth recovery and landing strategies have their pros and cons and it is not obvious what would be a sound choice for Europe. Therefore, the German Aerospace Center DLR initiated a parametric system study, named ENTRAIN, that evaluates the impact of different return options on the launcher design on a technical level: the vertical take-off, vertical landing method (VTVL) as used by SpaceX compared to the vertical take-off, horizontal landing (VTHL) method as used for the Space Shuttle. Within this study, launchers were designed using different propellant combinations, staging velocities and engine cycles. The designed launchers are evaluated in this paper regarding performance, technical difficulties, operational aspects, size, mass and complexity.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Options for Future European Reusable Booster Stages: Evaluation and Comparison of VTHL and VTVL Return Methods","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-02-22 05:59:02","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3972618/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2024-07-23T13:24:02+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-07-23T09:52:06+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"67248545616176761526046427526938121436","date":"2024-07-03T15:22:10+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-03-25T20:06:23+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"9f4618f1-7416-4ae4-99fc-3cac7b75b829","date":"2024-02-28T15:27:26+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"fba9a43a-3edd-491b-b8bb-f62cccc8f48a","date":"2024-02-26T15:26:08+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2024-02-23T14:03:14+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-02-23T13:05:30+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2024-02-20T13:34:42+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"CEAS Space Journal","date":"2024-02-20T11:11:38+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"ceas-space-journal","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"ceas","sideBox":"Learn more about [CEAS Space Journal](http://link.springer.com/journal/12567)","snPcode":"12567","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/12567/3","title":"CEAS Space Journal","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"50655995-8e02-4868-b92d-1eb4fcbf7a02","owner":[],"postedDate":"February 22nd, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-11-11T16:02:27+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-3972618","link":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12567-024-00571-x","journal":{"identity":"ceas-space-journal","isVorOnly":false,"title":"CEAS Space Journal"},"publishedOn":"2024-11-04 15:57:52","publishedOnDateReadable":"November 4th, 2024"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-02-22 05:59:02","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1007/s12567-024-00571-x","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12567-024-00571-x","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-3972618","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-3972618","identity":"rs-3972618","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"J0_U0BvcaRcwD8yVFaRlm","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0