Faculty Opinions recommendation of Surgical treatment of ovarian endometriomas: state of the art?

In: Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · 2012 · doi:10.3410/f.717952221.793457629 · W4210444682
dataset OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View at publisher

Abstract

To define the role of surgery in the treatment of endometriomas, we review the literature available via PubMed and cross-reference the published data. We analyze the arguments in favor of and against surgical treatment of endometriomas and compare surgical techniques. Pain relief and pregnancy rates of more than 50% after surgery are the most important arguments in favor of surgery. Histologic and biologic markers of ovarian reserve show a risk of decreased ovarian reserve that should be taken into consideration, especially in cases of repeated surgery. Considerable surgical expertise is required, and the lack of comparative studies yields no conclusions on the best surgical technique. Despite the risk of decreased ovarian reserve due to the surgical procedure, surgery has an important role in the treatment of ovarian endometriomas, and more studies are required to define the most appropriate surgical technique.Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. PMID: 22763094

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-14T06:15:46.576397+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK