TMS-Evoked Corticospinal Beta Oscillations in Humans Recorded from Muscles

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

The paper studied whether subthreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over human motor cortex can induce corticospinal beta-band oscillations that are detectable in tonically active muscles, and whether these TMS-evoked signals share neural generators with endogenous beta rhythms. Using single-pulse TMS in healthy participants with concurrent EMG (from muscles) and EEG (to assess cortical responses), the authors systematically varied stimulation intensity, coil orientation, and site, and also used advanced EMG methods to examine motor neuron pool and motor unit–level transmission. They found a robust, short-latency increase in EMG beta activity after TMS, with results across configurations indicating that inhibitory interneurons in primary motor cortex generate the beta response. The study caveat is that the conclusions about generators and propagation are inferred from coherence and projection analyses rather than direct neural recordings. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can entrain oscillatory brain activity, offering a promising approach to study motor-related neural oscillations such as beta rhythms. However, how TMS-induced corticospinal oscillations are generated, propagated, and related to endogenous activity remains unclear, partly due to limitations in brain recording techniques. Recording muscle activity provides an alternative and physiologically grounded window into corticospinal dynamics. Methods We investigated whether subthreshold TMS over the motor cortex induces corticospinal oscillatory activity detectable in muscles, and whether these responses share neural generators with endogenous beta rhythms. Single-pulse subthreshold TMS was applied over the motor cortex in healthy participants while electromyography (EMG) was recorded from tonically active muscles. Stimulation intensity, coil orientation, and stimulation site were systematically varied. Concurrent electroencephalography (EEG) was used to assess cortical responses and corticomuscular transmission. In additional experiments, advanced EMG techniques were employed to track motor neuron pools and characterize how TMS-evoked oscillations are transmitted at the motor unit level. Results TMS elicited a robust and short-latency increase in beta-band activity in the EMG. The analysis of the elicited muscle responses and the comparison of results across different TMS configurations indicate that the beta responses resulted from activation of inhibitory interneurons in the targeted primary motor cortex. Importantly, the characteristics of cortico-muscular coherence and beta projection to the muscles indicate that the elicited beta responses with TMS have same cortical sources as endogenously generated beta activity. Conclusions These findings demonstrate that muscle recordings provide a sensitive and physiologically meaningful readout of TMS-induced corticospinal beta oscillations.
Full text 2,084 characters · extracted from oa-html · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can entrain oscillatory brain activity, offering a promising approach to study motor-related neural oscillations such as beta rhythms. However, how TMS-induced corticospinal oscillations are generated, propagated, and related to endogenous activity remains unclear, partly due to limitations in brain recording techniques. Recording muscle activity provides an alternative and physiologically grounded window into corticospinal dynamics.

Methods

We investigated whether subthreshold TMS over the motor cortex induces corticospinal oscillatory activity detectable in muscles, and whether these responses share neural generators with endogenous beta rhythms. Single-pulse subthreshold TMS was applied over the motor cortex in healthy participants while electromyography (EMG) was recorded from tonically active muscles. Stimulation intensity, coil orientation, and stimulation site were systematically varied. Concurrent electroencephalography (EEG) was used to assess cortical responses and corticomuscular transmission. In additional experiments, advanced EMG techniques were employed to track motor neuron pools and characterize how TMS-evoked oscillations are transmitted at the motor unit level.

Results

TMS elicited a robust and short-latency increase in beta-band activity in the EMG. The analysis of the elicited muscle responses and the comparison of results across different TMS configurations indicate that the beta responses resulted from activation of inhibitory interneurons in the targeted primary motor cortex. Importantly, the characteristics of cortico-muscular coherence and beta projection to the muscles indicate that the elicited beta responses with TMS have same cortical sources as endogenously generated beta activity.

Conclusions

These findings demonstrate that muscle recordings provide a sensitive and physiologically meaningful readout of TMS-induced corticospinal beta oscillations. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Declarations of interest:

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0