Differences in other-directed emotion regulation tracks connectivity between amygdala and prefrontal regions during fairness decisions

Abstract Fairness decisions often integrate affective responses within a social context, yet emotion regulation in this literature has been largely studied as a self-directed process rather than an interpersonal one. We examined how individual differences in other-directed emotion regulation—measured with the Emotion Regulation of Others and Self (EROS) scale—relate to behavioral and neural responses during fairness decisions in 138 adults completing a variant of the Ultimatum Game with human and computer partners during fMRI. Behaviorally, participants who more strongly endorsed worsening others’ emotions rejected unfair offers more frequently, and this tendency interacted with offer fairness to amplify rejection of unfair offers. At the neural level, the left anterior insula tracked offer unfairness more strongly in social versus nonsocial contexts, consistent with sociality modulating the neural encoding of fairness. Right dlPFC activation during socially unfair offers was greater among individuals who preferred to improve others’ emotions. Connectivity analyses revealed that social fairness sensitivity predicted stronger amygdala–orbitofrontal and amygdala–dmPFC coupling; the latter was further amplified among individuals higher in other-directed emotion worsening. Together, these findings identify interpersonal emotion regulation as an understudied source of variation in the affective and prefrontal systems supporting fairness-based social decisions. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes ↵* Denotes co-senior authors