Editorial Expression of Concern: Ovarian stripping versus cystectomy: recurrence of endometriosis and pregnancy rate

editorial OA: gold public-domain-us
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-08-08

An editorial expresses concern regarding potential data inaccuracies, specifically p values in Table 1, and advises readers to interpret the original article's findings cautiously due to unavailable raw data.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by gpt-5.6-luna, 2026-08-11 · read from full text

This editorial expression of concern addresses the article “Ovarian stripping versus cystectomy: recurrence of endometriosis and pregnancy rate,” which compared these surgical approaches in relation to endometriosis recurrence and pregnancy outcomes. After publication, concerns were raised about the p values reported in Table 1, and the authors were unable to provide the raw data because of the time elapsed since publication; readers are therefore advised to interpret the article’s results and conclusions cautiously, and the authors’ agreement with the expression of concern was not stated. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — the expression of concern specifically concerns reported recurrence and pregnancy findings after ovarian stripping versus cystectomy.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 2,296 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Editorial Expression of Concern: Arch Gynecol Obstet (2014) 290:163–167 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3158-z The Editor-in-Chief is issuing an Editorial Expression of Concern for this article to alert readers that, after the publication of this article, concerns were raised regarding the data reported in this article, specifically the p values reported in Table 1. Due to the duration of time since the article was published, the authors have been unable to provide the raw data for this article. Readers are therefore advised to interpret the results and conclusions with caution. The authors did not state whether they agree to this Expression of Concern. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. About this article Cite this article Moscarini, M., Milazzo, G.N., Assorgi, C. et al. Editorial Expression of Concern: Ovarian stripping versus cystectomy: recurrence of endometriosis and pregnancy rate. Arch Gynecol Obstet 313, 244 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-026-08549-2 Published: Version of record: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-026-08549-2

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-19T06:08:28.815611+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-08-19T06:02:05.074954+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-08-19T06:03:43.084120+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine