A Cost Analysis of Overdose Management at a Supervised Consumption Site in Calgary, Canada

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

Background and Aims: We report on a cost study, using population level data to determine the impact of emergency overdose management at supervised consumption services (SCS) versus conventional services. Design: We completed a cost analysis from a payer’s perspective. In this setting, there is a single-payer model of service delivery. Setting: In Calgary, ‘Safeworks Harm Reduction Program,’ was established in late 2017 and offers 24/7 access to SCS. The facility is a nurse-led service, available for client drop-in. We conducted a cost analysis for the entire duration of the program. This covers two years and three months. Measurements: We assessed costs using the following factors, using government health databases: monthly operational costs of providing services for drug consumption, cost of providing EMS for clients with overdoses who could not be revived at the facility, and benefit of EMS costs averted from overdoses that were successfully managed at the SCS. Findings: The proportion of clients who have overdosed at the SCS has decreased steadily for the duration of the program. The number of overdoses that can be managed on site at the SCS has trended upward, currently 98%. Each overdose that is managed at the SCS produces approximately $1,600 CAD in cost savings, with a savings of over $2.3 million for the lifetime of the program. Conclusions: Overdose management at an SCS creates cost savings by offsetting costs required for managing overdoses using emergency services.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0