Surgical or Medical treatment of Endometrioma (SOMA trial)

dataset OA: green CC0
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-30

The SOMA trial, a multicenter randomized controlled study in the Netherlands, evaluated surgical versus medical treatments for ovarian endometrioma in premenopausal women experiencing pain symptoms.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

The provided text does not contain study content from the SOMA trial; it is an automated server protection page describing Anubis proof-of-work and blocking of automated scraping, not biomedical methods or results. Because the actual paper’s population, interventions (surgical vs medical treatment), outcomes, and findings are not included, there are no extractable key results or limitations from the supplied material. The paper cannot be accurately summarized from the text available here. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it is titled “Surgical or Medical treatment of Endometrioma (SOMA trial),” which concerns endometriomas.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The SOMA-trial (Surgery or Medication for women with endometrioMA) was designed as a multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT) along with a prospective cohort. Patients who were willing to participate in the clinical trial but declined randomization were treated according to their preference and participated in the prospective cohort, which followed the same study protocol. This study was carried out in 28 university- and teaching hospitals in the Netherlands and patients were recruited from May 2019 till May 2023. The RCT stopped in June 2021 before the target sample size was reached, mostly because of a strong patient preference for one of the treatment options. Recruitment continued in the prospective cohort. Patients were eligible if they had an ovarian endometrioma with a cyst diameter ≥3 cm (measured by transvaginal ultrasound or MRI). Furthermore, they had to be premenopausal, aged ≥18 years and they had to report at least one of the endometriosis related pain symptoms: dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain or dyspareunia. Patients were excluded if there were signs of deep infiltrating endometriosis (i.e. endometriosis that extends beneath the peritoneum and may affect the uterosacral ligaments, pelvic sidewalls, rectovaginal septum, vagina, bowel, bladder or ureter2) by physical examination and transvaginal ultrasound or MRI), were not able to read, write and understand Dutch or English, and were not able or willing to provide written informed consent. Patients who were assigned or had chosen surgery, received surgical treatment by a gynaecologist according to the technical description and recommendations by the Working Group of the ESHRE, ESGE and WES. Surgical treatment could include: cystectomy, cyst drainage, laser ablation, plasma energy ablation, coagulation, (salpingo)oophorectomy. Unexpected findings during surgery, as well as the performance of adhesiolysis and/or removal of peritoneal tissue or incidental deep infiltrating endometriosis, were also systematically recorded. Treatment with medication could include analgesics and/or hormonal therapy.
Full text 1,083 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Beveiligde verbinding wordt gecontroleerd... Loading... You are seeing this because the administrator of this website has set up Anubis to protect the server against the scourge of AI companies aggressively scraping websites. This can and does cause downtime for the websites, which makes their resources inaccessible for everyone. Anubis is a compromise. Anubis uses a Proof-of-Work scheme in the vein of Hashcash, a proposed proof-of-work scheme for reducing email spam. The idea is that at individual scales the additional load is ignorable, but at mass scraper levels it adds up and makes scraping much more expensive. Ultimately, this is a placeholder solution so that more time can be spent on fingerprinting and identifying headless browsers (EG: via how they do font rendering) so that the challenge proof of work page doesn't need to be presented to users that are much more likely to be legitimate. Please note that Anubis requires the use of modern JavaScript features that plugins like JShelter will disable. Please disable JShelter or other such plugins for this domain.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisdie_deep_infiltratingendometriomadysmenorrheadyspareunia

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-10T11:24:39.924735+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK