Full text
26,906 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Individualized Hybrid Electroconvulsive Therapy (i-HECT) Shows Rapid Anti-Depressant Effect and Improved Cognition in Young Patients with Depression | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Individualized Hybrid Electroconvulsive Therapy (i-HECT) Shows Rapid Anti-Depressant Effect and Improved Cognition in Young Patients with Depression Jing-ya Zhang , Lun Zeng , Jia Li , View ORCID Profile Mian-mian Chen , View ORCID Profile Shu-xian Xu , Baijian Tan , View ORCID Profile Xin-hui Xie doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.01.24311339 Jing-ya Zhang a Department of Clinical Psychology, Second People’s Hospital of Huizhou , Huizhou, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Lun Zeng a Department of Clinical Psychology, Second People’s Hospital of Huizhou , Huizhou, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Jia Li b Electroconvulsive Therapy Room, Second People’s Hospital of Huizhou , Huizhou, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Mian-mian Chen c Department of Psychiatry, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University , Wuhan, Hubei, PR China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Mian-mian Chen Shu-xian Xu c Department of Psychiatry, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University , Wuhan, Hubei, PR China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Shu-xian Xu Baijian Tan a Department of Clinical Psychology, Second People’s Hospital of Huizhou , Huizhou, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Xin-hui Xie c Department of Psychiatry, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University , Wuhan, Hubei, PR China d Brain Function and Psychosomatic Medicine Institute, Second People’s Hospital of Huizhou , Huizhou, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Xin-hui Xie For correspondence: xxh.med{at}gmail.com xin-hui.xie{at}whu.edu.cn Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Background For young patients with depression, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is highly effective but causes acute cognitive side effects. We designed a new i-HECT therapy combines ECT with low-charge electrotherapy (LCE) and individual symptom monitoring to reduce cognitive impairments. Methods i-HECT comprised two treatments: ECT and LCE. ECT utilized an energy set of 1.5 times the seizure threshold (ST), while LCE was set at 0.5 ST. The initial session employed ECT. Subsequent sessions involved ECT or LCE, depending on whether meeting the ECT-LCE transition criteria (MADRS total score < 22 or ≥ 50% reduction), assessed after each session. Results The intention-to-treat analysis revealed an 80.4% response rate and a 58.7% remission rate (Hedges’ g = 3.29). Notably, both subjective and objective cognitive functions significantly improved post-i-HECT treatments and during the 3-month follow-up periods. Conclusion The i-HECT protocol may provide a rapid antidepressant treatment option with cognitive benefits for young depression patients. Highlights Designed a novel but simple ECT protocol, i-HECT, for young depression patients. The trial employed Simon’s optimal two-stage design with a high power of 0.95. The i-HECT rapidly improved both depression symptoms and cognitive functions. 1. Introduction Severe depressive symptoms in young patients can result in significant consequences, underscoring the critical need for prompt and efficacious antidepressant interventions. Although electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) exhibits rapid antidepressant efficacy [ 1 ], young patients experience acute significant memory and cognitive impairments as side effects [ 2 ]. During ECT treatment, symptom reduction is rapid initially, and side effects increase over time. To balance efficacy and side effects, we proposed a new ECT strategy termed Hybrid-ECT. In Hybrid-ECT, the first three sessions use standard bilateral ECT with energy set at 1.5 times the seizure threshold (ST). Thereafter, it transitions to low-charge electrotherapy (LCE) at 0.5 ST. Our previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that Hybrid-ECT maintained similar antidepressant effects to ECT but with significantly fewer side effects [ 3 ]. Furthermore, after reviewing data from both Hybrid-ECTs and ECTs, we noted individual variations in the initial response to ECTs. For instance, while some patients experienced a 50% decline in depression scale scores after a single ECT session, others may require more than nine sessions to achieve similar results. The variability suggested the potential for personalized transition conditions from ECT to LCE within Hybrid-ECT, aiming to optimize therapeutic benefits. Therefore, we devised a new but simple protocol called individualized Hybrid-ECT (i-HECT). Under the i-HECT protocol, we assess patients’ symptoms after each ECT session. If the predetermined ECT-LCE transition criteria are met, we implement the switch. To evaluate the antidepressant efficacy and side effects, particularly cognitive, of i-HECT in young patients with depression, we conducted this trial. 2. Methods This single-arm trial employed a Simon’s optimal two-stage design [ 4 ] with a 3-month follow-up duration, conducted at the Second People’s Hospital of Huizhou (April 2021–November 2023) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki [ 5 ]. Both patients and raters remained blinded to the ECT-LCE transition. The Human Ethics Committee of the Hospital approved the protocol. Patients and their legal guardians can withdraw at any time for any reason. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn , ChiCTR2100045682). 2.1 Patients Inclusion criteria: 1) Age 16–25 years old; 2) Inpatients diagnosed with unipolar or bipolar depression according to ICD-10, with or without psychotic symptoms; 3) Baseline Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) [ 6 ] score ≥ 22. Exclusion criteria: 1) Pregnancy; 2) Participation in other studies within 30 days; 3) Undergoing of ECT or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment within the past 6 months; 4) Previous poor response to ECT; 5) History of substance abuse disorder; 6) Presence of contraindications to ECT or anesthesia risks; 7) History of epilepsy. 2.2 i-HECT procedures ( Figure 1 ) 2.2.1 Basic settings The i-HECT protocol comprised two treatments: ECT (1.5 ST) and LCE (0.5 ST), consistent with our previous report [ 3 ]. ECT/LCE sessions (three times per week) were performed using a spECTRUM 5000Q ECT instrument (MECTA Corporation, OR, USA), with pulse width of 1 ms and a fixed current of 800 mA. The dose titration procedure was performed to determine the ST during the first session. Subsequent treatments were either ECT or LCE based on whether the patient met the criteria for ECT-LCE transition. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Flow chart. Abbreviations: ECT: electroconvulsive therapy; LCE: low-charge electrotherapy; ST: seizure threshold; rTMS: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; MADRS: Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; i-HECT: individualized Hybrid-ECT. 2.2.2 Criteria for ECT-LCE transition When either of the following conditions is met, the next treatment is switched to LCE: a) MADRS total score < 22; b) MADRS total score reduction ≥ 50%. 2.2.3 Criteria for terminating i-HECT treatment After meeting any of the following criteria, i-HECT treatment was terminated and transitioned to the follow-up period: a) Completion of 12 ECT/LCE sessions; b) MADRS total score < 12; c) A consecutive decrease of < 2 points over three MADRS assessments; d) Other reasons, such as voluntary withdrawal or other medical considerations. 2.3 Visit Schedule The five visits were set at 1) baseline; 2) post-ECT-LCE-transition; 3) post-treatment (within 24–48 hour after the last ECT/LCE session); 4) end of the 1-month follow-up period; and 5) end of the 3-month follow-up period. 2.4 Pharmacotherapy Patients maintained their antidepressants and antipsychotics during the trial. Anticonvulsants, mood stabilizers, or lithium were discontinued during the i-HECT treatment. Single dose of alprazolam or oxazepam were prescribed as necessary when patients became agitated or felt anxious, but were prohibited 24 hour before ECT/LCE sessions. When patients suffered from insomnia, zopiclone, eszopiclone, or zolpidem were temporarily prescribed. 2.5 Statistical analysis The primary outcome is the response rate analyzed in the intent-to-treat sample. Response is defined as a reduction of ≥ 50% in MADRS total score relative to baseline at the post-treatment visit. Additionally, achieving a MADRS score ≤ 12 is considered remission. The trial employed an optimal Simon’s two-stage design [ 4 ], with a null threshold referencing O’Reardon et al.’s RCT set at 18.1% [ 7 ], and an alternative threshold referencing Kellner et al.’s RCT set at 43% [ 8 ]. In stage I, 19 patients will be recruited. If 4 or fewer responders are observed, the trial will be halted prematurely. Otherwise, an additional 27 patients will be recruited in stage II. If 13 or more responses among these total 46 patients, the null hypothesis will be rejected, indicating promise for the i-HECT treatment. The design controls the type I error rate at 0.05 and yields the power of 0.95. The secondary outcomes including MADRS and its subscales, 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) [ 9 ], Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) [ 10 ], Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) [ 11 ], and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) [ 12 ]. The subjective cognitive functions were evaluated using Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire, and the objective cognitive functions were evaluated using Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) [ 13 ], and Stroop Color and Word Test [ 14 ]. Orientation recovery tests (ORTs) after each ECT/LCE session were used to measure recovery time after ECT/LCE. Any adverse events (AEs) or drop-out for any reason was recorded to analyze the safety. The linear mixed model and the least square mean (LSM) and its 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to estimate the effects of outcomes at each visit using the LmerTest package [ 15 ] in R (version 4.2.0). 3. Results A total of 46 patients were enrolled. The baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1 . View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 1. Baseline Characteristics. 3.1 Efficacy All patients completed the treatments. Five patients did not complete the 1-month follow-up, and seven patients did not complete the 3-month follow-up ( Figure 1 ). At the post-treatment visit, 37 patients (80.4%) achieved a response, with 27 (58.7%) achieving remission. The mean number of treatment sessions was 6.0 + 2.1, with 3.0 + 1.7 sessions of ECT and 3.2 + 1.6 sessions of LCE. Forty-three patients transitioned from ECT to LCE due to meeting the ECT-LCE transition criteria. Three patients did not meet the criteria and remained on ECTs throughout the trial, all three were non-responders. The reduction in MADRS score was 19.1 + 7.0, with Hedges’ g = 3.29 (95% CI = 2.66 to 3.91). For details, please see sFigure 1 and Table 2 . View this table: View inline View popup Table 2. Clinical and Cognitive Outcomes. Following i-HECT treatments, significant improvements were observed across various measures including MADRS, PHQ-9, GAD-7, C-SSRS, and PANSS. Notably, cognitive function, a key focus of this trial, demonstrated significant improvements in both subjective and objective assessments. ( sFigure 2–4 , and Table 2 ) 3.2 Safety The most commonly reported AEs were memory complaints, headaches, and fatigue. The incidence of these three AEs, along with nausea and dizziness, are notably lower after LCE compared to ECT, and the ORTs after LCEs were significantly shorter than ECTs ( Table 3 ). View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 3. Safety Results. 3.3 Data accessibility The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request. 4. Discussion In brief, i-HECT showed comparable antidepressant efficacy to ECT. Moreover, the most promising outcome was the significant improvement observed in both subjective and objective cognitive functions post-treatment, with this trend continuing during the 3-month follow-up period. Young patients with depression are typically in early stages of their education or career, making prompt intervention imperative. While ECT is a most evidence-supported rapid antidepressant treatment, concerns about cognitive side effects have reduced its use in this population of young patients with depression. However, our i-HECT protocol may provide a new and simple option for addressing these concerns in these young individuals. One major advantage of i-HECT is its compatibility with existing ECT equipment worldwide, requiring no specialized modifications. Another advantage is its simple setup, requiring no additional training for operators. In conclusion, our i-HECT protocol offers promise as a rapid antidepressant treatment for young patients with depression, with the added benefit of improving cognitive function. Its simplicity makes it a potentially valuable treatment option. Data Availability The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request. Supplementary Materials Download figure Open in new tab sFigure 1. Changes in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Note: Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Abbreviations: ECT: electroconvulsive therapy; LCE: low-charge electrotherapy. Download figure Open in new tab sFigure 2. Changes in 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7), and Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Note: Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Abbreviations: ECT: electroconvulsive therapy; LCE: low-charge electrotherapy. Download figure Open in new tab sFigure 3. Changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Note: Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Abbreviations: ECT: electroconvulsive therapy; LCE: low-charge electrotherapy. Download figure Open in new tab sFigure 4. Changes in Objective (RBANS and Stroop tests) and Subjective Cognitive (SCDQ) Functions. Note: Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Abbreviations: RBANS: Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. SCDQ: Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire; ECT: electroconvulsive therapy; LCE: low-charge electrotherapy. Footnotes Conflict of Interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in this work. Funding This work was supported by grant from the Science and Technology Program of Huizhou (Grant No. 2021SC010311001 (Baijian Tan) and 2022CQ010013 (Lun Zeng)) and the Guangdong Medical Research Foundation (Grant No.A2022333 (Lun Zeng)). This work has not received funding/assistance from any commercial organizations. The funding source had no roles in the design of this study and will not have any roles during the execution, analyses, interpretation of the data, or decision to submit results. References [1]. ↵ Ghaziuddin N , Kutcher SP , Knapp P , American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Work Group on Quality Issues . Summary of the practice parameter for the use of electroconvulsive therapy with adolescents . J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2004 ; 43 : 119 – 22 . doi: 10.1097/00004583-200401000-00028 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [2]. ↵ Ghaziuddin N , Laughrin D , Giordani B. Cognitive side effects of electroconvulsive therapy in adolescents . J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2000 ; 10 : 269 – 76 . doi: 10.1089/cap.2000.10.269 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed [3]. ↵ Zhang J , Xu S , Zeng L , Chen L , Li J , Jiang Z , et al. Improved Safety of Hybrid Electroconvulsive Therapy Compared With Standard Electroconvulsive Therapy in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Pilot Trial . Frontiers in Psychiatry 2022 ; 13 . [4]. ↵ Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials . Control Clin Trials 1989 ; 10 : 1 – 10 . doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science [5]. ↵ World Medical Association . World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects . JAMA 2013 ; 310 : 2191 – 4 . doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science [6]. ↵ Montgomery SA , Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change . Br J Psychiatry 1979 ; 134 : 382 – 9 . doi: 10.1192/bjp.134.4.382 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text [7]. ↵ O’Reardon JP , Solvason HB , Janicak PG , Sampson S , Isenberg KE , Nahas Z , et al. Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: a multisite randomized controlled trial . Biol Psychiatry 2007 ; 62 : 1208 – 16 . doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.01.018 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science [8]. ↵ Kellner CH , Knapp R , Husain MM , Rasmussen K , Sampson S , Cullum M , et al. Bifrontal, bitemporal and right unilateral electrode placement in ECT: randomised trial . Br J Psychiatry 2010 ; 196 : 226 – 34 . doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.066183 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text [9]. ↵ Kroenke K , Spitzer RL , Williams JB . The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure . J Gen Intern Med 2001 ; 16 : 606 – 13 . doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science [10]. ↵ Spitzer RL , Kroenke K , Williams JBW , Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7 . Arch Intern Med 2006 ; 166 : 1092 – 7 . doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science [11]. ↵ Posner K , Brown GK , Stanley B , Brent DA , Yershova KV , Oquendo MA , et al. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults . Am J Psychiatry 2011 ; 168 : 1266 – 77 . doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science [12]. ↵ Kay SR , Fiszbein A , Opler LA . The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia . Schizophr Bull 1987 ; 13 : 261 – 76 . doi: 10.1093/schbul/13.2.261 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science [13]. ↵ Randolph C , Tierney MC , Mohr E , Chase TN . The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity . J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1998 ; 20 : 310 – 9 . doi: 10.1076/jcen.20.3.310.823 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science [14]. ↵ Stroop JR . Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions . Journal of Experimental Psychology 1935 ; 18 : 643 . OpenUrl CrossRef Web of Science [15]. ↵ Kuznetsova A , Brockhoff PB , Christensen RHB . lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models . Journal of Statistical Software 2017 ; 82 : 1 – 26 . doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13 . OpenUrl CrossRef View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted August 07, 2024. Download PDF Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Individualized Hybrid Electroconvulsive Therapy (i-HECT) Shows Rapid Anti-Depressant Effect and Improved Cognition in Young Patients with Depression Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Individualized Hybrid Electroconvulsive Therapy (i-HECT) Shows Rapid Anti-Depressant Effect and Improved Cognition in Young Patients with Depression Jing-ya Zhang , Lun Zeng , Jia Li , Mian-mian Chen , Shu-xian Xu , Baijian Tan , Xin-hui Xie medRxiv 2024.08.01.24311339; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.01.24311339 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Individualized Hybrid Electroconvulsive Therapy (i-HECT) Shows Rapid Anti-Depressant Effect and Improved Cognition in Young Patients with Depression Jing-ya Zhang , Lun Zeng , Jia Li , Mian-mian Chen , Shu-xian Xu , Baijian Tan , Xin-hui Xie medRxiv 2024.08.01.24311339; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.01.24311339 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (574) Allergy and Immunology (865) Anesthesia (304) Cardiovascular Medicine (4462) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (445) Dermatology (383) Emergency Medicine (611) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1517) Epidemiology (15251) Forensic Medicine (31) Gastroenterology (1132) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6621) Geriatric Medicine (669) Health Economics (1002) Health Informatics (4564) Health Policy (1372) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1617) Hematology (544) HIV/AIDS (1272) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15938) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1107) Medical Education (624) Medical Ethics (147) Nephrology (670) Neurology (6643) Nursing (346) Nutrition (1001) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1149) Occupational and Environmental Health (957) Oncology (3350) Ophthalmology (981) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (421) Pain Medicine (436) Palliative Medicine (130) Pathology (665) Pediatrics (1698) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (694) Primary Care Research (714) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5465) Public and Global Health (9259) Radiology and Imaging (2212) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1372) Respiratory Medicine (1199) Rheumatology (598) Sexual and Reproductive Health (716) Sports Medicine (533) Surgery (715) Toxicology (100) Transplantation (289) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a03e19636bf68f53',t:'MTc4MDE0Nzg4Ng=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.