Prescribing measures: Unintended negative consequences of mandating standardized mental health measurement
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated summary
This paper discusses the potential unintended negative consequences of mandating standardized mental health measurements for research funding and offers recommendations for mitigation.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
In July 2020, two of the largest funders of mental health research worldwide — the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and the Wellcome Trust — announced plans to standardize mental health measurement. Specifically, obtaining funding for research related to depression and anxiety will be conditional on using four specific measures.While we agree that there are obvious benefits to standardizing mental health measurement, some of which are discussed in the announcement by NIMH and Wellcome, in this paper we focus on potential unintended negative consequences of this initiative, and lay out recommendations for how some of these might be mitigated.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0