Anthropogenic range contraction, temporal sampling bias, and the performance of species distribution models
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Anthropogenic range contraction (ARC) dynamically alters species ranges, which can be problematic for correlational species distribution modelling (SDM). We used a virtual ecologist approach to simulate ARC and temporally-biased sampling, demonstrate its link to two principal forms of data misrepresentation, and investigate the outcomes to SDM performance. Occurrences sampled before ARC were mismatched against contemporary anthropogenic pressures (‘occurrence-habitat mismatching’), which impeded predictions of species responses to those pressures and produced models that underestimated the impact of human activity on species distribution. Occurrences sampled after ARC were truncated representations of historically realised niches (‘niche truncation’), which were carried over onto predictions of species-environment relationships, but were overcome by incorporating an appropriate anthropogenic predictor. Given the pervasive global human footprint and associated ARC, these data misrepresentations are likely inherent in most occurrence datasets and should be interrogated during model development. Accounting for these effects differs depending on the type of data misrepresentation.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-01T06:38:12.426807+00:00