The incidence of unexpected uterine malignancies in hysterectomies carried out for benign indications
other
OA: gold
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the incidence of unexpected uterine malignancies in patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications and to evaluate their clinical characteristics.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent benign hysterectomy in the Department of Gynecology, the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from January 2015 to December 2020. The clinical data of these patients were retrieved and collected.
RESULTS: Their median age was 49.8 years (31-82 years). The mean parity was 1.86 ± 2.54. Their mean BMI was 27.5 ± 7.6 kg/m2. 42.90% were (2438/5683) postmenopausal. The benign indications of procedure were as follows: symptomatic uterine leiomyomas 2218/5683 (39.02%), pelvic organ prolapse 1406/5683 (24.74%), symptomatic endometriosis or adenomyosis 1132/5683 (19.91%), and 927/5683 (16.31%) to treat other benign conditions such as abnormal uterine bleeding, infection, polyps, and endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. In minimally invasive surgery subgroups, 1560/2621 (59.52%) specimens were removed by in-bag manual morcellation through vaginal cuff. The mean operative time of minimally invasive surgery with in-bag morcellation was shorter than abdominal hysterectomy (96.75 ± 35.7 vs. 140 ± 32.6, P < .001), and the estimated blood loss was also less than abdominal hysterectomy (47.35 ± 42.3 vs. 170 ± 60.4, P < .001). A total of 19/5683 (0.33%) unexpected uterine malignancies were recorded, of which 14/5683 (0.26%) were unexpected endometrial carcinomas and 5/5683 (0.08%) were unexpected uterine sarcomas.
CONCLUSION: Preoperative examination in the context of benign hysterectomy must be undertaken with care, and patients should be educated about the very slight possibility of a malignant diagnosis.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-16T06:07:01.518242+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-06-16T06:06:40.169363+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine