Visualiser l’endométriose

In: Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances · 2020 · vol. 14(3) · doi:10.4000/rac.6867 · W3081979061
article OA: diamond CC0

Abstract

Cet article porte sur la vision professionnelle des radiologues spécialisé·e·s dans l’endométriose. Le diagnostic y est appréhendé comme un dispositif d’authentification des corps. Il s’agit d’aborder, d’une part, les enjeux liés à la division du travail médical et, d’autre part, ceux liés à l’apprentissage d’habiletés techniques et sensorielles, en cherchant à montrer leur imbrication et leurs implications pour faire advenir au monde une maladie – l’endométriose. La démonstration procède en deux temps : la première partie porte sur le travail de légitimation de l’expertise visuelle des radiologues à travers un travail de frontières avec la chirurgie gynécologique ayant entraîné un déplacement de juridiction au sein du processus diagnostique ; la deuxième partie se centre sur la façon dont les radiologues apprennent à voir l’endométriose et à donner sens aux images produites par le biais de la mobilisation d’un ensemble de prises et repères perceptuels.
Full text 7,406 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abbott, A. (1988). The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Batt, R. (2011). A history of endometriosis. London: Springer. Beaulieu, A. (2001). Voxels in the brain: Neuroscience, Informatics and Changing Notions of Objectivity. Social Studies of Science. 31(5), 635-680. Beaulieu, A. (2002). Images Are Not the (Only) Truth: Brain Mapping, Visual Knowledge, and Iconoclasm. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 27(1), 53-86. Bessy, C., Chateauraynaud, F. (1993). Les ressorts de l’expertise. In Conein, B., Dodier, N., Thévenot, L. (dir.). Les objets dans l’action. De la maison au laboratoire. Paris : Les Editions de l’EHESS. Bessy, C., Chateauraynaud, F. (2014 [1995]). Experts et faussaires. Pour une sociologie de la perception. Paris : Pétra. Blume, S. S. (1992). Insight and Industry: On the Dynamics of' Technological Change in Medicine. Cambridge: MIT Press. Boullier, D. (1995). Du patient à l’image radiologique : une sociologie des transformations. Techniques et culture, 25/26, 19-34. Burri, R. V. (2008). Doing distinctions: Boundary work and symbolic capital in radiology. Social Studies of Science. 38(1), 35-62. Burri, R. V., Dumit, J. (2008). Social Studies of Scientific Imaging and Visualization. In Hackett, E.J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., Wajcman, J. (dir.). The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge: MIT Press. Cartwright, L. (1995). Screening the Body: Tracing Medicine's Visual Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Chateauraynaud F. (1997). Vigilance et transformation. Présence corporelle et responsabilité dans la conduite des dispositifs techniques. Réseaux, 85(15), 101-127. Cohn, S. (2004). Increasing resolution, intensifying ambiguity: An ethnographic account of seeing life in brain scans. Economy and Society. 33(1), 52-76. Daston, L., Galison P. (2007). Objectivity. New York: Zone Books. Didi-Huberman. 2014 [1982]. Invention de l’hystérie. Charcot et l’Iconographie photographique de la Salpêtrière. Paris : Editions Macula. Dodier, N. (1993). Les arènes des habiletés techniques. In Conein, B., Dodier, N., Thévenot, L. (dir.). Les objets dans l’action. De la maison au laboratoire. Paris : Les Editions de l’EHESS. Dodier, N. (2003). Leçons politiques de l’épidémie du sida. Paris : Editions de l’EHESS. Dodier, N., Barbot, J. (2008). Autonomy and Objectivity as Political Operators in the Medical World: Twenty Years of Public Controversy about AIDS Treatments in France. Science in Context. 21(3), 403-434. Dodier, N., Barbot, J. (2016). La force des dispositifs. Annales « Histoire, Sciences Sociales ». 71(2), 421-450. Duden, B. (1991). The Woman Beneath the Skin: A Doctor's Patients in Eighteenth-Century Germany. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Dumit, J. (1999). Objective Brains, Prejudicial Images. Science in Context. 12(1), 173-201. Estival, C. (2012). Incidences de l’imagerie médicale sur la pudeur dans la relation patients-soignants. Histoire, médecine et santé. 1, 77-91. Foucault, M. (1963). Naissance de la clinique. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France. Gieryn, T. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review. 48(6), 781-795. Golan, T. (2004). The Emergence of the Silent Witness: The Legal and Medical Reception of X-rays in the USA. Social Studies of Science. 34(4), 469-499. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist. 96(3), 606-633. Haute Autorité de Santé. (2017). Prise en charge de l’endométriose. Consulté sur https://www.has-sante.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/2018-01/prise_en_charge_de_lendometriose_-_recommandations.pdf Joyce, K. (2005). Appealing Images: Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Production of Authoritative Knowledge. Social Studies of Science. 35(3), 437-462. Joyce, K. (2006). From Numbers to Pictures: The Development of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Visual Turn in Medicine. Science as Culture. 15(1), 1-22. Kevles, B. H. (1997). Naked to The Bone: Medical Imaging in The Twentieth Century. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. Koch, E. B. (1993). In the Image of Science? Negotiating the Development of Diagnostic Ultrasound in the Cultures of Surgery and Radiology. Technology and Culture. 34(4), 858-893. Koechlin, A. (en cours). Les mobilisations professionnelles et politiques autour d’une spécialité de la santé des femmes, la gynécologie médicale (1931-2020). Thèse de doctorat en sociologie, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris. Latour, B. (1985). Les vues de l’esprit. Culture Technique. 14, 5-29. Laws, S. (1990). Issues of blood: The politics of menstruation. Hampshire: Macmillan. Lynch, M. (1985). Discipline and the Material Form of Images: An Analysis of Scientific Visibility. Social Studies of Science. 15(1), 37-66. Lynch, M., Woolgar, S. (dir.) (1990 [1988]). Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge: MIT Press. Mitchell, L. (2001). Baby’s First Picture. Toronto: University Toronto Press. Nezhat, C., Nezhat, F., Nezhat, C. (2012). Endometriosis: ancient disease, ancient treatments. Fertility and Sterility. 98(6S), S1-S62. Norman, D. A. (1993). Les artefacts cognitifs. In Conein, B., Dodier, N., Thévenot, L. (dir.). Les objets dans l’action. De la maison au laboratoire. Paris : Les Editions de l’EHESS. Pasveer, B. (1989). Knowledge of shadows: the introduction of X-ray images in medicine. Sociology of Health and Illness. 11(4), 360-383. Pasveer, B. (2006). Representing or Mediating. A History and Philosophy of x-ray Images in Medicine. In Pauwels, L. (dir.). Visual cultures of science: rethinking representational practices in knowledge building and science communication. Hanover, London: University Press of New England. Rapp, R. (1998). Real-Time Fetus: The Role of the Sonogram in the Age of Monitored Reproduction. In Downey, G. L., Dumit J. (dir.). Cyborgs and Citadels: Anthropological Interventions in Emerging Sciences and Technologies. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press. Sandell, K. (2010). Learning to produce, see and say the (ab)normal: Professional vision in ultrasound scanning during pregnancy. In Johnson, E., Berner, B. (dir.). Technology and Medical Practice: Blood, Guts and Machines. Farnham: Ashgate. Schnegg, C., Rey, S. (2017). Quand les morts passent un scanner. Anthropologie & Santé, 15. Schubert, C. (2011). Making sure. A comparative micro-analysis of diagnostic instruments in medical practice. Social Science and Medicine. 73, 851-857. Seear, K. (2009). The etiquette of endometriosis: Stigmatisation, menstrual concealment and the diagnostic delay. Social Science and Medicine. 69(8), 1220-1227. Shafrir A. L. et al. (2018). Risk for and consequences of endometriosis: A critical epidemiologic review. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Souffron, V. (2015). De l’autopsie à la virtopsie : Voir et ne pas y toucher. Communications. 97(2), 57-71. Young, A (1995). The Harmony of Illusions: Inventing Post–Traumatic Stress Disorder. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Yoxen, E. (1989 [1987]). Seeing with sound: a study of the development of medical images. In Bijker, W., Hughes, T., Pinch, T. (dir.). The Social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (2)

References (43)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK