Comparison of questionnaires used for the evaluation of patients with chronic pelvic pain

In: Neurourology and Urodynamics · 2013 · vol. 32(8) , pp. 1074–1079 · doi:10.1002/nau.22364 · PMID:23359143 · W1605964721
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This study compared pain, bladder complaints, and quality of life questionnaires in chronic pelvic pain patients, finding varying correlations and suggesting distinct assessments for different symptom domains.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

AIMS: Comparison of questionnaires for the evaluation of symptoms and QoL in patients with CPPS. METHODS: The MPQ-DLV, PDI, NIH-CPSI, ICSI, and PUF, were compared for: pain, bladder complaints, and for QoL. RESULTS: The studied group N = 26 (male: 16; female: 10) showed a good distribution in gender for the age (MW-U: P = 0.6) and BMI (MW-U: P = 0.5). The intraclass correlation (ICC) for pain intensity of MPQ-NWC and MPQ-PRIT was 0.55. The ICC's, for other different pain intensity scores were mostly 0.77. The ICC for NIH-CPSI and PUF-SS was the lowest (=0.48). The QoL showed a global bad correlation (ICC ≤ 0.27) with MPQ-DLV-QoL/PDI, PDI/ICPI, PDI/PUF-BS and ICPI/PUF-BS scoring >0.5. CONCLUSION: When the most used questionnaires for QoL assessment in patients with CPPS are compared, very different results can be found. This indicates that results from one questionnaire cannot be used for overall conclusions concerning pain intensity and QoL. For bladder symptoms the results seem to correspond better. To develop one generally accepted questionnaire would facilitate the interpretation and comparison of data in this condition.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (2)

References (23)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-14T06:15:46.576397+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK