Effects of in vitro hemolysis and repeated freeze-thaw cycles in protein abundance quantification using the SomaScan and Olink assays

preprint OA: closed Public-Domain
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,848 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Abstract SomaScan and Olink are affinity-based platforms that aim to estimate the relative abundance of thousands of human proteins with a broad range of endogenous concentrations. In this study, we investigated the effects of in vitro hemolysis and repeated freeze-thaw cycles in protein abundance quantification across 10,776 (11K SomaScan) and 1472 (Olink Explore 1536) analytes, respectively. Using SomaScan, we found two distinct groups, each one consisting of 4% of all aptamers, affected by either hemolysis or freeze-thaw cycles. Using Olink, we found 6% of analytes affected by freeze-thaw cycles and nearly half of all measured probes significantly impacted by hemolysis. Moreover, we observed that Olink probes affected by hemolysis target proteins with a larger number of annotated protein-protein interactions. We found that Olink probes affected by hemolysis were significantly associated with the erythrocyte proteome, whereas SomaScan probes were not. Given the extent of the observed nuisance effects, we propose that unbiased, quantitative methods of evaluating hemolysis, such as the hemolysis index successfully implemented in many clinical laboratories, should be adopted in proteomics studies. We provide detailed results for each SomaScan and Olink probe in the form of extensive Supplementary Data files to be used as resources for the growing user communities of both platforms. Competing Interest Statement J.C. and L.F. have given unpaid seminars and/or webinars sponsored or co-sponsored by SomaLogic. R.M. has given unpaid seminars sponsored by Olink. Footnotes ↵‡ Co-first authors Minor revision: (1) Keywords were added following the Abstract section; (2) Data and software were made publicly available, adding reference to the OSF public repository; (3) References were updated, adding date of access for pre-prints.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: Public-Domain