Gonorrhea in women seen for routine gynecologic care: Criteria for testing
article
OA: closed
CC0
Abstract
PurposeThis study was initiated to determine risk factors for Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection of the cervix in women seen for routine care in a hospital-based obstetrics and gynecology practice.Patients and methodsExtensive clinical data and cervical culture specimens for N. gonorrhoeae were obtained prospectively from 1,441 women between the ages of 18 and 50. Fifty clinical factors were evaluated by multivariate analysis.ResultsOf the 1,441 patients tested, 25 (1.7 percent) had a positive culture result. The majority of infected women were asymptomatic. The following five factors were found to be associated independently with gonococcal infection: (1) sex with a partner who may have had gonorrhea or a urethral discharge within the prior three months, (2) endocervical bleeding induced by the initial swab, (3) age at first intercourse less than or equal to 16, (4) method of payment (Medicaid), and (5) low abdominal or pelvic pain. Race, a univariate risk factor, was not associated with gonorrhea when these other factors were considered. The risk of infection for women with none, one, two, or three or more of these multivariate risk factors was 0.2, 0.8, 2.9, and 9.8 percent, respectively.ConclusionClinical data are helpful in identifying women at risk for gonorrhea. If resources are insufficient to evaluate all sexually active women, we suggest routine testing based on the presence of the multivariate risk factors identified.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (30)
- doi:10.1001/jama.1986.03370130086029 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.1987.03400060090037 via openalex
- doi:10.2105/ajph.64.7.701 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(77)92720-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.1969.03160280052010 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/sti.51.5.307 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/infdis/137.2.161 via openalex
- doi:10.7326/0003-4819-94-5-715_3 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00007435-198204000-00004 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(77)90737-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/biomet/54.1-2.167 via openalex
- doi:10.7326/0003-4819-108-3-499_2 via openalex
- W1945887335 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.1987.03390180077027 via openalex
- W2227136416 via openalex
- W2404309653 via openalex
- W2405387512 via openalex
- W2414420032 via openalex
- W2417086746 via openalex
- W4300615941 via openalex
- W6640879082 via openalex
- W6818867926 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0002-9378(86)90601-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(85)80105-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1128/jcm.19.3.383-387.1984 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0002-9378(75)90020-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1128/jcm.12.3.301-303.1980 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00005650-198511000-00003 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.1969.03160280049009 via openalex
- doi:10.1128/iai.36.3.1042-1053.1982 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T05:55:38.273849+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-10T06:36:06.991349+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK