Editorial: Minimally invasive surgery in benign gynecological pathology.
Minimally invasive surgery offers safer, less painful, and more effective alternatives to traditional open surgery for benign gynecological conditions, improving patient quality of life through reduced trauma and faster recovery.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This editorial discusses the role of minimally invasive surgery in treating benign gynecological conditions, describing approaches such as laparoscopy, robotics, and natural-orifice or vaginal surgery, and comparing them conceptually with traditional open procedures in terms of patient experience and surgical outcomes. It highlights applications for conditions including uterine fibroids (e.g., laparoscopic myomectomy/hysterectomy and strategies to reduce blood loss), ovarian cyst surgery via transvaginal natural orifice endoscopic surgery, and hysterectomy-related considerations, while acknowledging a limitation that these techniques require specialized training and experience. The author emphasizes reported benefits such as shorter hospital stays, reduced postoperative pain, faster recovery, improved cosmetic outcomes, and lower risks of complications like infection and blood loss, including references to enhanced recovery measures. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it explicitly lists endometriosis among benign gynecological pathologies addressed by minimally invasive surgery, even though it is written as a general editorial rather than an endometriosis-focused study.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
11,391 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 2 sections
· click to expand
References
Keywords
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-16T09:21:09.727480+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00