Paricalcitol and hydroxychloroquine modulates extracellular matrix and enhance chemotherapy efficacy in pancreatic cancer

Paricalcitol and hydroxychloroquine modulates extracellular matrix and enhance chemotherapy efficacy in pancreatic cancer | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Paricalcitol and hydroxychloroquine modulates extracellular matrix and enhance chemotherapy efficacy in pancreatic cancer Bassel El-Rayes, Dhana Reddy, Sujith Sarvesh, Jeremy Foote, Doug Welsch, and 3 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6406693/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 27 Sep, 2025 Read the published version in Cancer Gene Therapy → Version 1 posted 10 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive cancer with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. In a previous publication, our group defined some of the mechanisms that vitamin D analogue paricalcitol (P) and hydroxychloroquine (H) potentiated the effects of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in PDAC. Based on this, we hypothesized that PH may potentiate 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, and this may involve a novel mechanism of extracellular matrix (ECM) modulation. The combination of PH with 5FU/oxaliplatin significantly increased the cell death, apoptosis, and S-phase cell cycle arrest as compared to untreated or 5FU/oxaliplatin treated MIA PaCa-2, HPAC and KPC cell lines. In vivo, the combination therapy inhibited PDAC growth and altered the immune landscape by activating T and NK cells. Proteomic analysis revealed significant reduction in ECM proteins, specifically integrin beta-4 (ITGB4). Confirmation of the role of ITGB4 was performed through genetic knockdown of ITGB4 which led ECM inhibition. In conclusion, the combination of PH significantly enhances the efficacy of oxaliplatin and 5FU. We identified a new mechanism of action of PH through inhibiting ITGB4 leading to ECM modulation. These results suggest that the combination of PH with cytotoxic chemotherapy should be tested in PDAC clinical trials. Biological sciences/Cancer/Gastrointestinal cancer/Pancreatic cancer Biological sciences/Biotechnology/Gene therapy/Targeted gene repair Combination therapy 5-fluorouracil oxaliplatin Extracellular matrix Integrin beta-4 COL1A1 Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Introduction Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most deadly malignancies [ 1 ]. It is estimated that by 2030, PDAC will become second leading cause of cancer related deaths in the U.S. The 5-year survival rate for PDAC is poor (~ 11%) due to its tendency for early metastasis and resistance to systemic treatments including cytotoxic and immune based therapies [ 2 , 3 ]. The resistance to systemic therapies is partly due to the presence of collagen-rich dense extracellular matrix (ECM) [ 4 ]. The PDAC ECM consists of several components such as collagens, glycoproteins, fibronectins, proteoglycans, hyaluronic acid, and laminins. Cancer associated fibroblasts (CAF) play a pivotal role in the development and maintenance of the ECM. PDAC cells interact with ECM components through integrins and receptor tyrosine kinases to form focal adhesion complexes, which help in growth, metastasis, and drug resistance [ 5 , 6 ]. ECM affects the behavior of immune and angiogenic cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) promoting a tumorigenic effects [ 7 ]. The compact and heterogeneous physical network of ECM components inhibit drug delivery further contributing to resistance and poor prognosis [ 8 ]. Therefore, the ECM has pleotropic effects in PDAC facilitating cancer cell survival, metastasis, and chemo-resistance. Modulating the ECM represents a rational approach to inhibit PDAC progression and promote the effects of systemic therapies. Previous reports have indicated that vitamin D analogue such as paricalcitol (P) and hydroxychloroquine (H) have effects on CAF and immune TME. Vitamin D analogues has been shown to suppress activated CAF in PDAC. It has also been shown to suppress the expression of several ECM proteins such as smooth muscle alpha-actin (SMA) in breast cancer [ 9 – 12 ]. H selectively reduced the deposition of ECM in hepatic stellate cells by inhibiting α-SMA and collagen I [ 13 ]. H alleviates renal interstitial fibrosis by inhibiting PI3K/Akt signaling and attenuates ECM and EMT by suppressing NF-κB signaling [ 14 ]. H has also been shown in clinical trials to modulate the immune microenvironment in PDAC [ 15 ]. The effects of the combination of H and P with 5FU-based chemotherapy on modulation of ECM and immune microenvironment in PDAC has not been previously studied. Clinical trial targeting ECM components including matrix metalloproteinase or hyaluronidase in PDAC have resulted in limited success [ 16 ]. The heterogeneity of CAF’s and redundant ECM composition and structure, limits the benefit of these therapies, which are very specifically designed against one component or pathway in the ECM. PDAC cells frequently develop resistance mechanisms, such as alterations in integrin expression and ECM remodeling, which reduce the effectiveness of such treatments. In our prior study, we reported the addition of HP to gemcitabine resulted in immune modulation and effects on autophagy [ 17 ]. These effects were observed in preclinical models and clinical samples from paired biopsies obtained from patients on a trial [ 17 ]. While gemcitabine based therapy is a standard chemotherapy for PDAC, accumulating evidences suggests that 5-FU based regimens may have shown superior efficacy [ 18 ]. Encouraged by the observed effects of PH with gemcitabine, we planned to assess this combination with 5FU-based therapy. In addition, our objective was to evaluate if the mechanisms involved in potentiation of 5FU-based therapy by H and P were mediated through mechanisms involving modulation of immune cells and ECM proteins in the TME. Results Paricalcitol and hydroxychloroquine enhances the growth inhibitory effects of 5FU and oxaliplatin in both murine and human PDAC cells The effects of PH in combination with 5FU and oxaliplatin (oxali) on murine and human PDAC cells were evaluated by dosing the cells with varying concentrations of the drugs and then quantifying the survival rates by cell viability using MTT assay. Human PDAC cell lines MIA PaCa-2 and HPAC, and murine KPC PDAC cells were cultured in the presence of PH, 5FU/oxali either alone or in combination for 72 h (Fig. 1 A-C). The combination treatment was extremely efficient in urging cytotoxicity in all the cell lines. The combination index (CI) values, calculated with PRISM software for dose-effect analysis, designated the presence of a robust synergism between 5FU/oxali with PH, exclusively at lower and intermediary drug doses compared to chemotherapy alone. We then asked whether this potential combination has effect on long-term survival of PDAC cells using clonogenic assays. Treatment of PH with 5FU (10 µM) and oxali (20 µM) inhibited colony-forming ability of PDAC cells (Fig. 1 D and 1 E). PH with 5FU and oxaliplatin combination promotes apoptosis in PDAC cells We analyzed the effect of this combination on inducing apoptosis in PDAC cells. Apoptosis measurement by annexin V and PI staining method. In MIA PaCa-2 cells, apoptosis was significantly higher in the combination arm (PH + 5FU + Oxali) compared to DMSO, PH, and 5FU/oxali alone. (Fig. 2 A and 2 D). Similar results were seen in HPAC (Fig. 2 B and 2 E ) and KPC cells (Fig. 2 C and 2 F). Taken together these results prove that the combination treatment is significantly enhancing apoptotic effect in both human and murine PDAC cells highlighting potentiation of 5FU/oxali by PH in PDAC treatment comparing to existing treatment. PH with 5FU and oxaliplatin combination inhibits cell cycle arrest in PDAC cells To study the anti‑proliferative mechanism of 5FU/oxali combined with PH, the effect of this combination treatment on the PDAC cell cycle was studied. Briefly, KPC, MIA PaCa-2 and HPAC cells were treated with 5FU (10 µM) and Oxaliplatin (20 µM), 0.35 µM of P and 25 µM of H alone or in combination for 72 h (Fig. 2 G-I). 5FU/oxali alone or in combination with PH resulted in S phase arrest. This is an effect that did not occur in DMSO or PH treated cells. (Fig. 2 G-I). The S phase arrest is due to effects of 5FU/oxali and is similar to effects previously reported [ 19 , 20 ]. PH with 5FU and oxaliplatin combination more potently inhibits PDAC tumor growth Since PH has effects on TME as well as cancer cells, orthotopic mouse model of PDAC were used to further evaluate this regimen. Mice were treated with vehicle, PH, 5FU/ oxali or their combination. The combination therapy significantly inhibited PDAC growth (Fig. 3 A) compared to vehicle. Additionally, the combination therapy demonstrated significantly greater efficacy compared to either 5FU/oxali or PH alone. The body weight of all mouse groups was stable; suggesting all treatment were well tolerated (Fig. 3 B). End-of-study KPC-Luc tumor pictures and weight confirmed the potentiation of 5FU/oxali by PH (Fig. 3 C). The combination of PH with 5FU and oxaliplatin alters immune landscape in the KPC-luc-TME To assess the immune effects of this regimen, we assessed the quantities of T and NK cell subsets by multiparameter flow cytometry. The combination of PH with 5FU/oxali significantly activated T and NK cells population in total tumor well as in only CD45 + cells compared to vehicle, 5FU/oxali and PH. In addition, we noticed a significant increase in the proportions of CD3 + NK1.1 − PD-1 + , and CD3 + NK1.1 − CTLA-4 + TNK cells suggesting that the combination therapy not only enhances the TNK cells activation but also promotes an immune environment favorable to antitumor responses in the KPC-luc TME (Fig. 3 D-G). A substantial increase in the proportions of γδ T cells in the combination treatment compared to any other treatments was observed (Fig. 3 H). Significant activation of NK cells in the combination treatment as compared to vehicle, PH and 5FU/oxali was observed (Fig. 3 I). Increased expression of CD3 − NK1.1 + CTLA-4 + and CD3 − NK1.1 + PD-1 + NK cells in the combination treatment suggests a potential shift in the immune profile (Fig. 3 J-K). Combination of PH with 5FU/oxali did not have any significant impact on the CD4 + and CD8 + T cells ( Supplementary Fig. 2A-F ). An increase in the expression of CD4 + FOXP3 − CTLA-4 + (Fig. 3 L) and CD4 + FOXP3 − PD-1 + (Fig. 3 M) (non-significant) in combination treatment was observed, suggesting the combination resulted in exhaustion and increase in regulatory capacity of CD4 + T cells. No change in the expression of CD8 + FOXP3 − PD-1 + (Fig. 3 N) and CD8 + FOXP3 − CTLA-4 + (Fig. 3 O) was observed in combination treatment. The combination of PH with 5FU and oxaliplatin inhibits ECM formation through ITGB4 As the tumor ECM plays major role in PDAC progression, we then asked if the combination treatment has impact on ECM inhibition. To this end, we utilized mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics on mouse models of PDAC treated with DMSO, PH, 5FU/oxali, and combination. Since the matriosome includes several of ECM protein such as collagens, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP), glycoproteins, and proteoglycans, we were interested to uncover the changes on these proteins in combination treatments [ 5 ]. In our study, PH with 5FU/oxali treatment caused a decreased abundance of several ECM-related proteins. Inhibition in collagen formation proteins such as COL1A1, COL2A1, COL4A1, COL161, COL9A1, COL12A1, COL14A1, CTSB, HSP47, TNC, and BCAN was observed in the animals treated with the combination (Fig. 4 A). This suggests changes in the tumor progression and alterations in the ECM remodeling and tumor stroma interactions. We further extended our analysis to check if this inhibition was mediated through integrin signaling and identified that several integrin signaling proteins along with collagen proteins were significantly inhibited in the combination treatment, including ITGB4, ITGAL, ITGAM, ITGA5, and ITGAV (Fig. 4 B-C). To conform this, we performed a western blot from the tumor tissues and found that combination treatment significantly inhibits the expression of ITGB4 (Fig. 6 D). This result points to a potential mechanism by which the combination treatment disrupts integrin-mediated pathways that are necessary for the ECM stability and tumor progression in PDAC. Examining the ECM proteoglycan signaling identified several collagen-binding proteins such as COL4A1, COL2A1, COL1A1 along with integrin’s (ITGB and ITGAV) were reduced in combination treatment (Fig. 4 D). Results of cell-cell communication revealed reduction of GRB2, ITGB4, SHPS1, FLNA, RSU1, and CD47, which impairs cell proliferation, adhesion, migration, and immune evasion. Activation of CDH13, PARVA, ILK, and FLNC enhances cell adhesion, migration, and survival, potentially driving tissue remodeling (Fig. 4 E). Proteins such as ITGAM, ITGAV, ITGA6, ITGB4, ITGB1, ITGA5, and ITGA3, along with ECM-related genes like TNC, COL1A1, COL1A2, COL6A1, COL6A2, FBN1, COL4A1, ITGAX, CD47, and CD44, play critical roles in regulating cell-matrix interactions and ECM remodeling. The downregulation of the expression of these genes in the combination treatment arm likely impairs key cellular processes, including adhesion, migration, and signaling, potentially affecting tissue structure and cellular responses to the treatment (Fig. 4 F). In combination treatment, the downregulation of the expression of various genes involved in DNA repair and signaling, including UBXN1, ISG15, DNLI1, BABA2, CSN5, DPOE1, DNLI3, RS27A, ARP8, UBE2N, ATM, TERA, PCNA, H4, and CSN2, points to a potential impairment in the DNA damage response and repair mechanisms (Fig. 4 G). These proteins are critical for various aspects of DNA repair, including ubiquitination, DNA damage sensing, repair pathway activation, and cell cycle regulation. In addition, DNA repair pathways are key mechanisms of resistance to DAN damaging agents such as oxaliplatin. Combination treatment potently inhibited the expression of chromatin organization proteins such as RBBP7, MEP60, RBBP4, SETD2, and HAT1 (Fig. 4 H). Reduced expression of apoptosis proteins like CASP3, Cytochrome C, TRADD, MAPK1, MAPK3, and APAF1 and activation of pro-apoptotic protein such as BAX were observed in the combination treatment confirming the apoptosis induction observed in the PDAC cell line experiments (Fig. 4 I). Programmed cell death proteins such as CYC, NMT1, OPA1, CASP3, and APAF1 found to be downregulated in combination treatment (Fig. 4 J). Pharmacological and genetic suppression of ITGB4 inhibits PDAC growth and ECM formation by COL1A1 Next, we pursued to ascertain the mechanisms by which this combination treatment affects PDAC. We hypothesized that inhibition of ITGB4 expression contributed to the decrease in ECM markers overexpressed in PDAC. To further investigate this, we first performed immunofluorescence study and identified that, combination treatment significantly lowers the protein levels of ITGB4 and COL1A1 in both human (Fig. 5 A, 5 C-D) and murine PDAC cells (Fig. 5 B, 5 E-F) compared to DMSO, PH or 5FU/oxali. We then analyzed the expression of ITGB4 in publicly available data sets and identified that, ITGB4 is highly expressed in PDAC (Fig. 6 A) and its overexpression is associated with poor patient survival [ 21 ](Fig. 6 B). We then looked at our previous studies where we have performed the proteomics in the same murine model using gemcitabine instead of 5FU and oxaliplatin [ 17 ]. Interestingly, we identified that, ITGB4 is significantly reduced in the combination of PH with gemcitabine compared to gemcitabine, PH or vehicle- treated alone (Fig. 6 C). This suggests that PH is enhancing the efficacy of chemotherapy drugs by inhibiting the ECM formation through ITGB4. This hypothesis was supported by our findings that ITGB4 expression was significantly reduced in both gemcitabine and 5FU/oxali treatments in combination with PH. We then validated the inhibitory effect of these combinations by performing western blot on tumor tissues ( Fig. 6 D ) and cultured cells treated with the same conditions as in vivo experiment (Fig. 6 E-F) and identified the similar reduction of ITGB4 and COL1A1. To directly assess, if the ECM disruption in combination treatment was mediated by ITGB4, we genetically knockdown ITGB4 and observed the expression of COL1A1. Interestingly, the knockdown of ITGB4 showed the reduced growth in colony formation assay suggesting that ITGB4 is crucial for PDAC growth in both human (Fig. 6 G and 6 I) and murine cells (Fig. 6 H and 6 J). Furthermore, immunoblotting results in murine and human PDAC cells with ITGB4 knockdown showed reduced expression of phospho FAK (pFAK) and COL1A1, which is consistent with the combination therapy suggesting that genetic and pharmacological inhibition of ITGB4 inhibits the PDAC growth and ECM disruption through COL1A1 (Fig. 6 K-L ) . These results collectively prove that the combination therapy disrupts expression of key elements of ECM such as COL1A1 by downregulating ITGB4, which in contributes to PDAC growth inhibition. Discussion The addition of PH to 5FU/oxali in PDAC significantly increased growth inhibition similar to the results previously reported with gemcitabine [ 17 ]. Increase in apoptosis as measured by annexin V and PI staining supports this is an underlying mechanism of inhibition [ 22 , 23 ]. In orthotopic model, the combination exhibited significantly enhanced tumor growth inhibition compared to single treatments. The proteomic data supports increase in apoptosis pathways in the animal model like the observation in the cell lines. The unchanged bodyweight across all treatment groups indicates that this treatment does not have an increased toxicity profile, which is similar to the observed effects in gemcitabine-based clinical trials. The mechanisms underlying the enhanced anti-tumor effects in the animal model include modulation of ECM, changes in tumor immune microenvironment as well as alterations in DNA repair mechanisms. PDAC microenvironment is immunosuppressive contributing to the aggressive behavior and resistance to therapy [ 24 – 26 ]. One of the most important aspects of our study is that the combination treatment alters the immune landscape in PDAC microenvironment. The activation of T NK cells and increased proportions of γδ T cells suggests that this combination not only targets tumor cells but also modifies the immune responses as well. The observed changes in the increased expression of CD3 + NK1.1 − PD-1 + and CD3 + NK1.1 − CTLA-4 + TNK cells indicate a favorable shift in the immune environment and favors the potential for combining this regimen with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The absence of significant changes in the CD4 + and CD3 + T cells could be because these populations are coupled with the activation specific regulatory cells (FOXP3 + PD-1 + ), suggesting a complex interplay where the combination treatment may promote regulatory pathways that could be combined for anti-tumor response. ITGB4 is encoded with β4 subunit, which is a laminin receptor that exclusively interacts with α6 subunit and plays a vital role in the biology of infiltrating cancer [ 27 ]. ITGB4 overexpression plays a key role in cell adhesion by binding with ECM proteins to regulate the cellular functions by transmitting adhesion signals [ 28 ]. ECM is vital for developing resistant niches by permitting cancer cells to tolerate therapeutic drugs before mutagenic resistance mechanisms are acquired [ 29 ]. Overexpression of ITGB4 shows significant correlations with tumor development and metastasis in several cancers including PDAC [ 30 ]. The molecular mechanism of this overexpressed ITGB4 in the ECM formation of PDAC is poorly understood. Paricalcitol inhibits the expression of ITGA6, ITGB4, and α-SMA in human breast cancer cells [ 11 ]. H binds to collagens required for ECM formation [ 31 ]. H is a known autophagy inhibitor, and the autophagy is considered as important regulator of ECM deposition, fibrosis and tissue remodeling. Secretory autophagosmes also promotes ECM proteolysis [ 32 ]. The significant reduction in the ECM proteins such as collagens observed in our model supports our hypothesis that the combination treatment with PH disrupts the structural and biochemical ECM that supports that PDAC growth and metastasis. A candidate pathway that could underlie the observed ECM modulation is ITGB4. Increased expression of ITGB4 is correlated with EMT hallmarks, reduces the expression of E-cadherin, and increases the expression of vimentin [ 30 , 33 ]. ITGB4 is also known to be a key molecule in the interaction between PDAC and ECM and contributes to ECM formation. Supporting this role of ITGB4 in PDAC biology is the observed poor survival in patients with PDAC with increased expression of ITGB4. In this current study, the significant downregulation of ITGB4 by PH treatment suggested that the downregulation of ECM components such as collagens or fibrinogen binding proteins maybe driven in part by ITGB4. Genetic inhibition of ITGB4 demonstrated similar ECM disruption and inhibitory effects on PDAC growth. Given this novel finding, we evaluated effects of PH and gemcitabine from our prior study on ITGB4 expression. Similarly, a significantly reduction in ITGB4 was observed with the gemcitabine-based regimen further confirming the role of this pathway in modulation of ECM observed after treatment with PH. In conclusion, PH sensitizes PDAC to the effects of 5FU and oxali. PH has diverse effects on PDAC biology including immune modulation, autophagy, and inhibition of CAF. In addition, PH can modulate the ECM partly through ITGB4 which is a new mechanism of action of this regimen. The results observed in this study further support testing this regimen in future clinical trials. Declarations Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest: All other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest. Consent to participate declaration Consent to Participate declaration: not applicable Ethics, Consent to Participate, and Consent to publish declaration Not applicable Data Availability All data and methodological details related to this manuscript are available upon request from the corresponding author. The corresponding author can be contacted for access to any supplementary information necessary for verifying or replicating the findings presented in this work. Author Contribution Declaration Dhana Sekhar Reddy Bandi, Ph.D (Conceptualization: Equal; Investigation: Equal; Methodology: Equal; Validation: Lead; Writing – original draft: Lead; Writing – review & editing: Lead) Sujith Sarvesh, Ph.D (Formal analysis: Supporting; Investigation: Supporting; Methodology: Supporting; Software: Equal; Writing – review & editing: Supporting) Jeremy B. Foote, Ph.D (Methodology: Supporting; Validation: Supporting; Writing – review & editing: Supporting) Mehmet Akce, MD (Writing – review & editing: Supporting) Doug Welsch;Software: Equal; Writing – review & editing: Supporting) Changde Cheng;(Formal analysis: Supporting; Software: Equal; Writing – review & editing: Supporting) Dr. Ganji Purnachandra Nagaraju, Ph.D (Conceptualization: Supporting; Formal analysis: Supporting; Methodology: Supporting; Supervision: Supporting; Writing – review & editing: Supporting) Prof. Bassel F. El-Rayes, MD (Conceptualization: Lead; Data curation: Lead; Formal analysis: Lead; Funding acquisition: Lead; Investigation: Lead; Methodology: Lead; Project administration: Lead; Resources: Lead; Software: Lead; Supervision: Lead; Validation: Lead; Visualization: Lead; Writing – original draft: Lead; Writing – review & editing: Lead) All authors have read and approved the final manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. Funding declaration: This work was supported by University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. This work also supported by Comprehensive cancer center core support grant (5P30CAO13148-47) and (1R01CA294647) Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. References Du J, Wang X, Li Y, Ren X, Zhou Y, Hu W et al . DHA exhibits synergistic therapeutic efficacy with cisplatin to induce ferroptosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma via modulation of iron metabolism. Cell death & disease 2021; 12: 705. Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 2024; 74. Kung HC, Yu J. Targeted therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Mechanisms and clinical study. MedComm 2023; 4: e216. Cid-Arregui A, Juarez V. Perspectives in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG 2015; 21: 9297. Tian C, Huang Y, Clauser KR, Rickelt S, Lau AN, Carr SA et al . Suppression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma growth and metastasis by fibrillar collagens produced selectively by tumor cells. Nature communications 2021; 12: 2328. Jin S, Lee W-C, Aust D, Pilarsky C, Cordes N. β8 integrin mediates pancreatic cancer cell radiochemoresistance. Molecular Cancer Research 2019; 17: 2126-2138. Tian C, Clauser KR, Öhlund D, Rickelt S, Huang Y, Gupta M et al . Proteomic analyses of ECM during pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression reveal different contributions by tumor and stromal cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2019; 116: 19609-19618. Zinger A, Koren L, Adir O, Poley M, Alyan M, Yaari Z et al . Collagenase nanoparticles enhance the penetration of drugs into pancreatic tumors. ACS nano 2019; 13: 11008-11021. Yu Y, Schuck K, Friess H, Kong B. Targeting aggressive fibroblasts to enhance the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets 2021; 25: 5-13. Gorchs L, Ahmed S, Mayer C, Knauf A, Fernández Moro C, Svensson M et al . The vitamin D analogue calcipotriol promotes an anti-tumorigenic phenotype of human pancreatic CAFs but reduces T cell mediated immunity. Scientific reports 2020; 10: 17444. Pendás-Franco N, González-Sancho JM, Suárez Y, Aguilera O, Steinmeyer A, Gamallo C et al . Vitamin D regulates the phenotype of human breast cancer cells. Differentiation 2007; 75: 193-207. Chen D, Xie J, Fiskesund R, Dong W, Liang X, Lv J et al . Chloroquine modulates antitumor immune response by resetting tumor-associated macrophages toward M1 phenotype. Nature communications 2018; 9: 873. Hou LS, Zhai XP, Zhang YW, Xing JH, Li C, Zhou SY et al . Targeted inhibition of autophagy in hepatic stellate cells by hydroxychloroquine: An effective therapeutic approach for the treatment of liver fibrosis. Liver International 2024. Li D, Yu K, Feng F, Zhang Y, Bai F, Zhang Y et al . Hydroxychloroquine alleviates renal interstitial fibrosis by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Biochemical and biophysical research communications 2022; 610: 154-161. Zeh HJ, Bahary N, Boone BA, Singhi AD, Miller-Ocuin JL, Normolle DP et al . A randomized phase II preoperative study of autophagy inhibition with high-dose hydroxychloroquine and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer patients. Clinical cancer research 2020; 26: 3126-3134. Mayasin YP, Osinnikova MN, Kharisova CB, Kitaeva KV, Filin IY, Gorodilova AV et al . Extracellular Matrix as a Target in Melanoma Therapy: From Hypothesis to Clinical Trials2024. Ganji PN, El-Rayes B. Mechanism of Enhancing Chemotherapy Efficacy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma with Paricalcitol and Hydroxychloroquine: A Single Cell RNA Sequencing-Part12024. Wainberg ZA, Melisi D, Macarulla T, Cid RP, Chandana SR, De La Fouchardière C et al . NALIRIFOX versus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in treatment-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (NAPOLI 3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. The Lancet 2023; 402: 1272-1281. De Angelis PM, Svendsrud DH, Kravik KL, Stokke T. Cellular response to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in 5-FU-resistant colon cancer cell lines during treatment and recovery. Molecular cancer 2006; 5: 1-25. Xu R, Zhang Y, Li A, Ma Y, Cai W, Song L et al . LY‑294002 enhances the chemosensitivity of liver cancer to oxaliplatin by blocking the PI3K/AKT/HIF‑1α pathway. Molecular Medicine Reports 2021; 24: 1-11. Anaya J. OncoLnc: linking TCGA survival data to mRNAs, miRNAs, and lncRNAs. PeerJ Comput Sci. 2016; 2: e67. Gao L, Shen L, Yu M, Ni J, Dong X, Zhou Y et al . Colon cancer cells treated with 5‑fluorouracil exhibit changes in polylactosamine‑type N‑glycans. Molecular medicine reports 2014; 9: 1697-1702. Lewis KA, Lilly KK, Reynolds EA, Sullivan WP, Kaufmann SH, Cliby WA. Ataxia telangiectasia and rad3-related kinase contributes to cell cycle arrest and survival after cisplatin but not oxaliplatin. Molecular cancer therapeutics 2009; 8: 855-863. Ju Y, Xu D, Liao M-m, Sun Y, Bao W-d, Yao F et al . Barriers and opportunities in pancreatic cancer immunotherapy. NPJ Precision Oncology 2024; 8: 199. Fan J-q, Wang M-F, Chen H-L, Shang D, Das JK, Song J. Current advances and outlooks in immunotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Molecular cancer 2020; 19: 32. Hosein AN, Dougan SK, Aguirre AJ, Maitra A. Translational advances in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma therapy. Nature cancer 2022; 3: 272-286. Jiang X, Wang J, Wang M, Xuan M, Han S, Li C et al . ITGB4 as a novel serum diagnosis biomarker and potential therapeutic target for colorectal cancer. Cancer medicine 2021; 10: 6823-6834. Stewart RL, O'connor KL. Clinical significance of the integrin α6β4 in human malignancies. Laboratory investigation 2015; 95: 976-986. Ko S, Jung KH, Yoon Y-C, Han BS, Park MS, Lee YJ et al . A novel DDR1 inhibitor enhances the anticancer activity of gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer. American Journal of Cancer Research 2022; 12: 4326. Masugi Y, Yamazaki K, Emoto K, Effendi K, Tsujikawa H, Kitago M et al . Upregulation of integrin β4 promotes epithelial–mesenchymal transition and is a novel prognostic marker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Laboratory investigation 2015; 95: 308-319. Wang H, Rao P, Qiu Y, Xiang L. Interaction mechanism between hydroxychloroquine sulfate and collagen: Insights from multi-spectroscopy, molecular docking, and molecular dynamic simulation methods. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 2023; 303: 123155. Migneault F, Hébert M-J. Autophagy, tissue repair, and fibrosis: a delicate balance. Matrix biology 2021; 100: 182-196. Li X-L, Liu L, Li D-D, He Y-P, Guo L-H, Sun L-P et al . Integrin β4 promotes cell invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition through the modulation of Slug expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Scientific reports 2017; 7: 40464. Additional Declarations There is NO conflict of interest to disclose. Supplementary Files SupplementaryTable1.docx Supplementary table 1: List of reagents and resources used in the study. SupplementaryFigure1.pdf Supplementary figure legends: Supplementary figure 1: Analysis of cell cycle progression by flow cytometry. Pictorial graph showing the proportion of cells in different phases of cell cycle treated with DMSO, PH, 5FU/oxali and PH+5FU/oxali treatments in MIA PaCa-2 (A), HPAC (B), and KPC (C) cells. Supplementaryfigure2.pdf Supplementary figure 2: (A). Proportions of CD4 + T-cells, (B). CD4 + Foxp3 - PD-1 + T cells, and (C). CD4 + Foxp3 - CTLA-4 + T cells in KPC TiME in DMSO, PH, 5FU/oxali, and PH+5FU/oxali treatments. (D). Expression of CD8+ T-cells, (E). CD8 + PD-1 + T cells, (F). CD8 + CTLA-4 + subsets from KPC TiME with the same treatment conditions as indicated above. SupplementaryMethods.docx Supplementary methodology Slide9.tif Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 27 Sep, 2025 Read the published version in Cancer Gene Therapy → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: revise 08 Jul, 2025 Review # 1 received at journal 07 Jul, 2025 Review # 2 received at journal 15 Jun, 2025 Reviewer # 2 agreed at journal 27 May, 2025 Reviewer # 1 agreed at journal 23 May, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 30 Apr, 2025 Submission checks completed at journal 23 Apr, 2025 First submitted to journal 23 Apr, 2025 Unknown event 23 Apr, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 22 Apr, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6406693","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":450132980,"identity":"ce5749b8-110f-4a7e-ac9c-7d0d1b91f56a","order_by":0,"name":"Bassel El-Rayes","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0405-5503","institution":"University of Alabama at Birmingham","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Bassel","middleName":"","lastName":"El-Rayes","suffix":""},{"id":450132981,"identity":"5e80c1ed-9f24-4835-9fec-12b24a07e87f","order_by":1,"name":"Dhana Reddy","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Dhana","middleName":"","lastName":"Reddy","suffix":""},{"id":450132982,"identity":"2d5c7efa-d63c-42e3-9dc4-334cd1610d60","order_by":2,"name":"Sujith Sarvesh","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sujith","middleName":"","lastName":"Sarvesh","suffix":""},{"id":450132983,"identity":"a6bc702a-7d91-4943-9d10-f2579a10cd09","order_by":3,"name":"Jeremy Foote","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jeremy","middleName":"","lastName":"Foote","suffix":""},{"id":450132984,"identity":"74a80b42-30c0-48cd-84f3-4e2d70216ed2","order_by":4,"name":"Doug Welsch","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Doug","middleName":"","lastName":"Welsch","suffix":""},{"id":450132985,"identity":"44d8659d-53f1-45e2-83d1-bb524cc06f3c","order_by":5,"name":"Chengde Cheng","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Chengde","middleName":"","lastName":"Cheng","suffix":""},{"id":450132986,"identity":"6754802b-b28f-470a-a3a0-b8cd573a313d","order_by":6,"name":"Mehmet Akce","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Alabama at Birmingham","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mehmet","middleName":"","lastName":"Akce","suffix":""},{"id":450132987,"identity":"922803a5-b8e9-40c1-9809-c5fb1ebbbdf0","order_by":7,"name":"Ganji Purnachandra Nagaraju","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4989-5234","institution":"University of Alabama","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ganji","middleName":"Purnachandra","lastName":"Nagaraju","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-04-08 23:45:14","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6406693/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6406693/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-025-00967-9","type":"published","date":"2025-09-27T04:00:00+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":81995573,"identity":"7b1a8843-8369-4948-af75-6b50ad88e8ce","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-05 17:52:58","extension":"jpg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":111930,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePH potentiates the growth inhibition of 5FU and oxaliplatin in PDAC cells.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(A-C).\u003c/strong\u003e The indicated cancer cell lines were treated with various concentration of 5FU and Oxaliplatin with standard dose of paricalcitol (350nm) and hydroxychloroquine (25 μM) for three days and subjected to MTT assays. Relative percentage cell viability was plotted with respect to DMSO treated cells. \u003cstrong\u003e(D).\u003c/strong\u003e The indicated cancer cell lines were treated with DMSO, PH, 5FU/oxali, and combination (PH+5FU/oxali) for 2–4 weeks, and long-term cell survival was measured using clonogenic assays. Representative images are shown. \u003cstrong\u003e(E). \u003c/strong\u003eColony counts from the clonogenic assay data shown in figure 1D\u003cstrong\u003e. \u003c/strong\u003eData represent the mean ± standard error of three biological replicates. ns = not significant, *p \u0026lt; 0.05, ****p \u0026lt; 0.0001.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6406693/v1/604095be6081f1ed89775491.jpg"},{"id":81996029,"identity":"305e7d75-0a31-40ad-8213-98819a284376","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-05 18:00:59","extension":"jpg","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":441935,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePH potentiates 5FU and oxaliplatin treatment induces apoptosis and S-phase arrest in PDAC cells\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(A-C).\u003c/strong\u003e The indicated PDAC cell lines were treated with DMSO, PH, 5FU+Oxali, and PH+5FU+Oxali for 72 h, and apoptosis was measured using an annexin V/propidium iodide staining kit.\u003cstrong\u003e (D-F).\u003c/strong\u003e The early, late and total apoptotic population from the shown data in panels A, B, and C is plotted in DMSO, PH, 5FU/oxali, and combination (PH+5FU/oxali) treated cells. \u003cstrong\u003e(G-I).\u003c/strong\u003e The cell cycle distribution of MIA PaCa-2, HPAC, and KPC cells treated with DMSO, PH, 5FU/oxali, and PH+5FU/oxali analyzed by flow cytometry. Data represent the mean ± standard error of three biological replicates. ns = not significant, *p \u0026lt; 0.05, ****p \u0026lt; 0.0001.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6406693/v1/4033bcc652127b1467efdf85.jpg"},{"id":81996617,"identity":"ac7e795a-1e6c-4acd-aa39-e0b5e812ffce","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-05 18:08:59","extension":"jpg","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":467144,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThe addition of PH to 5FU and oxaliplatin combination treatment significantly inhibits PDAC growth in an orthotopic pancreatic implantation model and activates immune-mediated responses.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(A). \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003eF\u003c/em\u003e-Luc-labeled KPC cells were orthotopically implanted into C57BL/6J mice (n=20). After 1 week, group of 5 mice were orally administered vehicle, PH, 5FU/oxali or PH+5FU/oxali. Bioluminescence images at the indicated time points are shown. (\u003cstrong\u003eB\u003c/strong\u003e). Average body weights of the animals during the treatment shown in experiment (\u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e). \u003cstrong\u003e(C).\u003c/strong\u003e Tumor images at the end of the experiment are shown.\u0026nbsp; (\u003cstrong\u003eD\u003c/strong\u003e). % of TNK cells (CD3\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e NK1.1\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e) in total tumor tissues (n=5). (\u003cstrong\u003eE\u003c/strong\u003e). % of TNK cells (CD3\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e NK1.1\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e) in per gm of CD45\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e cells (n=5). (\u003cstrong\u003eF\u003c/strong\u003e). % of PD-1\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e cells in CD3\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e NK1.1\u003csup\u003e+ \u003c/sup\u003eTNK cells in per gm of CD45\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e cells (n=5). (\u003cstrong\u003eG\u003c/strong\u003e). % of CTLA4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e cells in CD3\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e NK1.1\u003csup\u003e+ \u003c/sup\u003eTNK cells in per gm of CD45\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e cells (n=5). (\u003cstrong\u003eH\u003c/strong\u003e). % of γδ T cells per gm of CD45\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e cells. (\u003cstrong\u003eI\u003c/strong\u003e). % of NK cells per gm of total tissue. (\u003cstrong\u003eJ\u003c/strong\u003e). % of CTLA4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e cells in NK cells in per gm of CD45\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e cells (n=5). (\u003cstrong\u003eK\u003c/strong\u003e). % of PD-1\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e cells in NK cells in per gm of CD45\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e cells (n=5). (\u003cstrong\u003eL\u003c/strong\u003e). % of CTLA4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e cells in CD4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e T cells (n=5). (\u003cstrong\u003eM\u003c/strong\u003e). % of PD-1\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e cells in CD4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e T cells (n=5). (\u003cstrong\u003eN\u003c/strong\u003e). % of PD-1\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e cells in CD8\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e T cells (n=5). (\u003cstrong\u003eO\u003c/strong\u003e). % of CTLA4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e cells in CD8\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e T cells (n=5). ns, non-significant, ∗p \u0026lt; 0.05, ∗∗p \u0026lt; 0.01, ∗∗∗p \u0026lt; 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p \u0026lt; 0.0001.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6406693/v1/b23cad0689c949a194e44bf3.jpg"},{"id":81996033,"identity":"f0d8a4a2-1ab7-4bb9-b537-40da37e71422","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-05 18:00:59","extension":"jpg","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":502006,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThe addition of PH to 5FU and oxaliplatin alters protein expression profiles in PDAC, influencing key pathways including ECM signaling, DNA repair, and apoptosis. \u003c/strong\u003eA cluster heat map of proteomic profiles through four experimental conditions is shown, with each row representing a different protein and each column corresponding to a sample group. The heat map displays differential protein expression levels, where regions in red indicate increased expression and blue regions indicate decreased expression. White areas indicate no change in expression. The conditions shown are DMSO, PH, 5FU/oxali, and PH+5FU/oxali.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(A). \u003c/strong\u003eCluster heat map of ECM signaling profile. \u003cstrong\u003e(B). \u003c/strong\u003eCluster heat map of Collagen formation profile. \u003cstrong\u003e(C). \u003c/strong\u003eCluster heat map of ECM proteoglycans profile. \u003cstrong\u003e(D). \u003c/strong\u003eCluster heat map of integrin signaling profile. \u003cstrong\u003e(E). \u003c/strong\u003eCluster heat map of cell-cell communications profile. \u003cstrong\u003e(F). \u003c/strong\u003eCluster heat map of integrin cell surface interactions profile. \u003cstrong\u003e(G). \u003c/strong\u003eCluster heat map of DNA repair profile. \u003cstrong\u003e(H). \u003c/strong\u003eCluster heat map of chromatin organization profile. \u003cstrong\u003e(I). \u003c/strong\u003eCluster heat map of apoptosis profile. \u003cstrong\u003e(J). \u003c/strong\u003eCluster heat map of programmed cell death profile.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"4.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6406693/v1/c49f68d37eeb5f7d71a62c60.jpg"},{"id":81995578,"identity":"a16b5559-35b4-4ed1-a633-4da17d0e5163","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-05 17:52:59","extension":"jpg","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":435799,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eImmunofluorescence analysis of effects of adding PH to 5FU oxaliplatin on ITGB4 and COL1A1 expression in PDAC cells. (A).\u003c/strong\u003e Immunofluorescence showing the expression of ITGB4 (red) in human MIA PaCa-2 cells treated with DMSO, PH, 5FU/oxali, or PH+5FU/oxali for 72 hours. Nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue), and the merged image shows the overlap of ITGB4 expression and DAPI staining. \u003cstrong\u003e(B)\u003c/strong\u003e. Immunofluorescence showing the expression of ITGB4 (red) in murine KPC cells treated with DMSO, PH, 5FU/oxali, or PH+5FU/oxali for 72 hours. Nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue), and the merged image shows the combined localization of ITGB4 and DAPI. Quantification of ITGB4 and COL1A1 fluorescence intensity in MIA PaCa-2 (C-D) and KPC (E-F) and cells treated with DMSO, PH, 5FU/oxali, or PH+5FU/oxali for 72 hours. The intensity was normalized to DAPI staining for each sample. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: ns non-significant, *p \u0026lt; 0.05, **p \u0026lt; 0.01, ***p \u0026lt; 0.001, ****p \u0026lt; 0.0001.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"5.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6406693/v1/b41118383704ab1f63f3242b.jpg"},{"id":81996030,"identity":"c8cec6d3-8026-4a23-b109-6908403ef17a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-05 18:00:59","extension":"jpg","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":434509,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eImpact of ITGB4 colony formation, sensitivity to combination therapy, and expression of pFAK and COL1A1 in human and murine PDAC cells and on outcome of patients with PDAC.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(A). \u003c/strong\u003eExpression levels of ITGB4 in normal and PDAC tissues in TCGA. \u003cstrong\u003e(B).\u003c/strong\u003e Kaplan plot showing overexpression of ITGB4 associates with poor prognosis in terms of overall survival in PDAC patients. \u003cstrong\u003e(C). \u003c/strong\u003eHeat map depicting the expression comparisons of ITGB4 in gemcitabine and 5FU+oxali treatments in combination with PH. (D). Western blot results showing the complete inhibition of ITGB4 in tumor tissues from the KPC orthotopic experiment shown in Figure 3. (E)\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003eImmunoblotting showing the reduced expression levels of ITGB4, phospho FAK, and unchanged levels of total FAK in MIA Paca-2 cells treated with DMSO, PH, 5FU/oxali and PH+5FU/oxali treatments for 72 h. \u003cstrong\u003e(F). \u003c/strong\u003eImmunoblotting showing the reduced expression levels of ITGB4, phospho FAK, and unchanged levels of total FAK in murine KPC cells under the same conditions as in panel F. \u003cstrong\u003e(G).\u003c/strong\u003e Human PDAC cells with ITGB4 KD (MIA PaCa-2) exhibit reduced colony formation and are less sensitive to combination treatment with PH+5FU/oxali.\u003cstrong\u003e (H).\u003c/strong\u003eMurine PDAC cells (KPC) with ITGB4 KD also show reduced colony formation and reduced sensitivity to combination treatment, suggesting that ITGB4 plays a critical role in mediating the efficacy of combination therapy in both human and murine PDAC models. Quantification of relative survival fraction in MIA PaCa-2 \u003cstrong\u003e(I)\u003c/strong\u003e and KPC \u003cstrong\u003e(J)\u003c/strong\u003e cells. Western blotting was performed to assess the expression of phosphorylated FAK (pFAK) and COL1A1 in PDAC cells with ITGB4 KD compared to non-silenced cells. \u003cstrong\u003e(K).\u003c/strong\u003e MIA PaCa-2 cells: ITGB4 KD results in a significant reduction in the expression of pFAK and COL1A1, suggesting that ITGB4 regulates key signaling pathways involved in cell adhesion and extracellular matrix remodeling. \u003cstrong\u003e(L).\u003c/strong\u003e KPC cells: Similar to MIA PaCa-2 cells, ITGB4 KD in KPC cells also leads to decreased expression of pFAK and COL1A1, further supporting the role of ITGB4 in regulating these critical pathways. Quantification of band intensity was performed and normalized to β-actin. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. *p \u0026lt; 0.05, **p \u0026lt; 0.01, ***p \u0026lt; 0.001 compared to control cells by two-way ANOVA.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure6.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6406693/v1/b7f72a9ca1029728f002b2d9.jpg"},{"id":92341726,"identity":"e75809c8-aebe-4b12-93bc-0cc91954ab71","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-28 07:05:24","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":3629856,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6406693/v1/16c3019d-bea1-4641-b673-ff5bab6dcd34.pdf"},{"id":81995574,"identity":"8faf386a-5e1d-4476-b54b-7ba2674a1014","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-05 17:52:59","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":16193,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary table 1:\u003c/strong\u003e List of reagents and resources used in the study.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryTable1.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6406693/v1/a122c3c7d218e0e7e1a7822d.docx"},{"id":81996618,"identity":"d4e70312-d882-4ed8-8562-1b26d608a296","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-05 18:08:59","extension":"pdf","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":199586,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary figure legends:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary figure 1: \u003c/strong\u003eAnalysis of cell cycle progression by flow cytometry. Pictorial graph showing the proportion of cells in different phases of cell cycle treated with DMSO, PH, 5FU/oxali and PH+5FU/oxali treatments in MIA PaCa-2 (A), HPAC (B), and KPC (C) cells.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryFigure1.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6406693/v1/8b4189ff2cfe4b39ba8ef19e.pdf"},{"id":81995583,"identity":"37c162ab-a504-4027-b4c0-a33e8ecbb356","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-05 17:52:59","extension":"pdf","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":112124,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary figure 2:\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e(A). \u003c/strong\u003eProportions of CD4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e T-cells, \u003cstrong\u003e(B). \u003c/strong\u003eCD4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e Foxp3\u003csup\u003e-\u003c/sup\u003e PD-1\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e T cells, and \u003cstrong\u003e(C). \u003c/strong\u003eCD4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e Foxp3\u003csup\u003e- \u003c/sup\u003eCTLA-4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e T cells in KPC TiME in DMSO, PH, 5FU/oxali, and PH+5FU/oxali treatments.\u003cstrong\u003e (D). \u003c/strong\u003eExpression of CD8+ T-cells,\u003cstrong\u003e (E). \u003c/strong\u003eCD8\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e PD-1\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e T cells,\u003cstrong\u003e (F). \u003c/strong\u003eCD8\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e CTLA-4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e subsets from KPC TiME with the same treatment conditions as indicated above.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Supplementaryfigure2.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6406693/v1/bc6bd1bdc5c379c653309ed4.pdf"},{"id":81995580,"identity":"eaf41d33-bbed-43ab-95d1-f4a1c14ecbf3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-05 17:52:59","extension":"docx","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":20849,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplementary methodology","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryMethods.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6406693/v1/7f0234e94269e569d0db904e.docx"},{"id":81996621,"identity":"71828cab-e622-4740-83dd-2b2c42452114","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-05 18:08:59","extension":"tif","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":181544,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Slide9.tif","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6406693/v1/5e8f487a7b14b4be7829c13d.tif"}],"financialInterests":"There is \u003cb\u003eNO\u003c/b\u003e conflict of interest to disclose.","formattedTitle":"Paricalcitol and hydroxychloroquine modulates extracellular matrix and enhance chemotherapy efficacy in pancreatic cancer","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003ePancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most deadly malignancies [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. It is estimated that by 2030, PDAC will become second leading cause of cancer related deaths in the U.S. The 5-year survival rate for PDAC is poor (~\u0026thinsp;11%) due to its tendency for early metastasis and resistance to systemic treatments including cytotoxic and immune based therapies [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e]. The resistance to systemic therapies is partly due to the presence of collagen-rich dense extracellular matrix (ECM) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe PDAC ECM consists of several components such as collagens, glycoproteins, fibronectins, proteoglycans, hyaluronic acid, and laminins. Cancer associated fibroblasts (CAF) play a pivotal role in the development and maintenance of the ECM. PDAC cells interact with ECM components through integrins and receptor tyrosine kinases to form focal adhesion complexes, which help in growth, metastasis, and drug resistance [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e]. ECM affects the behavior of immune and angiogenic cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) promoting a tumorigenic effects [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e]. The compact and heterogeneous physical network of ECM components inhibit drug delivery further contributing to resistance and poor prognosis [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e]. Therefore, the ECM has pleotropic effects in PDAC facilitating cancer cell survival, metastasis, and chemo-resistance. Modulating the ECM represents a rational approach to inhibit PDAC progression and promote the effects of systemic therapies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePrevious reports have indicated that vitamin D analogue such as paricalcitol (P) and hydroxychloroquine (H) have effects on CAF and immune TME. Vitamin D analogues has been shown to suppress activated CAF in PDAC. It has also been shown to suppress the expression of several ECM proteins such as smooth muscle alpha-actin (SMA) in breast cancer [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR10 CR11\" citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e]. H selectively reduced the deposition of ECM in hepatic stellate cells by inhibiting α-SMA and collagen I [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e]. H alleviates renal interstitial fibrosis by inhibiting PI3K/Akt signaling and attenuates ECM and EMT by suppressing NF-κB signaling [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e]. H has also been shown in clinical trials to modulate the immune microenvironment in PDAC [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e]. The effects of the combination of H and P with 5FU-based chemotherapy on modulation of ECM and immune microenvironment in PDAC has not been previously studied.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eClinical trial targeting ECM components including matrix metalloproteinase or hyaluronidase in PDAC have resulted in limited success [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e]. The heterogeneity of CAF\u0026rsquo;s and redundant ECM composition and structure, limits the benefit of these therapies, which are very specifically designed against one component or pathway in the ECM. PDAC cells frequently develop resistance mechanisms, such as alterations in integrin expression and ECM remodeling, which reduce the effectiveness of such treatments. In our prior study, we reported the addition of HP to gemcitabine resulted in immune modulation and effects on autophagy [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e]. These effects were observed in preclinical models and clinical samples from paired biopsies obtained from patients on a trial [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e]. While gemcitabine based therapy is a standard chemotherapy for PDAC, accumulating evidences suggests that 5-FU based regimens may have shown superior efficacy [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e]. Encouraged by the observed effects of PH with gemcitabine, we planned to assess this combination with 5FU-based therapy. In addition, our objective was to evaluate if the mechanisms involved in potentiation of 5FU-based therapy by H and P were mediated through mechanisms involving modulation of immune cells and ECM proteins in the TME.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eParicalcitol and hydroxychloroquine enhances the growth inhibitory effects of 5FU and oxaliplatin in both murine and human PDAC cells\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe effects of PH in combination with 5FU and oxaliplatin (oxali) on murine and human PDAC cells were evaluated by dosing the cells with varying concentrations of the drugs and then quantifying the survival rates by cell viability using MTT assay. Human PDAC cell lines MIA PaCa-2 and HPAC, and murine KPC PDAC cells were cultured in the presence of PH, 5FU/oxali either alone or in combination for 72 h (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eA-C). The combination treatment was extremely efficient in urging cytotoxicity in all the cell lines. The combination index (CI) values, calculated with PRISM software for dose-effect analysis, designated the presence of a robust synergism between 5FU/oxali with PH, exclusively at lower and intermediary drug doses compared to chemotherapy alone. We then asked whether this potential combination has effect on long-term survival of PDAC cells using clonogenic assays. Treatment of PH with 5FU (10 \u0026micro;M) and oxali (20 \u0026micro;M) inhibited colony-forming ability of PDAC cells (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eD and \u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eE).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePH with 5FU and oxaliplatin combination promotes apoptosis in PDAC cells\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe analyzed the effect of this combination on inducing apoptosis in PDAC cells. Apoptosis measurement by annexin V and PI staining method. In MIA PaCa-2 cells, apoptosis was significantly higher in the combination arm (PH\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;5FU\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Oxali) compared to DMSO, PH, and 5FU/oxali alone. (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eA and \u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eD). Similar results were seen in HPAC (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eB and \u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eE\u003cb\u003e)\u003c/b\u003e and KPC cells (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eC and \u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eF). Taken together these results prove that the combination treatment is significantly enhancing apoptotic effect in both human and murine PDAC cells highlighting potentiation of 5FU/oxali by PH in PDAC treatment comparing to existing treatment.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003ePH with 5FU and oxaliplatin combination inhibits cell cycle arrest in PDAC cells\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo study the anti‑proliferative mechanism of 5FU/oxali combined with PH, the effect of this combination treatment on the PDAC cell cycle was studied. Briefly, KPC, MIA PaCa-2 and HPAC cells were treated with 5FU (10 \u0026micro;M) and Oxaliplatin (20 \u0026micro;M), 0.35 \u0026micro;M of P and 25 \u0026micro;M of H alone or in combination for 72 h (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eG-I). 5FU/oxali alone or in combination with PH resulted in S phase arrest. This is an effect that did not occur in DMSO or PH treated cells. (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eG-I). The S phase arrest is due to effects of 5FU/oxali and is similar to effects previously reported [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003ePH with 5FU and oxaliplatin combination more potently inhibits PDAC tumor growth\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSince PH has effects on TME as well as cancer cells, orthotopic mouse model of PDAC were used to further evaluate this regimen. Mice were treated with vehicle, PH, 5FU/ oxali or their combination. The combination therapy significantly inhibited PDAC growth (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eA) compared to vehicle. Additionally, the combination therapy demonstrated significantly greater efficacy compared to either 5FU/oxali or PH alone. The body weight of all mouse groups was stable; suggesting all treatment were well tolerated (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eB). End-of-study KPC-Luc tumor pictures and weight confirmed the potentiation of 5FU/oxali by PH (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eC).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eThe combination of PH with 5FU and oxaliplatin alters immune landscape in the KPC-luc-TME\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo assess the immune effects of this regimen, we assessed the quantities of T and NK cell subsets by multiparameter flow cytometry. The combination of PH with 5FU/oxali significantly activated T and NK cells population in total tumor well as in only CD45\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e cells compared to vehicle, 5FU/oxali and PH. In addition, we noticed a significant increase in the proportions of CD3\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e NK1.1\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u003c/sup\u003e PD-1\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e, and CD3\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e NK1.1\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u003c/sup\u003e CTLA-4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e TNK cells suggesting that the combination therapy not only enhances the TNK cells activation but also promotes an immune environment favorable to antitumor responses in the KPC-luc TME (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eD-G). A substantial increase in the proportions of γδ T cells in the combination treatment compared to any other treatments was observed (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eH). Significant activation of NK cells in the combination treatment as compared to vehicle, PH and 5FU/oxali was observed (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eI). Increased expression of CD3\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u003c/sup\u003e NK1.1\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e CTLA-4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e and CD3\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u003c/sup\u003e NK1.1\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e PD-1\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e NK cells in the combination treatment suggests a potential shift in the immune profile (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eJ-K). Combination of PH with 5FU/oxali did not have any significant impact on the CD4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e and CD8\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e T cells (\u003cb\u003eSupplementary Fig.\u0026nbsp;2A-F\u003c/b\u003e). An increase in the expression of CD4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e FOXP3\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u003c/sup\u003e CTLA-4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eL) and CD4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e FOXP3\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u003c/sup\u003e PD-1\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eM) (non-significant) in combination treatment was observed, suggesting the combination resulted in exhaustion and increase in regulatory capacity of CD4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e T cells. No change in the expression of CD8\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e FOXP3\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u003c/sup\u003e PD-1\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eN) and CD8\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e FOXP3\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u003c/sup\u003e CTLA-4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eO) was observed in combination treatment.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eThe combination of PH with 5FU and oxaliplatin inhibits ECM formation through ITGB4\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs the tumor ECM plays major role in PDAC progression, we then asked if the combination treatment has impact on ECM inhibition. To this end, we utilized mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics on mouse models of PDAC treated with DMSO, PH, 5FU/oxali, and combination. Since the matriosome includes several of ECM protein such as collagens, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP), glycoproteins, and proteoglycans, we were interested to uncover the changes on these proteins in combination treatments [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]. In our study, PH with 5FU/oxali treatment caused a decreased abundance of several ECM-related proteins. Inhibition in collagen formation proteins such as COL1A1, COL2A1, COL4A1, COL161, COL9A1, COL12A1, COL14A1, CTSB, HSP47, TNC, and BCAN was observed in the animals treated with the combination (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA). This suggests changes in the tumor progression and alterations in the ECM remodeling and tumor stroma interactions. We further extended our analysis to check if this inhibition was mediated through integrin signaling and identified that several integrin signaling proteins along with collagen proteins were significantly inhibited in the combination treatment, including ITGB4, ITGAL, ITGAM, ITGA5, and ITGAV (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eB-C). To conform this, we performed a western blot from the tumor tissues and found that combination treatment significantly inhibits the expression of ITGB4 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eD). This result points to a potential mechanism by which the combination treatment disrupts integrin-mediated pathways that are necessary for the ECM stability and tumor progression in PDAC. Examining the ECM proteoglycan signaling identified several collagen-binding proteins such as COL4A1, COL2A1, COL1A1 along with integrin\u0026rsquo;s (ITGB and ITGAV) were reduced in combination treatment (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eD). Results of cell-cell communication revealed reduction of GRB2, ITGB4, SHPS1, FLNA, RSU1, and CD47, which impairs cell proliferation, adhesion, migration, and immune evasion. Activation of CDH13, PARVA, ILK, and FLNC enhances cell adhesion, migration, and survival, potentially driving tissue remodeling (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eE).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eProteins such as ITGAM, ITGAV, ITGA6, ITGB4, ITGB1, ITGA5, and ITGA3, along with ECM-related genes like TNC, COL1A1, COL1A2, COL6A1, COL6A2, FBN1, COL4A1, ITGAX, CD47, and CD44, play critical roles in regulating cell-matrix interactions and ECM remodeling. The downregulation of the expression of these genes in the combination treatment arm likely impairs key cellular processes, including adhesion, migration, and signaling, potentially affecting tissue structure and cellular responses to the treatment (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eF). In combination treatment, the downregulation of the expression of various genes involved in DNA repair and signaling, including UBXN1, ISG15, DNLI1, BABA2, CSN5, DPOE1, DNLI3, RS27A, ARP8, UBE2N, ATM, TERA, PCNA, H4, and CSN2, points to a potential impairment in the DNA damage response and repair mechanisms (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eG). These proteins are critical for various aspects of DNA repair, including ubiquitination, DNA damage sensing, repair pathway activation, and cell cycle regulation. In addition, DNA repair pathways are key mechanisms of resistance to DAN damaging agents such as oxaliplatin. Combination treatment potently inhibited the expression of chromatin organization proteins such as RBBP7, MEP60, RBBP4, SETD2, and HAT1 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eH). Reduced expression of apoptosis proteins like CASP3, Cytochrome C, TRADD, MAPK1, MAPK3, and APAF1 and activation of pro-apoptotic protein such as BAX were observed in the combination treatment confirming the apoptosis induction observed in the PDAC cell line experiments (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eI). Programmed cell death proteins such as CYC, NMT1, OPA1, CASP3, and APAF1 found to be downregulated in combination treatment (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eJ).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePharmacological and genetic suppression of ITGB4 inhibits PDAC growth and ECM formation by COL1A1\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eNext, we pursued to ascertain the mechanisms by which this combination treatment affects PDAC. We hypothesized that inhibition of ITGB4 expression contributed to the decrease in ECM markers overexpressed in PDAC. To further investigate this, we first performed immunofluorescence study and identified that, combination treatment significantly lowers the protein levels of ITGB4 and COL1A1 in both human (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eA, \u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eC-D) and murine PDAC cells (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eB, \u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eE-F) compared to DMSO, PH or 5FU/oxali. We then analyzed the expression of ITGB4 in publicly available data sets and identified that, ITGB4 is highly expressed in PDAC (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eA) and its overexpression is associated with poor patient survival [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e](Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eB). We then looked at our previous studies where we have performed the proteomics in the same murine model using gemcitabine instead of 5FU and oxaliplatin [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e]. Interestingly, we identified that, ITGB4 is significantly reduced in the combination of PH with gemcitabine compared to gemcitabine, PH or vehicle- treated alone (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eC). This suggests that PH is enhancing the efficacy of chemotherapy drugs by inhibiting the ECM formation through ITGB4. This hypothesis was supported by our findings that ITGB4 expression was significantly reduced in both gemcitabine and 5FU/oxali treatments in combination with PH. We then validated the inhibitory effect of these combinations by performing western blot on tumor tissues \u003cb\u003e(\u003c/b\u003eFig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eD\u003cb\u003e)\u003c/b\u003e and cultured cells treated with the same conditions as \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e experiment (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eE-F) and identified the similar reduction of ITGB4 and COL1A1.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo directly assess, if the ECM disruption in combination treatment was mediated by ITGB4, we genetically knockdown ITGB4 and observed the expression of COL1A1. Interestingly, the knockdown of ITGB4 showed the reduced growth in colony formation assay suggesting that ITGB4 is crucial for PDAC growth in both human (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eG and \u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eI) and murine cells (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eH and \u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eJ). Furthermore, immunoblotting results in murine and human PDAC cells with ITGB4 knockdown showed reduced expression of phospho FAK (pFAK) and COL1A1, which is consistent with the combination therapy suggesting that genetic and pharmacological inhibition of ITGB4 inhibits the PDAC growth and ECM disruption through COL1A1 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eK-L\u003cb\u003e)\u003c/b\u003e. These results collectively prove that the combination therapy disrupts expression of key elements of ECM such as COL1A1 by downregulating ITGB4, which in contributes to PDAC growth inhibition.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe addition of PH to 5FU/oxali in PDAC significantly increased growth inhibition similar to the results previously reported with gemcitabine [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e]. Increase in apoptosis as measured by annexin V and PI staining supports this is an underlying mechanism of inhibition [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. In orthotopic model, the combination exhibited significantly enhanced tumor growth inhibition compared to single treatments. The proteomic data supports increase in apoptosis pathways in the animal model like the observation in the cell lines. The unchanged bodyweight across all treatment groups indicates that this treatment does not have an increased toxicity profile, which is similar to the observed effects in gemcitabine-based clinical trials. The mechanisms underlying the enhanced anti-tumor effects in the animal model include modulation of ECM, changes in tumor immune microenvironment as well as alterations in DNA repair mechanisms.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePDAC microenvironment is immunosuppressive contributing to the aggressive behavior and resistance to therapy [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR25\" citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e]. One of the most important aspects of our study is that the combination treatment alters the immune landscape in PDAC microenvironment. The activation of T NK cells and increased proportions of γδ T cells suggests that this combination not only targets tumor cells but also modifies the immune responses as well. The observed changes in the increased expression of CD3\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e NK1.1\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u003c/sup\u003e PD-1\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e and CD3\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e NK1.1\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u003c/sup\u003e CTLA-4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e TNK cells indicate a favorable shift in the immune environment and favors the potential for combining this regimen with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The absence of significant changes in the CD4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e and CD3\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e T cells could be because these populations are coupled with the activation specific regulatory cells (FOXP3\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e PD-1\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e), suggesting a complex interplay where the combination treatment may promote regulatory pathways that could be combined for anti-tumor response.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eITGB4 is encoded with β4 subunit, which is a laminin receptor that exclusively interacts with α6 subunit and plays a vital role in the biology of infiltrating cancer [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e]. ITGB4 overexpression plays a key role in cell adhesion by binding with ECM proteins to regulate the cellular functions by transmitting adhesion signals [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e]. ECM is vital for developing resistant niches by permitting cancer cells to tolerate therapeutic drugs before mutagenic resistance mechanisms are acquired [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e]. Overexpression of ITGB4 shows significant correlations with tumor development and metastasis in several cancers including PDAC [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e]. The molecular mechanism of this overexpressed ITGB4 in the ECM formation of PDAC is poorly understood.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eParicalcitol inhibits the expression of ITGA6, ITGB4, and α-SMA in human breast cancer cells [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. H binds to collagens required for ECM formation [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e]. H is a known autophagy inhibitor, and the autophagy is considered as important regulator of ECM deposition, fibrosis and tissue remodeling. Secretory autophagosmes also promotes ECM proteolysis [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e]. The significant reduction in the ECM proteins such as collagens observed in our model supports our hypothesis that the combination treatment with PH disrupts the structural and biochemical ECM that supports that PDAC growth and metastasis. A candidate pathway that could underlie the observed ECM modulation is ITGB4. Increased expression of ITGB4 is correlated with EMT hallmarks, reduces the expression of E-cadherin, and increases the expression of vimentin [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e]. ITGB4 is also known to be a key molecule in the interaction between PDAC and ECM and contributes to ECM formation. Supporting this role of ITGB4 in PDAC biology is the observed poor survival in patients with PDAC with increased expression of ITGB4. In this current study, the significant downregulation of ITGB4 by PH treatment suggested that the downregulation of ECM components such as collagens or fibrinogen binding proteins maybe driven in part by ITGB4. Genetic inhibition of ITGB4 demonstrated similar ECM disruption and inhibitory effects on PDAC growth. Given this novel finding, we evaluated effects of PH and gemcitabine from our prior study on ITGB4 expression. Similarly, a significantly reduction in ITGB4 was observed with the gemcitabine-based regimen further confirming the role of this pathway in modulation of ECM observed after treatment with PH.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn conclusion, PH sensitizes PDAC to the effects of 5FU and oxali. PH has diverse effects on PDAC biology including immune modulation, autophagy, and inhibition of CAF. In addition, PH can modulate the ECM partly through ITGB4 which is a new mechanism of action of this regimen. The results observed in this study further support testing this regimen in future clinical trials.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDisclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eAll other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent to participate declaration\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConsent to Participate declaration: not applicable\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics, Consent to Participate, and Consent to publish declaration\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData Availability\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll data and methodological details related to this manuscript are available upon request from the corresponding author. The corresponding author can be contacted for access to any supplementary information necessary for verifying or replicating the findings presented in this work.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor Contribution Declaration\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDhana Sekhar Reddy Bandi, Ph.D (Conceptualization: Equal; Investigation: Equal; Methodology: Equal; Validation: Lead; Writing – original draft: Lead; Writing – review \u0026amp; editing: Lead)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSujith Sarvesh, Ph.D (Formal analysis: Supporting; Investigation: Supporting; Methodology: Supporting; Software: Equal; Writing – review \u0026amp; editing: Supporting)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeremy B. Foote, Ph.D (Methodology: Supporting; Validation: Supporting; Writing – review \u0026amp; editing: Supporting)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMehmet Akce, MD (Writing – review \u0026amp; editing: Supporting)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoug Welsch;Software: Equal; Writing – review \u0026amp; editing: Supporting)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChangde Cheng;(Formal analysis: Supporting; Software: Equal; Writing – review \u0026amp; editing: Supporting)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDr. Ganji Purnachandra Nagaraju, Ph.D (Conceptualization: Supporting; Formal analysis: Supporting; Methodology: Supporting; Supervision: Supporting; Writing – review \u0026amp; editing: Supporting)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eProf. Bassel F. El-Rayes, MD (Conceptualization: Lead; Data curation: Lead; Formal analysis: Lead; Funding acquisition: Lead; Investigation: Lead; Methodology: Lead; Project administration: Lead; Resources: Lead; Software: Lead; Supervision: Lead; Validation: Lead; Visualization: Lead; Writing – original draft: Lead; Writing – review \u0026amp; editing: Lead)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAll authors have read and approved the final manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding declaration:\u003c/strong\u003e This work was supported by University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. This work also supported by Comprehensive cancer center core support grant (5P30CAO13148-47) and (1R01CA294647)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe authors declare no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDu J, Wang X, Li Y, Ren X, Zhou Y, Hu W\u003cem\u003e et al\u003c/em\u003e. DHA exhibits synergistic therapeutic efficacy with cisplatin to induce ferroptosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma via modulation of iron metabolism. \u003cem\u003eCell death \u0026amp; disease\u003c/em\u003e 2021; 12: 705.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSiegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. \u003cem\u003eCA: a cancer journal for clinicians\u003c/em\u003e 2024; 74.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKung HC, Yu J. Targeted therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Mechanisms and clinical study. \u003cem\u003eMedComm\u003c/em\u003e 2023; 4: e216.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCid-Arregui A, Juarez V. Perspectives in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. \u003cem\u003eWorld journal of gastroenterology: WJG\u003c/em\u003e 2015; 21: 9297.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTian C, Huang Y, Clauser KR, Rickelt S, Lau AN, Carr SA\u003cem\u003e et al\u003c/em\u003e. Suppression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma growth and metastasis by fibrillar collagens produced selectively by tumor cells. \u003cem\u003eNature communications\u003c/em\u003e 2021; 12: 2328.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJin S, Lee W-C, Aust D, Pilarsky C, Cordes N. \u0026beta;8 integrin mediates pancreatic cancer cell radiochemoresistance. \u003cem\u003eMolecular Cancer Research\u003c/em\u003e 2019; 17: 2126-2138.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTian C, Clauser KR, \u0026Ouml;hlund D, Rickelt S, Huang Y, Gupta M\u003cem\u003e et al\u003c/em\u003e. Proteomic analyses of ECM during pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression reveal different contributions by tumor and stromal cells. \u003cem\u003eProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences\u003c/em\u003e 2019; 116: 19609-19618.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZinger A, Koren L, Adir O, Poley M, Alyan M, Yaari Z\u003cem\u003e et al\u003c/em\u003e. Collagenase nanoparticles enhance the penetration of drugs into pancreatic tumors. \u003cem\u003eACS nano\u003c/em\u003e 2019; 13: 11008-11021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYu Y, Schuck K, Friess H, Kong B. Targeting aggressive fibroblasts to enhance the treatment of pancreatic cancer. \u003cem\u003eExpert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets\u003c/em\u003e 2021; 25: 5-13.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGorchs L, Ahmed S, Mayer C, Knauf A, Fern\u0026aacute;ndez Moro C, Svensson M\u003cem\u003e et al\u003c/em\u003e. The vitamin D analogue calcipotriol promotes an anti-tumorigenic phenotype of human pancreatic CAFs but reduces T cell mediated immunity. \u003cem\u003eScientific reports\u003c/em\u003e 2020; 10: 17444.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePend\u0026aacute;s-Franco N, Gonz\u0026aacute;lez-Sancho JM, Su\u0026aacute;rez Y, Aguilera O, Steinmeyer A, Gamallo C\u003cem\u003e et al\u003c/em\u003e. Vitamin D regulates the phenotype of human breast cancer cells. \u003cem\u003eDifferentiation\u003c/em\u003e 2007; 75: 193-207.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChen D, Xie J, Fiskesund R, Dong W, Liang X, Lv J\u003cem\u003e et al\u003c/em\u003e. Chloroquine modulates antitumor immune response by resetting tumor-associated macrophages toward M1 phenotype. \u003cem\u003eNature communications\u003c/em\u003e 2018; 9: 873.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHou LS, Zhai XP, Zhang YW, Xing JH, Li C, Zhou SY\u003cem\u003e et al\u003c/em\u003e. Targeted inhibition of autophagy in hepatic stellate cells by hydroxychloroquine: An effective therapeutic approach for the treatment of liver fibrosis. \u003cem\u003eLiver International\u003c/em\u003e 2024.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLi D, Yu K, Feng F, Zhang Y, Bai F, Zhang Y\u003cem\u003e et al\u003c/em\u003e. Hydroxychloroquine alleviates renal interstitial fibrosis by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. \u003cem\u003eBiochemical and biophysical research communications\u003c/em\u003e 2022; 610: 154-161.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZeh HJ, Bahary N, Boone BA, Singhi AD, Miller-Ocuin JL, Normolle DP\u003cem\u003e et al\u003c/em\u003e. A randomized phase II preoperative study of autophagy inhibition with high-dose hydroxychloroquine and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer patients. \u003cem\u003eClinical cancer research\u003c/em\u003e 2020; 26: 3126-3134.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMayasin YP, Osinnikova MN, Kharisova CB, Kitaeva KV, Filin IY, Gorodilova AV\u003cem\u003e et al\u003c/em\u003e. Extracellular Matrix as a Target in Melanoma Therapy: From Hypothesis to Clinical Trials2024.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGanji PN, El-Rayes B. Mechanism of Enhancing Chemotherapy Efficacy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma with Paricalcitol and Hydroxychloroquine: A Single Cell RNA Sequencing-Part12024.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWainberg ZA, Melisi D, Macarulla T, Cid RP, Chandana SR, De La Fouchardi\u0026egrave;re C\u003cem\u003e et al\u003c/em\u003e. NALIRIFOX versus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in treatment-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (NAPOLI 3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. \u003cem\u003eThe Lancet\u003c/em\u003e 2023; 402: 1272-1281.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDe Angelis PM, Svendsrud DH, Kravik KL, Stokke T. Cellular response to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in 5-FU-resistant colon cancer cell lines during treatment and recovery. \u003cem\u003eMolecular cancer\u003c/em\u003e 2006; 5: 1-25.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eXu R, Zhang Y, Li A, Ma Y, Cai W, Song L\u003cem\u003e et al\u003c/em\u003e. LY‑294002 enhances the chemosensitivity of liver cancer to oxaliplatin by blocking the PI3K/AKT/HIF‑1\u0026alpha; pathway. \u003cem\u003eMolecular Medicine Reports\u003c/em\u003e 2021; 24: 1-11.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnaya J. OncoLnc: linking TCGA survival data to mRNAs, miRNAs, and lncRNAs. PeerJ Comput Sci. 2016; 2: e67.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGao L, Shen L, Yu M, Ni J, Dong X, Zhou Y\u003cem\u003e et al\u003c/em\u003e. Colon cancer cells treated with 5‑fluorouracil exhibit changes in polylactosamine‑type N‑glycans. \u003cem\u003eMolecular medicine reports\u003c/em\u003e 2014; 9: 1697-1702.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLewis KA, Lilly KK, Reynolds EA, Sullivan WP, Kaufmann SH, Cliby WA. Ataxia telangiectasia and rad3-related kinase contributes to cell cycle arrest and survival after cisplatin but not oxaliplatin. \u003cem\u003eMolecular cancer therapeutics\u003c/em\u003e 2009; 8: 855-863.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJu Y, Xu D, Liao M-m, Sun Y, Bao W-d, Yao F\u003cem\u003e et al\u003c/em\u003e. Barriers and opportunities in pancreatic cancer immunotherapy. \u003cem\u003eNPJ Precision Oncology\u003c/em\u003e 2024; 8: 199.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFan J-q, Wang M-F, Chen H-L, Shang D, Das JK, Song J. Current advances and outlooks in immunotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. \u003cem\u003eMolecular cancer\u003c/em\u003e 2020; 19: 32.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHosein AN, Dougan SK, Aguirre AJ, Maitra A. Translational advances in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma therapy. \u003cem\u003eNature cancer\u003c/em\u003e 2022; 3: 272-286.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJiang X, Wang J, Wang M, Xuan M, Han S, Li C\u003cem\u003e et al\u003c/em\u003e. ITGB4 as a novel serum diagnosis biomarker and potential therapeutic target for colorectal cancer. \u003cem\u003eCancer medicine\u003c/em\u003e 2021; 10: 6823-6834.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStewart RL, O\u0026apos;connor KL. Clinical significance of the integrin \u0026alpha;6\u0026beta;4 in human malignancies. \u003cem\u003eLaboratory investigation\u003c/em\u003e 2015; 95: 976-986.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKo S, Jung KH, Yoon Y-C, Han BS, Park MS, Lee YJ\u003cem\u003e et al\u003c/em\u003e. A novel DDR1 inhibitor enhances the anticancer activity of gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer. \u003cem\u003eAmerican Journal of Cancer Research\u003c/em\u003e 2022; 12: 4326.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMasugi Y, Yamazaki K, Emoto K, Effendi K, Tsujikawa H, Kitago M\u003cem\u003e et al\u003c/em\u003e. Upregulation of integrin \u0026beta;4 promotes epithelial\u0026ndash;mesenchymal transition and is a novel prognostic marker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. \u003cem\u003eLaboratory investigation\u003c/em\u003e 2015; 95: 308-319.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWang H, Rao P, Qiu Y, Xiang L. Interaction mechanism between hydroxychloroquine sulfate and collagen: Insights from multi-spectroscopy, molecular docking, and molecular dynamic simulation methods. \u003cem\u003eSpectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy\u003c/em\u003e 2023; 303: 123155.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMigneault F, H\u0026eacute;bert M-J. Autophagy, tissue repair, and fibrosis: a delicate balance. \u003cem\u003eMatrix biology\u003c/em\u003e 2021; 100: 182-196.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLi X-L, Liu L, Li D-D, He Y-P, Guo L-H, Sun L-P\u003cem\u003e et al\u003c/em\u003e. Integrin \u0026beta;4 promotes cell invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition through the modulation of Slug expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. \u003cem\u003eScientific reports\u003c/em\u003e 2017; 7: 40464.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"cancer-gene-therapy","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"cgt","sideBox":"Learn more about [Cancer Gene Therapy](http://www.nature.com/cgt/)","snPcode":"41417","submissionUrl":"https://mts-cgt.nature.com/cgi-bin/main.plex","title":"Cancer Gene Therapy","twitterHandle":"@cgtnature","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Nature AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"Combination therapy, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, Extracellular matrix, Integrin beta-4, COL1A1","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6406693/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6406693/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003ePancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive cancer with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. In a previous publication, our group defined some of the mechanisms that vitamin D analogue paricalcitol (P) and hydroxychloroquine (H) potentiated the effects of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in PDAC. Based on this, we hypothesized that PH may potentiate 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, and this may involve a novel mechanism of extracellular matrix (ECM) modulation. The combination of PH with 5FU/oxaliplatin significantly increased the cell death, apoptosis, and S-phase cell cycle arrest as compared to untreated or 5FU/oxaliplatin treated MIA PaCa-2, HPAC and KPC cell lines. In vivo, the combination therapy inhibited PDAC growth and altered the immune landscape by activating T and NK cells. Proteomic analysis revealed significant reduction in ECM proteins, specifically integrin beta-4 (ITGB4). Confirmation of the role of ITGB4 was performed through genetic knockdown of ITGB4 which led ECM inhibition. In conclusion, the combination of PH significantly enhances the efficacy of oxaliplatin and 5FU. We identified a new mechanism of action of PH through inhibiting ITGB4 leading to ECM modulation. These results suggest that the combination of PH with cytotoxic chemotherapy should be tested in PDAC clinical trials.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Paricalcitol and hydroxychloroquine modulates extracellular matrix and enhance chemotherapy efficacy in pancreatic cancer","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-05-05 17:52:54","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6406693/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"revise","date":"2025-07-08T11:28:53+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-07-07T15:34:21+00:00","index":1,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-06-16T02:33:45+00:00","index":2,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-05-27T15:16:18+00:00","index":2,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-05-23T09:01:52+00:00","index":1,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-04-30T10:01:29+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2025-04-23T15:29:28+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Cancer Gene Therapy","date":"2025-04-23T15:10:28+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksFailed","content":"","date":"2025-04-23T11:04:52+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-04-22T19:23:34+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"cancer-gene-therapy","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"cgt","sideBox":"Learn more about [Cancer Gene Therapy](http://www.nature.com/cgt/)","snPcode":"41417","submissionUrl":"https://mts-cgt.nature.com/cgi-bin/main.plex","title":"Cancer Gene Therapy","twitterHandle":"@cgtnature","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Nature AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"76721744-a8c2-41b3-b06a-0c3529639d3a","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 5th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":47900262,"name":"Biological sciences/Cancer/Gastrointestinal cancer/Pancreatic cancer"},{"id":47900263,"name":"Biological sciences/Biotechnology/Gene therapy/Targeted gene repair"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-09-28T07:05:14+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-6406693","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-025-00967-9","journal":{"identity":"cancer-gene-therapy","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Cancer Gene Therapy"},"publishedOn":"2025-09-27 04:00:00","publishedOnDateReadable":"September 27th, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-05-05 17:52:54","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s41417-025-00967-9","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-025-00967-9","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6406693","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6406693","identity":"rs-6406693","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}