Full text
2,095 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
You must log in to post a comment.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Add a Comment
You must log in to post a comment.
Comments
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
Understanding how sample size influences biodiversity detection across taxonomic
groups differing in body size is critical for designing robust and cost-efficient
metabarcoding studies of soil eukaryotes. Using a soil mass gradient (0.25-32 g)
combined with a universal 18S rRNA metabarcoding approach, we quantified how
sample mass shapes diversity estimates across eukaryotic taxa. Diversity metrics
(richness and inverse Simpson diversity; q = 0, 2) and community dispersion exhibited
clear body size-dependent responses. Larger-bodied taxa (e.g., Nematoda, Collembola, Insecta) showed pronounced increases in detected diversity and reduced
community dispersion with increasing soil mass, indicating that small soil samples fail
to capture their full diversity. Conversely, microeukaryotic groups such as fungi and
protists displayed weak or even negative relationships with increasing soil mass,
implying limited improvement in detection with increased sampling effort. These findings demonstrate the interactive effect organismal body size and sampling
approach on the detection of soil biodiversity. We suggest optimal soil sample sizes for different groups of soil biota, and propose that a taxon-specific analytical framework can enhance both the ecological representativeness and cost efficiency in
metabarcoding-based soil biodiversity assessments and monitoring.
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2GM39
Biodiversity, Bioinformatics, Life Sciences
18S rRNA metabarcoding, Soil eukaryotes, Sample size, Body size, Soil eDNA
Published: 2026-04-14 04:54
Last Updated: 2026-04-14 04:54
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Language:
English
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.