Sample size shapes metabarcoding-driven biodiversity assessments across body sizes in soil

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
Full text 2,095 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Understanding how sample size influences biodiversity detection across taxonomic groups differing in body size is critical for designing robust and cost-efficient metabarcoding studies of soil eukaryotes. Using a soil mass gradient (0.25-32 g) combined with a universal 18S rRNA metabarcoding approach, we quantified how sample mass shapes diversity estimates across eukaryotic taxa. Diversity metrics (richness and inverse Simpson diversity; q = 0, 2) and community dispersion exhibited clear body size-dependent responses. Larger-bodied taxa (e.g., Nematoda, Collembola, Insecta) showed pronounced increases in detected diversity and reduced community dispersion with increasing soil mass, indicating that small soil samples fail to capture their full diversity. Conversely, microeukaryotic groups such as fungi and protists displayed weak or even negative relationships with increasing soil mass, implying limited improvement in detection with increased sampling effort. These findings demonstrate the interactive effect organismal body size and sampling approach on the detection of soil biodiversity. We suggest optimal soil sample sizes for different groups of soil biota, and propose that a taxon-specific analytical framework can enhance both the ecological representativeness and cost efficiency in metabarcoding-based soil biodiversity assessments and monitoring. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2GM39 Biodiversity, Bioinformatics, Life Sciences 18S rRNA metabarcoding, Soil eukaryotes, Sample size, Body size, Soil eDNA Published: 2026-04-14 04:54 Last Updated: 2026-04-14 04:54 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: None Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0