Modeling VEGF and GLUT1 Expression as Coadapted Foraging Strategies in Cancer

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0
Full text 1,965 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Natural selection acting on cancer cells within their tumor microenvironment should favor cells with fast or efficient nutrient uptake strategies. Here, we develop and analyze a game-theoretic model focusing on the coadaptation between two foraging traits: vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1). Studies show that VEGF and GLUT1 are often co-expressed and are associated with more aggressive tumor phenotypes and poor clinical prognosis. VEGF is a diffusible paracrine factor that recruits blood vessels towards neighborhoods of cancer cells (angiogenesis). GLUT1 is a cell-surface transporter that enables the uptake of nutrients, especially glucose. We model these strategies operating at different scales: VEGF influences resource availability at the neighborhood level, while GLUT1 determines resource uptake at the cellular level. For VEGF, we introduce a resource-sharing continuum. With no resource sharing, cells access resources in proportion to their VEGF contribution. With uniform sharing, cells have equal access to resources, regardless of their VEGF contribution. The former leads to a tragedy of the commons and overproduction of VEGF. The latter yields a public goods game with moderate VEGF expression matching a group optimum. GLUT1 expression mediates uptake of resources recruited by VEGF and is largely independent of the degree of resource sharing. Therapeutically, both VEGF and GLUT1 inhibitors are more effective in high resource-sharing neighborhoods and less so as resource sharing declines. Overall, inhibition of GLUT1-mediated uptake emerges as more effective. The model, perhaps the first to consider VEGF and GLUT1 as coadaptations, emphasizes the need to consider cancer cell traits jointly. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes We have updated the manuscript to include additional figures and corrected errors in equation numbering.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0