In silicostudy of selected alkaloids as dual inhibitors of β and γ-Secretases for Alzheimer’s disease

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,618 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has become ubiquitous as the number of elderly individuals increases and has been conceived as a socioeconomic problem lately. To date, no success is recorded for disease-modifying therapies for AD but only drugs for symptomatic relief exist. Research has been centered on the role of β-amyloid on the pathogenesis of AD, which has led to the development of drugs that target Aβ (β and γ-Secretase inhibitors) to reduce the amount of Aβ formed. However, the existing β and γ-Secretase inhibitors were associated with harmful side effects, low efficacy, and inability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Thus, in this current study, 54 alkaloids from the PhytoHub server (phytohub.eu), and two approved drugs were docked against β-Secretases. Additionally, galantamine and 5 alkaloids with the utmost binding potential with β-secretase were subjected to pharmacokinetics evaluation and docked against γ-secretase. . From our result, 5 compounds displayed for both docking periods, with demissidine, solasodine, tomatidine, and solanidine having better BE than the control drugs. Based on the Pharmacokinetics evaluation, 4 compounds possessed good pharmacokinetic evaluation and biological activities than galantamine. This study suggests that demissidine, solasodine, tomatidine, and solanidine are promising dual inhibitors against β and γ-Secretase proteins in silico. However, there is an urgent need to carry out in vitro and in vivo experiments on these new leads to validate the findings of this study. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-ND-4.0