Engineered isoprene production from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii using herbicide selection markers and CO2-fed cultivation optimization through multi-parallel photobioreactor headspace gas analysis

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,031 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Metabolic engineering requires selection markers for transformant generation. However, use of antibiotic resistance is of concern for potential horizontal gene transfer in the environment. Herbicide resistance markers are an alternative for photosynthetic cell line engineering as these agents are plant-specific with resistance mechanisms that can be generated from mutations of endogenous genes. Here, we developed norflurazon and oxyfluorfen resistance markers for nuclear genome transformant selection in the model green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. These were used to engineer robust isoprene biosynthesis by facilitating overexpression of a yeast isopentenyl-diphosphate delta-isomerase (ScIDI), the alga’s own beta carotene ketolase (CrBKT), and the sweet potato isoprene synthase (IbIspS). Further UV-C mutagenesis and colony selection were employed to improve yields to ∼350 mg isoprene L-1 culture on organic carbon. It was then possible to optimize CO₂-driven cultivation and isoprene biosynthesis in batch and continuous processes using multi-port, real-time, in-line mass spectrometry coupled to parallel photobioreactors. The highest isoprene yields in batch were achieved under 900 µE illumination and 33 °C and, in turbidostat mode, ∼51 mg isoprene L culture-1 day-1 was achieved for 3 days concomitant with algal biomass production. Cultivation of the engineered alga directly in effluent from an anaerobic membrane bioreactor was also conducted. Isoprene production was concomitant with removal of ammonium and phosphate from the wastewater, and biomass production was similar to that in replete medium. Isoprene yields exhibited gradual reduction after each successive repetitive refresh, which could be mitigated by supplementation of trace elements. The results demonstrate that engineered algae could be used as a secondary wastewater treatment step while generating both biomass and volatile co-products like isoprene. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0